Two contrasting explanations of involvement violations: expectancy violations theory versus discrepancy arousal theory
The effects of violations of expectations on arousal, reciprocity, & compensation in the medical practitioner-patient relationship are considered, specifically, expectancy violations (EV) & discrepancy arousal (DA) predictions are contrasted. EV theory predicts that given a communication wit...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Human communication research 1994-06, Vol.20 (4), p.560-591 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 591 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 560 |
| container_title | Human communication research |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | LE POIRE, B. A BURGOON, J. K |
| description | The effects of violations of expectations on arousal, reciprocity, & compensation in the medical practitioner-patient relationship are considered, specifically, expectancy violations (EV) & discrepancy arousal (DA) predictions are contrasted. EV theory predicts that given a communication with high reward valence, high & very high involvement (including touch & close proximity) should be met with reciprocation. DA theory predicts that Ss should compensate the level of involvement with a reciprocal level of involvement regardless of valence or involvement. Undergraduates (N = 92) participated in a practice medical interview. Various levels of involvement were enacted by one male & one female confederate. Results contradicted both the DA & EV theories of ongoing interactions. It is suggested that both theories need modification if they are to successfully account for these results. 4 Tables, 4 Figures, 47 References. Adapted from the source document |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00335.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85579748</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>85334309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-d842937367bad71a345f8eb282c7a5ce2dd757041690836ab7b0cc038a0a080e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1r3DAQhkVpIdsk_8GkpTe7I48-cysh_YBALulZyLLcevFaW0m73fz7ytkllEJp5yKYefTODO8QckWhoSXerxvKhKpbzVVDtWZN7gAQeXN4QVbPpZdkBSigRq30GXmd0hpKSCVXZP_wM1QuzDnalMf5W-UP28nONo9hTlUYqnHeh2nvN37O1X4M07FyvXDeZTu7x9_SVf7uQywZH9MuVf2YXPTbJ8jGsEt2OhEX5NVgp-QvT-85-frx9uHmc313_-nLzYe72rVa5bpXrNUoUcjO9pJaZHxQvmtV66Tlzrd9L7kERoUGhcJ2sgPnAJUFCwo8npN3R91tDD92PmWzKTP5qazoyzxGcS61ZOo_QESGoP8JCooCW8ELePUHuA67OJdtTXEKpRB6UXvzVwiBF4vYU8_rI-ViSCn6wWzjuLHx0VAwyx2YtVnMNovZizozpzswh_L57amFTc5OQyx2jOlZgVEGnDP8BeCFtnY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1305787409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two contrasting explanations of involvement violations: expectancy violations theory versus discrepancy arousal theory</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>LE POIRE, B. A ; BURGOON, J. K</creator><creatorcontrib>LE POIRE, B. A ; BURGOON, J. K</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The effects of violations of expectations on arousal, reciprocity, & compensation in the medical practitioner-patient relationship are considered, specifically, expectancy violations (EV) & discrepancy arousal (DA) predictions are contrasted. EV theory predicts that given a communication with high reward valence, high & very high involvement (including touch & close proximity) should be met with reciprocation. DA theory predicts that Ss should compensate the level of involvement with a reciprocal level of involvement regardless of valence or involvement. Undergraduates (N = 92) participated in a practice medical interview. Various levels of involvement were enacted by one male & one female confederate. Results contradicted both the DA & EV theories of ongoing interactions. It is suggested that both theories need modification if they are to successfully account for these results. 4 Tables, 4 Figures, 47 References. Adapted from the source document]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3989</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2958</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00335.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HCORDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, MA: blackwell</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Expectations ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Norms ; Patients ; Physicians ; Practitioner Patient Relationship ; Professional relationships ; Psychological Factors ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reciprocity ; Sanctions ; Social interactions. Communication. Group processes ; Social psychology ; Social research</subject><ispartof>Human communication research, 1994-06, Vol.20 (4), p.560-591</ispartof><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Jun 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-d842937367bad71a345f8eb282c7a5ce2dd757041690836ab7b0cc038a0a080e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925,33775</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4140554$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LE POIRE, B. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURGOON, J. K</creatorcontrib><title>Two contrasting explanations of involvement violations: expectancy violations theory versus discrepancy arousal theory</title><title>Human communication research</title><description><![CDATA[The effects of violations of expectations on arousal, reciprocity, & compensation in the medical practitioner-patient relationship are considered, specifically, expectancy violations (EV) & discrepancy arousal (DA) predictions are contrasted. EV theory predicts that given a communication with high reward valence, high & very high involvement (including touch & close proximity) should be met with reciprocation. DA theory predicts that Ss should compensate the level of involvement with a reciprocal level of involvement regardless of valence or involvement. Undergraduates (N = 92) participated in a practice medical interview. Various levels of involvement were enacted by one male & one female confederate. Results contradicted both the DA & EV theories of ongoing interactions. It is suggested that both theories need modification if they are to successfully account for these results. 