Brain activity during reading The effects of exposure duration and task
Brain activity during reading tasks was investigated using PET. The aim was to account for differences in the results of two previous studies [those of Petersen et al. (Science 1990; 249: 1041–4) and Howard et al. (Brain 1992; 115: 1769–82)] by systematically varying the type of reading task and the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Brain (London, England : 1878) England : 1878), 1994-12, Vol.117 (6), p.1255-1269 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1269 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1255 |
container_title | Brain (London, England : 1878) |
container_volume | 117 |
creator | Price, C. J. Wise, R. J. S. Watson, J. D. G. Patterson, K. Howard, D. Frackowiak, R. S. J. |
description | Brain activity during reading tasks was investigated using PET. The aim was to account for differences in the results of two previous studies [those of Petersen et al. (Science 1990; 249: 1041–4) and Howard et al. (Brain 1992; 115: 1769–82)] by systematically varying the type of reading task and the exposure duration of the word stimuli. Both variables strongly influenced patterns of brain activity. There were three types of task: (i) reading aloud; (ii) reading silently; and (Hi) lexical decision on visually presented words and pseudowords. Reading aloud and reading silently engaged the left middle and superior temporal regions, confirming the important role of these areas in visual word processing.The areas principally engaged during lexical decision were the left inferior and middle frontal cortices and the supplementary motor area; activity in these areas suggests that the subjects were using a phonological strategy to perform the task. There was also a significant effect of exposure duration, with activity being greater for short (150 ms) exposure durations than for long (1000 ms or 981 ms) exposure durations. We conclude that until we understand how subtle variations in experimental design influence brain activity during reading tasks, the association of specific processing functions with individual anatomical areas activated during reading is premature. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/brain/117.6.1255 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85604253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76941826</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-c518827a8fe43312725936176e2d4906858ad46196fa55a8069beac28764f1593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EKkvhzgUpQqi3bD22Z2wfaUVbpEpIUCTUi-VNbHC7myx2gtp_T8Ku9sCll5nD-96TZh5jb4EvgVt5uso-dacAeklLEIjP2AIU8VoA0nO24JxTbSzyl-xVKXecg5KCjtiRNoIjqQW7PJsTKt8M6U8aHqt2zKn7WeXg23nf_ApViDE0Q6n6WIWHbV_GHGbMD6mfjF1bDb7cv2Yvol-X8Ga_j9n3i08351f19ZfLz-cfr-sGgYZ5GiO0NzEoKUFogVYSaAqiVZaTQeNbRWApekRvONlV8I0wmlSEiT1mJ7vcbe5_j6EMbpNKE9Zr34V-LM4gcSVQPglqsgqMoCdBwQmEIJzA9_-Bd_2Yu-laBxYVaIV6gvgOanJfSg7RbXPa-PzogLu5MvevMjdV5sjNlU2Wd_vccbUJ7cGw72jSP-x1Xxq_jtl3TSoHTEqSVsyfqXdYKkN4OMg-3zvSUqO7-nHrzm6V-KpRuW_yLzTuq24</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195417457</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Brain activity during reading The effects of exposure duration and task</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><creator>Price, C. J. ; Wise, R. J. S. ; Watson, J. D. G. ; Patterson, K. ; Howard, D. ; Frackowiak, R. S. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Price, C. J. ; Wise, R. J. S. ; Watson, J. D. G. ; Patterson, K. ; Howard, D. ; Frackowiak, R. S. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Brain activity during reading tasks was investigated using PET. The aim was to account for differences in the results of two previous studies [those of Petersen et al. (Science 1990; 249: 1041–4) and Howard et al. (Brain 1992; 115: 1769–82)] by systematically varying the type of reading task and the exposure duration of the word stimuli. Both variables strongly influenced patterns of brain activity. There were three types of task: (i) reading aloud; (ii) reading silently; and (Hi) lexical decision on visually presented words and pseudowords. Reading aloud and reading silently engaged the left middle and superior temporal regions, confirming the important role of these areas in visual word processing.The areas principally engaged during lexical decision were the left inferior and middle frontal cortices and the supplementary motor area; activity in these areas suggests that the subjects were using a phonological strategy to perform the task. There was also a significant effect of exposure duration, with activity being greater for short (150 ms) exposure durations than for long (1000 ms or 981 ms) exposure durations. We conclude that until we understand how subtle variations in experimental design influence brain activity during reading tasks, the association of specific processing functions with individual anatomical areas activated during reading is premature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-8950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2156</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/brain/117.6.1255</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7820564</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRAIAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Brain - physiology ; exposure duration ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Language ; Male ; Mental Processes ; Middle Aged ; PET ; Production and perception of written language ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reading ; task ; Tomography, Emission-Computed</subject><ispartof>Brain (London, England : 1878), 1994-12, Vol.117 (6), p.1255-1269</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Dec 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-c518827a8fe43312725936176e2d4906858ad46196fa55a8069beac28764f1593</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3363929$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7820564$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Price, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, R. J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, J. D. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frackowiak, R. S. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Brain activity during reading The effects of exposure duration and task</title><title>Brain (London, England : 1878)</title><addtitle>Brain</addtitle><description>Brain activity during reading tasks was investigated using PET. The aim was to account for differences in the results of two previous studies [those of Petersen et al. (Science 1990; 249: 1041–4) and Howard et al. (Brain 1992; 115: 1769–82)] by systematically varying the type of reading task and the exposure duration of the word stimuli. Both variables strongly influenced patterns of brain activity. There were three types of task: (i) reading aloud; (ii) reading silently; and (Hi) lexical decision on visually presented words and pseudowords. Reading aloud and reading silently engaged the left middle and superior temporal regions, confirming the important role of these areas in visual word processing.The areas principally engaged during lexical decision were the left inferior and middle frontal cortices and the supplementary motor area; activity in these areas suggests that the subjects were using a phonological strategy to perform the task. There was also a significant effect of exposure duration, with activity being greater for short (150 ms) exposure durations than for long (1000 ms or 981 ms) exposure durations. We conclude that until we understand how subtle variations in experimental design influence brain activity during reading tasks, the association of specific processing functions with individual anatomical areas activated during reading is premature.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>exposure duration</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Processes</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>PET</subject><subject>Production and perception of written language</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>task</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed</subject><issn>0006-8950</issn><issn>1460-2156</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EKkvhzgUpQqi3bD22Z2wfaUVbpEpIUCTUi-VNbHC7myx2gtp_T8Ku9sCll5nD-96TZh5jb4EvgVt5uso-dacAeklLEIjP2AIU8VoA0nO24JxTbSzyl-xVKXecg5KCjtiRNoIjqQW7PJsTKt8M6U8aHqt2zKn7WeXg23nf_ApViDE0Q6n6WIWHbV_GHGbMD6mfjF1bDb7cv2Yvol-X8Ga_j9n3i08351f19ZfLz-cfr-sGgYZ5GiO0NzEoKUFogVYSaAqiVZaTQeNbRWApekRvONlV8I0wmlSEiT1mJ7vcbe5_j6EMbpNKE9Zr34V-LM4gcSVQPglqsgqMoCdBwQmEIJzA9_-Bd_2Yu-laBxYVaIV6gvgOanJfSg7RbXPa-PzogLu5MvevMjdV5sjNlU2Wd_vccbUJ7cGw72jSP-x1Xxq_jtl3TSoHTEqSVsyfqXdYKkN4OMg-3zvSUqO7-nHrzm6V-KpRuW_yLzTuq24</recordid><startdate>19941201</startdate><enddate>19941201</enddate><creator>Price, C. J.</creator><creator>Wise, R. J. S.</creator><creator>Watson, J. D. G.</creator><creator>Patterson, K.</creator><creator>Howard, D.</creator><creator>Frackowiak, R. S. J.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19941201</creationdate><title>Brain activity during reading The effects of exposure duration and task</title><author>Price, C. J. ; Wise, R. J. S. ; Watson, J. D. G. ; Patterson, K. ; Howard, D. ; Frackowiak, R. S. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-c518827a8fe43312725936176e2d4906858ad46196fa55a8069beac28764f1593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>exposure duration</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Processes</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>PET</topic><topic>Production and perception of written language</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>task</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Price, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wise, R. J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, J. D. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frackowiak, R. S. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Brain (London, England : 1878)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Price, C. J.</au><au>Wise, R. J. S.</au><au>Watson, J. D. G.</au><au>Patterson, K.</au><au>Howard, D.</au><au>Frackowiak, R. S. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Brain activity during reading The effects of exposure duration and task</atitle><jtitle>Brain (London, England : 1878)</jtitle><addtitle>Brain</addtitle><date>1994-12-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1255</spage><epage>1269</epage><pages>1255-1269</pages><issn>0006-8950</issn><eissn>1460-2156</eissn><coden>BRAIAK</coden><abstract>Brain activity during reading tasks was investigated using PET. The aim was to account for differences in the results of two previous studies [those of Petersen et al. (Science 1990; 249: 1041–4) and Howard et al. (Brain 1992; 115: 1769–82)] by systematically varying the type of reading task and the exposure duration of the word stimuli. Both variables strongly influenced patterns of brain activity. There were three types of task: (i) reading aloud; (ii) reading silently; and (Hi) lexical decision on visually presented words and pseudowords. Reading aloud and reading silently engaged the left middle and superior temporal regions, confirming the important role of these areas in visual word processing.The areas principally engaged during lexical decision were the left inferior and middle frontal cortices and the supplementary motor area; activity in these areas suggests that the subjects were using a phonological strategy to perform the task. There was also a significant effect of exposure duration, with activity being greater for short (150 ms) exposure durations than for long (1000 ms or 981 ms) exposure durations. We conclude that until we understand how subtle variations in experimental design influence brain activity during reading tasks, the association of specific processing functions with individual anatomical areas activated during reading is premature.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>7820564</pmid><doi>10.1093/brain/117.6.1255</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-8950 |
ispartof | Brain (London, England : 1878), 1994-12, Vol.117 (6), p.1255-1269 |
issn | 0006-8950 1460-2156 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85604253 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Brain - diagnostic imaging Brain - physiology exposure duration Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Language Male Mental Processes Middle Aged PET Production and perception of written language Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reading task Tomography, Emission-Computed |
title | Brain activity during reading The effects of exposure duration and task |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T06%3A11%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Brain%20activity%20during%20reading%20The%20effects%20of%20exposure%20duration%20and%20task&rft.jtitle=Brain%20(London,%20England%20:%201878)&rft.au=Price,%20C.%20J.&rft.date=1994-12-01&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1255&rft.epage=1269&rft.pages=1255-1269&rft.issn=0006-8950&rft.eissn=1460-2156&rft.coden=BRAIAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/brain/117.6.1255&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76941826%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195417457&rft_id=info:pmid/7820564&rfr_iscdi=true |