Output-based allocations and revenue recycling: Implications for the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme
The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS) is more comprehensive in its coverage of emissions than schemes introduced or proposed to date in any other country in that it includes agricultural greenhouse gases, which account for half of New Zealand’s total emissions. But, motivated by concerns...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy policy 2010-12, Vol.38 (12), p.7861-7872 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7872 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 7861 |
container_title | Energy policy |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Lennox, James A. van Nieuwkoop, Renger |
description | The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS) is more comprehensive in its coverage of emissions than schemes introduced or proposed to date in any other country in that it includes agricultural greenhouse gases, which account for half of New Zealand’s total emissions. But, motivated by concerns for the international competitiveness of emissions-intensive, trade-exposed industrial and agricultural activities, current legislation provides for substantial ongoing free allocations to such activities, linked to their output. Here we use a computable general equilibrium model to analyse the impacts of output-based allocation, given the possibility of recycling net revenues to reduce prior distorting taxes. Unlike previous modelling studies of alternative NZ ETS designs, we allow for a more realistic modelling both of capital and labour supply. We find that, as suggested by theoretical results, interactions between the ETS and existing taxes are important. Given any level of output-based allocation, the negative macroeconomic impacts can be reduced by recycling net revenues as efficiently as possible. Less obviously, we find that there may be an optimal non-zero level of output-based allocation. This optimal level increases as the carbon price and/or factor supply elasticities increase, but decreases if revenues are recycled with greater efficiency.
►The current New Zealand emissions trading scheme could be made less costly. ►Recycling revenues to reduce distorting income taxes reduces macroeconomic costs. ►With high (exogenous) carbon prices, output-based allocation may also reduce costs. ►Efficient revenue recycling lowers optimal rates of output-based allocation. ►Optimal rates are parameter-dependent, but are much lower than legislated levels. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_855685253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421510006634</els_id><sourcerecordid>1777128309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c678t-e84e27f9fb6e378854848051cdce13f2d1a9bea14170ee61bf07ced7c85e6fdb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxSMEEsvCJ-ASISG4ZBnHTmwjcaiqApUKPVAuXCzHmbBe5R92smi_PZPd0gOHUktjS_bvPY08L0leMtgwYOW73Qb7cWg3OdAN6A1A_ihZMSV5VkopHycr4MAykbPiafIsxh0ACKXFKvHX8zTOU1bZiHVq23ZwdvJDH1Pb12nAPfYz0ukOrvX9z_fpZTe2_i_TDCGdtph-xd_pD7TtornofIzH15tga9Kk39wWO3yePGlsG_HF7blOvn-8uDn_nF1df7o8P7vKXCnVlKESmMtGN1WJXCpVCCUUFMzVDhlv8ppZXaFlgklALFnVgHRYS6cKLJu64uvkzcl3DMOvGeNkqCGHLTWHwxyNKopSFXnBH0RKzbT-P8mVliDkQr69l2Q0DkYz4cXD0FxxWFxf_YPuhjn09I1GMdCiWBzXCT9BLgwxBmzMGHxnw8EwMEtMzM4cY2KWmBjQhmJCqi8nVcAR3Z0EafW4wHvDLVe0HaiOSm49FctpG6mkKpmRSuZmO3Xk9_q2VRudbZtge-fjnW_OBQjBgbgPJw4pC3uPwUTnsadRekrbZOrB39v3H1Ik7Ro</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>810945677</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Output-based allocations and revenue recycling: Implications for the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme</title><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Lennox, James A. ; van Nieuwkoop, Renger</creator><creatorcontrib>Lennox, James A. ; van Nieuwkoop, Renger</creatorcontrib><description>The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS) is more comprehensive in its coverage of emissions than schemes introduced or proposed to date in any other country in that it includes agricultural greenhouse gases, which account for half of New Zealand’s total emissions. But, motivated by concerns for the international competitiveness of emissions-intensive, trade-exposed industrial and agricultural activities, current legislation provides for substantial ongoing free allocations to such activities, linked to their output. Here we use a computable general equilibrium model to analyse the impacts of output-based allocation, given the possibility of recycling net revenues to reduce prior distorting taxes. Unlike previous modelling studies of alternative NZ ETS designs, we allow for a more realistic modelling both of capital and labour supply. We find that, as suggested by theoretical results, interactions between the ETS and existing taxes are important. Given any level of output-based allocation, the negative macroeconomic impacts can be reduced by recycling net revenues as efficiently as possible. Less obviously, we find that there may be an optimal non-zero level of output-based allocation. This optimal level increases as the carbon price and/or factor supply elasticities increase, but decreases if revenues are recycled with greater efficiency.
