A longitudinal study of confrontation naming in the “normal” elderly
The longitudinal effects of age on confrontation naming using the 60-item Boston Naming Test (BNT) were studied in 541 “normal” elderly (ages 50–99). For participants with at least 4 annual assessments (n = 238), 150 were followed for ≥6 years, 81 for ≥8 years, and 43 for ≥10 years. A small practice...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2005-10, Vol.11 (6), p.716-726 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 726 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 716 |
container_title | Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | ZEC, RONALD F. MARKWELL, STEPHEN J. BURKETT, NICOLE R. LARSEN, DEB L. |
description | The longitudinal effects of age on confrontation naming using the
60-item Boston Naming Test (BNT) were studied in 541 “normal”
elderly (ages 50–99). For participants with at least 4 annual
assessments (n = 238), 150 were followed for ≥6 years, 81 for
≥8 years, and 43 for ≥10 years. A small practice effect (0.21 words,
p = 0.06) and moderately high test-retest reliability were found
when comparing the first 2 assessments, which were 9–15 months apart
(r = 0.76, n = 353). Reliable change index scores
indicated that an annual decline of ≥4 points on the BNT is needed for
a statistically reliable decline in an individual. A gradient in the mean
annual rate of change on the BNT was found with improvement in the 50s age
group, no change in the 60s age group, and decline in the 70s and 80s age
groups. When projected over 10 years, the magnitudes of the mean changes
were relatively small, that is, a 1-word improvement for
participants in their 50s and a 1.3-word decline for participants
in their 70s. These findings demonstrate that lexical retrieval as
measured by a visual object confrontation naming task is generally well
preserved in aging with only subtle decline in the 7th and 8th decades of
age. (JINS, 2005, 11, 716–726.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1355617705050897 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85631007</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1355617705050897</cupid><sourcerecordid>19341719</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-82ad95c767078c2b922bb14fe8e37655dfb2601d5f1964c28f550f67513ad52d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9qFTEUxoNYbK0-gBsJLtyNzUkm_5al1F6xIK2Ky5CZJNepM0lNZsC764Poy_VJnOFeLLRIOYtz4Pudw5d8CL0C8g4IyKPPwDgXICXhcyktn6ADqIWupBDwdJ5nuVr0ffS8lCtCgAEhz9A-CForTeQBWh3jPsV1N06ui7bHZR42OAXcphhyiqMduxRxtEMX17iLePzu8e3N75jyYPvbmz_Y987nfvMC7QXbF_9y1w_R1_enX05W1fmnsw8nx-dVW0syVopap3krhSRStbTRlDYN1MErz6Tg3IWGCgKOB9CibqkKnJMgJAdmHaeOHaK327vXOf2cfBnN0JXW972NPk3FKC6WR8pHQaEk1bXWj4KgWQ0SFvDNPfAqTXn-tWIoKKUIaDVDsIXanErJPpjr3A02bwwQs6RmHqQ277zeHZ6awbu7jV1MM1Btga6M_tc_3eYfRkgmuRFnF-bj5eqSkYtvZuHZzoQdmty5tb-z-n8bfwHeYrBF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218880198</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A longitudinal study of confrontation naming in the “normal” elderly</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>ZEC, RONALD F. ; MARKWELL, STEPHEN J. ; BURKETT, NICOLE R. ; LARSEN, DEB L.</creator><creatorcontrib>ZEC, RONALD F. ; MARKWELL, STEPHEN J. ; BURKETT, NICOLE R. ; LARSEN, DEB L.</creatorcontrib><description>The longitudinal effects of age on confrontation naming using the
60-item Boston Naming Test (BNT) were studied in 541 “normal”
elderly (ages 50–99). For participants with at least 4 annual
assessments (n = 238), 150 were followed for ≥6 years, 81 for
≥8 years, and 43 for ≥10 years. A small practice effect (0.21 words,
p = 0.06) and moderately high test-retest reliability were found
when comparing the first 2 assessments, which were 9–15 months apart
(r = 0.76, n = 353). Reliable change index scores
indicated that an annual decline of ≥4 points on the BNT is needed for
a statistically reliable decline in an individual. A gradient in the mean
annual rate of change on the BNT was found with improvement in the 50s age
group, no change in the 60s age group, and decline in the 70s and 80s age
groups. When projected over 10 years, the magnitudes of the mean changes
were relatively small, that is, a 1-word improvement for
participants in their 50s and a 1.3-word decline for participants
in their 70s. These findings demonstrate that lexical retrieval as
