Neighborhood Effects in Reading Aloud: New Findings and New Challenges for Computational Models
A word from a dense neighborhood is often read aloud faster than a word from a sparse neighborhood. This advantage is usually attributed to orthography, but orthographic and phonological neighbors are typically confounded. Two experiments investigated the effect of neighborhood density on reading al...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 2006-08, Vol.32 (4), p.799-810 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 810 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 799 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Mulatti, Claudio Reynolds, Michael G Besner, Derek |
description | A word from a dense neighborhood is often read aloud faster than a word from a sparse neighborhood. This advantage is usually attributed to orthography, but orthographic and phonological neighbors are typically confounded. Two experiments investigated the effect of neighborhood density on reading aloud when phonological density was varied while orthographic density was held constant, and vice versa. A phonological neighborhood effect was observed, but not an orthographic one. These results are inconsistent with the predominant role ascribed to orthographic neighbors in accounts of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Consistent with this interpretation, 6 different computational models of reading aloud failed to simulate this pattern of results. The results of the present experiments thus provide a new understanding of some of the processes underlying reading aloud, and new challenges for computational models. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.799 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85643624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ742398</ericid><sourcerecordid>614447864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-80096f9914c16e666af7058f3f9cfb18fabb1e9b5c9582619adc01968bac68413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0V9rFDEQAPAgir1Wv4CIHNL6tmcmfybJYylXrRQF0eeQzSa9LXu7a3IL9ts3yx098MHmJQ_zm8lMhpB3QFdAufpMqcEKJOMrzlZipYx5QRZguKmAKfWSLJ7ACTnN-Z6WA1q-JieAWiDTdEEuvof2blMPaTMMzXIdY_C7vGz75c_gmra_W152w9S8Ia-i63J4e7jPyO_r9a-rr9Xtjy83V5e3lROIu0rPD0ZjQHjAgIguKip15NH4WIOOrq4hmFp6IzVDMK7xFAzq2vnSEfAz8mlfd0zDnynknd222Yeuc30Ypmy1RMGRiWchapSgpCzw4z_wfphSX4awCEIIpVH8D7GCzNxiQWyPfBpyTiHaMbVblx4sUDvvw87T2_m7LWdW2LKPkvThUHmqt6E5phwWUMDFAbjsXReT632bj04ZpbSa3fu9C6n1T-H1NyUYN3Nz5_uwG50d84N3adf6LmT7dzMe23kEGfOkWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614447864</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neighborhood Effects in Reading Aloud: New Findings and New Challenges for Computational Models</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Mulatti, Claudio ; Reynolds, Michael G ; Besner, Derek</creator><creatorcontrib>Mulatti, Claudio ; Reynolds, Michael G ; Besner, Derek</creatorcontrib><description>A word from a dense neighborhood is often read aloud faster than a word from a sparse neighborhood. This advantage is usually attributed to orthography, but orthographic and phonological neighbors are typically confounded. Two experiments investigated the effect of neighborhood density on reading aloud when phonological density was varied while orthographic density was held constant, and vice versa. A phonological neighborhood effect was observed, but not an orthographic one. These results are inconsistent with the predominant role ascribed to orthographic neighbors in accounts of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Consistent with this interpretation, 6 different computational models of reading aloud failed to simulate this pattern of results. The results of the present experiments thus provide a new understanding of some of the processes underlying reading aloud, and new challenges for computational models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.799</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16846280</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPHPDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Attention ; Biological and medical sciences ; Discrimination (Psychology) ; Experimental Psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Language ; Lexical Decision ; Models, Theoretical ; Oral Reading ; Orthographic Symbols ; Orthography ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Phonetics ; Phonology ; Production and perception of written language ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; Reading ; Semantics ; Studies ; Verbal Behavior ; Visual Perception ; Visual Stimuli ; Visual task performance ; Word Recognition ; Writing</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2006-08, Vol.32 (4), p.799-810</ispartof><rights>2006 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>((c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Aug 2006</rights><rights>2006, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-80096f9914c16e666af7058f3f9cfb18fabb1e9b5c9582619adc01968bac68413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-80096f9914c16e666af7058f3f9cfb18fabb1e9b5c9582619adc01968bac68413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927,31001</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ742398$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17977870$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16846280$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mulatti, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Michael G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besner, Derek</creatorcontrib><title>Neighborhood Effects in Reading Aloud: New Findings and New Challenges for Computational Models</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><description>A word from a dense neighborhood is often read aloud faster than a word from a sparse neighborhood. This advantage is usually attributed to orthography, but orthographic and phonological neighbors are typically confounded. Two experiments investigated the effect of neighborhood density on reading aloud when phonological density was varied while orthographic density was held constant, and vice versa. A phonological neighborhood effect was observed, but not an orthographic one. These results are inconsistent with the predominant role ascribed to orthographic neighbors in accounts of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Consistent with this interpretation, 6 different computational models of reading aloud failed to simulate this pattern of results. The results of the present experiments thus provide a new understanding of some of the processes underlying reading aloud, and new challenges for computational models.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology)</subject><subject>Experimental Psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Lexical Decision</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Oral Reading</subject><subject>Orthographic Symbols</subject><subject>Orthography</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Production and perception of written language</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Verbal Behavior</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Visual Stimuli</subject><subject>Visual task performance</subject><subject>Word Recognition</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>0096-1523</issn><issn>1939-1277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0V9rFDEQAPAgir1Wv4CIHNL6tmcmfybJYylXrRQF0eeQzSa9LXu7a3IL9ts3yx098MHmJQ_zm8lMhpB3QFdAufpMqcEKJOMrzlZipYx5QRZguKmAKfWSLJ7ACTnN-Z6WA1q-JieAWiDTdEEuvof2blMPaTMMzXIdY_C7vGz75c_gmra_W152w9S8Ia-i63J4e7jPyO_r9a-rr9Xtjy83V5e3lROIu0rPD0ZjQHjAgIguKip15NH4WIOOrq4hmFp6IzVDMK7xFAzq2vnSEfAz8mlfd0zDnynknd222Yeuc30Ypmy1RMGRiWchapSgpCzw4z_wfphSX4awCEIIpVH8D7GCzNxiQWyPfBpyTiHaMbVblx4sUDvvw87T2_m7LWdW2LKPkvThUHmqt6E5phwWUMDFAbjsXReT632bj04ZpbSa3fu9C6n1T-H1NyUYN3Nz5_uwG50d84N3adf6LmT7dzMe23kEGfOkWg</recordid><startdate>20060801</startdate><enddate>20060801</enddate><creator>Mulatti, Claudio</creator><creator>Reynolds, Michael G</creator><creator>Besner, Derek</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060801</creationdate><title>Neighborhood Effects in Reading Aloud</title><author>Mulatti, Claudio ; Reynolds, Michael G ; Besner, Derek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-80096f9914c16e666af7058f3f9cfb18fabb1e9b5c9582619adc01968bac68413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology)</topic><topic>Experimental Psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Lexical Decision</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Oral Reading</topic><topic>Orthographic Symbols</topic><topic>Orthography</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Production and perception of written language</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Verbal Behavior</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Visual Stimuli</topic><topic>Visual task performance</topic><topic>Word Recognition</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mulatti, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Michael G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besner, Derek</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mulatti, Claudio</au><au>Reynolds, Michael G</au><au>Besner, Derek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ742398</ericid><atitle>Neighborhood Effects in Reading Aloud: New Findings and New Challenges for Computational Models</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><date>2006-08-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>799</spage><epage>810</epage><pages>799-810</pages><issn>0096-1523</issn><eissn>1939-1277</eissn><coden>JPHPDH</coden><abstract>A word from a dense neighborhood is often read aloud faster than a word from a sparse neighborhood. This advantage is usually attributed to orthography, but orthographic and phonological neighbors are typically confounded. Two experiments investigated the effect of neighborhood density on reading aloud when phonological density was varied while orthographic density was held constant, and vice versa. A phonological neighborhood effect was observed, but not an orthographic one. These results are inconsistent with the predominant role ascribed to orthographic neighbors in accounts of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Consistent with this interpretation, 6 different computational models of reading aloud failed to simulate this pattern of results. The results of the present experiments thus provide a new understanding of some of the processes underlying reading aloud, and new challenges for computational models.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>16846280</pmid><doi>10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.799</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0096-1523 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2006-08, Vol.32 (4), p.799-810 |
issn | 0096-1523 1939-1277 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85643624 |
source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Attention Biological and medical sciences Discrimination (Psychology) Experimental Psychology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Language Lexical Decision Models, Theoretical Oral Reading Orthographic Symbols Orthography Pattern Recognition, Visual Phonetics Phonology Production and perception of written language Psycholinguistics Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time Reading Semantics Studies Verbal Behavior Visual Perception Visual Stimuli Visual task performance Word Recognition Writing |
title | Neighborhood Effects in Reading Aloud: New Findings and New Challenges for Computational Models |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T07%3A52%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neighborhood%20Effects%20in%20Reading%20Aloud:%20New%20Findings%20and%20New%20Challenges%20for%20Computational%20Models&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Human%20perception%20and%20performance&rft.au=Mulatti,%20Claudio&rft.date=2006-08-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=799&rft.epage=810&rft.pages=799-810&rft.issn=0096-1523&rft.eissn=1939-1277&rft.coden=JPHPDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.799&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614447864%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614447864&rft_id=info:pmid/16846280&rft_ericid=EJ742398&rfr_iscdi=true |