Lexical boundary error analysis in hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria

This investigation is the second in a series to examine a potential source of reduced intelligibility in dysarthric speech, namely the mismatch between listeners' perceptual strategies and the acoustic information available in the dysarthric speech signal. Lexical boundary error (LBE) analysis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2000-06, Vol.107 (6), p.3415-3424
Hauptverfasser: Liss, J M, Spitzer, S M, Caviness, J N, Adler, C, Edwards, B W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3424
container_issue 6
container_start_page 3415
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 107
creator Liss, J M
Spitzer, S M
Caviness, J N
Adler, C
Edwards, B W
description This investigation is the second in a series to examine a potential source of reduced intelligibility in dysarthric speech, namely the mismatch between listeners' perceptual strategies and the acoustic information available in the dysarthric speech signal. Lexical boundary error (LBE) analysis was conducted on listener transcripts from phrases produced by speakers with hypokinetic dysarthria, ataxic dysarthria, and normal controls. By design, the hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthric tapes elicited similar intelligibility (words-correct) scores. However, they elicited different numbers and patterns of lexical boundary errors. The nature of the error pattern differences can be traced to the listeners' use of available syllabic strength information to segment the acoustic stream. Specifically, although both dysarthric speech samples elicited numerous lexical boundary errors, those for the hypokinetic speech generally conformed to predictions offered from studies of degraded normal speech. Those for the ataxic speech did not conform strongly to such predictions. It appears that the prosodic deficits of the ataxic speech (tendency toward syllabic isochrony, excessive loudness variation, and reduced vowel working space consequent to reductions in vowel strength) posed more of a problem for listeners than did the prosodic deficits of the hypokinetic speech (rapid rate, monotony, reduced vowel working space).
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.429412
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85559466</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71221213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-bd1884ee56f65b191a3c95650aed3bf54b1b635b6f0c959f22ee10d7bb5ba9a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtPwzAUhS0EoqUg8QtQJsSS4utX7RGVp1SJBWbLjh3VkCbFTiTy7zFKBzamq3v0nTN8CF0CXgIQuIUlI4oBOUJz4ASXkhN2jOYYYyiZEmKGzlL6yC-XVJ2iGWC54lSKObrf-O9Qmaaw3dA6E8fCx9jFwrSmGVNIRWiL7bjvPkPr-1Dl3BWmN7lTuDGZ2G9jMOfopDZN8heHu0Dvjw9v6-dy8_r0sr7blBUF3JfWgZTMey5qwS0oMLRSXHBsvKO25syCFZRbUeOcq5oQ7wG7lbXcGmUYXaDraXcfu6_Bp17vQqp805jWd0PSknOumBD_gisgJHujGbyZwCp2KUVf630Mu6xBA9a_ajXoSW1Grw6bg9159wecXNIfbKlzNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71221213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lexical boundary error analysis in hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Liss, J M ; Spitzer, S M ; Caviness, J N ; Adler, C ; Edwards, B W</creator><creatorcontrib>Liss, J M ; Spitzer, S M ; Caviness, J N ; Adler, C ; Edwards, B W</creatorcontrib><description>This investigation is the second in a series to examine a potential source of reduced intelligibility in dysarthric speech, namely the mismatch between listeners' perceptual strategies and the acoustic information available in the dysarthric speech signal. Lexical boundary error (LBE) analysis was conducted on listener transcripts from phrases produced by speakers with hypokinetic dysarthria, ataxic dysarthria, and normal controls. By design, the hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthric tapes elicited similar intelligibility (words-correct) scores. However, they elicited different numbers and patterns of lexical boundary errors. The nature of the error pattern differences can be traced to the listeners' use of available syllabic strength information to segment the acoustic stream. Specifically, although both dysarthric speech samples elicited numerous lexical boundary errors, those for the hypokinetic speech generally conformed to predictions offered from studies of degraded normal speech. Those for the ataxic speech did not conform strongly to such predictions. It appears that the prosodic deficits of the ataxic speech (tendency toward syllabic isochrony, excessive loudness variation, and reduced vowel working space consequent to reductions in vowel strength) posed more of a problem for listeners than did the prosodic deficits of the hypokinetic speech (rapid rate, monotony, reduced vowel working space).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.429412</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10875386</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASMAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Ataxia - complications ; Dysarthria - complications ; Female ; Humans ; Hypokinesia ; Male ; Space life sciences ; Speech Intelligibility ; Vocabulary</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2000-06, Vol.107 (6), p.3415-3424</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-bd1884ee56f65b191a3c95650aed3bf54b1b635b6f0c959f22ee10d7bb5ba9a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-bd1884ee56f65b191a3c95650aed3bf54b1b635b6f0c959f22ee10d7bb5ba9a43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10875386$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liss, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spitzer, S M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caviness, J N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adler, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, B W</creatorcontrib><title>Lexical boundary error analysis in hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>This investigation is the second in a series to examine a potential source of reduced intelligibility in dysarthric speech, namely the mismatch between listeners' perceptual strategies and the acoustic information