Limitations of the dual-process-theory regarding the writing of words and non-words to dictation
It is generally assumed that the lexical and phonological systems are involved in writing to dictation. In an experiment concerned with the writing of words and non-words to dictation, the handwriting of female students was registered using a digitising tablet. The data contradict the assumption tha...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Brain and language 2004-12, Vol.91 (3), p.267-273 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 273 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 267 |
| container_title | Brain and language |
| container_volume | 91 |
| creator | Tucha, Oliver Trumpp, Christian Lange, Klaus W. |
| description | It is generally assumed that the lexical and phonological systems are involved in writing to dictation. In an experiment concerned with the writing of words and non-words to dictation, the handwriting of female students was registered using a digitising tablet. The data contradict the assumption that the phonological system represents an alexical process. Both words and non-words which were acoustically presented to the subjects were lexically parsed. The analysis of kinematic data revealed significant differences between the subjects’ writing of words and non-words. The findings reveal gross disturbances of handwriting fluency during the writing of non-words. The findings of the experiment cannot be explained by the dual-process-theory. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.03.003 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85604382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ730905</ericid><els_id>S0093934X04000537</els_id><sourcerecordid>67060296</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a460t-16ec634597f6d53d809059d05ea814055630dfd3afe379aac9cd0ab2e70976763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtP3DAUha2qVRkov6BVlQ3sEq7j2IkXXVSIp0ZiA1J3xmPfTD3KxNTOFPHv60yisoOVH-e7x9f3EPKVQkGBirNNsdK97YoSoCqAFQDsA1lQkJCXlPOPZAEgWS5Z9euAHMa4AaC0auhncpBkxjgvF-Rx6bZu0IPzfcx8mw2_MbM73eVPwRuMMU8XPrxkAdc6WNev98RzcMO4TwXPPtiYpUay3vf5dBp8Zp2ZXL-QT63uIh7P6xF5uLy4P7_Ol3dXN-c_l7muBAw5FWgEq7isW2E5s036BpcWOOqGVsC5YGBby3SLrJZaG2ks6FWJNcha1IIdkdPJNzX-Z4dxUFsXDXad7tHvomq4gIo15bugqEFAKUdHNoEm-BgDtuopuK0OL4qCGhNQG7VPQI0JKGAqJZCqvs_2u9UW7WvNPPIEnMyAjkZ3bdC9cfGVSx-lohqf_zZxGJz5L1_c1mwcTZJ_zHIa6l-HQUXjsDdoXUAzKOvdm33-AzTwrl0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67060296</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Limitations of the dual-process-theory regarding the writing of words and non-words to dictation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Tucha, Oliver ; Trumpp, Christian ; Lange, Klaus W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tucha, Oliver ; Trumpp, Christian ; Lange, Klaus W.</creatorcontrib><description>It is generally assumed that the lexical and phonological systems are involved in writing to dictation. In an experiment concerned with the writing of words and non-words to dictation, the handwriting of female students was registered using a digitising tablet. The data contradict the assumption that the phonological system represents an alexical process. Both words and non-words which were acoustically presented to the subjects were lexically parsed. The analysis of kinematic data revealed significant differences between the subjects’ writing of words and non-words. The findings reveal gross disturbances of handwriting fluency during the writing of non-words. The findings of the experiment cannot be explained by the dual-process-theory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-934X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2155</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.03.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15533552</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRLGAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Brain - physiology ; Connectionistic models ; Digitising tablet ; Dual-process-theory ; Female ; Females ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Handwriting ; Humans ; Interactive models ; Language ; Language Processing ; Modularity hypothesis ; Production and perception of written language ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Semantics ; Speech Perception - physiology ; Students ; Verbal Communication ; Writing to dictation</subject><ispartof>Brain and language, 2004-12, Vol.91 (3), p.267-273</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a460t-16ec634597f6d53d809059d05ea814055630dfd3afe379aac9cd0ab2e70976763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a460t-16ec634597f6d53d809059d05ea814055630dfd3afe379aac9cd0ab2e70976763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.03.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ730905$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16301646$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15533552$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tucha, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trumpp, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lange, Klaus W.</creatorcontrib><title>Limitations of the dual-process-theory regarding the writing of words and non-words to dictation</title><title>Brain and language</title><addtitle>Brain Lang</addtitle><description>It is generally assumed that the lexical and phonological systems are involved in writing to dictation. In an experiment concerned with the writing of words and non-words to dictation, the handwriting of female students was registered using a digitising tablet. The data contradict the assumption that the phonological system represents an alexical process. Both words and non-words which were acoustically presented to the subjects were lexically parsed. The analysis of kinematic data revealed significant differences between the subjects’ writing of words and non-words. The findings reveal gross disturbances of handwriting fluency during the writing of non-words. The findings of the experiment cannot be explained by the dual-process-theory.