Probability analysis of the safety of the second energy module of the leningrad nuclear power plant

A special international program was undertaken to estimate the safety of the second power unit at the Leningrad Nuclear Power Plant after reconstruction and the effectiveness of the new safety measures introduced. The analysis is based on the IAEA method, modified for RBMK reactors. The calculations...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Atomic energy (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1999-08, Vol.87 (2), p.565-568
Hauptverfasser: Lebedev, VI, Garusov, YuV, Makushkin, A V, Skok, YuG, Kukhar, S V, Cherkashov, YuM, Bocharov, S G, Shiverskii, E A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 568
container_issue 2
container_start_page 565
container_title Atomic energy (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 87
creator Lebedev, VI
Garusov, YuV
Makushkin, A V
Skok, YuG
Kukhar, S V
Cherkashov, YuM
Bocharov, S G
Shiverskii, E A
description A special international program was undertaken to estimate the safety of the second power unit at the Leningrad Nuclear Power Plant after reconstruction and the effectiveness of the new safety measures introduced. The analysis is based on the IAEA method, modified for RBMK reactors. The calculations employ a full-scale model of the risk of the power unit and the initial data for a 10-year operating period. After reconstruction, the frequency of serious accidents with core damage is 1.4.10 super(-5) per reactor-year and is acceptable in terms of the OPB-88/97 requirements. The influence of reconstruction is considerable: according to the estimates, the risk is reduced by a factor of more than 100. The results of the analysis permit suggestions regarding further increase in safety and reduction in cost of the reconstruction without increasing the risk of accident.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF02673220
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_855679649</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1777139600</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-c9e2db687f8595f394297c23e1a5741d1f78ee2406ff3931896560b522bc086d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AXFiyJUJ0nzddTFVWFBD3ouaTpdu3SbNWmR_fdGdBE8eJmv92EY5iXklMIVBVDXt3NgUnHGYI9MqFA81wzEfqpB8rxgQh-SoxhXAGCk0RPinoOvbNV27bDNbG-7bWxj5ptseMMs2gbTeNeh832dYY9huc3Wvh473Gkd9m2_DLbO-tF1aEO28R-YYmf74ZgcNLaLePKTp-R1fvcye8gXT_ePs5tF7piGIXcGWV1JrRotjGi4KZhRjnGkVqiC1rRRGpEVIJskcqqNFBIqwVjlQMuaT8n5995N8O8jxqFct9Fhl25AP8ZSCyGVkYVJ5MW_JFVKUW4kQELP_qArP4b0qFgqoTWwQvEEXX5DLvgYAzblJrRrG7YlhfLLmPLXGP4Jk1h-kg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>758802473</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Probability analysis of the safety of the second energy module of the leningrad nuclear power plant</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Lebedev, VI ; Garusov, YuV ; Makushkin, A V ; Skok, YuG ; Kukhar, S V ; Cherkashov, YuM ; Bocharov, S G ; Shiverskii, E A</creator><creatorcontrib>Lebedev, VI ; Garusov, YuV ; Makushkin, A V ; Skok, YuG ; Kukhar, S V ; Cherkashov, YuM ; Bocharov, S G ; Shiverskii, E A</creatorcontrib><description>A special international program was undertaken to estimate the safety of the second power unit at the Leningrad Nuclear Power Plant after reconstruction and the effectiveness of the new safety measures introduced. The analysis is based on the IAEA method, modified for RBMK reactors. The calculations employ a full-scale model of the risk of the power unit and the initial data for a 10-year operating period. After reconstruction, the frequency of serious accidents with core damage is 1.4.10 super(-5) per reactor-year and is acceptable in terms of the OPB-88/97 requirements. The influence of reconstruction is considerable: according to the estimates, the risk is reduced by a factor of more than 100. The results of the analysis permit suggestions regarding further increase in safety and reduction in cost of the reconstruction without increasing the risk of accident.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-4258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8205</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02673220</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Accidents ; Estimates ; Mathematical models ; Nuclear engineering ; Nuclear power generation ; Nuclear power plants ; Nuclear safety ; Probability ; Reactors ; Reconstruction ; Risk ; Safety</subject><ispartof>Atomic energy (New York, N.Y.), 1999-08, Vol.87 (2), p.565-568</ispartof><rights>Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lebedev, VI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garusov, YuV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makushkin, A V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skok, YuG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kukhar, S V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherkashov, YuM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bocharov, S G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiverskii, E A</creatorcontrib><title>Probability analysis of the safety of the second energy module of the leningrad nuclear power plant</title><title>Atomic energy (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>A special international program was undertaken to estimate the safety of the second power unit at the Leningrad Nuclear Power Plant after reconstruction and the effectiveness of the new safety measures introduced. The analysis is based on the IAEA method, modified for RBMK reactors. The calculations employ a full-scale model of the risk of the power unit and the initial data for a 10-year operating period. After reconstruction, the frequency of serious accidents with core damage is 1.4.10 super(-5) per reactor-year and is acceptable in terms of the OPB-88/97 requirements. The influence of reconstruction is considerable: according to the estimates, the risk is reduced by a factor of more than 100. The results of the analysis permit suggestions regarding further increase in safety and reduction in cost of the reconstruction without increasing the risk of accident.