Differences in audiotaped versus videotaped physician-patient interactions

Most medical interaction studies have been conducted on audiotaped recordings of physician-patient encounters. Empirical studies have not previously demonstrated whether coders' scores differ on audio-only versus videotaped data. Data from a convenience sample of forty-seven physician-patient i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of nonverbal behavior 2002-12, Vol.26 (4), p.219-239
Hauptverfasser: Riddle, Dawn L, Albrecht, Terrance L, Coovert, Michael D, Penner, Louis A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 239
container_issue 4
container_start_page 219
container_title Journal of nonverbal behavior
container_volume 26
creator Riddle, Dawn L
Albrecht, Terrance L
Coovert, Michael D
Penner, Louis A
description Most medical interaction studies have been conducted on audiotaped recordings of physician-patient encounters. Empirical studies have not previously demonstrated whether coders' scores differ on audio-only versus videotaped data. Data from a convenience sample of forty-seven physician-patient interactions were analyzed using the same coding systems to judge audio-only versus video-based data formats. All coding conditions demonstrated acceptable reliability, using intraclass correlation coefficients. However, MANOVA analyses show that ratings of audiotaped physician-patient interactions are not equivalent to ratings of videotaped encounters. Exploratory factor analyses show differences in the underlying structures of the data derived from the audio-only versus the video information. The differences in the video-based factor solutions account for more total variance and are more consistent with theoretical expectations. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1023/A:1022160117278
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85583848</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>353072141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-2c1191d36a2c4fbfb192c9f912ea4dc9f903f15bf96cd5ffbe9f699a349805ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdTk1LxDAUDKLgunr2Wjx4i-YlTZp4W9b1iwUvei5p-oJZalqbdMF_b8U9eRhmGGaGIeQS2A0wLm5XdzNxUAyg4pU-IguQlaBCSXFMFgwMUKm1OiVnKe0YY6UpqwV5uQ_e44jRYSpCLOzUhj7bAdtij2OaUrEPLR6c4eM7BRdspIPNAWOeGxlH63LoYzonJ952CS8OvCTvD5u39RPdvj4-r1dbOnCATLmD-UsrlOWu9I1vwHBnvAGOtmx_FRMeZOONcq30vkHjlTFWlEYzaVEsyfXf7jD2XxOmXH-G5LDrbMR-SrWWUgtd6jl49S-466cxzt9qzg2vhJzxA-jbXcs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229273527</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in audiotaped versus videotaped physician-patient interactions</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Riddle, Dawn L ; Albrecht, Terrance L ; Coovert, Michael D ; Penner, Louis A</creator><creatorcontrib>Riddle, Dawn L ; Albrecht, Terrance L ; Coovert, Michael D ; Penner, Louis A</creatorcontrib><description>Most medical interaction studies have been conducted on audiotaped recordings of physician-patient encounters. Empirical studies have not previously demonstrated whether coders' scores differ on audio-only versus videotaped data. Data from a convenience sample of forty-seven physician-patient interactions were analyzed using the same coding systems to judge audio-only versus video-based data formats. All coding conditions demonstrated acceptable reliability, using intraclass correlation coefficients. However, MANOVA analyses show that ratings of audiotaped physician-patient interactions are not equivalent to ratings of videotaped encounters. Exploratory factor analyses show differences in the underlying structures of the data derived from the audio-only versus the video information. The differences in the video-based factor solutions account for more total variance and are more consistent with theoretical expectations. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-5886</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1022160117278</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNVBDV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Comparative analysis ; Physician patient relationships</subject><ispartof>Journal of nonverbal behavior, 2002-12, Vol.26 (4), p.219-239</ispartof><rights>Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers Winter 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Riddle, Dawn L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albrecht, Terrance L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coovert, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penner, Louis A</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in audiotaped versus videotaped physician-patient interactions</title><title>Journal of nonverbal behavior</title><description>Most medical interaction studies have been conducted on audiotaped recordings of physician-patient encounters. Empirical studies have not previously demonstrated whether coders' scores differ on audio-only versus videotaped data. Data from a convenience sample of forty-seven physician-patient interactions were analyzed using the same coding systems to judge audio-only versus video-based data formats. All coding conditions demonstrated acceptable reliability, using intraclass correlation coefficients. However, MANOVA analyses show that ratings of audiotaped physician-patient interactions are not equivalent to ratings of videotaped encounters. Exploratory factor analyses show differences in the underlying structures of the data derived from the audio-only versus the video information. The differences in the video-based factor solutions account for more total variance and are more consistent with theoretical expectations. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Physician patient relationships</subject><issn>0191-5886</issn><issn>1573-3653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdTk1LxDAUDKLgunr2Wjx4i-YlTZp4W9b1iwUvei5p-oJZalqbdMF_b8U9eRhmGGaGIeQS2A0wLm5XdzNxUAyg4pU-IguQlaBCSXFMFgwMUKm1OiVnKe0YY6UpqwV5uQ_e44jRYSpCLOzUhj7bAdtij2OaUrEPLR6c4eM7BRdspIPNAWOeGxlH63LoYzonJ952CS8OvCTvD5u39RPdvj4-r1dbOnCATLmD-UsrlOWu9I1vwHBnvAGOtmx_FRMeZOONcq30vkHjlTFWlEYzaVEsyfXf7jD2XxOmXH-G5LDrbMR-SrWWUgtd6jl49S-466cxzt9qzg2vhJzxA-jbXcs</recordid><startdate>20021201</startdate><enddate>20021201</enddate><creator>Riddle, Dawn L</creator><creator>Albrecht, Terrance L</creator><creator>Coovert, Michael D</creator><creator>Penner, Louis A</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021201</creationdate><title>Differences in audiotaped versus videotaped physician-patient interactions</title><author>Riddle, Dawn L ; Albrecht, Terrance L ; Coovert, Michael D ; Penner, Louis A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-2c1191d36a2c4fbfb192c9f912ea4dc9f903f15bf96cd5ffbe9f699a349805ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Physician patient relationships</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Riddle, Dawn L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albrecht, Terrance L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coovert, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penner, Louis A</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of nonverbal behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Riddle, Dawn L</au><au>Albrecht, Terrance L</au><au>Coovert, Michael D</au><au>Penner, Louis A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in audiotaped versus videotaped physician-patient interactions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nonverbal behavior</jtitle><date>2002-12-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>219</spage><epage>239</epage><pages>219-239</pages><issn>0191-5886</issn><eissn>1573-3653</eissn><coden>JNVBDV</coden><abstract>Most medical interaction studies have been conducted on audiotaped recordings of physician-patient encounters. Empirical studies have not previously demonstrated whether coders' scores differ on audio-only versus videotaped data. Data from a convenience sample of forty-seven physician-patient interactions were analyzed using the same coding systems to judge audio-only versus video-based data formats. All coding conditions demonstrated acceptable reliability, using intraclass correlation coefficients. However, MANOVA analyses show that ratings of audiotaped physician-patient interactions are not equivalent to ratings of videotaped encounters. Exploratory factor analyses show differences in the underlying structures of the data derived from the audio-only versus the video information. The differences in the video-based factor solutions account for more total variance and are more consistent with theoretical expectations. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1022160117278</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0191-5886
ispartof Journal of nonverbal behavior, 2002-12, Vol.26 (4), p.219-239
issn 0191-5886
1573-3653
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85583848
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Behavior
Comparative analysis
Physician patient relationships
title Differences in audiotaped versus videotaped physician-patient interactions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T09%3A26%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20audiotaped%20versus%20videotaped%20physician-patient%20interactions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nonverbal%20behavior&rft.au=Riddle,%20Dawn%20L&rft.date=2002-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=219&rft.epage=239&rft.pages=219-239&rft.issn=0191-5886&rft.eissn=1573-3653&rft.coden=JNVBDV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1022160117278&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E353072141%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229273527&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true