The Bilateral Effect: Callosal Inhibition or Intrahemispheric Competition?
The magnification of visual field asymmetry observed with bilateral compared to unilateral tachistoscopic presentation of homologous stimuli (bilateral effect) can be explained by two hypothetical processes: homologous activation with subsequent inhibition of callosal information transfer or intrahe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Brain and cognition 2001-04, Vol.45 (3), p.317-324 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 324 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 317 |
container_title | Brain and cognition |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Olk, Bettina Hartje, Wolfgang |
description | The magnification of visual field asymmetry observed with bilateral compared to unilateral tachistoscopic presentation of homologous stimuli (bilateral effect) can be explained by two hypothetical processes: homologous activation with subsequent inhibition of callosal information transfer or intrahemispheric competition for processing resources. A lexical decision task with unilateral and bilateral stimulation and response with the right or left hand was used in an attempt to decide between these hypotheses. Analysis of response time data revealed a bilateral effect, superimposed on a right visual field advantage, and no interaction between visual field and response hand. Results are consistent with the hypothesis of intrahemispheric competition in the left hemisphere. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1006/brcg.2000.1258 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85542107</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278262600912582</els_id><sourcerecordid>77054514</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b7412ee0f7ba8aa8fc552f26609d0de35a818e04f8077fc4ecd665dc0302f5ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1PwzAMQCMEYuPjyhFVQuLW4aRNk3JBMA0YmsRlnKM0dVhQ146kQ-Lfk7EJToiTZfvZsp4JOaMwogDFVeXN64gBxJRxuUeGFEpIGc3FPhkCEzJlBSsG5CiEt0iVOWOHZEBpBlyKYkie5gtM7lyje_S6SSbWoumvk7Fumi7EwrRduMr1rmuTzses93qBSxdWC_TOJONuucL-u39zQg6sbgKe7uIxebmfzMeP6ez5YTq-naUmK8s-rUROGSJYUWmptbSGc2ZZUUBZQ40Z15JKhNxKEMKaHE1dFLw2kAGzHOvsmFxu9658977G0Kt4j8Gm0S1266Ak5zmjIP4FhQCec5pHcLQFje9C8GjVyrul9p-KgtpoVhvNaqNZbTTHgfPd5nW1xPoX33mNwMUO0MHoxnrdGhd-uJKXXECk5JbCqOvDoVfBOGwN1s7HN6i6c39d8AWMOZgg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77054514</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Bilateral Effect: Callosal Inhibition or Intrahemispheric Competition?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Olk, Bettina ; Hartje, Wolfgang</creator><creatorcontrib>Olk, Bettina ; Hartje, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><description>The magnification of visual field asymmetry observed with bilateral compared to unilateral tachistoscopic presentation of homologous stimuli (bilateral effect) can be explained by two hypothetical processes: homologous activation with subsequent inhibition of callosal information transfer or intrahemispheric competition for processing resources. A lexical decision task with unilateral and bilateral stimulation and response with the right or left hand was used in an attempt to decide between these hypotheses. Analysis of response time data revealed a bilateral effect, superimposed on a right visual field advantage, and no interaction between visual field and response hand. Results are consistent with the hypothesis of intrahemispheric competition in the left hemisphere.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-2626</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2147</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/brcg.2000.1258</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11305876</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRCOEI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anatomical correlates of behavior ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; bilateral effect ; Biological and medical sciences ; Corpus Callosum - physiology ; Female ; Fixation, Ocular - physiology ; Functional Laterality - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Key Words: visual field asymmetry ; lexical decision ; Male ; Neural Inhibition - physiology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Visual Fields - physiology ; Visual Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>Brain and cognition, 2001-04, Vol.45 (3), p.317-324</ispartof><rights>2001 Academic Press</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2001 Academic Press.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b7412ee0f7ba8aa8fc552f26609d0de35a818e04f8077fc4ecd665dc0302f5ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b7412ee0f7ba8aa8fc552f26609d0de35a818e04f8077fc4ecd665dc0302f5ed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1006/brcg.2000.1258$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=959570$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11305876$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olk, Bettina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartje, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><title>The Bilateral Effect: Callosal Inhibition or Intrahemispheric Competition?</title><title>Brain and cognition</title><addtitle>Brain Cogn</addtitle><description>The magnification of visual field asymmetry observed with bilateral compared to unilateral tachistoscopic presentation of homologous stimuli (bilateral effect) can be explained by two hypothetical processes: homologous activation with subsequent inhibition of callosal information transfer or intrahemispheric competition for processing resources. A lexical decision task with unilateral and bilateral stimulation and response with the right or left hand was used in an attempt to decide between these hypotheses. Analysis of response time data revealed a bilateral effect, superimposed on a right visual field advantage, and no interaction between visual field and response hand. Results are consistent with the hypothesis of intrahemispheric competition in the left hemisphere.