Validity and reliability of the 'good perioperative nursing care scale' for Turkish patients and nurses
Aim. To test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Good Perioperative Nursing Care Scale for nurses and patients. Background. The nursing care in operating departments has an important role in modern health care and therefore more research concerning perioperative care quality is...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical nursing 2011-01, Vol.20 (1-2), p.166-174 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 174 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1-2 |
| container_start_page | 166 |
| container_title | Journal of clinical nursing |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Donmez, Yelda Candan Ozbayır, Turkan |
| description | Aim. To test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Good Perioperative Nursing Care Scale for nurses and patients.
Background. The nursing care in operating departments has an important role in modern health care and therefore more research concerning perioperative care quality is needed and the development of a measurement tool is necessary.
Design. The study was designed as a cross‐sectional survey.
Method. The research population was 346 patients who had surgery and 159 operating room nurses who worked at 11 hospitals. The GPNCS contains 32 items. The items on the nurses’ form were changed as little as possible to create the form for patients to be able to directly compare them. To determine the tool’s language equivalency/adaptation of the questionnaire for both nurses and patients, the tool was translated into Turkish then retranslated, and a pilot study was conducted.
Results. The total scale’s total mean score and standard deviation for nurses was determined to be 113·23 (SD 2·13) and for patients was 128·23 (SD 1·27). To test the scale’s stability over time, a test‐retest was conducted and the results showed a strong confirmatory correlation.
Conclusions. The GPNCS was determined to be a tool that had indicators of being adequate, reliable and valid for the Turkish population.
Relevance to clinical practice. This study highlighted the importance of comparing the quality and effectiveness of nursing care in different operating departments. It is recommended that it be used to determine the quality of perioperative nursing care in Turkey. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03314.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_856047679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2233789791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4664-ab52cc7043853959854523fa5b9c0d6a98d1b0a59bd4fa81953891e2b5e3a5a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v0zAYhy0EYmXwFZDFpacU_499QULVGKBpQzBgN8tJ3nTu0rjYCbTfHmcdPXABH17br5_3kawfQpiSBc3r9XpBuZIFKwlbMJK7hHMqFrtHaHZ8eIxmxChWUKLKE_QspTUhlDPGn6ITRokghLMZWn1znW_8sMeub3CEzrvKd9M9tHi4BTxfhdDgLUQfcnGD_wm4H2Py_QrXLgJOtetgjtsQ8fUY73y6xduMQT-ke-cEQ3qOnrSuS_DiYT9FX9-dXS_fFxdX5x-Wby-KWiglCldJVtclEVxLbqTRUkjGWycrU5NGOaMbWhEnTdWI1mlqJNeGAqskcCed5KdofvBuY_gxQhrsxqcaus71EMZktVRElKo0_yapVoIRzTL56i9yHcbY529YzZhhshQ6Q_oA1TGkFKG12-g3Lu4tJXYKza7tlI2dsrFTaPY-NLvLoy8f_GO1geY4-CelDLw5AL98B_v_FtuPV8vL6ZgFxUHg0wC7o8DFO6tKXkr7_fLcflI3Xwz5fJNtvwEJQ7O0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>822925748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity and reliability of the 'good perioperative nursing care scale' for Turkish patients and nurses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Donmez, Yelda Candan ; Ozbayır, Turkan</creator><creatorcontrib>Donmez, Yelda Candan ; Ozbayır, Turkan</creatorcontrib><description>Aim. To test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Good Perioperative Nursing Care Scale for nurses and patients.
Background. The nursing care in operating departments has an important role in modern health care and therefore more research concerning perioperative care quality is needed and the development of a measurement tool is necessary.
Design. The study was designed as a cross‐sectional survey.
Method. The research population was 346 patients who had surgery and 159 operating room nurses who worked at 11 hospitals. The GPNCS contains 32 items. The items on the nurses’ form were changed as little as possible to create the form for patients to be able to directly compare them. To determine the tool’s language equivalency/adaptation of the questionnaire for both nurses and patients, the tool was translated into Turkish then retranslated, and a pilot study was conducted.
Results. The total scale’s total mean score and standard deviation for nurses was determined to be 113·23 (SD 2·13) and for patients was 128·23 (SD 1·27). To test the scale’s stability over time, a test‐retest was conducted and the results showed a strong confirmatory correlation.
Conclusions. The GPNCS was determined to be a tool that had indicators of being adequate, reliable and valid for the Turkish population.
Relevance to clinical practice. This study highlighted the importance of comparing the quality and effectiveness of nursing care in different operating departments. It is recommended that it be used to determine the quality of perioperative nursing care in Turkey.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-1067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2702</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03314.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21040032</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Humans ; Nursing ; Nursing care ; Operating Rooms - manpower ; Performance evaluation ; perioperative care scale ; Perioperative Nursing ; Polls & surveys ; quality ; Quality of care ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; Standard deviation ; Studies ; Turkey ; Turkish ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical nursing, 2011-01, Vol.20 (1-2), p.166-174</ispartof><rights>2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Jan 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4664-ab52cc7043853959854523fa5b9c0d6a98d1b0a59bd4fa81953891e2b5e3a5a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4664-ab52cc7043853959854523fa5b9c0d6a98d1b0a59bd4fa81953891e2b5e3a5a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2702.2010.03314.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2702.2010.03314.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21040032$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Donmez, Yelda Candan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozbayır, Turkan</creatorcontrib><title>Validity and reliability of the 'good perioperative nursing care scale' for Turkish patients and nurses</title><title>Journal of clinical nursing</title><addtitle>J Clin Nurs</addtitle><description>Aim. To test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Good Perioperative Nursing Care Scale for nurses and patients.
