Young children's use of prosody in sentence parsing
Korean children's ability to use prosodic phrasing in sentence comprehension was studied using two types of ambiguity. First, we examined a word-segmentation ambiguity in which placement of the phrasal boundary leads to different interpretations of a sentence. Next, we examined a syntactic ambi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of psycholinguistic research 2003-03, Vol.32 (2), p.197-217 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 217 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 197 |
| container_title | Journal of psycholinguistic research |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Choi, Youngon Mazuka, Reiko |
| description | Korean children's ability to use prosodic phrasing in sentence comprehension was studied using two types of ambiguity. First, we examined a word-segmentation ambiguity in which placement of the phrasal boundary leads to different interpretations of a sentence. Next, we examined a syntactic ambiguity in which the same words were differently grouped into syntactic phrases by prosodic demarcation. Children aged 3 or 4 years showed that they could use prosodic information to segment utterances and to derive the meaning of ambiguous sentences when the sentences only contained a word-segmentation ambiguity. However, even 5- to 6-year-old children were not able to reliably resolve the second type of ambiguity, an ambiguity of phrasal grouping, by using prosodic information. The results demonstrate that children's difficulties in dealing with structural ambiguity are not due to their inability to use prosodic information. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1023/A:1022400424874 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85577099</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>945095681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-a6e0ab026394ad5388266f5399fcaf789fc78363148bdf9cbb8bcb4632db9b1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsyGLAabA2edPtqriS6rEAgNTZCdOCUqdEjdD_z2WKAsL06P39Oj03hFyzuCGAcfb-V0GFwCCC6PFAZkyqbFQUspDMgWwUCgLckJOUvqEnI1hx2TCeJ4aZFOC7_0YV7T6aLt6CPE60TEF2jd0M_Spr3e0jTSFuA2xCnTjhtTG1Sk5alyXwtmeM_L2cP-6eCqWL4_Pi_myqJCxbeFUAOeBK7TC1RKN4Uo1Eq1tKtdok6ENKmTC-LqxlffGV14o5LW3nnmckaufvbnL1xjStly3qQpd52Lox1QaKbUGa_8VNTLNjRJZvPwjfvbjEPMRJUeQjIORWbrYS6Nfh7rcDO3aDbvy92n4DZ4MbFI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230512085</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Young children's use of prosody in sentence parsing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Choi, Youngon ; Mazuka, Reiko</creator><creatorcontrib>Choi, Youngon ; Mazuka, Reiko</creatorcontrib><description>Korean children's ability to use prosodic phrasing in sentence comprehension was studied using two types of ambiguity. First, we examined a word-segmentation ambiguity in which placement of the phrasal boundary leads to different interpretations of a sentence. Next, we examined a syntactic ambiguity in which the same words were differently grouped into syntactic phrases by prosodic demarcation. Children aged 3 or 4 years showed that they could use prosodic information to segment utterances and to derive the meaning of ambiguous sentences when the sentences only contained a word-segmentation ambiguity. However, even 5- to 6-year-old children were not able to reliably resolve the second type of ambiguity, an ambiguity of phrasal grouping, by using prosodic information. The results demonstrate that children's difficulties in dealing with structural ambiguity are not due to their inability to use prosodic information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-6905</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6555</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1022400424874</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12690831</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPLRB7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Ambiguity ; Child ; Child Language ; Child, Preschool ; Educational Research ; English ; Evidence ; Female ; Grammar ; Humans ; Language Acquisition ; Language Processing ; Linguistics - methods ; Male ; Reading Comprehension ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Sentences ; Speech ; Speech Production Measurement ; Verbal Behavior ; Visual Stimuli ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2003-03, Vol.32 (2), p.197-217</ispartof><rights>Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-a6e0ab026394ad5388266f5399fcaf789fc78363148bdf9cbb8bcb4632db9b1b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12690831$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choi, Youngon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazuka, Reiko</creatorcontrib><title>Young children's use of prosody in sentence parsing</title><title>Journal of psycholinguistic research</title><addtitle>J Psycholinguist Res</addtitle><description>Korean children's ability to use prosodic phrasing in sentence comprehension was studied using two types of ambiguity. First, we examined a word-segmentation ambiguity in which placement of the phrasal boundary leads to different interpretations of a sentence. Next, we examined a syntactic ambiguity in which the same words were differently grouped into syntactic phrases by prosodic demarcation. Children aged 3 or 4 years showed that they could use prosodic information to segment utterances and to derive the meaning of ambiguous sentences when the sentences only contained a word-segmentation ambiguity. However, even 5- to 6-year-old children were not able to reliably resolve the second type of ambiguity, an ambiguity of phrasal grouping, by using prosodic information. The results demonstrate that children's difficulties in dealing with structural ambiguity are not due to their inability to use prosodic information.