Syntactic priming in spoken production: Linguistic and temporal interference
Current evidence about the persistence of syntactic priming effects (Bock, 1986) is equivocal: Using spoken picture description, Bock and Griffin (2000) found that it persisted over as many as 10 trials; using written sentence completion, Branigan, Pickering, and Cleland (1999) found that it dissipa...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Memory & cognition 2000-12, Vol.28 (8), p.1297-1302 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1302 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 1297 |
| container_title | Memory & cognition |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | BRANIGAN, Holly P PICKERING, Martin J STEWART, Andrew J MCLEAN, Janet F |
| description | Current evidence about the persistence of syntactic priming effects (Bock, 1986) is equivocal: Using spoken picture description, Bock and Griffin (2000) found that it persisted over as many as 10 trials; using written sentence completion, Branigan, Pickering, and Cleland (1999) found that it dissipated if even a single sentence intervened between prime and target. This paper asks what causes it to be long lasting. On one account, the rapid decay evidenced by Branigan et al. occurs because the task emphasizes conceptual planning; on another account, it is due to the written nature of their task. If conceptual planning is the cause, this might relate to planning the prime sentence or planning an intervening sentence. Hence we conducted an experiment with spoken sentence completion, contrasting no delay, an intervening sentence, and a pure temporal delay. The results indicated that strong and similar priming occurred in all three cases, therefore lending support to the claim that spoken priming is long lasting. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3758/bf03211830 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85535695</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69076701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-985d2b557b14b2e807d65646b489b9e61ebf1b6ee0053a9ca5accd141ba6ce2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c9LHDEUB_AgLbpuvfgHlEHBQ2E0v14m8abitsKCB1vobUgyb8rY2cyazBz8783iqkWQngJ5H15e3peQQ0ZPRQX6zLVUcMa0oDtkxkDwEoxUn8iMUkNLoPz3HtlP6Z5SCmDULtljjDNjoJqR5d1jGK0fO1-sY7fqwp-iC0VaD38x5JuhmXJtCOfFMpemLm2gDU0x4mo9RNtnPWJsMWLw-IV8bm2f8GB7zsmvxfXPqx_l8vb7zdXFsvTSmLE0GhruACrHpOOoadUoUFI5qY0zqBi6ljmFmOcV1ngL1vuGSeas8sidmJOT5755wIcJ01ivuuSx723AYUq1BhCgDPwXVhwUaC0zPHoH74cphvyJmrNKCpn3nNHxR4jpqqKggYmsvj0rH4eUIrb1ZrE2PtaM1pu86svFS14Zf922nNwKmze6DeifN23ytm-jDb5Lr05rboQRT26Qm3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877058513</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Syntactic priming in spoken production: Linguistic and temporal interference</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>BRANIGAN, Holly P ; PICKERING, Martin J ; STEWART, Andrew J ; MCLEAN, Janet F</creator><creatorcontrib>BRANIGAN, Holly P ; PICKERING, Martin J ; STEWART, Andrew J ; MCLEAN, Janet F</creatorcontrib><description>Current evidence about the persistence of syntactic priming effects (Bock, 1986) is equivocal: Using spoken picture description, Bock and Griffin (2000) found that it persisted over as many as 10 trials; using written sentence completion, Branigan, Pickering, and Cleland (1999) found that it dissipated if even a single sentence intervened between prime and target. This paper asks what causes it to be long lasting. On one account, the rapid decay evidenced by Branigan et al. occurs because the task emphasizes conceptual planning; on another account, it is due to the written nature of their task. If conceptual planning is the cause, this might relate to planning the prime sentence or planning an intervening sentence. Hence we conducted an experiment with spoken sentence completion, contrasting no delay, an intervening sentence, and a pure temporal delay. The results indicated that strong and similar priming occurred in all three cases, therefore lending support to the claim that spoken priming is long lasting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-502X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/bf03211830</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11219957</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MYCGAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin, TX: Psychonomic Society</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cues ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Interpersonal communication ; Language ; Linguistics ; Male ; Models, Psychological ; Production and perception of spoken language ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Speech ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Memory & cognition, 2000-12, Vol.28 (8), p.1297-1302</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Dec 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-985d2b557b14b2e807d65646b489b9e61ebf1b6ee0053a9ca5accd141ba6ce2b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-985d2b557b14b2e807d65646b489b9e61ebf1b6ee0053a9ca5accd141ba6ce2b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=882939$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11219957$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BRANIGAN, Holly