Background. The nursing care in operating departments has an important role in modern health care and therefore more research concerning perioperative care quality is needed and the development of a measurement tool is necessary.
Design. The study was designed as a cross‐sectional survey.
Method. The research population was 346 patients who had surgery and 159 operating room nurses who worked at 11 hospitals. The GPNCS contains 32 items. The items on the nurses’ form were changed as little as possible to create the form for patients to be able to directly compare them. To determine the tool’s language equivalency/adaptation of the questionnaire for both nurses and patients, the tool was translated into Turkish then retranslated, and a pilot study was conducted.
Results. The total scale’s total mean score and standard deviation for nurses was determined to be 113·23 (SD 2·13) and for patients was 128·23 (SD 1·27). To test the scale’s stability over time, a test‐retest was conducted and the results showed a strong confirmatory correlation.
Conclusions. The GPNCS was determined to be a tool that had indicators of being adequate, reliable and valid for the Turkish population.
Relevance to clinical practice. This study highlighted the importance of comparing the quality and effectiveness of nursing care in different operating departments. It is recommended that it be used to determine the quality of perioperative nursing care in Turkey.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Operating Rooms - manpower</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>perioperative care scale</subject><subject>Perioperative Nursing</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>quality</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>Turkish</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0962-1067</issn><issn>1365-2702</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9v0zAYhy0EYmXwFZDFpacU_499QULVGKBpQzBgN8tJ3nTu0rjYCbTfHmcdPXABH17br5_3kawfQpiSBc3r9XpBuZIFKwlbMJK7hHMqFrtHaHZ8eIxmxChWUKLKE_QspTUhlDPGn6ITRokghLMZWn1znW_8sMeub3CEzrvKd9M9tHi4BTxfhdDgLUQfcnGD_wm4H2Py_QrXLgJOtetgjtsQ8fUY73y6xduMQT-ke-cEQ3qOnrSuS_DiYT9FX9-dXS_fFxdX5x-Wby-KWiglCldJVtclEVxLbqTRUkjGWycrU5NGOaMbWhEnTdWI1mlqJNeGAqskcCed5KdofvBuY_gxQhrsxqcaus71EMZktVRElKo0_yapVoIRzTL56i9yHcbY529YzZhhshQ6Q_oA1TGkFKG12-g3Lu4tJXYKza7tlI2dsrFTaPY-NLvLoy8f_GO1geY4-CelDLw5AL98B_v_FtuPV8vL6ZgFxUHg0wC7o8DFO6tKXkr7_fLcflI3Xwz5fJNtvwEJQ7O0</recordid><startdate>201101</startdate><enddate>201101</enddate><creator>Donmez, Yelda Candan</creator><creator>Ozbayır, Turkan</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201101</creationdate><title>Validity and reliability of the 'good perioperative nursing care scale' for Turkish patients and nurses</title><author>Donmez, Yelda Candan ; Ozbayır, Turkan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4664-ab52cc7043853959854523fa5b9c0d6a98d1b0a59bd4fa81953891e2b5e3a5a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Operating Rooms - manpower</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>perioperative care scale</topic><topic>Perioperative Nursing</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>quality</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>Turkish</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Donmez, Yelda Candan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozbayır, Turkan</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Donmez, Yelda Candan</au><au>Ozbayır, Turkan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity and reliability of the 'good perioperative nursing care scale' for Turkish patients and nurses</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Nurs</addtitle><date>2011-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>166</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>166-174</pages><issn>0962-1067</issn><eissn>1365-2702</eissn><abstract>Aim. To test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Good Perioperative Nursing Care Scale for nurses and patients.
Background. The nursing care in operating departments has an important role in modern health care and therefore more research concerning perioperative care quality is needed and the development of a measurement tool is necessary.
Design. The study was designed as a cross‐sectional survey.
Method. The research population was 346 patients who had surgery and 159 operating room nurses who worked at 11 hospitals. The GPNCS contains 32 items. The items on the nurses’ form were changed as little as possible to create the form for patients to be able to directly compare them. To determine the tool’s language equivalency/adaptation of the questionnaire for both nurses and patients, the tool was translated into Turkish then retranslated, and a pilot study was conducted.
Results. The total scale’s total mean score and standard deviation for nurses was determined to be 113·23 (SD 2·13) and for patients was 128·23 (SD 1·27). To test the scale’s stability over time, a test‐retest was conducted and the results showed a strong confirmatory correlation.
Conclusions. The GPNCS was determined to be a tool that had indicators of being adequate, reliable and valid for the Turkish population.
Relevance to clinical practice. This study highlighted the importance of comparing the quality and effectiveness of nursing care in different operating departments. It is recommended that it be used to determine the quality of perioperative nursing care in Turkey.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21040032</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03314.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0962-1067 |
| ispartof | Journal of clinical nursing, 2011-01, Vol.20 (1-2), p.166-174 |
| issn | 0962-1067 1365-2702 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_856047679 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Humans Nursing Nursing care Operating Rooms - manpower Performance evaluation perioperative care scale Perioperative Nursing Polls & surveys quality Quality of care Questionnaires Reliability Standard deviation Studies Turkey Turkish Validity |
| title | Validity and reliability of the 'good perioperative nursing care scale' for Turkish patients and nurses |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T01%3A45%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20and%20reliability%20of%20the%20'good%20perioperative%20nursing%20care%20scale'%20for%20Turkish%20patients%20and%20nurses&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20nursing&rft.au=Donmez,%20Yelda%20Candan&rft.date=2011-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=166&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=166-174&rft.issn=0962-1067&rft.eissn=1365-2702&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03314.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2233789791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=822925748&rft_id=info:pmid/21040032&rfr_iscdi=true |