Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations?
Writing and speaking are clearly related activities, but the acts of production are different. To what extent are the underlying processes shared? This paper reports three experiments that use syntactic priming to investigate whether writing and speaking use the same mechanisms to construct syntacti...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of memory and language 2006-02, Vol.54 (2), p.185-198 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 198 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 185 |
| container_title | Journal of memory and language |
| container_volume | 54 |
| creator | Cleland, Alexandra A. Pickering, Martin J. |
| description | Writing and speaking are clearly related activities, but the acts of production are different. To what extent are the underlying processes shared? This paper reports three experiments that use syntactic priming to investigate whether writing and speaking use the same mechanisms to construct syntactic form. People tended to repeat syntactic form between modality (from writing to speaking and speaking to writing) to the same extent that they did within either modality. The results suggest that the processor employs the same mechanism for syntactic encoding in written and spoken production, and that use of a syntactic form primes structural features concerned with syntactic encoding that are perceptually independent. We interpret the results in terms of current accounts of language production. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.003 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85643249</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ724618</ericid><els_id>S0749596X05001269</els_id><sourcerecordid>1174271051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-247378309c30d834fcf443dc81b338a35b34fb9c55ff6d89661cb8435d5a43613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AMFFEXTX8aZ5NMWF6Di-GHCj4C5k0lRT-zLpKPPvTZlBwYWbhHPPuZfDh9AhhgkGzM_KSVlXkwSABT0BIFtohCHjMYgEb6MRpDSLWcZfdtGe9yUAxixNRujquo2-nO1t8xqpJo98Z9T7IEzdVe0q6t9M5FUdnlXTK91bHTnTOeNNkL1tG3-xj3YKVXlzsPnH6Plm9jS9i-ePt_fTy3msKfA-TmhKUkEg0wRyQWihC0pJrgVeECIUYYswW2SasaLgucg4x3ohKGE5U5RwTMbodH23c-3H0vhe1tZrU1WqMe3SS8E4JQnNQvD4T7Bsl64J3WSCGRBBUgghvA5p13rvTCE7Z2vlVhKDHJDKUgakckA6jALSsHOyOay8VlXhVKOt_11MGRMpGQocrXPGWf1jzx7ShHIsgn2-sQOtT2uc9NqaRpvcOqN7mbf2nxLfZKmTaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215038370</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations?</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Cleland, Alexandra A. ; Pickering, Martin J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cleland, Alexandra A. ; Pickering, Martin J.</creatorcontrib><description>Writing and speaking are clearly related activities, but the acts of production are different. To what extent are the underlying processes shared? This paper reports three experiments that use syntactic priming to investigate whether writing and speaking use the same mechanisms to construct syntactic form. People tended to repeat syntactic form between modality (from writing to speaking and speaking to writing) to the same extent that they did within either modality. The results suggest that the processor employs the same mechanism for syntactic encoding in written and spoken production, and that use of a syntactic form primes structural features concerned with syntactic encoding that are perceptually independent. We interpret the results in terms of current accounts of language production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-596X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0821</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMLAE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Comparative analysis ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Language ; Language Patterns ; Language Processing ; Language production ; Oral Language ; Orthography ; Phonology ; Priming ; Production and perception of written language ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Speaking ; Structural Analysis (Linguistics) ; Syntax ; Writing ; Writing (Composition) ; Written Language</subject><ispartof>Journal of memory and language, 2006-02, Vol.54 (2), p.185-198</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-247378309c30d834fcf443dc81b338a35b34fb9c55ff6d89661cb8435d5a43613</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ724618$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17558739$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cleland, Alexandra A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickering, Martin J.</creatorcontrib><title>Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations?</title><title>Journal of memory and language</title><description>Writing and speaking are clearly related activities, but the acts of production are different. To what extent are the underlying processes shared? This paper reports three experiments that use syntactic priming to investigate whether writing and speaking use the same mechanisms to construct syntactic form. People tended to repeat syntactic form between modality (from writing to speaking and speaking to writing) to the same extent that they did within either modality. The results suggest that the processor employs the same mechanism for syntactic encoding in written and spoken production, and that use of a syntactic form primes structural features concerned with syntactic encoding that are perceptually independent. We interpret the results in terms of current accounts of language production.