measured by a visual object confrontation naming task is generally well
preserved in aging with only subtle decline in the 7th and 8th decades of
age. (JINS, 2005, 11, 716–726.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-6177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1355617705050897</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16248907</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JINSF9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging ; Aging - physiology ; Alzheimer's disease ; Anomia - physiopathology ; Boston Naming Test ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Cognition ; Cognition & reasoning ; Confidence Intervals ; Demography ; Female ; Geriatric Assessment ; Humans ; Individuality ; Language ; Lexical retrieval ; Linear Models ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data ; Neuropsychology ; Older people ; Reproducibility of Results ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2005-10, Vol.11 (6), p.716-726</ispartof><rights>2005 The International Neuropsychological Society</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Oct 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-82ad95c767078c2b922bb14fe8e37655dfb2601d5f1964c28f550f67513ad52d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-82ad95c767078c2b922bb14fe8e37655dfb2601d5f1964c28f550f67513ad52d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1355617705050897/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16248907$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ZEC, RONALD F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARKWELL, STEPHEN J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURKETT, NICOLE R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LARSEN, DEB L.</creatorcontrib><title>A longitudinal study of confrontation naming in the “normal” elderly</title><title>Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society</title><addtitle>J Int Neuropsychol Soc</addtitle><description>The longitudinal effects of age on confrontation naming using the
60-item Boston Naming Test (BNT) were studied in 541 “normal”
elderly (ages 50–99). For participants with at least 4 annual
assessments (n = 238), 150 were followed for ≥6 years, 81 for
≥8 years, and 43 for ≥10 years. A small practice effect (0.21 words,
p = 0.06) and moderately high test-retest reliability were found
when comparing the first 2 assessments, which were 9–15 months apart
(r = 0.76, n = 353). Reliable change index scores
indicated that an annual decline of ≥4 points on the BNT is needed for
a statistically reliable decline in an individual. A gradient in the mean
annual rate of change on the BNT was found with improvement in the 50s age
group, no change in the 60s age group, and decline in the 70s and 80s age
groups. When projected over 10 years, the magnitudes of the mean changes
were relatively small, that is, a 1-word improvement for
participants in their 50s and a 1.3-word decline for participants
in their 70s. These findings demonstrate that lexical retrieval as
measured by a visual object confrontation naming task is generally well
preserved in aging with only subtle decline in the 7th and 8th decades of
age. (JINS, 2005, 11, 716–726.)</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Aging - physiology</subject><subject>Alzheimer's disease</subject><subject>Anomia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Boston Naming Test</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Lexical retrieval</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1355-6177</issn><issn>1469-7661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9qFTEUxoNYbK0-gBsJLtyNzUkm_5al1F6xIK2Ky5CZJNepM0lNZsC764Poy_VJnOFeLLRIOYtz4Pudw5d8CL0C8g4IyKPPwDgXICXhcyktn6ADqIWupBDwdJ5nuVr0ffS8lCtCgAEhz9A-CForTeQBWh3jPsV1N06ui7bHZR42OAXcphhyiqMduxRxtEMX17iLePzu8e3N75jyYPvbmz_Y987nfvMC7QXbF_9y1w_R1_enX05W1fmnsw8nx-dVW0syVopap3krhSRStbTRlDYN1MErz6Tg3IWGCgKOB9CibqkKnJMgJAdmHaeOHaK327vXOf2cfBnN0JXW972NPk3FKC6WR8pHQaEk1bXWj4KgWQ0SFvDNPfAqTXn-tWIoKKUIaDVDsIXanErJPpjr3A02bwwQs6RmHqQ277zeHZ6awbu7jV1MM1Btga6M_tc_3eYfRkgmuRFnF-bj5eqSkYtvZuHZzoQdmty5tb-z-n8bfwHeYrBF</recordid><startdate>200510</startdate><enddate>200510</enddate><creator>ZEC, RONALD F.</creator><creator>MARKWELL, STEPHEN J.</creator><creator>BURKETT, NICOLE R.</creator><creator>LARSEN, DEB L.