Learning argument structure generalizations

General correlations between form & meaning at the level of argument structure patterns have often been assumed to be innate. Claims of innateness typically rest on the idea that the input is not rich enough for general learning strategies to yield the required representations. The present work...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cognitive linguistics 2004-01, Vol.15 (3), p.289-316
Hauptverfasser: Goldberg, Adele E, Casenhiser, Devin M, Sethuraman, Nitya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:General correlations between form & meaning at the level of argument structure patterns have often been assumed to be innate. Claims of innateness typically rest on the idea that the input is not rich enough for general learning strategies to yield the required representations. The present work demonstrates that the semantics associated with argument structure generalizations can indeed be learned, given the nature of the input & an understanding of general categorization strategies. Examination of an extensive corpus study of children's & mothers' speech shows that tokens of one particular verb are found to account for a great majority of instances of each argument frame considered. Experimental results are reported that demonstrate that high token frequency of a single prototypical exemplar facilitates the learning of constructional meaning. 7 Tables, 118 References. Adapted from the source document
ISSN:0936-5907
1613-3641
DOI:10.1515/cogl.2004.011