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Patterns</subject><subject>Language Processing</subject><subject>Language production</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Orthography</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Priming</subject><subject>Production and perception of written language</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Speaking</subject><subject>Structural Analysis (Linguistics)</subject><subject>Syntax</subject><subject>Writing</subject><subject>Writing (Composition)</subject><subject>Written Language</subject><issn>0749-596X</issn><issn>1096-0821</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AMFFEXTX8aZ5NMWF6Di-GHCj4C5k0lRT-zLpKPPvTZlBwYWbhHPPuZfDh9AhhgkGzM_KSVlXkwSABT0BIFtohCHjMYgEb6MRpDSLWcZfdtGe9yUAxixNRujquo2-nO1t8xqpJo98Z9T7IEzdVe0q6t9M5FUdnlXTK91bHTnTOeNNkL1tG3-xj3YKVXlzsPnH6Plm9jS9i-ePt_fTy3msKfA-TmhKUkEg0wRyQWihC0pJrgVeECIUYYswW2SasaLgucg4x3ohKGE5U5RwTMbodH23c-3H0vhe1tZrU1WqMe3SS8E4JQnNQvD4T7Bsl64J3WSCGRBBUgghvA5p13rvTCE7Z2vlVhKDHJDKUgakckA6jALSsHOyOay8VlXhVKOt_11MGRMpGQocrXPGWf1jzx7ShHIsgn2-sQOtT2uc9NqaRpvcOqN7mbf2nxLfZKmTaA</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Cleland, Alexandra A.</creator><creator>Pickering, Martin J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations?</title><author>Cleland, Alexandra A. ; Pickering, Martin J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-247378309c30d834fcf443dc81b338a35b34fb9c55ff6d89661cb8435d5a43613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Patterns</topic><topic>Language Processing</topic><topic>Language production</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Orthography</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Priming</topic><topic>Production and perception of written language</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Speaking</topic><topic>Structural Analysis (Linguistics)</topic><topic>Syntax</topic><topic>Writing</topic><topic>Writing (Composition)</topic><topic>Written Language</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cleland, Alexandra A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickering, Martin J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Journal of memory and language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cleland, Alexandra A.</au><au>Pickering, Martin J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ724618</ericid><atitle>Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of memory and language</jtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>185</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>185-198</pages><issn>0749-596X</issn><eissn>1096-0821</eissn><coden>JMLAE6</coden><abstract>Writing and speaking are clearly related activities, but the acts of production are different. To what extent are the underlying processes shared? This paper reports three experiments that use syntactic priming to investigate whether writing and speaking use the same mechanisms to construct syntactic form. People tended to repeat syntactic form between modality (from writing to speaking and speaking to writing) to the same extent that they did within either modality. The results suggest that the processor employs the same mechanism for syntactic encoding in written and spoken production, and that use of a syntactic form primes structural features concerned with syntactic encoding that are perceptually independent. We interpret the results in terms of current accounts of language production.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.003</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0749-596X |
| ispartof | Journal of memory and language, 2006-02, Vol.54 (2), p.185-198 |
| issn | 0749-596X 1096-0821 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85643249 |
| source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Comparative analysis Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Language Language Patterns Language Processing Language production Oral Language Orthography Phonology Priming Production and perception of written language Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Speaking Structural Analysis (Linguistics) Syntax Writing Writing (Composition) Written Language |
| title | Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T21%3A39%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20writing%20and%20speaking%20employ%20the%20same%20syntactic%20representations?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20memory%20and%20language&rft.au=Cleland,%20Alexandra%20A.&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=185&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=185-198&rft.issn=0749-596X&rft.eissn=1096-0821&rft.coden=JMLAE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1174271051%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215038370&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ724618&rft_els_id=S0749596X05001269&rfr_iscdi=true |