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anatomical correlates of behavior</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>bilateral effect</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Corpus Callosum - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fixation, Ocular - physiology</subject><subject>Functional Laterality - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Key Words: visual field asymmetry</subject><subject>lexical decision</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neural Inhibition - physiology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Fields - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><issn>0278-2626</issn><issn>1090-2147</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1PwzAMQCMEYuPjyhFVQuLW4aRNk3JBMA0YmsRlnKM0dVhQ146kQ-Lfk7EJToiTZfvZsp4JOaMwogDFVeXN64gBxJRxuUeGFEpIGc3FPhkCEzJlBSsG5CiEt0iVOWOHZEBpBlyKYkie5gtM7lyje_S6SSbWoumvk7Fumi7EwrRduMr1rmuTzses93qBSxdWC_TOJONuucL-u39zQg6sbgKe7uIxebmfzMeP6ez5YTq-naUmK8s-rUROGSJYUWmptbSGc2ZZUUBZQ40Z15JKhNxKEMKaHE1dFLw2kAGzHOvsmFxu9658977G0Kt4j8Gm0S1266Ak5zmjIP4FhQCec5pHcLQFje9C8GjVyrul9p-KgtpoVhvNaqNZbTTHgfPd5nW1xPoX33mNwMUO0MHoxnrdGhd-uJKXXECk5JbCqOvDoVfBOGwN1s7HN6i6c39d8AWMOZgg</recordid><startdate>20010401</startdate><enddate>20010401</enddate><creator>Olk, Bettina</creator><creator>Hartje, Wolfgang</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010401</creationdate><title>The Bilateral Effect: Callosal Inhibition or Intrahemispheric Competition?</title><author>Olk, Bettina ; Hartje, Wolfgang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b7412ee0f7ba8aa8fc552f26609d0de35a818e04f8077fc4ecd665dc0302f5ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anatomical correlates of behavior</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>bilateral effect</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Corpus Callosum - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fixation, Ocular - physiology</topic><topic>Functional Laterality - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Key Words: visual field asymmetry</topic><topic>lexical decision</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neural Inhibition - physiology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Fields - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olk, Bettina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartje, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Brain and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olk, Bettina</au><au>Hartje, Wolfgang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Bilateral Effect: Callosal Inhibition or Intrahemispheric Competition?</atitle><jtitle>Brain and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Cogn</addtitle><date>2001-04-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>317</spage><epage>324</epage><pages>317-324</pages><issn>0278-2626</issn><eissn>1090-2147</eissn><coden>BRCOEI</coden><abstract>The magnification of visual field asymmetry observed with bilateral compared to unilateral tachistoscopic presentation of homologous stimuli (bilateral effect) can be explained by two hypothetical processes: homologous activation with subsequent inhibition of callosal information transfer or intrahemispheric competition for processing resources. A lexical decision task with unilateral and bilateral stimulation and response with the right or left hand was used in an attempt to decide between these hypotheses. Analysis of response time data revealed a bilateral effect, superimposed on a right visual field advantage, and no interaction between visual field and response hand. Results are consistent with the hypothesis of intrahemispheric competition in the left hemisphere.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11305876</pmid><doi>10.1006/brcg.2000.1258</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-2626 |
ispartof | Brain and cognition, 2001-04, Vol.45 (3), p.317-324 |
issn | 0278-2626 1090-2147 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85542107 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adult Anatomical correlates of behavior Behavioral psychophysiology bilateral effect Biological and medical sciences Corpus Callosum - physiology Female Fixation, Ocular - physiology Functional Laterality - physiology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Key Words: visual field asymmetry lexical decision Male Neural Inhibition - physiology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time - physiology Visual Fields - physiology Visual Perception - physiology |
title | The Bilateral Effect: Callosal Inhibition or Intrahemispheric Competition? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T05%3A11%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Bilateral%20Effect:%20Callosal%20Inhibition%20or%20Intrahemispheric%20Competition?&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Olk,%20Bettina&rft.date=2001-04-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=317&rft.epage=324&rft.pages=317-324&rft.issn=0278-2626&rft.eissn=1090-2147&rft.coden=BRCOEI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/brcg.2000.1258&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77054514%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77054514&rft_id=info:pmid/11305876&rft_els_id=S0278262600912582&rfr_iscdi=true |