Output-based allocations and revenue recycling: Implications for the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme

The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS) is more comprehensive in its coverage of emissions than schemes introduced or proposed to date in any other country in that it includes agricultural greenhouse gases, which account for half of New Zealand’s total emissions. But, motivated by concerns...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy policy 2010-12, Vol.38 (12), p.7861-7872
Hauptverfasser: Lennox, James A., van Nieuwkoop, Renger
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7872
container_issue 12
container_start_page 7861
container_title Energy policy
container_volume 38
creator Lennox, James A.
van Nieuwkoop, Renger
description The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS) is more comprehensive in its coverage of emissions than schemes introduced or proposed to date in any other country in that it includes agricultural greenhouse gases, which account for half of New Zealand’s total emissions. But, motivated by concerns for the international competitiveness of emissions-intensive, trade-exposed industrial and agricultural activities, current legislation provides for substantial ongoing free allocations to such activities, linked to their output. Here we use a computable general equilibrium model to analyse the impacts of output-based allocation, given the possibility of recycling net revenues to reduce prior distorting taxes. Unlike previous modelling studies of alternative NZ ETS designs, we allow for a more realistic modelling both of capital and labour supply. We find that, as suggested by theoretical results, interactions between the ETS and existing taxes are important. Given any level of output-based allocation, the negative macroeconomic impacts can be reduced by recycling net revenues as efficiently as possible. Less obviously, we find that there may be an optimal non-zero level of output-based allocation. This optimal level increases as the carbon price and/or factor supply elasticities increase, but decreases if revenues are recycled with greater efficiency. ►The current New Zealand emissions trading scheme could be made less costly. ►Recycling revenues to reduce distorting income taxes reduces macroeconomic costs. ►With high (exogenous) carbon prices, output-based allocation may also reduce costs. ►Efficient revenue recycling lowers optimal rates of output-based allocation. ►Optimal rates are parameter-dependent, but are much lower than legislated levels.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_855685253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421510006634</els_id><sourcerecordid>1777128309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c678t-e84e27f9fb6e378854848051cdce13f2d1a9bea14170ee61bf07ced7c85e6fdb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxSMEEsvCJ-ASISG4ZBnHTmwjcaiqApUKPVAuXCzHmbBe5R92smi_PZPd0gOHUktjS_bvPY08L0leMtgwYOW73Qb7cWg3OdAN6A1A_ihZMSV5VkopHycr4MAykbPiafIsxh0ACKXFKvHX8zTOU1bZiHVq23ZwdvJDH1Pb12nAPfYz0ukOrvX9z_fpZTe2_i_TDCGdtph-xd_pD7TtornofIzH15tga9Kk39wWO3yePGlsG_HF7blOvn-8uDn_nF1df7o8P7vKXCnVlKESmMtGN1WJXCpVCCUUFMzVDhlv8ppZXaFlgklALFnVgHRYS6cKLJu64uvkzcl3DMOvGeNkqCGHLTWHwxyNKopSFXnBH0RKzbT-P8mVliDkQr69l2Q0DkYz4cXD0FxxWFxf_YPuhjn09I1GMdCiWBzXCT9BLgwxBmzMGHxnw8EwMEtMzM4cY2KWmBjQhmJCqi8nVcAR3Z0EafW4wHvDLVe0HaiOSm49FctpG6mkKpmRSuZmO3Xk9_q2VRudbZtge-fjnW_OBQjBgbgPJw4pC3uPwUTnsadRekrbZOrB39v3H1Ik7Ro</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>810945677</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Output-based allocations and revenue recycling: Implications for the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme</title><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Lennox, James A. ; van Nieuwkoop, Renger</creator><creatorcontrib>Lennox, James A. ; van Nieuwkoop, Renger</creatorcontrib><description>The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS) is more comprehensive in its coverage of emissions than schemes introduced or proposed to date in any other country in that it includes agricultural greenhouse gases, which account for half of New Zealand’s total emissions. But, motivated by concerns for the international competitiveness of emissions-intensive, trade-exposed industrial and agricultural activities, current legislation provides for substantial ongoing free allocations to such activities, linked to their output. Here we use a computable general equilibrium model to analyse the impacts of output-based allocation, given the possibility of recycling net revenues to reduce prior distorting taxes. Unlike previous modelling studies of alternative NZ ETS designs, we allow for a more realistic modelling both of capital and labour supply. We find that, as suggested by theoretical results, interactions between the ETS and existing taxes are important. Given any level of output-based allocation, the negative macroeconomic impacts can be reduced by recycling net revenues as efficiently as possible. Less obviously, we find that there may be an optimal non-zero level of output-based allocation. This optimal level increases as the carbon price and/or factor supply elasticities increase, but decreases if revenues are recycled with greater