</description><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Language</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language Acquisition</subject><subject>Language Processing</subject><subject>Linguistics - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Production Measurement</subject><subject>Verbal Behavior</subject><subject>Visual Stimuli</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0090-6905</issn><issn>1573-6555</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqUwsyGLAabA2edPtqriS6rEAgNTZCdOCUqdEjdD_z2WKAsL06P39Oj03hFyzuCGAcfb-V0GFwCCC6PFAZkyqbFQUspDMgWwUCgLckJOUvqEnI1hx2TCeJ4aZFOC7_0YV7T6aLt6CPE60TEF2jd0M_Spr3e0jTSFuA2xCnTjhtTG1Sk5alyXwtmeM_L2cP-6eCqWL4_Pi_myqJCxbeFUAOeBK7TC1RKN4Uo1Eq1tKtdok6ENKmTC-LqxlffGV14o5LW3nnmckaufvbnL1xjStly3qQpd52Lox1QaKbUGa_8VNTLNjRJZvPwjfvbjEPMRJUeQjIORWbrYS6Nfh7rcDO3aDbvy92n4DZ4MbFI</recordid><startdate>200303</startdate><enddate>200303</enddate><creator>Choi, Youngon</creator><creator>Mazuka, Reiko</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200303</creationdate><title>Young children's use of prosody in sentence parsing</title><author>Choi, Youngon ; Mazuka, Reiko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-a6e0ab026394ad5388266f5399fcaf789fc78363148bdf9cbb8bcb4632db9b1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Language</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language Acquisition</topic><topic>Language Processing</topic><topic>Linguistics - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Production Measurement</topic><topic>Verbal Behavior</topic><topic>Visual Stimuli</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choi, Youngon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazuka, Reiko</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of psycholinguistic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choi, Youngon</au><au>Mazuka, Reiko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Young children's use of prosody in sentence parsing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psycholinguistic research</jtitle><addtitle>J Psycholinguist Res</addtitle><date>2003-03</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>197</spage><epage>217</epage><pages>197-217</pages><issn>0090-6905</issn><eissn>1573-6555</eissn><coden>JPLRB7</coden><abstract>Korean children's ability to use prosodic phrasing in sentence comprehension was studied using two types of ambiguity. First, we examined a word-segmentation ambiguity in which placement of the phrasal boundary leads to different interpretations of a sentence. Next, we examined a syntactic ambiguity in which the same words were differently grouped into syntactic phrases by prosodic demarcation. Children aged 3 or 4 years showed that they could use prosodic information to segment utterances and to derive the meaning of ambiguous sentences when the sentences only contained a word-segmentation ambiguity. However, even 5- to 6-year-old children were not able to reliably resolve the second type of ambiguity, an ambiguity of phrasal grouping, by using prosodic information. The results demonstrate that children's difficulties in dealing with structural ambiguity are not due to their inability to use prosodic information.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>12690831</pmid><doi>10.1023/A:1022400424874</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0090-6905 |
| ispartof | Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2003-03, Vol.32 (2), p.197-217 |
| issn | 0090-6905 1573-6555 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85577099 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Ambiguity Child Child Language Child, Preschool Educational Research English Evidence Female Grammar Humans Language Acquisition Language Processing Linguistics - methods Male Reading Comprehension Resistance (Psychology) Sentences Speech Speech Production Measurement Verbal Behavior Visual Stimuli Young Children |
| title | Young children's use of prosody in sentence parsing |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A06%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Young%20children's%20use%20of%20prosody%20in%20sentence%20parsing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psycholinguistic%20research&rft.au=Choi,%20Youngon&rft.date=2003-03&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=197&rft.epage=217&rft.pages=197-217&rft.issn=0090-6905&rft.eissn=1573-6555&rft.coden=JPLRB7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1022400424874&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E945095681%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230512085&rft_id=info:pmid/12690831&rfr_iscdi=true |