SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams
Misperception of nonwords created by adjacent letter transpositions (TL anagrams) indicates that word recognition is based on an orthographic matching process that is tolerant of minor positional errors in the letter sequence. We report five experiments that investigate the extent to which the mispe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of memory and language 2007-02, Vol.56 (2), p.189-211 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 211 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 189 |
container_title | Journal of memory and language |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Frankish, Clive Turner, Emma |
description | Misperception of nonwords created by adjacent letter transpositions (TL anagrams) indicates that word recognition is based on an orthographic matching process that is tolerant of minor positional errors in the letter sequence. We report five experiments that investigate the extent to which the misperception of TL anagrams is influenced by orthographic and phonological properties of the letter string. The first two experiments demonstrate that in a lexical decision task with masked target displays, false positive responses are more likely for unpronounceable than for pronounceable TL items. In Experiment 3 this effect was observed in an identification task as a trade-off between lexical responses and correct identification. A fourth experiment provided additional evidence that these effects are mediated by phonological rather than orthographic processing. This interpretation was strengthened by a final experiment showing that dyslexic participants did not show the pronounceability effect in lexical decision. These results are interpreted in terms of inhibition of lexical responses to TL anagrams by incompatible phonological representations of the letter string. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85640748</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ751567</ericid><els_id>S0749596X06001501</els_id><sourcerecordid>85640748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-db6de2fcea8e4b835fe9e2353eb179e1f243f02a9a5c1ce61f93b021a32042d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EEkvhByBxsJDgltTjxE4CJ1RKP1TRQ7cSN8vrjLuOsnFqe5H23-NlVyD10NMc5nnfGT2EvAdWAgN5OpTDZiw5Y7IEKBnjL8gCWCcL1nJ4SRasqbtCdPLXa_ImxoExANHwBbF3V5cXS6qnnt7d_7z9_oUu10iDH5F6S31Ia_8Q9Lze_UXmtZ_86B921E00ZXDGYHBOzk97PAU9xdlH7OmIKWHIIZ3jm_iWvLJ6jPjuOE_I_Y_z5dllcXN7cXX27aYwNZOp6FeyR24N6hbrVVsJix3ySlS4gqZDsLyuLOO608KAQQm2q1aMg644q3nPqxPy-dA7B_-4xZjUxkWD46gn9NuoWiHrrKLN4Mcn4OC3Ycq_KQ6CVVKwJkNwgEzwMQa0ag5uo8NOAVN77WpQWbvaa1cAKmvPmU_HYh2NHm1WYlz8H2zrVnQCMvfhwGFw5t_6_LoRIOT-9NfjOtv67TCoaBxOBnsX0CTVe_fME38A1pGglQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215036507</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Frankish, Clive ; Turner, Emma</creator><creatorcontrib>Frankish, Clive ; Turner, Emma</creatorcontrib><description>Misperception of nonwords created by adjacent letter transpositions (TL anagrams) indicates that word recognition is based on an orthographic matching process that is tolerant of minor positional errors in the letter sequence. We report five experiments that investigate the extent to which the misperception of TL anagrams is influenced by orthographic and phonological properties of the letter string. The first two experiments demonstrate that in a lexical decision task with masked target displays, false positive responses are more likely for unpronounceable than for pronounceable TL items. In Experiment 3 this effect was observed in an identification task as a trade-off between lexical responses and correct identification. A fourth experiment provided additional evidence that these effects are mediated by phonological rather than orthographic processing. This interpretation was strengthened by a final experiment showing that dyslexic participants did not show the pronounceability effect in lexical decision. These results are interpreted in terms of inhibition of lexical responses to TL anagrams by incompatible phonological representations of the letter string.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-596X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0821</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMLAE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Assembled phonology ; Bigram frequency ; Biological and medical sciences ; Dyslexia ; Experimental psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Identification ; Language ; Language and communication disorders ; Language Processing ; Lexical decision ; Medical sciences ; Orthographic Symbols ; Orthography ; Orthotactic ; Perception ; Phonology ; Production and perception of written language ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reading ; Reading comprehension ; Transposed letters ; Word Recognition</subject><ispartof>Journal of memory and language, 2007-02, Vol.56 (2), p.189-211</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-db6de2fcea8e4b835fe9e2353eb179e1f243f02a9a5c1ce61f93b021a32042d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-db6de2fcea8e4b835fe9e2353eb179e1f243f02a9a5c1ce61f93b021a32042d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X06001501$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ751567$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18485951$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frankish, Clive</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Emma</creatorcontrib><title>SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams</title><title>Journal of memory and language</title><description>Misperception of nonwords created by adjacent letter transpositions (TL anagrams) indicates that word recognition is based on an orthographic matching process that is tolerant of minor positional errors in the letter sequence. We report five experiments that investigate the extent to which the misperception of TL anagrams is influenced by orthographic and phonological properties of the letter string. The first two experiments demonstrate that in a lexical decision task with masked target displays, false positive responses are more likely for unpronounceable than for pronounceable TL items. In Experiment 3 this effect was observed in an identification task as a trade-off between lexical responses and correct identification. A fourth experiment provided additional evidence that these effects are mediated by phonological rather than orthographic processing. This interpretation was strengthened by a final experiment showing that dyslexic participants did not show the pronounceability effect in lexical decision. These results are interpreted in terms of inhibition of lexical responses to TL anagrams by incompatible phonological representations of the letter string.</description><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Assembled phonology</subject><subject>Bigram frequency</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Dyslexia</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language and communication disorders</subject><subject>Language Processing</subject><subject>Lexical decision</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Orthographic Symbols</subject><subject>Orthography</subject><subject>Orthotactic</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Production and perception of written language</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading comprehension</subject><subject>Transposed letters</subject><subject>Word Recognition</subject><issn>0749-596X</issn><issn>1096-0821</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EEkvhByBxsJDgltTjxE4CJ1RKP1TRQ7cSN8vrjLuOsnFqe5H23-NlVyD10NMc5nnfGT2EvAdWAgN5OpTDZiw5Y7IEKBnjL8gCWCcL1nJ4SRasqbtCdPLXa_ImxoExANHwBbF3V5cXS6qnnt7d_7z9_oUu10iDH5F6S31Ia_8Q9Lze_UXmtZ_86B921E00ZXDGYHBOzk97PAU9xdlH7OmIKWHIIZ3jm_iWvLJ6jPjuOE_I_Y_z5dllcXN7cXX27aYwNZOp6FeyR24N6hbrVVsJix3ySlS4gqZDsLyuLOO608KAQQm2q1aMg644q3nPqxPy-dA7B_-4xZjUxkWD46gn9NuoWiHrrKLN4Mcn4OC3Ycq_KQ6CVVKwJkNwgEzwMQa0ag5uo8NOAVN77WpQWbvaa1cAKmvPmU_HYh2NHm1WYlz8H2zrVnQCMvfhwGFw5t_6_LoRIOT-9NfjOtv67TCoaBxOBnsX0CTVe_fME38A1pGglQ</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Frankish, Clive</creator><creator>Turner, Emma</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams</title><author>Frankish, Clive ; Turner, Emma</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-db6de2fcea8e4b835fe9e2353eb179e1f243f02a9a5c1ce61f93b021a32042d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Assembled phonology</topic><topic>Bigram frequency</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Dyslexia</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language and communication disorders</topic><topic>Language Processing</topic><topic>Lexical decision</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Orthographic Symbols</topic><topic>Orthography</topic><topic>Orthotactic</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Production and perception of written language</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading comprehension</topic><topic>Transposed letters</topic><topic>Word Recognition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frankish, Clive</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Emma</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Journal of memory and language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frankish, Clive</au><au>Turner, Emma</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ751567</ericid><atitle>SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams</atitle><jtitle>Journal of memory and language</jtitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>211</epage><pages>189-211</pages><issn>0749-596X</issn><eissn>1096-0821</eissn><coden>JMLAE6</coden><abstract>Misperception of nonwords created by adjacent letter transpositions (TL anagrams) indicates that word recognition is based on an orthographic matching process that is tolerant of minor positional errors in the letter sequence. We report five experiments that investigate the extent to which the misperception of TL anagrams is influenced by orthographic and phonological properties of the letter string. The first two experiments demonstrate that in a lexical decision task with masked target displays, false positive responses are more likely for unpronounceable than for pronounceable TL items. In Experiment 3 this effect was observed in an identification task as a trade-off between lexical responses and correct identification. A fourth experiment provided additional evidence that these effects are mediated by phonological rather than orthographic processing. This interpretation was strengthened by a final experiment showing that dyslexic participants did not show the pronounceability effect in lexical decision. These results are interpreted in terms of inhibition of lexical responses to TL anagrams by incompatible phonological representations of the letter string.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.002</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0749-596X |
ispartof | Journal of memory and language, 2007-02, Vol.56 (2), p.189-211 |
issn | 0749-596X 1096-0821 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85640748 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult and adolescent clinical studies Assembled phonology Bigram frequency Biological and medical sciences Dyslexia Experimental psychology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Identification Language Language and communication disorders Language Processing Lexical decision Medical sciences Orthographic Symbols Orthography Orthotactic Perception Phonology Production and perception of written language Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychopathology. Psychiatry Reading Reading comprehension Transposed letters Word Recognition |
title | SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T09%3A55%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SIHGT%20and%20SUNOD:%20The%20role%20of%20orthography%20and%20phonology%20in%20the%20perception%20of%20transposed%20letter%20anagrams&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20memory%20and%20language&rft.au=Frankish,%20Clive&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=211&rft.pages=189-211&rft.issn=0749-596X&rft.eissn=1096-0821&rft.coden=JMLAE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85640748%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215036507&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ751567&rft_els_id=S0749596X06001501&rfr_iscdi=true |