The Effect of Relevance Instructions on Reading Time and Learning
The authors examined the effect of prereading relevance instructions on reading time and learning for 2 types of text. Experiment 1 found that relevance instructions increased learning for relevant segments without increasing reading time when reading a scientific text sentence by sentence on a comp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of educational psychology 2005-02, Vol.97 (1), p.88-102 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 102 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 88 |
container_title | Journal of educational psychology |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | McCrudden, Matthew T Schraw, Gregory Kambe, Gretchen |
description | The authors examined the effect of prereading relevance instructions on reading time and learning for 2 types of text. Experiment 1 found that relevance instructions increased learning for relevant segments without increasing reading time when reading a scientific text sentence by sentence on a computer. In contrast, the same segments were learned less well and took longer to read when nonrelevant. Experiment 2 replicated the findings when individuals read an informational narrative text. These findings supported the no increased effort hypothesis, which states that relevant information is learned better without additional effort when readers are told what is relevant prior to reading. In contrast, nonrelevant information is learned less well. The authors attribute these effects to the goal-focusing nature of relevance instructions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.88 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85615631</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ688040</ericid><sourcerecordid>614400066</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-bd15db5cf70f30808e7aa0cf035a69d0dc90064ac6a3c7853353bbee8534e05a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1rGzEQhkVpoG7SH1DoYWlpbuuMrJVWOprgfGEIBPcsxtpRu2atdaXdQP59tTi4kENO-nifeWfmZewrhzkHUV8BLBYlKCXmpp7zudYf2IwbYcoFr9VHNjvpn9jnlHYAIPJjxpabP1SsvCc3FL0vnqijZwyOivuQhji6oe1DKvqQFWza8LvYtHsqMDTFmjCG_HPBzjx2ib68nufs181qc31Xrh9v76-X6xKrWg7ltuGy2Urna_ACNGiqEcF5EBKVaaBxBkBV6BQKV2sphBTbLVG-VQQSxTm7PPoeYv93pDTYfZscdR0G6sdktVRcKsEz-P0NuOvHGPJsVvGqyqvnzd-BFhyMyVaQIX6EXOxTiuTtIbZ7jC-Wg51it1OsdvKzprbcap1rfr4aY3LY-ZjTbNP_QqXACD0N8O3IUWzdSV49KK2hmlr_OMp4QHtILw7j0LqOkqVmPDX7BzmNlQE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614400066</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Relevance Instructions on Reading Time and Learning</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>McCrudden, Matthew T ; Schraw, Gregory ; Kambe, Gretchen</creator><creatorcontrib>McCrudden, Matthew T ; Schraw, Gregory ; Kambe, Gretchen</creatorcontrib><description>The authors examined the effect of prereading relevance instructions on reading time and learning for 2 types of text. Experiment 1 found that relevance instructions increased learning for relevant segments without increasing reading time when reading a scientific text sentence by sentence on a computer. In contrast, the same segments were learned less well and took longer to read when nonrelevant. Experiment 2 replicated the findings when individuals read an informational narrative text. These findings supported the no increased effort hypothesis, which states that relevant information is learned better without additional effort when readers are told what is relevant prior to reading. In contrast, nonrelevant information is learned less well. The authors attribute these effects to the goal-focusing nature of relevance instructions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0663</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2176</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.88</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLEPA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Computer Assisted Testing ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Language ; Learning ; Performance Factors ; Production and perception of written language ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reading ; Reading Comprehension ; Reading instruction ; Reading Rate ; Recall (Psychology) ; Scientific Literacy ; Teaching ; Testing ; Text Structure ; Time</subject><ispartof>Journal of educational psychology, 2005-02, Vol.97 (1), p.88-102</ispartof><rights>2005 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Feb 2005</rights><rights>2005, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-bd15db5cf70f30808e7aa0cf035a69d0dc90064ac6a3c7853353bbee8534e05a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-bd15db5cf70f30808e7aa0cf035a69d0dc90064ac6a3c7853353bbee8534e05a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ688040$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16609386$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCrudden, Matthew T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schraw, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kambe, Gretchen</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Relevance Instructions on Reading Time and Learning</title><title>Journal of educational psychology</title><description>The authors examined the effect of prereading relevance instructions on reading time and learning for 2 types of text. Experiment 1 found that relevance instructions increased learning for relevant segments without increasing reading time when reading a scientific text sentence by sentence on a computer. In contrast, the same segments were learned less well and took longer to read when nonrelevant. Experiment 2 replicated the findings when individuals read an informational narrative text. These findings supported the no increased effort hypothesis, which states that relevant information is learned better without additional effort when readers are told what is relevant prior to reading. In contrast, nonrelevant information is learned less well. The authors attribute these effects to the goal-focusing nature of relevance instructions.