Validation of the postoperative nausea and vomiting intensity score in gynaecological patients
The Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) Intensity Scale was developed to distinguish trivial from clinically important PONV perioperatively and has been validated in a general surgical population. This study aimed to assess the scale in gynaecological surgery patients. Seventy-three patients un...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Anaesthesia and intensive care 2011, Vol.39 (1), p.73-78 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 78 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 73 |
| container_title | Anaesthesia and intensive care |
| container_volume | 39 |
| creator | ALLEN, M. L LESLIE, K JANSEN, N |
| description | The Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) Intensity Scale was developed to distinguish trivial from clinically important PONV perioperatively and has been validated in a general surgical population. This study aimed to assess the scale in gynaecological surgery patients. Seventy-three patients undergoing gynaecological surgery were included. Interviews occurred at four and 24 hours postoperatively. Measurements included the PONV Intensity Scale, nausea and pain visual analogue scale, antiemetic use and complications related to PONT. Ten patients (14%) had a clinically significant PONV Intensity Scale score, 42 (58%) reported nausea and 15 (21%) reported vomiting during the study. At 24 hours, 80% of patients with a clinically significant score at four hours had received antiemetics vs 18% of those without a clinically significant score (P = 0.001). Of patients with a clinically significant score at 24 hours, 71% had suffered a complication vs 11% of those without a clinically significant score (P < 0.0001). The median nausea visual analogue scale scores at four hours were 69 mm (interquartile range 69 to 76 mm) in patients with a clinically significant score vs 0 mm (0 to 9 mm) in patients without a clinically significant score (mean difference 56 mm, 95% confidence interval 41 to 72 mm, P < 0.0001). The PONV Intensity Scale is a valid, responsive and practically useful instrument in distinguishing trivial from clinically significant PON. The rate of clinically important PONV is considerably lower than the rate of any PONV symptoms perioperatively. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0310057x1103900112 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_855907303</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A250999961</galeid><sourcerecordid>A250999961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-d3a3bd574cd6128a08688f46972720ce96aa242a98ad20dcb75eb0df777840f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0c9rFDEUB_AgFrut_gMeJCjF0-jLj5lkjqXYKhR6UenJ4W2SWVNmkzHJFPe_N8uuFswlJHzeS3hfQl4z-MCYUh9BMIBW_WYMRA_AGH9GVkxK3QBX7DlZ7UFTxf0pOcv5oZKeq_YFOeVMqBZ6uSI_vuPkLRYfA40jLT8dnWMucXapXj46GnDJDikGSx_j1hcfNtSH4kL2ZUezicnVM93sAjoTp7jxBic612IXSn5JTkacsnt13M_Jt-tPX68-N7d3N1-uLm8bIwUrjRUo1rZV0tiOcY2gO61H2fWKKw7G9R0ilxx7jZaDNWvVujXYUSmlJYxSnJP3h75zir8Wl8uw9dm4acLg4pIH3bY9KAGiyrf_yYe4pFA_VxFTWgsNFb07oA1ObvBhjCWh2bccLnkdXF0dq4oflEkx5-TGYU5-i2k3MBj2CQ3HhO6fEqpFb47vL-uts_9K_kZSwcURYK6jHBMG4_OTEz1TEkD8AYW9l58</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>851788380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the postoperative nausea and vomiting intensity score in gynaecological patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>ALLEN, M. L ; LESLIE, K ; JANSEN, N</creator><creatorcontrib>ALLEN, M. L ; LESLIE, K ; JANSEN, N</creatorcontrib><description>The Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) Intensity Scale was developed to distinguish trivial from clinically important PONV perioperatively and has been validated in a general surgical population. This study aimed to assess the scale in gynaecological surgery patients. Seventy-three patients undergoing gynaecological surgery were included. Interviews occurred at four and 24 hours postoperatively. Measurements included the PONV Intensity Scale, nausea and pain visual analogue scale, antiemetic use and complications related to PONT. Ten patients (14%) had a clinically significant PONV Intensity Scale score, 42 (58%) reported nausea and 15 (21%) reported vomiting during the study. At 24 hours, 80% of patients with a clinically significant score at four hours had received antiemetics vs 18% of those without a clinically significant score (P = 0.001). Of patients with a clinically significant score at 24 hours, 71% had suffered a complication vs 11% of those without a clinically significant score (P < 0.0001). The median nausea visual analogue scale scores at four hours were 69 mm (interquartile range 69 to 76 mm) in patients with a clinically significant score vs 0 mm (0 to 9 mm) in patients without a clinically significant score (mean difference 56 mm, 95% confidence interval 41 to 72 mm, P < 0.0001). The PONV Intensity Scale is a valid, responsive and practically