Verb Agreement and Disagreement: A Corpus Investigation of Concord Variation in Existential There + Be Constructions

This multiregister corpus study investigates the social factors affecting concord variation found in existential there + be (ETB) constructions in present-day American English. The study questions previous work in this area, which suggests that a lack of concord is reflective of informal, conversati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of English linguistics 2005-03, Vol.33 (1), p.35-61
1. Verfasser: Crawford, William J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 61
container_issue 1
container_start_page 35
container_title Journal of English linguistics
container_volume 33
creator Crawford, William J.
description This multiregister corpus study investigates the social factors affecting concord variation found in existential there + be (ETB) constructions in present-day American English. The study questions previous work in this area, which suggests that a lack of concord is reflective of informal, conversational situations of use. The five registers analyzed (conversation, academic lectures, academic writing, fiction, and chat language) showed that the two spoken registers resulted in the greatest number of variation in agreement. A comparison of the linguistic contexts of ETBs in the two spoken registers finds both similarities and differences of function across two spoken registers. The article concludes by adopting the position that the contracted ETB construction is an unanalyzed chunk or formulaic sequence of language.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0075424204274001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85629930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0075424204274001</sage_id><sourcerecordid>85629930</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a1621-5535f4a221aee217c21c369fbfb514e7b66b3845ce2a42cf376f8ef429f155323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMouFbv3uxFb6uZydfusdRPKHhRryEbJ7Jlu1uT9uB_b8pWBMHTwLzfe8w8xs6BXwMYc8O5URIlcolGcg4HrAClsFRSmUNW7ORypx-zk5SWnPNKoi7YxRvFZjr7iEQr6jdT179Pb9vkfhan7Ci4LtHZfk7Y6_3dy_yxXDw_PM1ni9KBRiiVEipIhwiOCMF4BC90HZrQKJBkGq0bUUnlCZ1EH4TRoaIgsQ75SoFiwq7G3HUcPreUNnbVJk9d53oatslWSmNdC55BPoI-DilFCnYd25WLXxa43TVh_zaRLZf7bJe860J0vW_Tr09nHITJXDly-X2yy2Eb-_zy_7nfOC5nbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85629930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Verb Agreement and Disagreement: A Corpus Investigation of Concord Variation in Existential There + Be Constructions</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Crawford, William J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Crawford, William J.</creatorcontrib><description>This multiregister corpus study investigates the social factors affecting concord variation found in existential there + be (ETB) constructions in present-day American English. The study questions previous work in this area, which suggests that a lack of concord is reflective of informal, conversational situations of use. The five registers analyzed (conversation, academic lectures, academic writing, fiction, and chat language) showed that the two spoken registers resulted in the greatest number of variation in agreement. A comparison of the linguistic contexts of ETBs in the two spoken registers finds both similarities and differences of function across two spoken registers. The article concludes by adopting the position that the contracted ETB construction is an unanalyzed chunk or formulaic sequence of language.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0075-4242</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0075424204274001</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JENLAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Descriptive studies and applied theories ; Linguistics ; Semantics and pragmatics</subject><ispartof>Journal of English linguistics, 2005-03, Vol.33 (1), p.35-61</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a1621-5535f4a221aee217c21c369fbfb514e7b66b3845ce2a42cf376f8ef429f155323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0075424204274001$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0075424204274001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16542137$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crawford, William J.</creatorcontrib><title>Verb Agreement and Disagreement: A Corpus Investigation of Concord Variation in Existential There + Be Constructions</title><title>Journal of English linguistics</title><description>This multiregister corpus study investigates the social factors affecting concord variation found in existential there + be (ETB) constructions in present-day American English. The study questions previous work in this area, which suggests that a lack of concord is reflective of informal, conversational situations of use. The five registers analyzed (conversation, academic lectures, academic writing, fiction, and chat language) showed that the two spoken registers resulted in the greatest number of variation in agreement. A comparison of the linguistic contexts of ETBs in the two spoken registers finds both similarities and differences of function across two spoken registers. The article concludes by adopting the position that the contracted ETB construction is an unanalyzed chunk or formulaic sequence of language.</description><subject>Descriptive studies and applied theories</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Semantics and pragmatics</subject><issn>0075-4242</issn><issn>1552-5457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMouFbv3uxFb6uZydfusdRPKHhRryEbJ7Jlu1uT9uB_b8pWBMHTwLzfe8w8xs6BXwMYc8O5URIlcolGcg4HrAClsFRSmUNW7ORypx-zk5SWnPNKoi7YxRvFZjr7iEQr6jdT179Pb9vkfhan7Ci4LtHZfk7Y6_3dy_yxXDw_PM1ni9KBRiiVEipIhwiOCMF4BC90HZrQKJBkGq0bUUnlCZ1EH4TRoaIgsQ75SoFiwq7G3HUcPreUNnbVJk9d53oatslWSmNdC55BPoI-DilFCnYd25WLXxa43TVh_zaRLZf7bJe860J0vW_Tr09nHITJXDly-X2yy2Eb-_zy_7nfOC5nbw</recordid><startdate>200503</startdate><enddate>200503</enddate><creator>Crawford, William J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200503</creationdate><title>Verb Agreement and Disagreement</title><author>Crawford, William J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a1621-5535f4a221aee217c21c369fbfb514e7b66b3845ce2a42cf376f8ef429f155323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Descriptive studies and applied theories</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Semantics and pragmatics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crawford, William J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of English linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crawford, William J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Verb Agreement and Disagreement: A Corpus Investigation of Concord Variation in Existential There + Be Constructions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of English linguistics</jtitle><date>2005-03</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>35-61</pages><issn>0075-4242</issn><eissn>1552-5457</eissn><coden>JENLAN</coden><abstract>This multiregister corpus study investigates the social factors affecting concord variation found in existential there + be (ETB) constructions in present-day American English. The study questions previous work in this area, which suggests that a lack of concord is reflective of informal, conversational situations of use. The five registers analyzed (conversation, academic lectures, academic writing, fiction, and chat language) showed that the two spoken registers resulted in the greatest number of variation in agreement. A comparison of the linguistic contexts of ETBs in the two spoken registers finds both similarities and differences of function across two spoken registers. The article concludes by adopting the position that the contracted ETB construction is an unanalyzed chunk or formulaic sequence of language.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0075424204274001</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0075-4242
ispartof Journal of English linguistics, 2005-03, Vol.33 (1), p.35-61
issn 0075-4242
1552-5457
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85629930
source SAGE Complete
subjects Descriptive studies and applied theories
Linguistics
Semantics and pragmatics
title Verb Agreement and Disagreement: A Corpus Investigation of Concord Variation in Existential There + Be Constructions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T10%3A25%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Verb%20Agreement%20and%20Disagreement:%20A%20Corpus%20Investigation%20of%20Concord%20Variation%20in%20Existential%20There%20+%20Be%20Constructions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20English%20linguistics&rft.au=Crawford,%20William%20J.&rft.date=2005-03&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=35-61&rft.issn=0075-4242&rft.eissn=1552-5457&rft.coden=JENLAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0075424204274001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85629930%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85629930&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0075424204274001&rfr_iscdi=true