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Connectionistic models</subject><subject>Digitising tablet</subject><subject>Dual-process-theory</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Handwriting</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interactive models</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Processing</subject><subject>Modularity hypothesis</subject><subject>Production and perception of written language</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Speech Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Verbal Communication</subject><subject>Writing to dictation</subject><issn>0093-934X</issn><issn>1090-2155</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtP3DAUha2qVRkov6BVlQ3sEq7j2IkXXVSIp0ZiA1J3xmPfTD3KxNTOFPHv60yisoOVH-e7x9f3EPKVQkGBirNNsdK97YoSoCqAFQDsA1lQkJCXlPOPZAEgWS5Z9euAHMa4AaC0auhncpBkxjgvF-Rx6bZu0IPzfcx8mw2_MbM73eVPwRuMMU8XPrxkAdc6WNev98RzcMO4TwXPPtiYpUay3vf5dBp8Zp2ZXL-QT63uIh7P6xF5uLy4P7_Ol3dXN-c_l7muBAw5FWgEq7isW2E5s036BpcWOOqGVsC5YGBby3SLrJZaG2ks6FWJNcha1IIdkdPJNzX-Z4dxUFsXDXad7tHvomq4gIo15bugqEFAKUdHNoEm-BgDtuopuK0OL4qCGhNQG7VPQI0JKGAqJZCqvs_2u9UW7WvNPPIEnMyAjkZ3bdC9cfGVSx-lohqf_zZxGJz5L1_c1mwcTZJ_zHIa6l-HQUXjsDdoXUAzKOvdm33-AzTwrl0</recordid><startdate>20041201</startdate><enddate>20041201</enddate><creator>Tucha, Oliver</creator><creator>Trumpp, Christian</creator><creator>Lange, Klaus W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041201</creationdate><title>Limitations of the dual-process-theory regarding the writing of words and non-words to dictation</title><author>Tucha, Oliver ; Trumpp, Christian ; Lange, Klaus W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a460t-16ec634597f6d53d809059d05ea814055630dfd3afe379aac9cd0ab2e70976763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Connectionistic models</topic><topic>Digitising tablet</topic><topic>Dual-process-theory</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Handwriting</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interactive models</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Processing</topic><topic>Modularity hypothesis</topic><topic>Production and perception of written language</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Speech Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Verbal Communication</topic><topic>Writing to dictation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tucha, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trumpp, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lange, Klaus W.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Brain and language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tucha, Oliver</au><au>Trumpp, Christian</au><au>Lange, Klaus W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ730905</ericid><atitle>Limitations of the dual-process-theory regarding the writing of words and non-words to dictation</atitle><jtitle>Brain and language</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Lang</addtitle><date>2004-12-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>267</spage><epage>273</epage><pages>267-273</pages><issn>0093-934X</issn><eissn>1090-2155</eissn><coden>BRLGAZ</coden><abstract>It is generally assumed that the lexical and phonological systems are involved in writing to dictation. In an experiment concerned with the writing of words and non-words to dictation, the handwriting of female students was registered using a digitising tablet. The data contradict the assumption that the phonological system represents an alexical process. Both words and non-words which were acoustically presented to the subjects were lexically parsed. The analysis of kinematic data revealed significant differences between the subjects’ writing of words and non-words. The findings reveal gross disturbances of handwriting fluency during the writing of non-words. The findings of the experiment cannot be explained by the dual-process-theory.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15533552</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bandl.2004.03.003</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0093-934X |
| ispartof | Brain and language, 2004-12, Vol.91 (3), p.267-273 |
| issn | 0093-934X 1090-2155 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85604382 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Biomechanical Phenomena Brain - physiology Connectionistic models Digitising tablet Dual-process-theory Female Females Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Handwriting Humans Interactive models Language Language Processing Modularity hypothesis Production and perception of written language Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychomotor Performance - physiology Semantics Speech Perception - physiology Students Verbal Communication Writing to dictation |
| title | Limitations of the dual-process-theory regarding the writing of words and non-words to dictation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A18%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Limitations%20of%20the%20dual-process-theory%20regarding%20the%20writing%20of%20words%20and%20non-words%20to%20dictation&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20language&rft.au=Tucha,%20Oliver&rft.date=2004-12-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=267&rft.epage=273&rft.pages=267-273&rft.issn=0093-934X&rft.eissn=1090-2155&rft.coden=BRLGAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.03.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67060296%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67060296&rft_id=info:pmid/15533552&rft_ericid=EJ730905&rft_els_id=S0093934X04000537&rfr_iscdi=true |