4 Tables, 4 Figures, 47 References. Adapted from the source document]]></description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Expectations</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practitioner Patient Relationship</subject><subject>Professional relationships</subject><subject>Psychological Factors</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reciprocity</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social research</subject><issn>0360-3989</issn><issn>1468-2958</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1r3DAQhkVpIdsk_8GkpTe7I48-cysh_YBALulZyLLcevFaW0m73fz7ytkllEJp5yKYefTODO8QckWhoSXerxvKhKpbzVVDtWZN7gAQeXN4QVbPpZdkBSigRq30GXmd0hpKSCVXZP_wM1QuzDnalMf5W-UP28nONo9hTlUYqnHeh2nvN37O1X4M07FyvXDeZTu7x9_SVf7uQywZH9MuVf2YXPTbJ8jGsEt2OhEX5NVgp-QvT-85-frx9uHmc313_-nLzYe72rVa5bpXrNUoUcjO9pJaZHxQvmtV66Tlzrd9L7kERoUGhcJ2sgPnAJUFCwo8npN3R91tDD92PmWzKTP5qazoyzxGcS61ZOo_QESGoP8JCooCW8ELePUHuA67OJdtTXEKpRB6UXvzVwiBF4vYU8_rI-ViSCn6wWzjuLHx0VAwyx2YtVnMNovZizozpzswh_L57amFTc5OQyx2jOlZgVEGnDP8BeCFtnY</recordid><startdate>19940601</startdate><enddate>19940601</enddate><creator>LE POIRE, B. A</creator><creator>BURGOON, J. K</creator><general>blackwell</general><general>Oxford University Press for the International Communication Association</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HNJIA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SFNNT</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940601</creationdate><title>Two contrasting explanations of involvement violations: expectancy violations theory versus discrepancy arousal theory</title><author>LE POIRE, B. A ; BURGOON, J. K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-d842937367bad71a345f8eb282c7a5ce2dd757041690836ab7b0cc038a0a080e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Expectations</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practitioner Patient Relationship</topic><topic>Professional relationships</topic><topic>Psychological Factors</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reciprocity</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LE POIRE, B. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURGOON, J. K</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 20</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 44</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Human communication research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LE POIRE, B. A</au><au>BURGOON, J. K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two contrasting explanations of involvement violations: expectancy violations theory versus discrepancy arousal theory</atitle><jtitle>Human communication research</jtitle><date>1994-06-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>560</spage><epage>591</epage><pages>560-591</pages><issn>0360-3989</issn><eissn>1468-2958</eissn><coden>HCORDD</coden><abstract><![CDATA[The effects of violations of expectations on arousal, reciprocity, & compensation in the medical practitioner-patient relationship are considered, specifically, expectancy violations (EV) & discrepancy arousal (DA) predictions are contrasted. EV theory predicts that given a communication with high reward valence, high & very high involvement (including touch & close proximity) should be met with reciprocation. DA theory predicts that Ss should compensate the level of involvement with a reciprocal level of involvement regardless of valence or involvement. Undergraduates (N = 92) participated in a practice medical interview. Various levels of involvement were enacted by one male & one female confederate. Results contradicted both the DA & EV theories of ongoing interactions. It is suggested that both theories need modification if they are to successfully account for these results. 4 Tables, 4 Figures, 47 References. Adapted from the source document]]></abstract><cop>Malden, MA</cop><pub>blackwell</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00335.x</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0360-3989 |
| ispartof | Human communication research, 1994-06, Vol.20 (4), p.560-591 |
| issn | 0360-3989 1468-2958 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85579748 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; Access via Wiley Online Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Behavior Biological and medical sciences Expectations Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Norms Patients Physicians Practitioner Patient Relationship Professional relationships Psychological Factors Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reciprocity Sanctions Social interactions. Communication. Group processes Social psychology Social research |
| title | Two contrasting explanations of involvement violations: expectancy violations theory versus discrepancy arousal theory |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T09%3A04%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20contrasting%20explanations%20of%20involvement%20violations:%20expectancy%20violations%20theory%20versus%20discrepancy%20arousal%20theory&rft.jtitle=Human%20communication%20research&rft.au=LE%20POIRE,%20B.%20A&rft.date=1994-06-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=560&rft.epage=591&rft.pages=560-591&rft.issn=0360-3989&rft.eissn=1468-2958&rft.coden=HCORDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00335.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85334309%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1305787409&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |