Neighborhood Effects in Reading Aloud: New Findings and New Challenges for Computational Models

A word from a dense neighborhood is often read aloud faster than a word from a sparse neighborhood. This advantage is usually attributed to orthography, but orthographic and phonological neighbors are typically confounded. Two experiments investigated the effect of neighborhood density on reading al...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 2006-08, Vol.32 (4), p.799-810
Hauptverfasser: Mulatti, Claudio, Reynolds, Michael G, Besner, Derek
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 810
container_issue 4
container_start_page 799
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
container_volume 32
creator Mulatti, Claudio
Reynolds, Michael G
Besner, Derek
description A word from a dense neighborhood is often read aloud faster than a word from a sparse neighborhood. This advantage is usually attributed to orthography, but orthographic and phonological neighbors are typically confounded. Two experiments investigated the effect of neighborhood density on reading aloud when phonological density was varied while orthographic density was held constant, and vice versa. A phonological neighborhood effect was observed, but not an orthographic one. These results are inconsistent with the predominant role ascribed to orthographic neighbors in accounts of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Consistent with this interpretation, 6 different computational models of reading aloud failed to simulate this pattern of results. The results of the present experiments thus provide a new understanding of some of the processes underlying reading aloud, and new challenges for computational models.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.799
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85643624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ742398</ericid><sourcerecordid>614447864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-80096f9914c16e666af7058f3f9cfb18fabb1e9b5c9582619adc01968bac68413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0V9rFDEQAPAgir1Wv4CIHNL6tmcmfybJYylXrRQF0eeQzSa9LXu7a3IL9ts3yx098MHmJQ_zm8lMhpB3QFdAufpMqcEKJOMrzlZipYx5QRZguKmAKfWSLJ7ACTnN-Z6WA1q-JieAWiDTdEEuvof2blMPaTMMzXIdY_C7vGz75c_gmra_W152w9S8Ia-i63J4e7jPyO_r9a-rr9Xtjy83V5e3lROIu0rPD0ZjQHjAgIguKip15NH4WIOOrq4hmFp6IzVDMK7xFAzq2vnSEfAz8mlfd0zDnynknd222Yeuc30Ypmy1RMGRiWchapSgpCzw4z_wfphSX4awCEIIpVH8D7GCzNxiQWyPfBpyTiHaMbVblx4sUDvvw87T2_m7LWdW2LKPkvThUHmqt6E5phwWUMDFAbjsXReT632bj04ZpbSa3fu9C6n1T-H1NyUYN3Nz5_uwG50d84N3adf6LmT7dzMe23kEGfOkWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614447864</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neighborhood Effects in Reading Aloud: New Findings and New Challenges for Computational Models</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Mulatti, Claudio ; Reynolds, Michael G ; Besner, Derek</creator><creatorcontrib>Mulatti, Claudio ; Reynolds, Michael G ; Besner, Derek</creatorcontrib><description>A word from a dense neighborhood is often read aloud faster than a word from a sparse neighborhood. This advantage is usually attributed to orthography, but orthographic and phonological neighbors are typically confounded. Two experiments investigated the effect of neighborhood density on reading aloud when phonological density was varied while orthographic density was held constant, and vice versa. A phonological neighborhood effect was observed, but not an orthographic one. These results are inconsistent with the predominant role ascribed to orthographic neighbors in accounts of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Consistent with this interpretation, 6 different computational models of reading aloud failed to simulate this pattern of results. The results of the present experiments thus provide a new understanding of some of the processes underlying reading aloud, and new challenges for computational models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.799</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16846280</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPHPDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Attention ; Biological and medical sciences ; Discrimination (Psychology) ; Experimental Psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Language ; Lexical Decision ; Models, Theoretical ; Oral Reading ; Orthographic Symbols ; Orthography ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Phonetics ; Phonology ; Production and perception of written language ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; Reading ; Semantics ; Studies ; Verbal Behavior ; Visual Perception ; Visual Stimuli ; Visual task performance ; Word Recognition ; Writing</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2006-08, Vol.32 (4), p.799-810</ispartof><rights>2006 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>((c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Aug 2006</rights><rights>2006, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-80096f9914c16e666af7058f3f9cfb18fabb1e9b5c9582619adc01968bac68413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-80096f9914c16e666af7058f3f9cfb18fabb1e9b5c9582619adc01968bac68413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927,31001</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ742398$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17977870$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16846280$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mulatti, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Michael G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besner, Derek</creatorcontrib><title>Neighborhood Effects in Reading Aloud: New Findings and New Challenges for Computational Models</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><description>A word from a dense neighborhood is often read aloud faster than a word from a sparse neighborhood. This advantage is usually attributed to orthography, but orthographic and phonological neighbors are typically confounded. Two experiments investigated the effect of neighborhood density on reading aloud when phonological density was varied while orthographic density was held constant, and vice versa. A phonological neighborhood effect was observed, but not an orthographic one. These results are inconsistent with the predominant role ascribed to orthographic neighbors in accounts of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Consistent with this interpretation, 6 different computational models of reading aloud failed to simulate this pattern of results. The results of the present experiments thus provide a new understanding of some of the processes underlying reading aloud, and new challenges for computational models.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology)</subject><subject>Experimental Psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Lexical Decision</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Oral Reading</subject><subject>Orthographic Symbols</subject><subject>Orthography</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Production and perception of written language</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Verbal Behavior</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Visual Stimuli</subject><subject>Visual task performance</subject><subject>Word Recognition</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>0096-1523</issn><issn>1939-1277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0V9rFDEQAPAgir1Wv4CIHNL6tmcmfybJYylXrRQF0eeQzSa9LXu7a3IL9ts3yx098MHmJQ_zm8lMhpB3QFdAufpMqcEKJOMrzlZipYx5QRZguKmAKfWSLJ7ACTnN-Z6WA1q-JieAWiDTdEEuvof2blMPaTMMzXIdY_C7vGz75c_gmra_W152w9S8Ia-i63J4e7jPyO_r9a-rr9Xtjy83V5e3lROIu0rPD0ZjQHjAgIguKip15NH4WIOOrq4hmFp6IzVDMK7xFAzq2vnSEfAz8mlfd0zDnynknd222Yeuc30Ypmy1RMGRiWchapSgpCzw4z_wfphSX4awCEIIpVH8D7GCzNxiQWyPfBpyTiHaMbVblx4sUDvvw87T2_m7LWdW2LKPkvThUHmqt6E5phwWUMDFAbjsXReT632bj04ZpbSa3fu9C6n1T-H1NyUYN3Nz5_uwG50d84N3adf6LmT7dzMe23kEGfOkWg</recordid><startdate>20060801</startdate><enddate>20060801</enddate><creator>Mulatti, Claudio</creator><creator>Reynolds, Michael G</creator><creator>Besner, Derek</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060801</creationdate><title>Neighborhood Effects in Reading Aloud</title><author>Mulatti, Claudio ; Reynolds, Michael G ; Besner, Derek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-80096f9914c16e666af7058f3f9cfb18fabb1e9b5c9582619adc01968bac68413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology)</topic><topic>Experimental Psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Lexical Decision</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Oral Reading</topic><topic>Orthographic Symbols</topic><topic>Orthography</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Production and perception of written language</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Verbal Behavior</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Visual Stimuli</topic><topic>Visual task performance</topic><topic>Word Recognition</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mulatti, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Michael G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besner, Derek</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mulatti, Claudio</au><au>Reynolds, Michael G</au><au>Besner, Derek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ742398</ericid><atitle>Neighborhood Effects in Reading Aloud: New Findings and New Challenges for Computational Models</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><date>2006-08-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>799</spage><epage>810</epage><pages>799-810</pages><issn>0096-1523</issn><eissn>1939-1277</eissn><coden>JPHPDH</coden><abstract>A word from a dense neighborhood is often read aloud faster than a word from a sparse neighborhood. This advantage is usually attributed to orthography, but orthographic and phonological neighbors are typically confounded. Two experiments investigated the effect of neighborhood density on reading aloud when phonological density was varied while orthographic density was held constant, and vice versa. A phonological neighborhood effect was observed, but not an orthographic one. These results are inconsistent with the predominant role ascribed to orthographic neighbors in accounts of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Consistent with this interpretation, 6 different computational models of reading aloud failed to simulate this pattern of results. The results of the present experiments thus provide a new understanding of some of the processes underlying reading aloud, and new challenges for computational models.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>16846280</pmid><doi>10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.799</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0096-1523
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2006-08, Vol.32 (4), p.799-810
issn 0096-1523
1939-1277
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85643624
source MEDLINE; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Attention
Biological and medical sciences
Discrimination (Psychology)
Experimental Psychology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Language
Lexical Decision
Models, Theoretical
Oral Reading
Orthographic Symbols
Orthography
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Phonetics
Phonology
Production and perception of written language
Psycholinguistics
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reaction Time
Reading
Semantics
Studies
Verbal Behavior
Visual Perception
Visual Stimuli
Visual task performance
Word Recognition
Writing
title Neighborhood Effects in Reading Aloud: New Findings and New Challenges for Computational Models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T07%3A52%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neighborhood%20Effects%20in%20Reading%20Aloud:%20New%20Findings%20and%20New%20Challenges%20for%20Computational%20Models&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Human%20perception%20and%20performance&rft.au=Mulatti,%20Claudio&rft.date=2006-08-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=799&rft.epage=810&rft.pages=799-810&rft.issn=0096-1523&rft.eissn=1939-1277&rft.coden=JPHPDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.799&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614447864%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614447864&rft_id=info:pmid/16846280&rft_ericid=EJ742398&rfr_iscdi=true