MULTIPLE NEGATION IN MODERN ENGLISH. A PRELIMINARY CORPUS-BASED STUDY
Although multiple negation was common in Old, Middle, & Early Modern English, it has become stigmatized as illogical & ungrammatical in Contemporary English. Following a survey of some studies devoted to multiple negation in nonstandard varieties of English, a corpus analysis is conducted us...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 2003-01, Vol.104 (4), p.477-498 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 498 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 477 |
container_title | Neuphilologische Mitteilungen |
container_volume | 104 |
creator | Palacios Martinez, Ignacio M |
description | Although multiple negation was common in Old, Middle, & Early Modern English, it has become stigmatized as illogical & ungrammatical in Contemporary English. Following a survey of some studies devoted to multiple negation in nonstandard varieties of English, a corpus analysis is conducted using data from the British English component of the International Corpus of English (ICE). An attempt is made to identify all the different types & subtypes of multiple negatives in the corpus & subject them to syntactic, semantic, & pragmatic analyses. The study has mainly a qualitative thrust, & occasional comparisons are drawn between spoken & written codes. Dependent & independent double negatives are distinguished, & several syntactic subcategories are differentiated within the latter. Both types are used to produce the effect of meaning intensification. However, many independent negatives are used in litotes-like figures to express an understatement on the speaker's/writer's part, as the negative meaning is weakened by affirming something through the contrary. Also, many independent negatives involving a modal operator & a negative infinitive convey an emphatically positive meaning, ie, a denial. 2 Tables, 61 References. Z. Dubiel |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85596412</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43343991</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43343991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j208t-abeb6085b3a755c23e3829b63669ed1072dcf31bdb385560eb038425433296563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjDtvgzAYABlaqWnan1DJUzcq4w8bM1JwiSVe4jFkQhgcKYiUFJOh_75I6XTL3T1YO4wJt8Gj7pP1bMyIMaUcnJ0l0iapZZEIlIk4qGWeIZmhNI9EmSGRxYmsDh8oQEUpEpnKLCiPKMzLoqnsz6ASEarqJjq-WI-nbjL69Z97q_kSdXiwkzyWYZDYI8F8tTulFcOcKug8SnsCGjjxFQPGfD042CNDfwJHDQo4pQxrhYG7hLoAxGeUwd56v3-vy_xz02ZtL2fT62nqvvV8M-1W-cx1yCa-3cXRrPPSXpfzpVt-223kgu878AcvDkl0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85596412</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MULTIPLE NEGATION IN MODERN ENGLISH. A PRELIMINARY CORPUS-BASED STUDY</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Palacios Martinez, Ignacio M</creator><creatorcontrib>Palacios Martinez, Ignacio M</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Although multiple negation was common in Old, Middle, & Early Modern English, it has become stigmatized as illogical & ungrammatical in Contemporary English. Following a survey of some studies devoted to multiple negation in nonstandard varieties of English, a corpus analysis is conducted using data from the British English component of the International Corpus of English (ICE). An attempt is made to identify all the different types & subtypes of multiple negatives in the corpus & subject them to syntactic, semantic, & pragmatic analyses. The study has mainly a qualitative thrust, & occasional comparisons are drawn between spoken & written codes. Dependent & independent double negatives are distinguished, & several syntactic subcategories are differentiated within the latter. Both types are used to produce the effect of meaning intensification. However, many independent negatives are used in litotes-like figures to express an understatement on the speaker's/writer's part, as the negative meaning is weakened by affirming something through the contrary. Also, many independent negatives involving a modal operator & a negative infinitive convey an emphatically positive meaning, ie, a denial. 2 Tables, 61 References. Z. Dubiel]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3754</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NPHMBG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Neuphilologischen Verein</publisher><subject>Double negation ; Grammatical clauses ; Grammatical constructions ; Language ; Litotes ; Relative clauses ; Syntactics ; Verbs ; Words</subject><ispartof>Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 2003-01, Vol.104 (4), p.477-498</ispartof><rights>Modern Language Society, 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43343991$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43343991$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Palacios Martinez, Ignacio M</creatorcontrib><title>MULTIPLE NEGATION IN MODERN ENGLISH. A PRELIMINARY CORPUS-BASED STUDY</title><title>Neuphilologische Mitteilungen</title><description><![CDATA[Although multiple negation was common in Old, Middle, & Early Modern English, it has become stigmatized as illogical & ungrammatical in Contemporary English. Following a survey of some studies devoted to multiple negation in nonstandard varieties of English, a corpus analysis is conducted using data from the British