Going, going, gone: the acquisition of the verb ‘go’

This study investigated different accounts of early argument structure acquisition and verb paradigm building through the detailed examination of the acquisition of the verb Go. Data from 11 children followed longitudinally between the ages of 2;0 and 3;0 were examined. Children's uses of the d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of child language 2002-11, Vol.29 (4), p.783-811
Hauptverfasser: THEAKSTON, ANNA L., LIEVEN, ELENA V. M., PINE, JULIAN M., ROWLAND, CAROLINE F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 811
container_issue 4
container_start_page 783
container_title Journal of child language
container_volume 29
creator THEAKSTON, ANNA L.
LIEVEN, ELENA V. M.
PINE, JULIAN M.
ROWLAND, CAROLINE F.
description This study investigated different accounts of early argument structure acquisition and verb paradigm building through the detailed examination of the acquisition of the verb Go. Data from 11 children followed longitudinally between the ages of 2;0 and 3;0 were examined. Children's uses of the different forms of Go were compared with respect to syntactic structure and the semantics encoded. The data are compatible with the suggestion that the children were not operating with a single verb representation that differentiated between different forms of Go but rather that their knowledge of the relationship between the different forms of Go varied depending on the structure produced and the meaning encoded. However, a good predictor of the children's use of different forms of Go in particular structures and to express particular meanings was the frequency of use of those structures and meanings with particular forms of Go in the input. The implications of these findings for theories of syntactic category formation and abstract rule-based descriptions of grammar are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S030500090200538X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85566017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S030500090200538X</cupid><sourcerecordid>72765823</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c655t-ddcf743bbb4be7a4c2931b939596b9f40a0d96ca03dbca1652616e34fed7cb43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0V9LHDEQAPBQLPW0_QC-yCLUp66d_N_4JlKvBWsrPWjxJSTZ7Bm929VkV_TNj9F-PT9J97xtDyzFp4HMb4aZDEJbGPYwYPn-G1DgAKCAAHBa_HiBRpgJlUsBZA2NFul8kV9HGyldPEpVvELrmDCJlaQjVIybUE_fZdM_ofb7WXvuM-Ouu5BCG5o6a6rHpxsfbfZw_3PaPNz_eo1eVmaW_JshbqLJ0YfJ4cf8-Mv40-HBce4E521elq6SjFprmfXSMEcUxVZRxZWwqmJgoFTCGaCldQYLTgQWnrLKl9JZRjfR7rLtVWyuO59aPQ_J-dnM1L7pki44F6L_i2ehJFLwgtBnIZcFVkIs4M4TeNF0se6X1YQA5pQXokd4iVxsUoq-0lcxzE280xj04kj6nyP1NdtD487OfbmqGK7Sg7cDMMmZWRVN7UJaOQaYMVn0Ll-6kFp_-zdv4qUWkkquxfhUn43xyefJ6Vf9vfd0GNbMbQzl1K9W-v-4vwGWSLbq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220153586</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Going, going, gone: the acquisition of the verb ‘go’</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>THEAKSTON, ANNA L. ; LIEVEN, ELENA V. M. ; PINE, JULIAN M. ; ROWLAND, CAROLINE F.</creator><creatorcontrib>THEAKSTON, ANNA L. ; LIEVEN, ELENA V. M. ; PINE, JULIAN M. ; ROWLAND, CAROLINE F.</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated different accounts of early argument structure acquisition and verb paradigm building through the detailed examination of the acquisition of the verb Go. Data from 11 children followed longitudinally between the ages of 2;0 and 3;0 were examined. Children's uses of the different forms of Go were compared with respect to syntactic structure and the semantics encoded. The data are compatible with the suggestion that the children were not operating with a single verb representation that differentiated between different forms of Go but rather that their knowledge of the relationship between the different forms of Go varied depending on the structure produced and the meaning encoded. However, a good predictor of the children's use of different forms of Go in particular structures and to express particular meanings was the frequency of use of those structures and meanings with particular forms of Go in the input. The implications of these findings for theories of syntactic category formation and abstract rule-based descriptions of grammar are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-0009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7602</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S030500090200538X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12471973</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCLGBJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adults ; Argument structure ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child development ; Child Language ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Children &amp; youth ; Developmental psychology ; English language ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grammar ; Humans ; Language acquisition ; Linguistics ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Meaning ; Notes and Discussion ; Phonology ; Preschool children ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Representation ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Semantic processing ; Semantics ; Semiotics ; Syntactic analysis ; Syntactic processing ; Syntactic structures ; Syntax ; Syntax semantics relationship ; Verbs ; Vocabulary</subject><ispartof>Journal of child language, 2002-11, Vol.29 (4), p.783-811</ispartof><rights>2002 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c655t-ddcf743bbb4be7a4c2931b939596b9f40a0d96ca03dbca1652616e34fed7cb43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S030500090200538X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,30977,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14014478$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12471973$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>THEAKSTON, ANNA L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIEVEN, ELENA V. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PINE, JULIAN M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROWLAND, CAROLINE F.</creatorcontrib><title>Going, going, gone: the acquisition of the verb ‘go’</title><title>Journal of child language</title><addtitle>J. Child Lang</addtitle><description>This study investigated different accounts of early argument structure acquisition and verb paradigm building through the detailed examination of the acquisition of the verb Go. Data from 11 children followed longitudinally between the ages of 2;0 and 3;0 were examined. Children's uses of the different forms of Go were compared with respect to syntactic structure and the semantics encoded. The data are compatible with the suggestion that the children were not operating with a single verb representation that differentiated between different forms of Go but rather that their knowledge of the relationship between the different forms of Go varied depending on the structure produced and the meaning encoded. However, a good predictor of the children's use of different forms of Go in particular structures and to express particular meanings was the frequency of use of those structures and meanings with particular forms of Go in the input. The implications of these findings for theories of syntactic category formation and abstract rule-based descriptions of grammar are discussed.