►The current New Zealand emissions trading scheme could be made less costly. ►Recycling revenues to reduce distorting income taxes reduces macroeconomic costs. ►With high (exogenous) carbon prices, output-based allocation may also reduce costs. ►Efficient revenue recycling lowers optimal rates of output-based allocation. ►Optimal rates are parameter-dependent, but are much lower than legislated levels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural pollution ; Air pollution ; Air pollution caused by fuel industries ; Allocations ; Allocative efficiency ; Applied general equilibrium models ; Applied sciences ; Carbon emissions ; Competitiveness ; Computable general equilibrium ; Computable general equilibrium Emissions trading Output-based allocation ; Distortion ; Economic models ; Emissions trading ; Energy ; Energy. Thermal use of fuels ; Exact sciences and technology ; General. Regulations. Norms. Economy ; Macroeconomics ; Modelling ; New Zealand ; Optimization ; Output rate ; Output-based allocation ; Recycled ; Recycling ; Revenue ; Revenues ; Studies ; Taxation ; Taxes</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2010-12, Vol.38 (12), p.7861-7872</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Dec 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c678t-e84e27f9fb6e378854848051cdce13f2d1a9bea14170ee61bf07ced7c85e6fdb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c678t-e84e27f9fb6e378854848051cdce13f2d1a9bea14170ee61bf07ced7c85e6fdb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23404430$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeenepol/v_3a38_3ay_3a2010_3ai_3a12_3ap_3a7861-7872.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lennox, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Nieuwkoop, Renger</creatorcontrib><title>Output-based allocations and revenue recycling: Implications for the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS) is more comprehensive in its coverage of emissions than schemes introduced or proposed to date in any other country in that it includes agricultural greenhouse gases, which account for half of New Zealand’s total emissions. But, motivated by concerns for the international competitiveness of emissions-intensive, trade-exposed industrial and agricultural activities, current legislation provides for substantial ongoing free allocations to such activities, linked to their output. Here we use a computable general equilibrium model to analyse the impacts of output-based allocation, given the possibility of recycling net revenues to reduce prior distorting taxes. Unlike previous modelling studies of alternative NZ ETS designs, we allow for a more realistic modelling both of capital and labour supply. We find that, as suggested by theoretical results, interactions between the ETS and existing taxes are important. Given any level of output-based allocation, the negative macroeconomic impacts can be reduced by recycling net revenues as efficiently as possible. Less obviously, we find that there may be an optimal non-zero level of output-based allocation. This optimal level increases as the carbon price and/or factor supply elasticities increase, but decreases if revenues are recycled with greater efficiency.
►The current New Zealand emissions trading scheme could be made less costly. ►Recycling revenues to reduce distorting income taxes reduces macroeconomic costs. ►With high (exogenous) carbon prices, output-based allocation may also reduce costs. ►Efficient revenue recycling lowers optimal rates of output-based allocation. ►Optimal rates are parameter-dependent, but are much lower than legislated levels.</description><subject>Agricultural pollution</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Air pollution caused by fuel industries</subject><subject>Allocations</subject><subject>Allocative efficiency</subject><subject>Applied general equilibrium models</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Carbon emissions</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Computable general equilibrium</subject><subject>Computable general equilibrium Emissions trading Output-based allocation</subject><subject>Distortion</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Emissions trading</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>General. Regulations. Norms. Economy</subject><subject>Macroeconomics</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Output rate</subject><subject>Output-based allocation</subject><subject>Recycled</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>Revenues</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Taxes</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxSMEEsvCJ-ASISG4ZBnHTmwjcaiqApUKPVAuXCzHmbBe5R92smi_PZPd0gOHUktjS_bvPY08L0leMtgwYOW73Qb7cWg3OdAN6A1A_ihZMSV5VkopHycr4MAykbPiafIsxh0ACKXFKvHX8zTOU1bZiHVq23ZwdvJDH1Pb12nAPfYz0ukOrvX9z_fpZTe2_i_TDCGdtph-xd_pD7TtornofIzH15tga9Kk39wWO3yePGlsG_HF7blOvn-8uDn_nF1df7o8P7vKXCnVlKESmMtGN1WJXCpVCCUUFMzVDhlv8ppZXaFlgklALFnVgHRYS6cKLJu64uvkzcl3DMOvGeNkqCGHLTWHwxyNKopSFXnBH0RKzbT-P8mVliDkQr69l2Q0DkYz4cXD0FxxWFxf_YPuhjn09I1GMdCiWBzXCT9BLgwxBmzMGHxnw8EwMEtMzM4cY2KWmBjQhmJCqi8nVcAR3Z0EafW4wHvDLVe0HaiOSm49FctpG6mkKpmRSuZmO3Xk9_q2VRudbZtge-fjnW_OBQjBgbgPJw4pC3uPwUTnsadRekrbZOrB39v3H1Ik7Ro</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Lennox, James A.