Going, going, gone: the acquisition of the verb ‘go’
This study investigated different accounts of early argument structure acquisition and verb paradigm building through the detailed examination of the acquisition of the verb Go. Data from 11 children followed longitudinally between the ages of 2;0 and 3;0 were examined. Children's uses of the d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of child language 2002-11, Vol.29 (4), p.783-811 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 811 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 783 |
container_title | Journal of child language |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | THEAKSTON, ANNA L. LIEVEN, ELENA V. M. PINE, JULIAN M. ROWLAND, CAROLINE F. |
description | This study investigated different accounts of early argument structure acquisition and verb paradigm building through the detailed examination of the acquisition of the verb Go. Data from 11 children followed longitudinally between the ages of 2;0 and 3;0 were examined. Children's uses of the different forms of Go were compared with respect to syntactic structure and the semantics encoded. The data are compatible with the suggestion that the children were not operating with a single verb representation that differentiated between different forms of Go but rather that their knowledge of the relationship between the different forms of Go varied depending on the structure produced and the meaning encoded. However, a good predictor of the children's use of different forms of Go in particular structures and to express particular meanings was the frequency of use of those structures and meanings with particular forms of Go in the input. The implications of these findings for theories of syntactic category formation and abstract rule-based descriptions of grammar are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S030500090200538X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85566017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S030500090200538X</cupid><sourcerecordid>72765823</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c655t-ddcf743bbb4be7a4c2931b939596b9f40a0d96ca03dbca1652616e34fed7cb43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0V9LHDEQAPBQLPW0_QC-yCLUp66d_N_4JlKvBWsrPWjxJSTZ7Bm929VkV_TNj9F-PT9J97xtDyzFp4HMb4aZDEJbGPYwYPn-G1DgAKCAAHBa_HiBRpgJlUsBZA2NFul8kV9HGyldPEpVvELrmDCJlaQjVIybUE_fZdM_ofb7WXvuM-Ouu5BCG5o6a6rHpxsfbfZw_3PaPNz_eo1eVmaW_JshbqLJ0YfJ4cf8-Mv40-HBce4E521elq6SjFprmfXSMEcUxVZRxZWwqmJgoFTCGaCldQYLTgQWnrLKl9JZRjfR7rLtVWyuO59aPQ_J-dnM1L7pki44F6L_i2ehJFLwgtBnIZcFVkIs4M4TeNF0se6X1YQA5pQXokd4iVxsUoq-0lcxzE280xj04kj6nyP1NdtD487OfbmqGK7Sg7cDMMmZWRVN7UJaOQaYMVn0Ll-6kFp_-zdv4qUWkkquxfhUn43xyefJ6Vf9vfd0GNbMbQzl1K9W-v-4vwGWSLbq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220153586</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Going, going, gone: the acquisition of the verb ‘go’</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>THEAKSTON, ANNA L. ; LIEVEN, ELENA V. M. ; PINE, JULIAN M. ; ROWLAND, CAROLINE F.</creator><creatorcontrib>THEAKSTON, ANNA L. ; LIEVEN, ELENA V. M. ; PINE, JULIAN M. ; ROWLAND, CAROLINE F.</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated different accounts of early argument structure acquisition and verb paradigm building through the detailed examination of the acquisition of the verb Go. Data from 11 children followed longitudinally between the ages of 2;0 and 3;0 were examined. Children's uses of the different forms of Go were compared with respect to syntactic structure and the semantics encoded. The data are compatible with the suggestion that the children were not operating with a single verb representation that differentiated between different forms of Go but rather that their knowledge of the relationship between the different forms of Go varied depending on the structure produced and the meaning encoded. However, a good predictor of the children's use of different forms of Go in particular structures and to express particular meanings was the frequency of use of those structures and meanings with particular forms of Go in the input. The implications of these findings for theories of syntactic category formation and abstract rule-based descriptions of grammar are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-0009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7602</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S030500090200538X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12471973</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCLGBJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adults ; Argument structure ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child development ; Child Language ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Children & youth ; Developmental psychology ; English language ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grammar ; Humans ; Language acquisition ; Linguistics ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Meaning ; Notes and Discussion ; Phonology ; Preschool children ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Representation ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Semantic processing ; Semantics ; Semiotics ; Syntactic analysis ; Syntactic processing ; Syntactic structures ; Syntax ; Syntax semantics relationship ; Verbs ; Vocabulary</subject><ispartof>Journal of child language, 2002-11, Vol.29 (4), p.783-811</ispartof><rights>2002 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c655t-ddcf743bbb4be7a4c2931b939596b9f40a0d96ca03dbca1652616e34fed7cb43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S030500090200538X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,30977,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14014478$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12471973$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>THEAKSTON, ANNA L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIEVEN, ELENA V. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PINE, JULIAN M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROWLAND, CAROLINE F.</creatorcontrib><title>Going, going, gone: the acquisition of the verb ‘go’</title><title>Journal of child language</title><addtitle>J. Child Lang</addtitle><description>This study investigated different accounts of early argument structure acquisition and verb paradigm building through the detailed examination of the acquisition of the verb Go. Data from 11 children followed longitudinally between the ages of 2;0 and 3;0 were examined. Children's uses of the different forms of Go were compared with respect to syntactic structure and the semantics encoded. The data are compatible with the suggestion that the children were not operating with a single verb representation that differentiated between different forms of Go but rather that their knowledge of the relationship between the different forms of Go varied depending on the structure produced and the meaning encoded. However, a good predictor of the children's use of different forms of Go in particular structures and to express particular meanings was the frequency of use of those structures and meanings with particular forms of Go in the input. The implications of these findings for theories of syntactic category formation and abstract rule-based descriptions of grammar are discussed.