SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams

Misperception of nonwords created by adjacent letter transpositions (TL anagrams) indicates that word recognition is based on an orthographic matching process that is tolerant of minor positional errors in the letter sequence. We report five experiments that investigate the extent to which the mispe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of memory and language 2007-02, Vol.56 (2), p.189-211
Hauptverfasser: Frankish, Clive, Turner, Emma
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 211
container_issue 2
container_start_page 189
container_title Journal of memory and language
container_volume 56
creator Frankish, Clive
Turner, Emma
description Misperception of nonwords created by adjacent letter transpositions (TL anagrams) indicates that word recognition is based on an orthographic matching process that is tolerant of minor positional errors in the letter sequence. We report five experiments that investigate the extent to which the misperception of TL anagrams is influenced by orthographic and phonological properties of the letter string. The first two experiments demonstrate that in a lexical decision task with masked target displays, false positive responses are more likely for unpronounceable than for pronounceable TL items. In Experiment 3 this effect was observed in an identification task as a trade-off between lexical responses and correct identification. A fourth experiment provided additional evidence that these effects are mediated by phonological rather than orthographic processing. This interpretation was strengthened by a final experiment showing that dyslexic participants did not show the pronounceability effect in lexical decision. These results are interpreted in terms of inhibition of lexical responses to TL anagrams by incompatible phonological representations of the letter string.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85640748</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ751567</ericid><els_id>S0749596X06001501</els_id><sourcerecordid>85640748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-db6de2fcea8e4b835fe9e2353eb179e1f243f02a9a5c1ce61f93b021a32042d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EEkvhByBxsJDgltTjxE4CJ1RKP1TRQ7cSN8vrjLuOsnFqe5H23-NlVyD10NMc5nnfGT2EvAdWAgN5OpTDZiw5Y7IEKBnjL8gCWCcL1nJ4SRasqbtCdPLXa_ImxoExANHwBbF3V5cXS6qnnt7d_7z9_oUu10iDH5F6S31Ia_8Q9Lze_UXmtZ_86B921E00ZXDGYHBOzk97PAU9xdlH7OmIKWHIIZ3jm_iWvLJ6jPjuOE_I_Y_z5dllcXN7cXX27aYwNZOp6FeyR24N6hbrVVsJix3ySlS4gqZDsLyuLOO608KAQQm2q1aMg644q3nPqxPy-dA7B_-4xZjUxkWD46gn9NuoWiHrrKLN4Mcn4OC3Ycq_KQ6CVVKwJkNwgEzwMQa0ag5uo8NOAVN77WpQWbvaa1cAKmvPmU_HYh2NHm1WYlz8H2zrVnQCMvfhwGFw5t_6_LoRIOT-9NfjOtv67TCoaBxOBnsX0CTVe_fME38A1pGglQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215036507</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Frankish, Clive ; Turner, Emma</creator><creatorcontrib>Frankish, Clive ; Turner, Emma</creatorcontrib><description>Misperception of nonwords created by adjacent letter transpositions (TL anagrams) indicates that word recognition is based on an orthographic matching process that is tolerant of minor positional errors in the letter sequence. We report five experiments that investigate the extent to which the misperception of TL anagrams is influenced by orthographic and phonological properties of the letter string. The first two experiments demonstrate that in a lexical decision task with masked target displays, false positive responses are more likely for unpronounceable than for pronounceable TL items. In Experiment 3 this effect was observed in an identification task as a trade-off between lexical responses and correct identification. A fourth experiment provided additional evidence that these effects are mediated by phonological rather than orthographic processing. This interpretation was strengthened by a final experiment showing that dyslexic participants did not show the pronounceability effect in lexical decision. These results are interpreted in terms of inhibition of lexical responses to TL anagrams by incompatible phonological representations of the letter string.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-596X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0821</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMLAE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Assembled phonology ; Bigram frequency ; Biological and medical sciences ; Dyslexia ; Experimental psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Identification ; Language ; Language and communication disorders ; Language Processing ; Lexical decision ; Medical sciences ; Orthographic Symbols ; Orthography ; Orthotactic ; Perception ; Phonology ; Production and perception of written language ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reading ; Reading comprehension ; Transposed letters ; Word Recognition</subject><ispartof>Journal of memory and language, 2007-02, Vol.56 (2), p.189-211</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-db6de2fcea8e4b835fe9e2353eb179e1f243f02a9a5c1ce61f93b021a32042d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-db6de2fcea8e4b835fe9e2353eb179e1f243f02a9a5c1ce61f93b021a32042d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X06001501$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ751567$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18485951$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frankish, Clive</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Emma</creatorcontrib><title>SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams</title><title>Journal of memory and language</title><description>Misperception of nonwords created by adjacent letter transpositions (TL anagrams) indicates that word recognition is based on an orthographic matching process that is tolerant of minor positional errors in the letter sequence. We report five experiments that investigate the extent to which the misperception of TL anagrams is influenced by orthographic and phonological properties of the letter string. The first two experiments demonstrate that in a lexical decision task with masked target displays, false positive responses are more likely for unpronounceable than for pronounceable TL items. In Experiment 3 this effect was observed in an identification task as a trade-off between lexical responses and correct identification. A fourth experiment provided additional evidence that these effects are mediated by phonological rather than orthographic processing. This interpretation was strengthened by a final experiment showing that dyslexic participants did not show the pronounceability effect in lexical decision. These results are interpreted in terms of inhibition of lexical responses to TL anagrams by incompatible phonological representations of the letter string.