efficiency. ►The current New Zealand emissions trading scheme could be made less costly. ►Recycling revenues to reduce distorting income taxes reduces macroeconomic costs. ►With high (exogenous) carbon prices, output-based allocation may also reduce costs. ►Efficient revenue recycling lowers optimal rates of output-based allocation. ►Optimal rates are parameter-dependent, but are much lower than legislated levels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural pollution ; Air pollution ; Air pollution caused by fuel industries ; Allocations ; Allocative efficiency ; Applied general equilibrium models ; Applied sciences ; Carbon emissions ; Competitiveness ; Computable general equilibrium ; Computable general equilibrium Emissions trading Output-based allocation ; Distortion ; Economic models ; Emissions trading ; Energy ; Energy. Thermal use of fuels ; Exact sciences and technology ; General. Regulations. Norms. Economy ; Macroeconomics ; Modelling ; New Zealand ; Optimization ; Output rate ; Output-based allocation ; Recycled ; Recycling ; Revenue ; Revenues ; Studies ; Taxation ; Taxes</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2010-12, Vol.38 (12), p.7861-7872</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Dec 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c678t-e84e27f9fb6e378854848051cdce13f2d1a9bea14170ee61bf07ced7c85e6fdb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c678t-e84e27f9fb6e378854848051cdce13f2d1a9bea14170ee61bf07ced7c85e6fdb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23404430$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeenepol/v_3a38_3ay_3a2010_3ai_3a12_3ap_3a7861-7872.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lennox, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Nieuwkoop, Renger</creatorcontrib><title>Output-based allocations and revenue recycling: Implications for the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS) is more comprehensive in its coverage of emissions than schemes introduced or proposed to date in any other country in that it includes agricultural greenhouse gases, which account for half of New Zealand’s total emissions. But, motivated by concerns for the international competitiveness of emissions-intensive, trade-exposed industrial and agricultural activities, current legislation provides for substantial ongoing free allocations to such activities, linked to their output. Here we use a computable general equilibrium model to analyse the impacts of output-based allocation, given the possibility of recycling net revenues to reduce prior distorting taxes. Unlike previous modelling studies of alternative NZ ETS designs, we allow for a more realistic modelling both of capital and labour supply. We find that, as suggested by theoretical results, interactions between the ETS and existing taxes are important. Given any level of output-based allocation, the negative macroeconomic impacts can be reduced by recycling net revenues as efficiently as possible. Less obviously, we find that there may be an optimal non-zero level of output-based allocation. This optimal level increases as the carbon price and/or factor supply elasticities increase, but decreases if revenues are recycled with greater efficiency. ►The current New Zealand emissions trading scheme could be made less costly. ►Recycling revenues to reduce distorting income taxes reduces macroeconomic costs. ►With high (exogenous) carbon prices, output-based allocation may also reduce costs. ►Efficient revenue recycling lowers optimal rates of output-based allocation. ►Optimal rates are parameter-dependent, but are much lower than legislated levels.</description><subject>Agricultural pollution</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Air pollution caused by fuel industries</subject><subject>Allocations</subject><subject>Allocative efficiency</subject><subject>Applied general equilibrium models</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Carbon emissions</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Computable general equilibrium</subject><subject>Computable general equilibrium Emissions trading Output-based allocation</subject><subject>Distortion</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Emissions trading</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>General. Regulations. Norms. Economy</subject><subject>Macroeconomics</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Output rate</subject><subject>Output-based allocation</subject><subject>Recycled</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>Revenues</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Taxes</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxSMEEsvCJ-ASISG4ZBnHTmwjcaiqApUKPVAuXCzHmbBe5R92smi_PZPd0gOHUktjS_bvPY08L0leMtgwYOW73Qb7cWg3OdAN6A1A_ihZMSV5VkopHycr4MAykbPiafIsxh0ACKXFKvHX8zTOU1bZiHVq23ZwdvJDH1Pb12nAPfYz0ukOrvX9z_fpZTe2_i_TDCGdtph-xd_pD7TtornofIzH15tga9Kk39wWO3yePGlsG_HF7blOvn-8uDn_nF1df7o8P7vKXCnVlKESmMtGN1WJXCpVCCUUFMzVDhlv8ppZXaFlgklALFnVgHRYS6cKLJu64uvkzcl3DMOvGeNkqCGHLTWHwxyNKopSFXnBH0RKzbT-P8mVliDkQr69l2Q0DkYz4cXD0FxxWFxf_YPuhjn09I1GMdCiWBzXCT9BLgwxBmzMGHxnw8EwMEtMzM4cY2KWmBjQhmJCqi8nVcAR3Z0EafW4wHvDLVe0HaiOSm49FctpG6mkKpmRSuZmO3Xk9_q2VRudbZtge-fjnW_OBQjBgbgPJw4pC3uPwUTnsadRekrbZOrB39v3H1Ik7Ro</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Lennox, James A.