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Argument structure</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Child Language</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language acquisition</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meaning</subject><subject>Notes and Discussion</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Preschool children</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Representation</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Semantic processing</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Semiotics</subject><subject>Syntactic analysis</subject><subject>Syntactic processing</subject><subject>Syntactic structures</subject><subject>Syntax</subject><subject>Syntax semantics relationship</subject><subject>Verbs</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><issn>0305-0009</issn><issn>1469-7602</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0V9LHDEQAPBQLPW0_QC-yCLUp66d_N_4JlKvBWsrPWjxJSTZ7Bm929VkV_TNj9F-PT9J97xtDyzFp4HMb4aZDEJbGPYwYPn-G1DgAKCAAHBa_HiBRpgJlUsBZA2NFul8kV9HGyldPEpVvELrmDCJlaQjVIybUE_fZdM_ofb7WXvuM-Ouu5BCG5o6a6rHpxsfbfZw_3PaPNz_eo1eVmaW_JshbqLJ0YfJ4cf8-Mv40-HBce4E521elq6SjFprmfXSMEcUxVZRxZWwqmJgoFTCGaCldQYLTgQWnrLKl9JZRjfR7rLtVWyuO59aPQ_J-dnM1L7pki44F6L_i2ehJFLwgtBnIZcFVkIs4M4TeNF0se6X1YQA5pQXokd4iVxsUoq-0lcxzE280xj04kj6nyP1NdtD487OfbmqGK7Sg7cDMMmZWRVN7UJaOQaYMVn0Ll-6kFp_-zdv4qUWkkquxfhUn43xyefJ6Vf9vfd0GNbMbQzl1K9W-v-4vwGWSLbq</recordid><startdate>20021101</startdate><enddate>20021101</enddate><creator>THEAKSTON, ANNA L.</creator><creator>LIEVEN, ELENA V. M.</creator><creator>PINE, JULIAN M.</creator><creator>ROWLAND, CAROLINE F.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021101</creationdate><title>Going, going, gone: the acquisition of the verb ‘go’</title><author>THEAKSTON, ANNA L. ; LIEVEN, ELENA V. M. ; PINE, JULIAN M. ; ROWLAND, CAROLINE F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c655t-ddcf743bbb4be7a4c2931b939596b9f40a0d96ca03dbca1652616e34fed7cb43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Argument structure</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Child Language</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language acquisition</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meaning</topic><topic>Notes and Discussion</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Preschool children</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Representation</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Semantic processing</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Semiotics</topic><topic>Syntactic analysis</topic><topic>Syntactic processing</topic><topic>Syntactic structures</topic><topic>Syntax</topic><topic>Syntax semantics relationship</topic><topic>Verbs</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>THEAKSTON, ANNA L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIEVEN, ELENA V. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PINE, JULIAN M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROWLAND, CAROLINE F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Journal of child language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>THEAKSTON, ANNA L.</au><au>LIEVEN, ELENA V. M.</au><au>PINE, JULIAN M.</au><au>ROWLAND, CAROLINE F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Going, going, gone: the acquisition of the verb ‘go’</atitle><jtitle>Journal of child language</jtitle><addtitle>J. Child Lang</addtitle><date>2002-11-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>783</spage><epage>811</epage><pages>783-811</pages><issn>0305-0009</issn><eissn>1469-7602</eissn><coden>JCLGBJ</coden><abstract>This study investigated different accounts of early argument structure acquisition and verb paradigm building through the detailed examination of the acquisition of the verb Go. Data from 11 children followed longitudinally between the ages of 2;0 and 3;0 were examined. Children's uses of the different forms of Go were compared with respect to syntactic structure and the semantics encoded. The data are compatible with the suggestion that the children were not operating with a single verb representation that differentiated between different forms of Go but rather that their knowledge of the relationship between the different forms of Go varied depending on the structure produced and the meaning encoded. However, a good predictor of the children's use of different forms of Go in particular structures and to express particular meanings was the frequency of use of those structures and meanings with particular forms of Go in the input. The implications of these findings for theories of syntactic category formation and abstract rule-based descriptions of grammar are discussed.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>12471973</pmid><doi>10.1017/S030500090200538X</doi><tpages>29</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-0009
ispartof Journal of child language, 2002-11, Vol.29 (4), p.783-811
issn 0305-0009
1469-7602
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85566017
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Adults
Argument structure
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Child development
Child Language
Child, Preschool
Children
Children & youth
Developmental psychology
English language
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Grammar
Humans
Language acquisition
Linguistics
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Meaning
Notes and Discussion
Phonology
Preschool children
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Representation
Resistance (Psychology)
Semantic processing
Semantics
Semiotics
Syntactic analysis
Syntactic processing
Syntactic structures
Syntax
Syntax semantics relationship
Verbs
Vocabulary
title Going, going, gone: the acquisition of the verb ‘go’
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T23%3A01%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Going,%20going,%20gone:%20the%20acquisition%20of%20the%20verb%20%E2%80%98go%E2%80%99&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20child%20language&rft.au=THEAKSTON,%20ANNA%20L.&rft.date=2002-11-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=783&rft.epage=811&rft.pages=783-811&rft.issn=0305-0009&rft.eissn=1469-7602&rft.coden=JCLGBJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S030500090200538X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72765823%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220153586&rft_id=info:pmid/12471973&rft_cupid=10_1017_S030500090200538X&rfr_iscdi=true