Verb Agreement and Disagreement: A Corpus Investigation of Concord Variation in Existential There + Be Constructions
This multiregister corpus study investigates the social factors affecting concord variation found in existential there + be (ETB) constructions in present-day American English. The study questions previous work in this area, which suggests that a lack of concord is reflective of informal, conversati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of English linguistics 2005-03, Vol.33 (1), p.35-61 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 61 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 35 |
container_title | Journal of English linguistics |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Crawford, William J. |
description | This multiregister corpus study investigates the social factors affecting concord variation found in existential there + be (ETB) constructions in present-day American English. The study questions previous work in this area, which suggests that a lack of concord is reflective of informal, conversational situations of use. The five registers analyzed (conversation, academic lectures, academic writing, fiction, and chat language) showed that the two spoken registers resulted in the greatest number of variation in agreement. A comparison of the linguistic contexts of ETBs in the two spoken registers finds both similarities and differences of function across two spoken registers. The article concludes by adopting the position that the contracted ETB construction is an unanalyzed chunk or formulaic sequence of language. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0075424204274001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85629930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0075424204274001</sage_id><sourcerecordid>85629930</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a1621-5535f4a221aee217c21c369fbfb514e7b66b3845ce2a42cf376f8ef429f155323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMouFbv3uxFb6uZydfusdRPKHhRryEbJ7Jlu1uT9uB_b8pWBMHTwLzfe8w8xs6BXwMYc8O5URIlcolGcg4HrAClsFRSmUNW7ORypx-zk5SWnPNKoi7YxRvFZjr7iEQr6jdT179Pb9vkfhan7Ci4LtHZfk7Y6_3dy_yxXDw_PM1ni9KBRiiVEipIhwiOCMF4BC90HZrQKJBkGq0bUUnlCZ1EH4TRoaIgsQ75SoFiwq7G3HUcPreUNnbVJk9d53oatslWSmNdC55BPoI-DilFCnYd25WLXxa43TVh_zaRLZf7bJe860J0vW_Tr09nHITJXDly-X2yy2Eb-_zy_7nfOC5nbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85629930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Verb Agreement and Disagreement: A Corpus Investigation of Concord Variation in Existential There + Be Constructions</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Crawford, William J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Crawford, William J.</creatorcontrib><description>This multiregister corpus study investigates the social factors affecting concord variation found in existential there + be (ETB) constructions in present-day American English. The study questions previous work in this area, which suggests that a lack of concord is reflective of informal, conversational situations of use. The five registers analyzed (conversation, academic lectures, academic writing, fiction, and chat language) showed that the two spoken registers resulted in the greatest number of variation in agreement. A comparison of the linguistic contexts of ETBs in the two spoken registers finds both similarities and differences of function across two spoken registers. The article concludes by adopting the position that the contracted ETB construction is an unanalyzed chunk or formulaic sequence of language.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0075-4242</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0075424204274001</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JENLAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Descriptive studies and applied theories ; Linguistics ; Semantics and pragmatics</subject><ispartof>Journal of English linguistics, 2005-03, Vol.33 (1), p.35-61</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a1621-5535f4a221aee217c21c369fbfb514e7b66b3845ce2a42cf376f8ef429f155323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0075424204274001$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0075424204274001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16542137$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crawford, William J.</creatorcontrib><title>Verb Agreement and Disagreement: A Corpus Investigation of Concord Variation in Existential There + Be Constructions</title><title>Journal of English linguistics</title><description>This multiregister corpus study investigates the social factors affecting concord variation found in existential there + be (ETB) constructions in present-day American English. The study questions previous work in this area, which suggests that a lack of concord is reflective of informal, conversational situations of use. The five registers analyzed (conversation, academic lectures, academic writing, fiction, and chat language) showed that the two spoken registers resulted in the greatest number of variation in agreement. A comparison of the linguistic contexts of ETBs in the two spoken registers finds both similarities and differences of function across two spoken registers. The article concludes by adopting the position that the contracted ETB construction is an unanalyzed chunk or formulaic sequence of language.</description><subject>Descriptive studies and applied theories</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Semantics and pragmatics</subject><issn>0075-4242</issn><issn>1552-5457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMouFbv3uxFb6uZydfusdRPKHhRryEbJ7Jlu1uT9uB_b8pWBMHTwLzfe8w8xs6BXwMYc8O5URIlcolGcg4HrAClsFRSmUNW7ORypx-zk5SWnPNKoi7YxRvFZjr7iEQr6jdT179Pb9vkfhan7Ci4LtHZfk7Y6_3dy_yxXDw_PM1ni9KBRiiVEipIhwiOCMF4BC90HZrQKJBkGq0bUUnlCZ1EH4TRoaIgsQ75SoFiwq7G3HUcPreUNnbVJk9d53oatslWSmNdC55BPoI-DilFCnYd25WLXxa43TVh_zaRLZf7bJe860J0vW_Tr09nHITJXDly-X2yy2Eb-_zy_7nfOC5nbw</recordid><startdate>200503</startdate><enddate>200503</enddate><creator>Crawford, William J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200503</creationdate><title>Verb Agreement and Disagreement</title><author>Crawford, William J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a1621-5535f4a221aee217c21c369fbfb514e7b66b3845ce2a42cf376f8ef429f155323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Descriptive studies and applied theories</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Semantics and pragmatics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crawford, William J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of English linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crawford, William J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Verb Agreement and Disagreement: A Corpus Investigation of Concord Variation in Existential There + Be Constructions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of English linguistics</jtitle><date>2005-03</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>35-61</pages><issn>0075-4242</issn><eissn>1552-5457</eissn><coden>JENLAN</coden><abstract>This multiregister corpus study investigates the social factors affecting concord variation found in existential there + be (ETB) constructions in present-day American English. The study questions previous work in this area, which suggests that a lack of concord is reflective of informal, conversational situations of use. The five registers analyzed (conversation, academic lectures, academic writing, fiction, and chat language) showed that the two spoken registers resulted in the greatest number of variation in agreement. A comparison of the linguistic contexts of ETBs in the two spoken registers finds both similarities and differences of function across two spoken registers. The article concludes by adopting the position that the contracted ETB construction is an unanalyzed chunk or formulaic sequence of language.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0075424204274001</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0075-4242 |
ispartof | Journal of English linguistics, 2005-03, Vol.33 (1), p.35-61 |
issn | 0075-4242 1552-5457 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85629930 |
source | SAGE Complete |
subjects | Descriptive studies and applied theories Linguistics Semantics and pragmatics |
title | Verb Agreement and Disagreement: A Corpus Investigation of Concord Variation in Existential There + Be Constructions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T10%3A25%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Verb%20Agreement%20and%20Disagreement:%20A%20Corpus%20Investigation%20of%20Concord%20Variation%20in%20Existential%20There%20+%20Be%20Constructions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20English%20linguistics&rft.au=Crawford,%20William%20J.&rft.date=2005-03&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=35-61&rft.issn=0075-4242&rft.eissn=1552-5457&rft.coden=JENLAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0075424204274001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85629930%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85629930&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0075424204274001&rfr_iscdi=true |