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200510</creationdate><title>A longitudinal study of confrontation naming in the “normal” elderly</title><author>ZEC, RONALD F. ; MARKWELL, STEPHEN J. ; BURKETT, NICOLE R. ; LARSEN, DEB L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-82ad95c767078c2b922bb14fe8e37655dfb2601d5f1964c28f550f67513ad52d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Aging - physiology</topic><topic>Alzheimer's disease</topic><topic>Anomia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Boston Naming Test</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Lexical retrieval</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ZEC, RONALD F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARKWELL, STEPHEN J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURKETT, NICOLE R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LARSEN, DEB L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ZEC, RONALD F.</au><au>MARKWELL, STEPHEN J.</au><au>BURKETT, NICOLE R.</au><au>LARSEN, DEB L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A longitudinal study of confrontation naming in the “normal” elderly</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society</jtitle><addtitle>J Int Neuropsychol Soc</addtitle><date>2005-10</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>716</spage><epage>726</epage><pages>716-726</pages><issn>1355-6177</issn><eissn>1469-7661</eissn><coden>JINSF9</coden><abstract>The longitudinal effects of age on confrontation naming using the
60-item Boston Naming Test (BNT) were studied in 541 “normal”
elderly (ages 50–99). For participants with at least 4 annual
assessments (n = 238), 150 were followed for ≥6 years, 81 for
≥8 years, and 43 for ≥10 years. A small practice effect (0.21 words,
p = 0.06) and moderately high test-retest reliability were found
when comparing the first 2 assessments, which were 9–15 months apart
(r = 0.76, n = 353). Reliable change index scores
indicated that an annual decline of ≥4 points on the BNT is needed for
a statistically reliable decline in an individual. A gradient in the mean
annual rate of change on the BNT was found with improvement in the 50s age
group, no change in the 60s age group, and decline in the 70s and 80s age
groups. When projected over 10 years, the magnitudes of the mean changes
were relatively small, that is, a 1-word improvement for
participants in their 50s and a 1.3-word decline for participants
in their 70s. These findings demonstrate that lexical retrieval as
measured by a visual object confrontation naming task is generally well
preserved in aging with only subtle decline in the 7th and 8th decades of
age. (JINS, 2005, 11, 716–726.)</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>16248907</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1355617705050897</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1355-6177 |
ispartof | Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2005-10, Vol.11 (6), p.716-726 |
issn | 1355-6177 1469-7661 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85631007 |
source | Cambridge Journals Online; MEDLINE |
subjects | Age Factors Aged Aged, 80 and over Aging Aging - physiology Alzheimer's disease Anomia - physiopathology Boston Naming Test Chi-Square Distribution Cognition Cognition & reasoning Confidence Intervals Demography Female Geriatric Assessment Humans Individuality Language Lexical retrieval Linear Models Longitudinal Studies Male Middle Aged Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data Neuropsychology Older people Reproducibility of Results Time Factors |
title | A longitudinal study of confrontation naming in the “normal” elderly |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T11%3A59%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20longitudinal%20study%20of%20confrontation%20naming%20in%20the%20%E2%80%9Cnormal%E2%80%9D%20elderly&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20International%20Neuropsychological%20Society&rft.au=ZEC,%20RONALD%20F.&rft.date=2005-10&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=716&rft.epage=726&rft.pages=716-726&rft.issn=1355-6177&rft.eissn=1469-7661&rft.coden=JINSF9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1355617705050897&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19341719%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218880198&rft_id=info:pmid/16248907&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1355617705050897&rfr_iscdi=true |