</creator><creator>van Nieuwkoop, Renger</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Output-based allocations and revenue recycling: Implications for the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme</title><author>Lennox, James A. ; van Nieuwkoop, Renger</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c678t-e84e27f9fb6e378854848051cdce13f2d1a9bea14170ee61bf07ced7c85e6fdb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agricultural pollution</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Air pollution caused by fuel industries</topic><topic>Allocations</topic><topic>Allocative efficiency</topic><topic>Applied general equilibrium models</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Carbon emissions</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Computable general equilibrium</topic><topic>Computable general equilibrium Emissions trading Output-based allocation</topic><topic>Distortion</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Emissions trading</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>General. Regulations. Norms. Economy</topic><topic>Macroeconomics</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Output rate</topic><topic>Output-based allocation</topic><topic>Recycled</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>Revenues</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Taxes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lennox, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Nieuwkoop, Renger</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lennox, James A.</au><au>van Nieuwkoop, Renger</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Output-based allocations and revenue recycling: Implications for the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>7861</spage><epage>7872</epage><pages>7861-7872</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS) is more comprehensive in its coverage of emissions than schemes introduced or proposed to date in any other country in that it includes agricultural greenhouse gases, which account for half of New Zealand’s total emissions. But, motivated by concerns for the international competitiveness of emissions-intensive, trade-exposed industrial and agricultural activities, current legislation provides for substantial ongoing free allocations to such activities, linked to their output. Here we use a computable general equilibrium model to analyse the impacts of output-based allocation, given the possibility of recycling net revenues to reduce prior distorting taxes. Unlike previous modelling studies of alternative NZ ETS designs, we allow for a more realistic modelling both of capital and labour supply. We find that, as suggested by theoretical results, interactions between the ETS and existing taxes are important. Given any level of output-based allocation, the negative macroeconomic impacts can be reduced by recycling net revenues as efficiently as possible. Less obviously, we find that there may be an optimal non-zero level of output-based allocation. This optimal level increases as the carbon price and/or factor supply elasticities increase, but decreases if revenues are recycled with greater efficiency. ►The current New Zealand emissions trading scheme could be made less costly. ►Recycling revenues to reduce distorting income taxes reduces macroeconomic costs. ►With high (exogenous) carbon prices, output-based allocation may also reduce costs. ►Efficient revenue recycling lowers optimal rates of output-based allocation. ►Optimal rates are parameter-dependent, but are much lower than legislated levels.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.002</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4215
ispartof Energy policy, 2010-12, Vol.38 (12), p.7861-7872
issn 0301-4215
1873-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_855685253
source RePEc; PAIS Index; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Agricultural pollution
Air pollution
Air pollution caused by fuel industries
Allocations
Allocative efficiency
Applied general equilibrium models
Applied sciences
Carbon emissions
Competitiveness
Computable general equilibrium
Computable general equilibrium Emissions trading Output-based allocation
Distortion
Economic models
Emissions trading
Energy
Energy. Thermal use of fuels
Exact sciences and technology
General. Regulations. Norms. Economy
Macroeconomics
Modelling
New Zealand
Optimization
Output rate
Output-based allocation
Recycled
Recycling
Revenue
Revenues
Studies
Taxation
Taxes
title Output-based allocations and revenue recycling: Implications for the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T16%3A36%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Output-based%20allocations%20and%20revenue%20recycling:%20Implications%20for%20the%20New%20Zealand%20Emissions%20Trading%20Scheme&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Lennox,%20James%20A.&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=7861&rft.epage=7872&rft.pages=7861-7872&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1777128309%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=810945677&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421510006634&rfr_iscdi=true