</creator><creator>van Nieuwkoop, Renger</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Output-based allocations and revenue recycling: Implications for the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme</title><author>Lennox, James A. ; van Nieuwkoop, Renger</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c678t-e84e27f9fb6e378854848051cdce13f2d1a9bea14170ee61bf07ced7c85e6fdb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agricultural pollution</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Air pollution caused by fuel industries</topic><topic>Allocations</topic><topic>Allocative efficiency</topic><topic>Applied general equilibrium models</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Carbon emissions</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Computable general equilibrium</topic><topic>Computable general equilibrium Emissions trading Output-based allocation</topic><topic>Distortion</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Emissions trading</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>General. Regulations. Norms. Economy</topic><topic>Macroeconomics</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Output rate</topic><topic>Output-based allocation</topic><topic>Recycled</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>Revenues</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Taxes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lennox, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Nieuwkoop, Renger</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lennox, James A.</au><au>van Nieuwkoop, Renger</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Output-based allocations and revenue recycling: Implications for the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>7861</spage><epage>7872</epage><pages>7861-7872</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS) is more comprehensive in its coverage of emissions than schemes introduced or proposed to date in any other country in that it includes agricultural greenhouse gases, which account for half of New Zealand’s total emissions. But, motivated by concerns for the international competitiveness of emissions-intensive, trade-exposed industrial and agricultural activities, current legislation provides for substantial ongoing free allocations to such activities, linked to their output. Here we use a computable general equilibrium model to analyse the impacts of output-based allocation, given the possibility of recycling net revenues to reduce prior distorting taxes. Unlike previous modelling studies of alternative NZ ETS designs, we allow for a more realistic modelling both of capital and labour supply. We find that, as suggested by theoretical results, interactions between the ETS and existing taxes are important. Given any level of output-based allocation, the negative macroeconomic impacts can be reduced by recycling net revenues as efficiently as possible. Less obviously, we find that there may be an optimal non-zero level of output-based allocation. This optimal level increases as the carbon price and/or factor supply elasticities increase, but decreases if revenues are recycled with greater efficiency.
►The current New Zealand emissions trading scheme could be made less costly. ►Recycling revenues to reduce distorting income taxes reduces macroeconomic costs. ►With high (exogenous) carbon prices, output-based allocation may also reduce costs. ►Efficient revenue recycling lowers optimal rates of output-based allocation. ►Optimal rates are parameter-dependent, but are much lower than legislated levels.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.002</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4215 |
ispartof | Energy policy, 2010-12, Vol.38 (12), p.7861-7872 |
issn | 0301-4215 1873-6777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_855685253 |
source | RePEc; PAIS Index; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Agricultural pollution Air pollution Air pollution caused by fuel industries Allocations Allocative efficiency Applied general equilibrium models Applied sciences Carbon emissions Competitiveness Computable general equilibrium Computable general equilibrium Emissions trading Output-based allocation Distortion Economic models Emissions trading Energy Energy. Thermal use of fuels Exact sciences and technology General. Regulations. Norms. Economy Macroeconomics Modelling New Zealand Optimization Output rate Output-based allocation Recycled Recycling Revenue Revenues Studies Taxation Taxes |
title | Output-based allocations and revenue recycling: Implications for the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T16%3A36%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Output-based%20allocations%20and%20revenue%20recycling:%20Implications%20for%20the%20New%20Zealand%20Emissions%20Trading%20Scheme&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Lennox,%20James%20A.&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=7861&rft.epage=7872&rft.pages=7861-7872&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1777128309%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=810945677&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421510006634&rfr_iscdi=true |