The Effect of Relevance Instructions on Reading Time and Learning

The authors examined the effect of prereading relevance instructions on reading time and learning for 2 types of text. Experiment 1 found that relevance instructions increased learning for relevant segments without increasing reading time when reading a scientific text sentence by sentence on a comp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of educational psychology 2005-02, Vol.97 (1), p.88-102
Hauptverfasser: McCrudden, Matthew T, Schraw, Gregory, Kambe, Gretchen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102
container_issue 1
container_start_page 88
container_title Journal of educational psychology
container_volume 97
creator McCrudden, Matthew T
Schraw, Gregory
Kambe, Gretchen
description The authors examined the effect of prereading relevance instructions on reading time and learning for 2 types of text. Experiment 1 found that relevance instructions increased learning for relevant segments without increasing reading time when reading a scientific text sentence by sentence on a computer. In contrast, the same segments were learned less well and took longer to read when nonrelevant. Experiment 2 replicated the findings when individuals read an informational narrative text. These findings supported the no increased effort hypothesis, which states that relevant information is learned better without additional effort when readers are told what is relevant prior to reading. In contrast, nonrelevant information is learned less well. The authors attribute these effects to the goal-focusing nature of relevance instructions.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.88
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85615631</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ688040</ericid><sourcerecordid>614400066</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-bd15db5cf70f30808e7aa0cf035a69d0dc90064ac6a3c7853353bbee8534e05a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1rGzEQhkVpoG7SH1DoYWlpbuuMrJVWOprgfGEIBPcsxtpRu2atdaXdQP59tTi4kENO-nifeWfmZewrhzkHUV8BLBYlKCXmpp7zudYf2IwbYcoFr9VHNjvpn9jnlHYAIPJjxpabP1SsvCc3FL0vnqijZwyOivuQhji6oe1DKvqQFWza8LvYtHsqMDTFmjCG_HPBzjx2ib68nufs181qc31Xrh9v76-X6xKrWg7ltuGy2Urna_ACNGiqEcF5EBKVaaBxBkBV6BQKV2sphBTbLVG-VQQSxTm7PPoeYv93pDTYfZscdR0G6sdktVRcKsEz-P0NuOvHGPJsVvGqyqvnzd-BFhyMyVaQIX6EXOxTiuTtIbZ7jC-Wg51it1OsdvKzprbcap1rfr4aY3LY-ZjTbNP_QqXACD0N8O3IUWzdSV49KK2hmlr_OMp4QHtILw7j0LqOkqVmPDX7BzmNlQE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614400066</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Relevance Instructions on Reading Time and Learning</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>McCrudden, Matthew T ; Schraw, Gregory ; Kambe, Gretchen</creator><creatorcontrib>McCrudden, Matthew T ; Schraw, Gregory ; Kambe, Gretchen</creatorcontrib><description>The authors examined the effect of prereading relevance instructions on reading time and learning for 2 types of text. Experiment 1 found that relevance instructions increased learning for relevant segments without increasing reading time when reading a scientific text sentence by sentence on a computer. In contrast, the same segments were learned less well and took longer to read when nonrelevant. Experiment 2 replicated the findings when individuals read an informational narrative text. These findings supported the no increased effort hypothesis, which states that relevant information is learned better without additional effort when readers are told what is relevant prior to reading. In contrast, nonrelevant information is learned less well. The authors attribute these effects to the goal-focusing nature of relevance instructions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0663</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2176</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.88</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLEPA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Computer Assisted Testing ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Language ; Learning ; Performance Factors ; Production and perception of written language ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reading ; Reading Comprehension ; Reading instruction ; Reading Rate ; Recall (Psychology) ; Scientific Literacy ; Teaching ; Testing ; Text Structure ; Time</subject><ispartof>Journal of educational psychology, 2005-02, Vol.97 (1), p.88-102</ispartof><rights>2005 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Feb 2005</rights><rights>2005, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-bd15db5cf70f30808e7aa0cf035a69d0dc90064ac6a3c7853353bbee8534e05a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-bd15db5cf70f30808e7aa0cf035a69d0dc90064ac6a3c7853353bbee8534e05a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ688040$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16609386$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCrudden, Matthew T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schraw, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kambe, Gretchen</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Relevance Instructions on Reading Time and Learning</title><title>Journal of educational psychology</title><description>The authors examined the effect of prereading relevance instructions on reading time and learning for 2 types of text. Experiment 1 found that relevance instructions increased learning for relevant segments without increasing reading time when reading a scientific text sentence by sentence on a computer. In contrast, the same segments were learned less well and took longer to read when nonrelevant. Experiment 2 replicated the findings when individuals read an informational narrative text. These findings supported the no increased effort hypothesis, which states that relevant information is learned better without additional effort when readers are told what is relevant prior to reading. In contrast, nonrelevant information is learned less well. The authors attribute these effects to the goal-focusing nature of relevance instructions.