</description><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Assembled phonology</subject><subject>Bigram frequency</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Dyslexia</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language and communication disorders</subject><subject>Language Processing</subject><subject>Lexical decision</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Orthographic Symbols</subject><subject>Orthography</subject><subject>Orthotactic</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Production and perception of written language</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading comprehension</subject><subject>Transposed letters</subject><subject>Word Recognition</subject><issn>0749-596X</issn><issn>1096-0821</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EEkvhByBxsJDgltTjxE4CJ1RKP1TRQ7cSN8vrjLuOsnFqe5H23-NlVyD10NMc5nnfGT2EvAdWAgN5OpTDZiw5Y7IEKBnjL8gCWCcL1nJ4SRasqbtCdPLXa_ImxoExANHwBbF3V5cXS6qnnt7d_7z9_oUu10iDH5F6S31Ia_8Q9Lze_UXmtZ_86B921E00ZXDGYHBOzk97PAU9xdlH7OmIKWHIIZ3jm_iWvLJ6jPjuOE_I_Y_z5dllcXN7cXX27aYwNZOp6FeyR24N6hbrVVsJix3ySlS4gqZDsLyuLOO608KAQQm2q1aMg644q3nPqxPy-dA7B_-4xZjUxkWD46gn9NuoWiHrrKLN4Mcn4OC3Ycq_KQ6CVVKwJkNwgEzwMQa0ag5uo8NOAVN77WpQWbvaa1cAKmvPmU_HYh2NHm1WYlz8H2zrVnQCMvfhwGFw5t_6_LoRIOT-9NfjOtv67TCoaBxOBnsX0CTVe_fME38A1pGglQ</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Frankish, Clive</creator><creator>Turner, Emma</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams</title><author>Frankish, Clive ; Turner, Emma</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-db6de2fcea8e4b835fe9e2353eb179e1f243f02a9a5c1ce61f93b021a32042d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Assembled phonology</topic><topic>Bigram frequency</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Dyslexia</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language and communication disorders</topic><topic>Language Processing</topic><topic>Lexical decision</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Orthographic Symbols</topic><topic>Orthography</topic><topic>Orthotactic</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Production and perception of written language</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading comprehension</topic><topic>Transposed letters</topic><topic>Word Recognition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frankish, Clive</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Emma</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Journal of memory and language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frankish, Clive</au><au>Turner, Emma</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ751567</ericid><atitle>SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams</atitle><jtitle>Journal of memory and language</jtitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>211</epage><pages>189-211</pages><issn>0749-596X</issn><eissn>1096-0821</eissn><coden>JMLAE6</coden><abstract>Misperception of nonwords created by adjacent letter transpositions (TL anagrams) indicates that word recognition is based on an orthographic matching process that is tolerant of minor positional errors in the letter sequence. We report five experiments that investigate the extent to which the misperception of TL anagrams is influenced by orthographic and phonological properties of the letter string. The first two experiments demonstrate that in a lexical decision task with masked target displays, false positive responses are more likely for unpronounceable than for pronounceable TL items. In Experiment 3 this effect was observed in an identification task as a trade-off between lexical responses and correct identification. A fourth experiment provided additional evidence that these effects are mediated by phonological rather than orthographic processing. This interpretation was strengthened by a final experiment showing that dyslexic participants did not show the pronounceability effect in lexical decision. These results are interpreted in terms of inhibition of lexical responses to TL anagrams by incompatible phonological representations of the letter string.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.002</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-596X
ispartof Journal of memory and language, 2007-02, Vol.56 (2), p.189-211
issn 0749-596X
1096-0821
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85640748
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Assembled phonology
Bigram frequency
Biological and medical sciences
Dyslexia
Experimental psychology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Identification
Language
Language and communication disorders
Language Processing
Lexical decision
Medical sciences
Orthographic Symbols
Orthography
Orthotactic
Perception
Phonology
Production and perception of written language
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Reading
Reading comprehension
Transposed letters
Word Recognition
title SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T09%3A55%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SIHGT%20and%20SUNOD:%20The%20role%20of%20orthography%20and%20phonology%20in%20the%20perception%20of%20transposed%20letter%20anagrams&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20memory%20and%20language&rft.au=Frankish,%20Clive&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=211&rft.pages=189-211&rft.issn=0749-596X&rft.eissn=1096-0821&rft.coden=JMLAE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85640748%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215036507&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ751567&rft_els_id=S0749596X06001501&rfr_iscdi=true