available in the dysarthric speech signal. Lexical boundary error (LBE) analysis was conducted on listener transcripts from phrases produced by speakers with hypokinetic dysarthria, ataxic dysarthria, and normal controls. By design, the hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthric tapes elicited similar intelligibility (words-correct) scores. However, they elicited different numbers and patterns of lexical boundary errors. The nature of the error pattern differences can be traced to the listeners' use of available syllabic strength information to segment the acoustic stream. Specifically, although both dysarthric speech samples elicited numerous lexical boundary errors, those for the hypokinetic speech generally conformed to predictions offered from studies of degraded normal speech. Those for the ataxic speech did not conform strongly to such predictions. It appears that the prosodic deficits of the ataxic speech (tendency toward syllabic isochrony, excessive loudness variation, and reduced vowel working space consequent to reductions in vowel strength) posed more of a problem for listeners than did the prosodic deficits of the hypokinetic speech (rapid rate, monotony, reduced vowel working space).</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ataxia - complications</subject><subject>Dysarthria - complications</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypokinesia</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Speech Intelligibility</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkDtPwzAUhS0EoqUg8QtQJsSS4utX7RGVp1SJBWbLjh3VkCbFTiTy7zFKBzamq3v0nTN8CF0CXgIQuIUlI4oBOUJz4ASXkhN2jOYYYyiZEmKGzlL6yC-XVJ2iGWC54lSKObrf-O9Qmaaw3dA6E8fCx9jFwrSmGVNIRWiL7bjvPkPr-1Dl3BWmN7lTuDGZ2G9jMOfopDZN8heHu0Dvjw9v6-dy8_r0sr7blBUF3JfWgZTMey5qwS0oMLRSXHBsvKO25syCFZRbUeOcq5oQ7wG7lbXcGmUYXaDraXcfu6_Bp17vQqp805jWd0PSknOumBD_gisgJHujGbyZwCp2KUVf630Mu6xBA9a_ajXoSW1Grw6bg9159wecXNIfbKlzNg</recordid><startdate>200006</startdate><enddate>200006</enddate><creator>Liss, J M</creator><creator>Spitzer, S M</creator><creator>Caviness, J N</creator><creator>Adler, C</creator><creator>Edwards, B W</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200006</creationdate><title>Lexical boundary error analysis in hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria</title><author>Liss, J M ; Spitzer, S M ; Caviness, J N ; Adler, C ; Edwards, B W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-bd1884ee56f65b191a3c95650aed3bf54b1b635b6f0c959f22ee10d7bb5ba9a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ataxia - complications</topic><topic>Dysarthria - complications</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypokinesia</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Speech Intelligibility</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liss, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spitzer, S M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caviness, J N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adler, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, B W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liss, J M</au><au>Spitzer, S M</au><au>Caviness, J N</au><au>Adler, C</au><au>Edwards, B W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lexical boundary error analysis in hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>2000-06</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3415</spage><epage>3424</epage><pages>3415-3424</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><coden>JASMAN</coden><abstract>This investigation is the second in a series to examine a potential source of reduced intelligibility in dysarthric speech, namely the mismatch between listeners' perceptual strategies and the acoustic information available in the dysarthric speech signal. Lexical boundary error (LBE) analysis was conducted on listener transcripts from phrases produced by speakers with hypokinetic dysarthria, ataxic dysarthria, and normal controls. By design, the hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthric tapes elicited similar intelligibility (words-correct) scores. However, they elicited different numbers and patterns of lexical boundary errors. The nature of the error pattern differences can be traced to the listeners' use of available syllabic strength information to segment the acoustic stream. Specifically, although both dysarthric speech samples elicited numerous lexical boundary errors, those for the hypokinetic speech generally conformed to predictions offered from studies of degraded normal speech. Those for the ataxic speech did not conform strongly to such predictions. It appears that the prosodic deficits of the ataxic speech (tendency toward syllabic isochrony, excessive loudness variation, and reduced vowel working space consequent to reductions in vowel strength) posed more of a problem for listeners than did the prosodic deficits of the hypokinetic speech (rapid rate, monotony, reduced vowel working space).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>10875386</pmid><doi>10.1121/1.429412</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2000-06, Vol.107 (6), p.3415-3424
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85559466
source MEDLINE; AIP Journals Complete; AIP Acoustical Society of America
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Ataxia - complications
Dysarthria - complications
Female
Humans
Hypokinesia
Male
Space life sciences
Speech Intelligibility
Vocabulary
title Lexical boundary error analysis in hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T20%3A48%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lexical%20boundary%20error%20analysis%20in%20hypokinetic%20and%20ataxic%20dysarthria&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Liss,%20J%20M&rft.date=2000-06&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3415&rft.epage=3424&rft.pages=3415-3424&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft.coden=JASMAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.429412&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71221213%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71221213&rft_id=info:pmid/10875386&rfr_iscdi=true