Ivabradine improves coronary flow reserve in patients with stable coronary artery disease

Abstract Objectives Although treatment with ivabradine reduces the incidence of hospital admissions for myocardial infarction and coronary revascularisation, there are no data concerning its effect on coronary circulation. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of ivabradine on coronary...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Atherosclerosis 2011-03, Vol.215 (1), p.160-165
Hauptverfasser: Skalidis, Emmanouil I, Hamilos, Michalis I, Chlouverakis, Gregory, Zacharis, Evangelos A, Vardas, Panos E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objectives Although treatment with ivabradine reduces the incidence of hospital admissions for myocardial infarction and coronary revascularisation, there are no data concerning its effect on coronary circulation. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of ivabradine on coronary flow velocity and flow reserve (CFR) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods During diagnostic coronary angiography (baseline), twenty-one patients with stable CAD underwent coronary flow velocity measurements (APV cm/s) in a non-culprit vessel, using a Doppler guidewire, at rest (r) and after adenosine administration to achieve maximal hyperaemia (h). During programmed coronary intervention in the culprit vessel, the same measurements were repeated one week after treatment with ivabradine (5 mg twice daily), both at the intrinsic heart rate and at a paced heart rate identical to that before treatment. CFR was defined as h-APV/r-APV. Results Heart rate was significantly lower after treatment with ivabradine (78 ± 14 bpm vs 65 ± 9 bpm, p < 0.001). Also, a reduction of r-APV (17.0 ± 5.5 vs 19.7 ± 7.6, p = 0.003) and augmentation of h-APV (57.9 ± 17.8 vs 53.5 ± 21.4, p = 0.009) leading to CFR improvement (3.51 ± 0.81 vs 2.78 ± 0.61, p < 0.001) were observed. During pacing, although r-APV reverted to values similar to those before treatment (20.0 ± 6.5 vs 19.7 ± 7.6, p = NS), a sustained improvement in h-APV was observed (59.5 ± 19.7 vs 53.5 ± 21.4, p = 0.007) and CFR remained higher than before treatment (3.04 ± 0.66 vs 2.78 ± 0.61, p < 0.001). Conclusions Ivabradine treatment significantly improves hyperaemic coronary flow velocity and CFR in patients with stable CAD. These effects remain even after heart rate correction indicating improved microvascular function.
ISSN:0021-9150
1879-1484
DOI:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.11.035