Brain activity during reading The effects of exposure duration and task

Brain activity during reading tasks was investigated using PET. The aim was to account for differences in the results of two previous studies [those of Petersen et al. (Science 1990; 249: 1041–4) and Howard et al. (Brain 1992; 115: 1769–82)] by systematically varying the type of reading task and the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brain (London, England : 1878) England : 1878), 1994-12, Vol.117 (6), p.1255-1269
Hauptverfasser: Price, C. J., Wise, R. J. S., Watson, J. D. G., Patterson, K., Howard, D., Frackowiak, R. S. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1269
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1255
container_title Brain (London, England : 1878)
container_volume 117
creator Price, C. J.
Wise, R. J. S.
Watson, J. D. G.
Patterson, K.
Howard, D.
Frackowiak, R. S. J.
description Brain activity during reading tasks was investigated using PET. The aim was to account for differences in the results of two previous studies [those of Petersen et al. (Science 1990; 249: 1041–4) and Howard et al. (Brain 1992; 115: 1769–82)] by systematically varying the type of reading task and the exposure duration of the word stimuli. Both variables strongly influenced patterns of brain activity. There were three types of task: (i) reading aloud; (ii) reading silently; and (Hi) lexical decision on visually presented words and pseudowords. Reading aloud and reading silently engaged the left middle and superior temporal regions, confirming the important role of these areas in visual word processing.The areas principally engaged during lexical decision were the left inferior and middle frontal cortices and the supplementary motor area; activity in these areas suggests that the subjects were using a phonological strategy to perform the task. There was also a significant effect of exposure duration, with activity being greater for short (150 ms) exposure durations than for long (1000 ms or 981 ms) exposure durations. We conclude that until we understand how subtle variations in experimental design influence brain activity during reading tasks, the association of specific processing functions with individual anatomical areas activated during reading is premature.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/brain/117.6.1255
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85604253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76941826</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-c518827a8fe43312725936176e2d4906858ad46196fa55a8069beac28764f1593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EKkvhzgUpQqi3bD22Z2wfaUVbpEpIUCTUi-VNbHC7myx2gtp_T8Ku9sCll5nD-96TZh5jb4EvgVt5uso-dacAeklLEIjP2AIU8VoA0nO24JxTbSzyl-xVKXecg5KCjtiRNoIjqQW7PJsTKt8M6U8aHqt2zKn7WeXg23nf_ApViDE0Q6n6WIWHbV_GHGbMD6mfjF1bDb7cv2Yvol-X8Ga_j9n3i08351f19ZfLz-cfr-sGgYZ5GiO0NzEoKUFogVYSaAqiVZaTQeNbRWApekRvONlV8I0wmlSEiT1mJ7vcbe5_j6EMbpNKE9Zr34V-LM4gcSVQPglqsgqMoCdBwQmEIJzA9_-Bd_2Yu-laBxYVaIV6gvgOanJfSg7RbXPa-PzogLu5MvevMjdV5sjNlU2Wd_vccbUJ7cGw72jSP-x1Xxq_jtl3TSoHTEqSVsyfqXdYKkN4OMg-3zvSUqO7-nHrzm6V-KpRuW_yLzTuq24</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195417457</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Brain activity during reading The effects of exposure duration and task</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><creator>Price, C. J. ; Wise, R. J. S. ; Watson, J. D. G. ; Patterson, K. ; Howard, D. ; Frackowiak, R. S. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Price, C. J. ; Wise, R. J. S. ; Watson, J. D. G. ; Patterson, K. ; Howard, D. ; Frackowiak, R. S. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Brain activity during reading tasks was investigated using PET. The aim was to account for differences in the results of two previous studies [those of Petersen et al. (Science 1990; 249: 1041–4) and Howard et al. (Brain 1992; 115: 1769–82)] by systematically varying the type of reading task and the exposure duration of the word stimuli. Both variables strongly influenced patterns of brain activity. There were three types of task: (i) reading aloud; (ii) reading silently; and (Hi) lexical decision on visually presented words and pseudowords. Reading aloud and reading silently engaged the left middle and superior temporal regions, confirming the important role of these areas in visual word processing.The areas principally engaged during lexical decision were the left inferior and middle frontal cortices and the supplementary motor area; activity in these areas suggests that the subjects were using a phonological strategy to perform the task. There was also a significant effect of exposure duration, with activity being greater for short (150 ms) exposure durations than for long (1000 ms or 981 ms) exposure durations. We conclude that until we understand how subtle variations in experimental design influence brain activity during reading tasks, the association of specific processing functions with individual anatomical areas activated during reading is premature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-8950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2156</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/brain/117.6.1255</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7820564</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRAIAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Brain - physiology ; exposure duration ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Language ; Male ; Mental Processes ; Middle Aged ; PET ; Production and perception of written language ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reading ; task ; Tomography, Emission-Computed</subject><ispartof>Brain (London, England : 1878), 1994-12, Vol.117 (6), p.1255-1269</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Dec 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-c518827a8fe43312725936176e2d4906858ad46196fa55a8069beac28764f1593</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3363929$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7820564$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Price, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, R. J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, J. D. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frackowiak, R. S. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Brain activity during reading The effects of exposure duration and task</title><title>Brain (London, England : 1878)</title><addtitle>Brain</addtitle><description>Brain activity during reading tasks was investigated using PET. The aim was to account for differences in the results of two previous studies [those of Petersen et al. (Science 1990; 249: 1041–4) and Howard et al. (Brain 1992; 115: 1769–82)] by systematically varying the type of reading task and the exposure duration of the word stimuli. Both variables strongly influenced patterns of brain activity. There were three types of task: (i) reading aloud; (ii) reading silently; and (Hi) lexical decision on visually presented words and pseudowords. Reading aloud and reading silently engaged the left middle and superior temporal regions, confirming the important role of these areas in visual word processing.The areas principally engaged during lexical decision were the left inferior and middle frontal cortices and the supplementary motor area; activity in these areas suggests that the subjects were using a phonological strategy to perform the task. There was also a significant effect of exposure duration, with activity being greater for short (150 ms) exposure durations than for long (1000 ms or 981 ms) exposure durations. We conclude that until we understand how subtle variations in experimental design influence brain activity during reading tasks, the association of specific processing functions with individual anatomical areas activated during reading is premature.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>exposure duration</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Processes</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>PET</subject><subject>Production and perception of written language</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>task</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed</subject><issn>0006-8950</issn><issn>1460-2156</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EKkvhzgUpQqi3bD22Z2wfaUVbpEpIUCTUi-VNbHC7myx2gtp_T8Ku9sCll5nD-96TZh5jb4EvgVt5uso-dacAeklLEIjP2AIU8VoA0nO24JxTbSzyl-xVKXecg5KCjtiRNoIjqQW7PJsTKt8M6U8aHqt2zKn7WeXg23nf_ApViDE0Q6n6WIWHbV_GHGbMD6mfjF1bDb7cv2Yvol-X8Ga_j9n3i08351f19ZfLz-cfr-sGgYZ5GiO0NzEoKUFogVYSaAqiVZaTQeNbRWApekRvONlV8I0wmlSEiT1mJ7vcbe5_j6EMbpNKE9Zr34V-LM4gcSVQPglqsgqMoCdBwQmEIJzA9_-Bd_2Yu-laBxYVaIV6gvgOanJfSg7RbXPa-PzogLu5MvevMjdV5sjNlU2Wd_vccbUJ7cGw72jSP-x1Xxq_jtl3TSoHTEqSVsyfqXdYKkN4OMg-3zvSUqO7-nHrzm6V-KpRuW_yLzTuq24</recordid><startdate>19941201</startdate><enddate>19941201</enddate><creator>Price, C. J.</creator><creator>Wise, R. J. S.</creator><creator>Watson, J. D. G.</creator><creator>Patterson, K.</creator><creator>Howard, D.</creator><creator>Frackowiak, R. S. J.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19941201</creationdate><title>Brain activity during reading The effects of exposure duration and task</title><author>Price, C. J. ; Wise, R. J. S. ; Watson, J. D. G. ; Patterson, K. ; Howard, D. ; Frackowiak, R. S. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-c518827a8fe43312725936176e2d4906858ad46196fa55a8069beac28764f1593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>exposure duration</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Processes</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>PET</topic><topic>Production and perception of written language</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>task</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Price, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, R. J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, J. D. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frackowiak, R. S. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Brain (London, England : 1878)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Price, C. J.</au><au>Wise, R. J. S.</au><au>Watson, J. D. G.</au><au>Patterson, K.</au><au>Howard, D.</au><au>Frackowiak, R. S. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Brain activity during reading The effects of exposure duration and task</atitle><jtitle>Brain (London, England : 1878)</jtitle><addtitle>Brain</addtitle><date>1994-12-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1255</spage><epage>1269</epage><pages>1255-1269</pages><issn>0006-8950</issn><eissn>1460-2156</eissn><coden>BRAIAK</coden><abstract>Brain activity during reading tasks was investigated using PET. The aim was to account for differences in the results of two previous studies [those of Petersen et al. (Science 1990; 249: 1041–4) and Howard et al. (Brain 1992; 115: 1769–82)] by systematically varying the type of reading task and the exposure duration of the word stimuli. Both variables strongly influenced patterns of brain activity. There were three types of task: (i) reading aloud; (ii) reading silently; and (Hi) lexical decision on visually presented words and pseudowords. Reading aloud and reading silently engaged the left middle and superior temporal regions, confirming the important role of these areas in visual word processing.The areas principally engaged during lexical decision were the left inferior and middle frontal cortices and the supplementary motor area; activity in these areas suggests that the subjects were using a phonological strategy to perform the task. There was also a significant effect of exposure duration, with activity being greater for short (150 ms) exposure durations than for long (1000 ms or 981 ms) exposure durations. We conclude that until we understand how subtle variations in experimental design influence brain activity during reading tasks, the association of specific processing functions with individual anatomical areas activated during reading is premature.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>7820564</pmid><doi>10.1093/brain/117.6.1255</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-8950
ispartof Brain (London, England : 1878), 1994-12, Vol.117 (6), p.1255-1269
issn 0006-8950
1460-2156
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85604253
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Brain - physiology
exposure duration
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Language
Male
Mental Processes
Middle Aged
PET
Production and perception of written language
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reading
task
Tomography, Emission-Computed
title Brain activity during reading The effects of exposure duration and task
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T06%3A11%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Brain%20activity%20during%20reading%20The%20effects%20of%20exposure%20duration%20and%20task&rft.jtitle=Brain%20(London,%20England%20:%201878)&rft.au=Price,%20C.%20J.&rft.date=1994-12-01&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1255&rft.epage=1269&rft.pages=1255-1269&rft.issn=0006-8950&rft.eissn=1460-2156&rft.coden=BRAIAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/brain/117.6.1255&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76941826%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195417457&rft_id=info:pmid/7820564&rfr_iscdi=true