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Argument structure</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Child Language</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language acquisition</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meaning</subject><subject>Notes and Discussion</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Preschool children</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Representation</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Semantic processing</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Semiotics</subject><subject>Syntactic analysis</subject><subject>Syntactic processing</subject><subject>Syntactic structures</subject><subject>Syntax</subject><subject>Syntax semantics relationship</subject><subject>Verbs</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><issn>0305-0009</issn><issn>1469-7602</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0V9LHDEQAPBQLPW0_QC-yCLUp66d_N_4JlKvBWsrPWjxJSTZ7Bm929VkV_TNj9F-PT9J97xtDyzFp4HMb4aZDEJbGPYwYPn-G1DgAKCAAHBa_HiBRpgJlUsBZA2NFul8kV9HGyldPEpVvELrmDCJlaQjVIybUE_fZdM_ofb7WXvuM-Ouu5BCG5o6a6rHpxsfbfZw_3PaPNz_eo1eVmaW_JshbqLJ0YfJ4cf8-Mv40-HBce4E521elq6SjFprmfXSMEcUxVZRxZWwqmJgoFTCGaCldQYLTgQWnrLKl9JZRjfR7rLtVWyuO59aPQ_J-dnM1L7pki44F6L_i2ehJFLwgtBnIZcFVkIs4M4TeNF0se6X1YQA5pQXokd4iVxsUoq-0lcxzE280xj04kj6nyP1NdtD487OfbmqGK7Sg7cDMMmZWRVN7UJaOQaYMVn0Ll-6kFp_-zdv4qUWkkquxfhUn43xyefJ6Vf9vfd0GNbMbQzl1K9W-v-4vwGWSLbq</recordid><startdate>20021101</startdate><enddate>20021101</enddate><creator>THEAKSTON, ANNA L.</creator><creator>LIEVEN, ELENA V. M.</creator><creator>PINE, JULIAN M.</creator><creator>ROWLAND, CAROLINE F.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021101</creationdate><title>Going, going, gone: the acquisition of the verb ‘go’</title><author>THEAKSTON, ANNA L. ; LIEVEN, ELENA V. M. ; PINE, JULIAN M. ; ROWLAND, CAROLINE F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c655t-ddcf743bbb4be7a4c2931b939596b9f40a0d96ca03dbca1652616e34fed7cb43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Argument structure</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Child Language</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language acquisition</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meaning</topic><topic>Notes and Discussion</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Preschool children</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Representation</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Semantic processing</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Semiotics</topic><topic>Syntactic analysis</topic><topic>Syntactic processing</topic><topic>Syntactic structures</topic><topic>Syntax</topic><topic>Syntax semantics relationship</topic><topic>Verbs</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>THEAKSTON, ANNA L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIEVEN, ELENA V. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PINE, JULIAN M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROWLAND, CAROLINE F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Journal of child language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>THEAKSTON, ANNA L.</au><au>LIEVEN, ELENA V. M.</au><au>PINE, JULIAN M.</au><au>ROWLAND, CAROLINE F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Going, going, gone: the acquisition of the verb ‘go’</atitle><jtitle>Journal of child language</jtitle><addtitle>J. Child Lang</addtitle><date>2002-11-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>783</spage><epage>811</epage><pages>783-811</pages><issn>0305-0009</issn><eissn>1469-7602</eissn><coden>JCLGBJ</coden><abstract>This study investigated different accounts of early argument structure acquisition and verb paradigm building through the detailed examination of the acquisition of the verb Go. Data from 11 children followed longitudinally between the ages of 2;0 and 3;0 were examined. Children's uses of the different forms of Go were compared with respect to syntactic structure and the semantics encoded. The data are compatible with the suggestion that the children were not operating with a single verb representation that differentiated between different forms of Go but rather that their knowledge of the relationship between the different forms of Go varied depending on the structure produced and the meaning encoded. However, a good predictor of the children's use of different forms of Go in particular structures and to express particular meanings was the frequency of use of those structures and meanings with particular forms of Go in the input. The implications of these findings for theories of syntactic category formation and abstract rule-based descriptions of grammar are discussed.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>12471973</pmid><doi>10.1017/S030500090200538X</doi><tpages>29</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-0009 |
ispartof | Journal of child language, 2002-11, Vol.29 (4), p.783-811 |
issn | 0305-0009 1469-7602 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85566017 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Adults Argument structure Biological and medical sciences Child Child development Child Language Child, Preschool Children Children & youth Developmental psychology English language Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Grammar Humans Language acquisition Linguistics Longitudinal Studies Male Meaning Notes and Discussion Phonology Preschool children Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Representation Resistance (Psychology) Semantic processing Semantics Semiotics Syntactic analysis Syntactic processing Syntactic structures Syntax Syntax semantics relationship Verbs Vocabulary |
title | Going, going, gone: the acquisition of the verb ‘go’ |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T23%3A01%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Going,%20going,%20gone:%20the%20acquisition%20of%20the%20verb%20%E2%80%98go%E2%80%99&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20child%20language&rft.au=THEAKSTON,%20ANNA%20L.&rft.date=2002-11-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=783&rft.epage=811&rft.pages=783-811&rft.issn=0305-0009&rft.eissn=1469-7602&rft.coden=JCLGBJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S030500090200538X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72765823%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220153586&rft_id=info:pmid/12471973&rft_cupid=10_1017_S030500090200538X&rfr_iscdi=true |