English component of the International Corpus of English (ICE). An attempt is made to identify all the different types & subtypes of multiple negatives in the corpus & subject them to syntactic, semantic, & pragmatic analyses. The study has mainly a qualitative thrust, & occasional comparisons are drawn between spoken & written codes. Dependent & independent double negatives are distinguished, & several syntactic subcategories are differentiated within the latter. Both types are used to produce the effect of meaning intensification. However, many independent negatives are used in litotes-like figures to express an understatement on the speaker's/writer's part, as the negative meaning is weakened by affirming something through the contrary. Also, many independent negatives involving a modal operator & a negative infinitive convey an emphatically positive meaning, ie, a denial. 2 Tables, 61 References. Z. Dubiel]]></description><subject>Double negation</subject><subject>Grammatical clauses</subject><subject>Grammatical constructions</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Litotes</subject><subject>Relative clauses</subject><subject>Syntactics</subject><subject>Verbs</subject><subject>Words</subject><issn>0028-3754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjDtvgzAYABlaqWnan1DJUzcq4w8bM1JwiSVe4jFkQhgcKYiUFJOh_75I6XTL3T1YO4wJt8Gj7pP1bMyIMaUcnJ0l0iapZZEIlIk4qGWeIZmhNI9EmSGRxYmsDh8oQEUpEpnKLCiPKMzLoqnsz6ASEarqJjq-WI-nbjL69Z97q_kSdXiwkzyWYZDYI8F8tTulFcOcKug8SnsCGjjxFQPGfD042CNDfwJHDQo4pQxrhYG7hLoAxGeUwd56v3-vy_xz02ZtL2fT62nqvvV8M-1W-cx1yCa-3cXRrPPSXpfzpVt-223kgu878AcvDkl0</recordid><startdate>20030101</startdate><enddate>20030101</enddate><creator>Palacios Martinez, Ignacio M</creator><general>Neuphilologischen Verein</general><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030101</creationdate><title>MULTIPLE NEGATION IN MODERN ENGLISH. A PRELIMINARY CORPUS-BASED STUDY</title><author>Palacios Martinez, Ignacio M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j208t-abeb6085b3a755c23e3829b63669ed1072dcf31bdb385560eb038425433296563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Double negation</topic><topic>Grammatical clauses</topic><topic>Grammatical constructions</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Litotes</topic><topic>Relative clauses</topic><topic>Syntactics</topic><topic>Verbs</topic><topic>Words</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Palacios Martinez, Ignacio M</creatorcontrib><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Neuphilologische Mitteilungen</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Palacios Martinez, Ignacio M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MULTIPLE NEGATION IN MODERN ENGLISH. A PRELIMINARY CORPUS-BASED STUDY</atitle><jtitle>Neuphilologische Mitteilungen</jtitle><date>2003-01-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>477</spage><epage>498</epage><pages>477-498</pages><issn>0028-3754</issn><coden>NPHMBG</coden><abstract><![CDATA[Although multiple negation was common in Old, Middle, & Early Modern English, it has become stigmatized as illogical & ungrammatical in Contemporary English. Following a survey of some studies devoted to multiple negation in nonstandard varieties of English, a corpus analysis is conducted using data from the British English component of the International Corpus of English (ICE). An attempt is made to identify all the different types & subtypes of multiple negatives in the corpus & subject them to syntactic, semantic, & pragmatic analyses. The study has mainly a qualitative thrust, & occasional comparisons are drawn between spoken & written codes. Dependent & independent double negatives are distinguished, & several syntactic subcategories are differentiated within the latter. Both types are used to produce the effect of meaning intensification. However, many independent negatives are used in litotes-like figures to express an understatement on the speaker's/writer's part, as the negative meaning is weakened by affirming something through the contrary. Also, many independent negatives involving a modal operator & a negative infinitive convey an emphatically positive meaning, ie, a denial. 2 Tables, 61 References. Z. Dubiel]]></abstract><pub>Neuphilologischen Verein</pub><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-3754 |
ispartof | Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 2003-01, Vol.104 (4), p.477-498 |
issn | 0028-3754 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85596412 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Double negation Grammatical clauses Grammatical constructions Language Litotes Relative clauses Syntactics Verbs Words |
title | MULTIPLE NEGATION IN MODERN ENGLISH. A PRELIMINARY CORPUS-BASED STUDY |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A59%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MULTIPLE%20NEGATION%20IN%20MODERN%20ENGLISH.%20A%20PRELIMINARY%20CORPUS-BASED%20STUDY&rft.jtitle=Neuphilologische%20Mitteilungen&rft.au=Palacios%20Martinez,%20Ignacio%20M&rft.date=2003-01-01&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=477&rft.epage=498&rft.pages=477-498&rft.issn=0028-3754&rft.coden=NPHMBG&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43343991%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85596412&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43343991&rfr_iscdi=true |