</description><subject>Accidents</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Nuclear engineering</subject><subject>Nuclear power generation</subject><subject>Nuclear power plants</subject><subject>Nuclear safety</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Reconstruction</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Safety</subject><issn>1063-4258</issn><issn>1573-8205</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AXFiyJUJ0nzddTFVWFBD3ouaTpdu3SbNWmR_fdGdBE8eJmv92EY5iXklMIVBVDXt3NgUnHGYI9MqFA81wzEfqpB8rxgQh-SoxhXAGCk0RPinoOvbNV27bDNbG-7bWxj5ptseMMs2gbTeNeh832dYY9huc3Wvh473Gkd9m2_DLbO-tF1aEO28R-YYmf74ZgcNLaLePKTp-R1fvcye8gXT_ePs5tF7piGIXcGWV1JrRotjGi4KZhRjnGkVqiC1rRRGpEVIJskcqqNFBIqwVjlQMuaT8n5995N8O8jxqFct9Fhl25AP8ZSCyGVkYVJ5MW_JFVKUW4kQELP_qArP4b0qFgqoTWwQvEEXX5DLvgYAzblJrRrG7YlhfLLmPLXGP4Jk1h-kg</recordid><startdate>19990801</startdate><enddate>19990801</enddate><creator>Lebedev, VI</creator><creator>Garusov, YuV</creator><creator>Makushkin, A V</creator><creator>Skok, YuG</creator><creator>Kukhar, S V</creator><creator>Cherkashov, YuM</creator><creator>Bocharov, S G</creator><creator>Shiverskii, E A</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990801</creationdate><title>Probability analysis of the safety of the second energy module of the leningrad nuclear power plant</title><author>Lebedev, VI ; Garusov, YuV ; Makushkin, A V ; Skok, YuG ; Kukhar, S V ; Cherkashov, YuM ; Bocharov, S G ; Shiverskii, E A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-c9e2db687f8595f394297c23e1a5741d1f78ee2406ff3931896560b522bc086d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Accidents</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Nuclear engineering</topic><topic>Nuclear power generation</topic><topic>Nuclear power plants</topic><topic>Nuclear safety</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Reconstruction</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Safety</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lebedev, VI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garusov, YuV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makushkin, A V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skok, YuG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kukhar, S V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherkashov, YuM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bocharov, S G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiverskii, E A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Atomic energy (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lebedev, VI</au><au>Garusov, YuV</au><au>Makushkin, A V</au><au>Skok, YuG</au><au>Kukhar, S V</au><au>Cherkashov, YuM</au><au>Bocharov, S G</au><au>Shiverskii, E A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Probability analysis of the safety of the second energy module of the leningrad nuclear power plant</atitle><jtitle>Atomic energy (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>1999-08-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>565</spage><epage>568</epage><pages>565-568</pages><issn>1063-4258</issn><eissn>1573-8205</eissn><abstract>A special international program was undertaken to estimate the safety of the second power unit at the Leningrad Nuclear Power Plant after reconstruction and the effectiveness of the new safety measures introduced. The analysis is based on the IAEA method, modified for RBMK reactors. The calculations employ a full-scale model of the risk of the power unit and the initial data for a 10-year operating period. After reconstruction, the frequency of serious accidents with core damage is 1.4.10 super(-5) per reactor-year and is acceptable in terms of the OPB-88/97 requirements. The influence of reconstruction is considerable: according to the estimates, the risk is reduced by a factor of more than 100. The results of the analysis permit suggestions regarding further increase in safety and reduction in cost of the reconstruction without increasing the risk of accident.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/BF02673220</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1063-4258
ispartof Atomic energy (New York, N.Y.), 1999-08, Vol.87 (2), p.565-568
issn 1063-4258
1573-8205
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_855679649
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Accidents
Estimates
Mathematical models
Nuclear engineering
Nuclear power generation
Nuclear power plants
Nuclear safety
Probability
Reactors
Reconstruction
Risk
Safety
title Probability analysis of the safety of the second energy module of the leningrad nuclear power plant
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A23%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Probability%20analysis%20of%20the%20safety%20of%20the%20second%20energy%20module%20of%20the%20leningrad%20nuclear%20power%20plant&rft.jtitle=Atomic%20energy%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Lebedev,%20VI&rft.date=1999-08-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=565&rft.epage=568&rft.pages=565-568&rft.issn=1063-4258&rft.eissn=1573-8205&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02673220&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1777139600%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=758802473&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true