The effects of speech production and speech comprehension on simulated driving performance
We performed two experiments comparing the effects of speech production and speech comprehension on simulated driving performance. In both experiments, participants completed a speech task and a simulated driving task under single‐ and dual‐task conditions, with language materials matched for lingui...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Applied cognitive psychology 2006-01, Vol.20 (1), p.43-63 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 63 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 43 |
| container_title | Applied cognitive psychology |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Kubose, Tate T. Bock, Kathryn Dell, Gary S. Garnsey, Susan M. Kramer, Arthur F. Mayhugh, Jeff |
| description | We performed two experiments comparing the effects of speech production and speech comprehension on simulated driving performance. In both experiments, participants completed a speech task and a simulated driving task under single‐ and dual‐task conditions, with language materials matched for linguistic complexity. In Experiment 1, concurrent production and comprehension resulted in more variable velocity compared to driving alone. Experiment 2 replicated these effects in a more difficult simulated driving environment, with participants showing larger and more variable headway times when speaking or listening while driving than when just driving. In both experiments, concurrent production yielded better control of lane position relative to single‐task performance; concurrent comprehension had little impact on control of lane position. On all other measures, production and comprehension had very similar effects on driving. The results show, in line with previous work, that there are detrimental consequences for driving of concurrent language use. Our findings imply that these detrimental consequences may be roughly the same whether drivers are producing speech or comprehending it. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/acp.1164 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85630405</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57108205</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5844-25d51506f0b60dba67c41e1c1dba7d0964fdfd2071bbc94493ea9383a0e33e8e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0W1rFDEQB_BFLHi2gh9hERTfbDt52mRf1kNboVTB04JvQi6ZeKn71GTXtt_eHHcqCFIhkDD58WeYKYrnBI4JAD0xdjwmpOaPigWBpqlAUnhcLEApVXFQ8KR4mtI1ADQ1oYvi62qDJXqPdkrl4Ms0ItpNOcbBzXYKQ1-a3v2q2qEbI26wT9uPfFLo5tZM6EoXw4_QfytHjH6InektHhUH3rQJn-3vw-Lzu7er5Xl18eHs_fL0orJCcV5R4QQRUHtY1-DWppaWEySW5Ld0uU3unXcUJFmvbcN5w9A0TDEDyBgqZIfFq11ubvpmxjTpLiSLbWt6HOaklagZcBAPQiEJKPpfEFRNZPMgpDlPMbGFL_6C18Mc-zwWTQmhvFGMZPR6h2wcUoro9RhDZ-K9JqC3y9V5uXq73Exf7vNMsqb1MQ88pD9e8poSqbKrdu42tHj_zzx9uvy4z937kCa8--1N_K5ryaTQV5dn-lx9umpWb0B_YT8BC0vA0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211249831</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of speech production and speech comprehension on simulated driving performance</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Kubose, Tate T. ; Bock, Kathryn ; Dell, Gary S. ; Garnsey, Susan M. ; Kramer, Arthur F. ; Mayhugh, Jeff</creator><creatorcontrib>Kubose, Tate T. ; Bock, Kathryn ; Dell, Gary S. ; Garnsey, Susan M. ; Kramer, Arthur F. ; Mayhugh, Jeff</creatorcontrib><description>We performed two experiments comparing the effects of speech production and speech comprehension on simulated driving performance. In both experiments, participants completed a speech task and a simulated driving task under single‐ and dual‐task conditions, with language materials matched for linguistic complexity. In Experiment 1, concurrent production and comprehension resulted in more variable velocity compared to driving alone. Experiment 2 replicated these effects in a more difficult simulated driving environment, with participants showing larger and more variable headway times when speaking or listening while driving than when just driving. In both experiments, concurrent production yielded better control of lane position relative to single‐task performance; concurrent comprehension had little impact on control of lane position. On all other measures, production and comprehension had very similar effects on driving. The results show, in line with previous work, that there are detrimental consequences for driving of concurrent language use. Our findings imply that these detrimental consequences may be roughly the same whether drivers are producing speech or comprehending it. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-4080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0720</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acp.1164</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACPSED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied psychology ; Automobile drivers ; Automobile driving ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition & reasoning ; Comprehension ; Consequences ; Driving ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Language ; Listening comprehension ; Production and perception of spoken language ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Simulation ; Speaking ; Speech production ; Transportation. City planning</subject><ispartof>Applied cognitive psychology, 2006-01, Vol.20 (1), p.43-63</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited Jan 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5844-25d51506f0b60dba67c41e1c1dba7d0964fdfd2071bbc94493ea9383a0e33e8e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5844-25d51506f0b60dba67c41e1c1dba7d0964fdfd2071bbc94493ea9383a0e33e8e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Facp.1164$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Facp.1164$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,4010,27900,27901,27902,30976,30977,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17462178$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kubose, Tate T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bock, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dell, Gary S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garnsey, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Arthur F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayhugh, Jeff</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of speech production and speech comprehension on simulated driving performance</title><title>Applied cognitive psychology</title><addtitle>Appl. Cognit. Psychol</addtitle><description>We performed two experiments comparing the effects of speech production and speech comprehension on simulated driving performance. In both experiments, participants completed a speech task and a simulated driving task under single‐ and dual‐task conditions, with language materials matched for linguistic complexity. In Experiment 1, concurrent production and comprehension resulted in more variable velocity compared to driving alone. Experiment 2 replicated these effects in a more difficult simulated driving environment, with participants showing larger and more variable headway times when speaking or listening while driving than when just driving. In both experiments, concurrent production yielded better control of lane position relative to single‐task performance; concurrent comprehension had little impact on control of lane position. On all other measures, production and comprehension had very similar effects on driving. The results show, in line with previous work, that there are detrimental consequences for driving of concurrent language use. Our findings imply that these detrimental consequences may be roughly the same whether drivers are producing speech or comprehending it. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Applied psychology</subject><subject>Automobile drivers</subject><subject>Automobile driving</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Consequences</subject><subject>Driving</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Listening comprehension</subject><subject>Production and perception of spoken language</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Speaking</subject><subject>Speech production</subject><subject>Transportation. City planning</subject><issn>0888-4080</issn><issn>1099-0720</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0W1rFDEQB_BFLHi2gh9hERTfbDt52mRf1kNboVTB04JvQi6ZeKn71GTXtt_eHHcqCFIhkDD58WeYKYrnBI4JAD0xdjwmpOaPigWBpqlAUnhcLEApVXFQ8KR4mtI1ADQ1oYvi62qDJXqPdkrl4Ms0ItpNOcbBzXYKQ1-a3v2q2qEbI26wT9uPfFLo5tZM6EoXw4_QfytHjH6InektHhUH3rQJn-3vw-Lzu7er5Xl18eHs_fL0orJCcV5R4QQRUHtY1-DWppaWEySW5Ld0uU3unXcUJFmvbcN5w9A0TDEDyBgqZIfFq11ubvpmxjTpLiSLbWt6HOaklagZcBAPQiEJKPpfEFRNZPMgpDlPMbGFL_6C18Mc-zwWTQmhvFGMZPR6h2wcUoro9RhDZ-K9JqC3y9V5uXq73Exf7vNMsqb1MQ88pD9e8poSqbKrdu42tHj_zzx9uvy4z937kCa8--1N_K5ryaTQV5dn-lx9umpWb0B_YT8BC0vA0A</recordid><startdate>200601</startdate><enddate>200601</enddate><creator>Kubose, Tate T.</creator><creator>Bock, Kathryn</creator><creator>Dell, Gary S.</creator><creator>Garnsey, Susan M.</creator><creator>Kramer, Arthur F.</creator><creator>Mayhugh, Jeff</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200601</creationdate><title>The effects of speech production and speech comprehension on simulated driving performance</title><author>Kubose, Tate T. ; Bock, Kathryn ; Dell, Gary S. ; Garnsey, Susan M. ; Kramer, Arthur F. ; Mayhugh, Jeff</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5844-25d51506f0b60dba67c41e1c1dba7d0964fdfd2071bbc94493ea9383a0e33e8e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Applied psychology</topic><topic>Automobile drivers</topic><topic>Automobile driving</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Consequences</topic><topic>Driving</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Listening comprehension</topic><topic>Production and perception of spoken language</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Speaking</topic><topic>Speech production</topic><topic>Transportation. City planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kubose, Tate T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bock, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dell, Gary S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garnsey, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Arthur F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayhugh, Jeff</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kubose, Tate T.</au><au>Bock, Kathryn</au><au>Dell, Gary S.</au><au>Garnsey, Susan M.</au><au>Kramer, Arthur F.</au><au>Mayhugh, Jeff</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of speech production and speech comprehension on simulated driving performance</atitle><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Appl. Cognit. Psychol</addtitle><date>2006-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>63</epage><pages>43-63</pages><issn>0888-4080</issn><eissn>1099-0720</eissn><coden>ACPSED</coden><abstract>We performed two experiments comparing the effects of speech production and speech comprehension on simulated driving performance. In both experiments, participants completed a speech task and a simulated driving task under single‐ and dual‐task conditions, with language materials matched for linguistic complexity. In Experiment 1, concurrent production and comprehension resulted in more variable velocity compared to driving alone. Experiment 2 replicated these effects in a more difficult simulated driving environment, with participants showing larger and more variable headway times when speaking or listening while driving than when just driving. In both experiments, concurrent production yielded better control of lane position relative to single‐task performance; concurrent comprehension had little impact on control of lane position. On all other measures, production and comprehension had very similar effects on driving. The results show, in line with previous work, that there are detrimental consequences for driving of concurrent language use. Our findings imply that these detrimental consequences may be roughly the same whether drivers are producing speech or comprehending it. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/acp.1164</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0888-4080 |
| ispartof | Applied cognitive psychology, 2006-01, Vol.20 (1), p.43-63 |
| issn | 0888-4080 1099-0720 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85630405 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Applied psychology Automobile drivers Automobile driving Biological and medical sciences Cognition & reasoning Comprehension Consequences Driving Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Language Listening comprehension Production and perception of spoken language Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Simulation Speaking Speech production Transportation. City planning |
| title | The effects of speech production and speech comprehension on simulated driving performance |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T19%3A00%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20speech%20production%20and%20speech%20comprehension%20on%20simulated%20driving%20performance&rft.jtitle=Applied%20cognitive%20psychology&rft.au=Kubose,%20Tate%20T.&rft.date=2006-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=63&rft.pages=43-63&rft.issn=0888-4080&rft.eissn=1099-0720&rft.coden=ACPSED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acp.1164&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57108205%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211249831&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |