Eye Movements and Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: Investigating the Subordinate-Bias Effect
Recent debates on lexical ambiguity resolution have centered on the subordinate-bias effect , in which reading time is longer on a biased ambiguous word in a subordinate-biasing context than on a control word. The nature of the control word-namely, whether it matched the frequency of the ambiguous w...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 2006-04, Vol.32 (2), p.335-350 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 350 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 335 |
| container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Sereno, Sara C O'Donnell, Patrick J Rayner, Keith |
| description | Recent debates on lexical ambiguity resolution have centered on the
subordinate-bias effect
, in which reading time is longer on a biased ambiguous word in a subordinate-biasing context than on a control word. The nature of the control word-namely, whether it matched the frequency of the ambiguous word's overall word form or its contextually instantiated word meaning (a higher or lower frequency word, respectively)-was examined. In addition, contexts that were singularly supportive of the ambiguous word's subordinate meaning were used. Eye movements were recorded as participants read contextually biasing passages that contained an ambiguous word target or a word-form or word-meaning control. A comparison of fixation times on the 2 control words revealed a significant effect of word frequency. Fixation times on the ambiguous word generally fell between those on the 2 controls and were significantly different than both. Results are discussed in relation to the reordered access model, in which both meaning frequency and prior context affect access procedures. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.335 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85642269</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ735967</ericid><sourcerecordid>614453763</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-fe810f7830a54d90bf514d0716c93b3772cd06339bbd042899a81d7bdd788f8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0d1rFDEQAPAgij2r_0ARWYr6tmuSyebjsZRrrVwpiD6HbJKtKftlsiu9_94cd_TAhzoveZjfDJMZhM4IrggG8QVjxUtSU6iAVrQCqF-gFVGgSkKFeIlWT-AEvUnpAecgsn6NTgjnwLhgK1Stt764Hf_43g9zKszgio1_DNZ0xUXfhPslzNviu09jt8xhHN6iV63pkn93eE_Rz6v1j8uv5ebu-ubyYlMaxvlctl4S3AoJ2NTMKdy0NWEOC8KtggaEoNZhDqCaxmFGpVJGEica54SUrTRwij7v-05x_L34NOs-JOu7zgx-XJKWNWeUcvVfyIVUUnGW4fk_8GFc4pA_oTlhrAaR53kG0Yxk3i3PiO6RjWNK0bd6iqE3casJ1rvD6N3e9W7vGqimOh8mF304dF6a3rtjyeESGXw6AJPy9ttoBhvS0QkBOUR27_fOx2Cf0utvAmrFd-mP-7SZjJ7S1po4B9v5pB9_Tcdx_gJTPKe4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614453763</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eye Movements and Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: Investigating the Subordinate-Bias Effect</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Sereno, Sara C ; O'Donnell, Patrick J ; Rayner, Keith</creator><creatorcontrib>Sereno, Sara C ; O'Donnell, Patrick J ; Rayner, Keith</creatorcontrib><description>Recent debates on lexical ambiguity resolution have centered on the
subordinate-bias effect
, in which reading time is longer on a biased ambiguous word in a subordinate-biasing context than on a control word. The nature of the control word-namely, whether it matched the frequency of the ambiguous word's overall word form or its contextually instantiated word meaning (a higher or lower frequency word, respectively)-was examined. In addition, contexts that were singularly supportive of the ambiguous word's subordinate meaning were used. Eye movements were recorded as participants read contextually biasing passages that contained an ambiguous word target or a word-form or word-meaning control. A comparison of fixation times on the 2 control words revealed a significant effect of word frequency. Fixation times on the ambiguous word generally fell between those on the 2 controls and were significantly different than both. Results are discussed in relation to the reordered access model, in which both meaning frequency and prior context affect access procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.335</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16634674</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPHPDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; Comprehension - physiology ; Context Effect ; Decision Making - physiology ; Eye Movements ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Eyes & eyesight ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Language ; Lexical Access ; Male ; Production and perception of written language ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; Reading ; Reading Comprehension ; Reading Processes ; Recognition (Psychology) - physiology ; Reference Values ; Semantics ; Stimulus Ambiguity ; Stimulus Parameters ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Word Frequency ; Word Recognition ; Words (Phonetic Units)</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2006-04, Vol.32 (2), p.335-350</ispartof><rights>2006 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Apr 2006</rights><rights>2006, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-fe810f7830a54d90bf514d0716c93b3772cd06339bbd042899a81d7bdd788f8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-fe810f7830a54d90bf514d0716c93b3772cd06339bbd042899a81d7bdd788f8a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,31004</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ735967$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17733337$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16634674$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sereno, Sara C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donnell, Patrick J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rayner, Keith</creatorcontrib><title>Eye Movements and Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: Investigating the Subordinate-Bias Effect</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><description>Recent debates on lexical ambiguity resolution have centered on the
subordinate-bias effect
, in which reading time is longer on a biased ambiguous word in a subordinate-biasing context than on a control word. The nature of the control word-namely, whether it matched the frequency of the ambiguous word's overall word form or its contextually instantiated word meaning (a higher or lower frequency word, respectively)-was examined. In addition, contexts that were singularly supportive of the ambiguous word's subordinate meaning were used. Eye movements were recorded as participants read contextually biasing passages that contained an ambiguous word target or a word-form or word-meaning control. A comparison of fixation times on the 2 control words revealed a significant effect of word frequency. Fixation times on the ambiguous word generally fell between those on the 2 controls and were significantly different than both. Results are discussed in relation to the reordered access model, in which both meaning frequency and prior context affect access procedures.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Comprehension - physiology</subject><subject>Context Effect</subject><subject>Decision Making - physiology</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Eyes & eyesight</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Lexical Access</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Production and perception of written language</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Reading Processes</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Stimulus Ambiguity</subject><subject>Stimulus Parameters</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Word Frequency</subject><subject>Word Recognition</subject><subject>Words (Phonetic Units)</subject><issn>0096-1523</issn><issn>1939-1277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0d1rFDEQAPAgij2r_0ARWYr6tmuSyebjsZRrrVwpiD6HbJKtKftlsiu9_94cd_TAhzoveZjfDJMZhM4IrggG8QVjxUtSU6iAVrQCqF-gFVGgSkKFeIlWT-AEvUnpAecgsn6NTgjnwLhgK1Stt764Hf_43g9zKszgio1_DNZ0xUXfhPslzNviu09jt8xhHN6iV63pkn93eE_Rz6v1j8uv5ebu-ubyYlMaxvlctl4S3AoJ2NTMKdy0NWEOC8KtggaEoNZhDqCaxmFGpVJGEica54SUrTRwij7v-05x_L34NOs-JOu7zgx-XJKWNWeUcvVfyIVUUnGW4fk_8GFc4pA_oTlhrAaR53kG0Yxk3i3PiO6RjWNK0bd6iqE3casJ1rvD6N3e9W7vGqimOh8mF304dF6a3rtjyeESGXw6AJPy9ttoBhvS0QkBOUR27_fOx2Cf0utvAmrFd-mP-7SZjJ7S1po4B9v5pB9_Tcdx_gJTPKe4</recordid><startdate>20060401</startdate><enddate>20060401</enddate><creator>Sereno, Sara C</creator><creator>O'Donnell, Patrick J</creator><creator>Rayner, Keith</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060401</creationdate><title>Eye Movements and Lexical Ambiguity Resolution</title><author>Sereno, Sara C ; O'Donnell, Patrick J ; Rayner, Keith</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-fe810f7830a54d90bf514d0716c93b3772cd06339bbd042899a81d7bdd788f8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Comprehension - physiology</topic><topic>Context Effect</topic><topic>Decision Making - physiology</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Eyes & eyesight</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Lexical Access</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Production and perception of written language</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Reading Processes</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Stimulus Ambiguity</topic><topic>Stimulus Parameters</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Word Frequency</topic><topic>Word Recognition</topic><topic>Words (Phonetic Units)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sereno, Sara C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donnell, Patrick J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rayner, Keith</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sereno, Sara C</au><au>O'Donnell, Patrick J</au><au>Rayner, Keith</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ735967</ericid><atitle>Eye Movements and Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: Investigating the Subordinate-Bias Effect</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><date>2006-04-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>335</spage><epage>350</epage><pages>335-350</pages><issn>0096-1523</issn><eissn>1939-1277</eissn><coden>JPHPDH</coden><abstract>Recent debates on lexical ambiguity resolution have centered on the
subordinate-bias effect
, in which reading time is longer on a biased ambiguous word in a subordinate-biasing context than on a control word. The nature of the control word-namely, whether it matched the frequency of the ambiguous word's overall word form or its contextually instantiated word meaning (a higher or lower frequency word, respectively)-was examined. In addition, contexts that were singularly supportive of the ambiguous word's subordinate meaning were used. Eye movements were recorded as participants read contextually biasing passages that contained an ambiguous word target or a word-form or word-meaning control. A comparison of fixation times on the 2 control words revealed a significant effect of word frequency. Fixation times on the ambiguous word generally fell between those on the 2 controls and were significantly different than both. Results are discussed in relation to the reordered access model, in which both meaning frequency and prior context affect access procedures.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>16634674</pmid><doi>10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.335</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0096-1523 |
| ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2006-04, Vol.32 (2), p.335-350 |
| issn | 0096-1523 1939-1277 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85642269 |
| source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Bias Biological and medical sciences Comprehension - physiology Context Effect Decision Making - physiology Eye Movements Eye Movements - physiology Eyes & eyesight Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Language Lexical Access Male Production and perception of written language Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time Reading Reading Comprehension Reading Processes Recognition (Psychology) - physiology Reference Values Semantics Stimulus Ambiguity Stimulus Parameters Visual Perception - physiology Word Frequency Word Recognition Words (Phonetic Units) |
| title | Eye Movements and Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: Investigating the Subordinate-Bias Effect |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T14%3A36%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eye%20Movements%20and%20Lexical%20Ambiguity%20Resolution:%20Investigating%20the%20Subordinate-Bias%20Effect&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Human%20perception%20and%20performance&rft.au=Sereno,%20Sara%20C&rft.date=2006-04-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=335&rft.epage=350&rft.pages=335-350&rft.issn=0096-1523&rft.eissn=1939-1277&rft.coden=JPHPDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.335&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614453763%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614453763&rft_id=info:pmid/16634674&rft_ericid=EJ735967&rfr_iscdi=true |