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Computer Assisted Testing</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Performance Factors</subject><subject>Production and perception of written language</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Reading instruction</subject><subject>Reading Rate</subject><subject>Recall (Psychology)</subject><subject>Scientific Literacy</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Text Structure</subject><subject>Time</subject><issn>0022-0663</issn><issn>1939-2176</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1rGzEQhkVpoG7SH1DoYWlpbuuMrJVWOprgfGEIBPcsxtpRu2atdaXdQP59tTi4kENO-nifeWfmZewrhzkHUV8BLBYlKCXmpp7zudYf2IwbYcoFr9VHNjvpn9jnlHYAIPJjxpabP1SsvCc3FL0vnqijZwyOivuQhji6oe1DKvqQFWza8LvYtHsqMDTFmjCG_HPBzjx2ib68nufs181qc31Xrh9v76-X6xKrWg7ltuGy2Urna_ACNGiqEcF5EBKVaaBxBkBV6BQKV2sphBTbLVG-VQQSxTm7PPoeYv93pDTYfZscdR0G6sdktVRcKsEz-P0NuOvHGPJsVvGqyqvnzd-BFhyMyVaQIX6EXOxTiuTtIbZ7jC-Wg51it1OsdvKzprbcap1rfr4aY3LY-ZjTbNP_QqXACD0N8O3IUWzdSV49KK2hmlr_OMp4QHtILw7j0LqOkqVmPDX7BzmNlQE</recordid><startdate>20050201</startdate><enddate>20050201</enddate><creator>McCrudden, Matthew T</creator><creator>Schraw, Gregory</creator><creator>Kambe, Gretchen</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050201</creationdate><title>The Effect of Relevance Instructions on Reading Time and Learning</title><author>McCrudden, Matthew T ; Schraw, Gregory ; Kambe, Gretchen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-bd15db5cf70f30808e7aa0cf035a69d0dc90064ac6a3c7853353bbee8534e05a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Computer Assisted Testing</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Performance Factors</topic><topic>Production and perception of written language</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Reading instruction</topic><topic>Reading Rate</topic><topic>Recall (Psychology)</topic><topic>Scientific Literacy</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Text Structure</topic><topic>Time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCrudden, Matthew T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schraw, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kambe, Gretchen</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycARTICLES (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCrudden, Matthew T</au><au>Schraw, Gregory</au><au>Kambe, Gretchen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ688040</ericid><atitle>The Effect of Relevance Instructions on Reading Time and Learning</atitle><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle><date>2005-02-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>88</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>88-102</pages><issn>0022-0663</issn><eissn>1939-2176</eissn><coden>JLEPA5</coden><abstract>The authors examined the effect of prereading relevance instructions on reading time and learning for 2 types of text. Experiment 1 found that relevance instructions increased learning for relevant segments without increasing reading time when reading a scientific text sentence by sentence on a computer. In contrast, the same segments were learned less well and took longer to read when nonrelevant. Experiment 2 replicated the findings when individuals read an informational narrative text. These findings supported the no increased effort hypothesis, which states that relevant information is learned better without additional effort when readers are told what is relevant prior to reading. In contrast, nonrelevant information is learned less well. The authors attribute these effects to the goal-focusing nature of relevance instructions.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.88</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0663 |
ispartof | Journal of educational psychology, 2005-02, Vol.97 (1), p.88-102 |
issn | 0022-0663 1939-2176 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85615631 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Computer Assisted Testing Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Instructional Effectiveness Language Learning Performance Factors Production and perception of written language Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reading Reading Comprehension Reading instruction Reading Rate Recall (Psychology) Scientific Literacy Teaching Testing Text Structure Time |
title | The Effect of Relevance Instructions on Reading Time and Learning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T17%3A33%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Relevance%20Instructions%20on%20Reading%20Time%20and%20Learning&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=McCrudden,%20Matthew%20T&rft.date=2005-02-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=88&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=88-102&rft.issn=0022-0663&rft.eissn=1939-2176&rft.coden=JLEPA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.88&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614400066%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614400066&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ688040&rfr_iscdi=true |