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Computer Assisted Testing</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Performance Factors</subject><subject>Production and perception of written language</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Reading instruction</subject><subject>Reading Rate</subject><subject>Recall (Psychology)</subject><subject>Scientific Literacy</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Text Structure</subject><subject>Time</subject><issn>0022-0663</issn><issn>1939-2176</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1rGzEQhkVpoG7SH1DoYWlpbuuMrJVWOprgfGEIBPcsxtpRu2atdaXdQP59tTi4kENO-nifeWfmZewrhzkHUV8BLBYlKCXmpp7zudYf2IwbYcoFr9VHNjvpn9jnlHYAIPJjxpabP1SsvCc3FL0vnqijZwyOivuQhji6oe1DKvqQFWza8LvYtHsqMDTFmjCG_HPBzjx2ib68nufs181qc31Xrh9v76-X6xKrWg7ltuGy2Urna_ACNGiqEcF5EBKVaaBxBkBV6BQKV2sphBTbLVG-VQQSxTm7PPoeYv93pDTYfZscdR0G6sdktVRcKsEz-P0NuOvHGPJsVvGqyqvnzd-BFhyMyVaQIX6EXOxTiuTtIbZ7jC-Wg51it1OsdvKzprbcap1rfr4aY3LY-ZjTbNP_QqXACD0N8O3IUWzdSV49KK2hmlr_OMp4QHtILw7j0LqOkqVmPDX7BzmNlQE</recordid><startdate>20050201</startdate><enddate>20050201</enddate><creator>McCrudden, Matthew T</creator><creator>Schraw, Gregory</creator><creator>Kambe, Gretchen</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050201</creationdate><title>The Effect of Relevance Instructions on Reading Time and Learning</title><author>McCrudden, Matthew T ; Schraw, Gregory ; Kambe, Gretchen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-bd15db5cf70f30808e7aa0cf035a69d0dc90064ac6a3c7853353bbee8534e05a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Computer Assisted Testing</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Performance Factors</topic><topic>Production and perception of written language</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Reading instruction</topic><topic>Reading Rate</topic><topic>Recall (Psychology)</topic><topic>Scientific Literacy</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Text Structure</topic><topic>Time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCrudden, Matthew T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schraw, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kambe, Gretchen</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycARTICLES (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCrudden, Matthew T</au><au>Schraw, Gregory</au><au>Kambe, Gretchen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ688040</ericid><atitle>The Effect of Relevance Instructions on Reading Time and Learning</atitle><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle><date>2005-02-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>88</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>88-102</pages><issn>0022-0663</issn><eissn>1939-2176</eissn><coden>JLEPA5</coden><abstract>The authors examined the effect of prereading relevance instructions on reading time and learning for 2 types of text. Experiment 1 found that relevance instructions increased learning for relevant segments without increasing reading time when reading a scientific text sentence by sentence on a computer. In contrast, the same segments were learned less well and took longer to read when nonrelevant. Experiment 2 replicated the findings when individuals read an informational narrative text. These findings supported the no increased effort hypothesis, which states that relevant information is learned better without additional effort when readers are told what is relevant prior to reading. In contrast, nonrelevant information is learned less well. The authors attribute these effects to the goal-focusing nature of relevance instructions.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.88</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0663
ispartof Journal of educational psychology, 2005-02, Vol.97 (1), p.88-102
issn 0022-0663
1939-2176
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85615631
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Computer Assisted Testing
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Instructional Effectiveness
Language
Learning
Performance Factors
Production and perception of written language
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reading
Reading Comprehension
Reading instruction
Reading Rate
Recall (Psychology)
Scientific Literacy
Teaching
Testing
Text Structure
Time
title The Effect of Relevance Instructions on Reading Time and Learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T17%3A33%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Relevance%20Instructions%20on%20Reading%20Time%20and%20Learning&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=McCrudden,%20Matthew%20T&rft.date=2005-02-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=88&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=88-102&rft.issn=0022-0663&rft.eissn=1939-2176&rft.coden=JLEPA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.88&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614400066%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614400066&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ688040&rfr_iscdi=true