useful instrument in distinguishing trivial from clinically significant PON. The rate of clinically important PONV is considerably lower than the rate of any PONV symptoms perioperatively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0310-057X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1448-0271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0310057x1103900112</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21375094</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AINCBS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Edgecliff: Anaesthesia Society of Anaesthetists</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Antiemetics - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Care and treatment ; Cohort Studies ; Complications and side effects ; Female ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures ; Gynecology, Operative ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nausea ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - diagnosis ; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - drug therapy ; Prospective Studies ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk factors ; Severity of Illness Index ; Vomiting ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia and intensive care, 2011, Vol.39 (1), p.73-78</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</rights><rights>Copyright Australian Society of Anaesthetists Jan 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-d3a3bd574cd6128a08688f46972720ce96aa242a98ad20dcb75eb0df777840f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-d3a3bd574cd6128a08688f46972720ce96aa242a98ad20dcb75eb0df777840f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23917400$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21375094$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ALLEN, M. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LESLIE, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JANSEN, N</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the postoperative nausea and vomiting intensity score in gynaecological patients</title><title>Anaesthesia and intensive care</title><addtitle>Anaesth Intensive Care</addtitle><description>The Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) Intensity Scale was developed to distinguish trivial from clinically important PONV perioperatively and has been validated in a general surgical population. This study aimed to assess the scale in gynaecological surgery patients. Seventy-three patients undergoing gynaecological surgery were included. Interviews occurred at four and 24 hours postoperatively. Measurements included the PONV Intensity Scale, nausea and pain visual analogue scale, antiemetic use and complications related to PONT. Ten patients (14%) had a clinically significant PONV Intensity Scale score, 42 (58%) reported nausea and 15 (21%) reported vomiting during the study. At 24 hours, 80% of patients with a clinically significant score at four hours had received antiemetics vs 18% of those without a clinically significant score (P = 0.001). Of patients with a clinically significant score at 24 hours, 71% had suffered a complication vs 11% of those without a clinically significant score (P < 0.0001). The median nausea visual analogue scale scores at four hours were 69 mm (interquartile range 69 to 76 mm) in patients with a clinically significant score vs 0 mm (0 to 9 mm) in patients without a clinically significant score (mean difference 56 mm, 95% confidence interval 41 to 72 mm, P < 0.0001). The PONV Intensity Scale is a valid, responsive and practically useful instrument in distinguishing trivial from clinically significant PON. The rate of clinically important PONV is considerably lower than the rate of any PONV symptoms perioperatively.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Antiemetics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Gynecology, Operative</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nausea</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - diagnosis</subject><subject>Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - drug therapy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Vomiting</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0310-057X</issn><issn>1448-0271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0c9rFDEUB_AgFrut_gMeJCjF0-jLj5lkjqXYKhR6UenJ4W2SWVNmkzHJFPe_N8uuFswlJHzeS3hfQl4z-MCYUh9BMIBW_WYMRA_AGH9GVkxK3QBX7DlZ7UFTxf0pOcv5oZKeq_YFOeVMqBZ6uSI_vuPkLRYfA40jLT8dnWMucXapXj46GnDJDikGSx_j1hcfNtSH4kL2ZUezicnVM93sAjoTp7jxBic612IXSn5JTkacsnt13M_Jt-tPX68-N7d3N1-uLm8bIwUrjRUo1rZV0tiOcY2gO61H2fWKKw7G9R0ilxx7jZaDNWvVujXYUSmlJYxSnJP3h75zir8Wl8uw9dm4acLg4pIH3bY9KAGiyrf_yYe4pFA_VxFTWgsNFb07oA1ObvBhjCWh2bccLnkdXF0dq4oflEkx5-TGYU5-i2k3MBj2CQ3HhO6fEqpFb47vL-uts_9K_kZSwcURYK6jHBMG4_OTEz1TEkD8AYW9l58</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>ALLEN, M. L</creator><creator>LESLIE, K</creator><creator>JANSEN, N</creator><general>Anaesthesia Society of Anaesthetists</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>Validation of the postoperative nausea and vomiting intensity score in gynaecological patients</title><author>ALLEN, M. L ; LESLIE, K ; JANSEN, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-d3a3bd574cd6128a08688f46972720ce96aa242a98ad20dcb75eb0df777840f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Antiemetics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Gynecology, Operative</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nausea</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - diagnosis</topic><topic>Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - drug therapy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Vomiting</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ALLEN, M. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LESLIE, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JANSEN, N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Australia & New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia and intensive care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ALLEN, M. L</au><au>LESLIE, K</au><au>JANSEN, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of the postoperative nausea and vomiting intensity score in gynaecological patients</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia and intensive care</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesth Intensive Care</addtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>73</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>73-78</pages><issn>0310-057X</issn><eissn>1448-0271</eissn><coden>AINCBS</coden><abstract>The Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) Intensity Scale was developed to distinguish trivial from clinically important PONV perioperatively and has been validated in a general surgical population. This study aimed to assess the scale in gynaecological surgery patients. Seventy-three patients undergoing gynaecological surgery were included. Interviews occurred at four and 24 hours postoperatively. Measurements included the PONV Intensity Scale, nausea and pain visual analogue scale, antiemetic use and complications related to PONT. Ten patients (14%) had a clinically significant PONV Intensity Scale score, 42 (58%) reported nausea and 15 (21%) reported vomiting during the study. At 24 hours, 80% of patients with a clinically significant score at four hours had received antiemetics vs 18% of those without a clinically significant score (P = 0.001). Of patients with a clinically significant score at 24 hours, 71% had suffered a complication vs 11% of those without a clinically significant score (P < 0.0001). The median nausea visual analogue scale scores at four hours were 69 mm (interquartile range 69 to 76 mm) in patients with a clinically significant score vs 0 mm (0 to 9 mm) in patients without a clinically significant score (mean difference 56 mm, 95% confidence interval 41 to 72 mm, P < 0.0001). The PONV Intensity Scale is a valid, responsive and practically useful instrument in distinguishing trivial from clinically significant PON. The rate of clinically important PONV is considerably lower than the rate of any PONV symptoms perioperatively.</abstract><cop>Edgecliff</cop><pub>Anaesthesia Society of Anaesthetists</pub><pmid>21375094</pmid><doi>10.1177/0310057x1103900112</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0310-057X |
| ispartof | Anaesthesia and intensive care, 2011, Vol.39 (1), p.73-78 |
| issn | 0310-057X 1448-0271 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_855907303 |
| source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adult Aged Anesthesia Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Antiemetics - therapeutic use Biological and medical sciences Care and treatment Cohort Studies Complications and side effects Female Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Gynecology, Operative Humans Medical sciences Middle Aged Nausea Pain Measurement - methods Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - diagnosis Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting - drug therapy Prospective Studies Reproducibility of Results Risk factors Severity of Illness Index Vomiting Young Adult |
| title | Validation of the postoperative nausea and vomiting intensity score in gynaecological patients |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A17%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20postoperative%20nausea%20and%20vomiting%20intensity%20score%20in%20gynaecological%20patients&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia%20and%20intensive%20care&rft.au=ALLEN,%20M.%20L&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=73-78&rft.issn=0310-057X&rft.eissn=1448-0271&rft.coden=AINCBS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0310057x1103900112&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA250999961%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=851788380&rft_id=info:pmid/21375094&rft_galeid=A250999961&rfr_iscdi=true |