P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PICKERING, Martin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEWART, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCLEAN, Janet F</creatorcontrib><title>Syntactic priming in spoken production: Linguistic and temporal interference</title><title>Memory & cognition</title><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><description>Current evidence about the persistence of syntactic priming effects (Bock, 1986) is equivocal: Using spoken picture description, Bock and Griffin (2000) found that it persisted over as many as 10 trials; using written sentence completion, Branigan, Pickering, and Cleland (1999) found that it dissipated if even a single sentence intervened between prime and target. This paper asks what causes it to be long lasting. On one account, the rapid decay evidenced by Branigan et al. occurs because the task emphasizes conceptual planning; on another account, it is due to the written nature of their task. If conceptual planning is the cause, this might relate to planning the prime sentence or planning an intervening sentence. Hence we conducted an experiment with spoken sentence completion, contrasting no delay, an intervening sentence, and a pure temporal delay. The results indicated that strong and similar priming occurred in all three cases, therefore lending support to the claim that spoken priming is long lasting.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal communication</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Production and perception of spoken language</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0090-502X</issn><issn>1532-5946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c9LHDEUB_AgLbpuvfgHlEHBQ2E0v14m8abitsKCB1vobUgyb8rY2cyazBz8783iqkWQngJ5H15e3peQQ0ZPRQX6zLVUcMa0oDtkxkDwEoxUn8iMUkNLoPz3HtlP6Z5SCmDULtljjDNjoJqR5d1jGK0fO1-sY7fqwp-iC0VaD38x5JuhmXJtCOfFMpemLm2gDU0x4mo9RNtnPWJsMWLw-IV8bm2f8GB7zsmvxfXPqx_l8vb7zdXFsvTSmLE0GhruACrHpOOoadUoUFI5qY0zqBi6ljmFmOcV1ngL1vuGSeas8sidmJOT5755wIcJ01ivuuSx723AYUq1BhCgDPwXVhwUaC0zPHoH74cphvyJmrNKCpn3nNHxR4jpqqKggYmsvj0rH4eUIrb1ZrE2PtaM1pu86svFS14Zf922nNwKmze6DeifN23ytm-jDb5Lr05rboQRT26Qm3Q</recordid><startdate>20001201</startdate><enddate>20001201</enddate><creator>BRANIGAN, Holly P</creator><creator>PICKERING, Martin J</creator><creator>STEWART, Andrew J</creator><creator>MCLEAN, Janet F</creator><general>Psychonomic Society</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SDSKB</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001201</creationdate><title>Syntactic priming in spoken production: Linguistic and temporal interference</title><author>BRANIGAN, Holly P ; PICKERING, Martin J ; STEWART, Andrew J ; MCLEAN, Janet F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-985d2b557b14b2e807d65646b489b9e61ebf1b6ee0053a9ca5accd141ba6ce2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal communication</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Production and perception of spoken language</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BRANIGAN, Holly P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PICKERING, Martin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEWART, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCLEAN, Janet F</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 43</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Memory & cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BRANIGAN, Holly P</au><au>PICKERING, Martin J</au><au>STEWART, Andrew J</au><au>MCLEAN, Janet F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Syntactic priming in spoken production: Linguistic and temporal interference</atitle><jtitle>Memory & cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><date>2000-12-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1297</spage><epage>1302</epage><pages>1297-1302</pages><issn>0090-502X</issn><eissn>1532-5946</eissn><coden>MYCGAO</coden><abstract>Current evidence about the persistence of syntactic priming effects (Bock, 1986) is equivocal: Using spoken picture description, Bock and Griffin (2000) found that it persisted over as many as 10 trials; using written sentence completion, Branigan, Pickering, and Cleland (1999) found that it dissipated if even a single sentence intervened between prime and target. This paper asks what causes it to be long lasting. On one account, the rapid decay evidenced by Branigan et al. occurs because the task emphasizes conceptual planning; on another account, it is due to the written nature of their task. If conceptual planning is the cause, this might relate to planning the prime sentence or planning an intervening sentence. Hence we conducted an experiment with spoken sentence completion, contrasting no delay, an intervening sentence, and a pure temporal delay. The results indicated that strong and similar priming occurred in all three cases, therefore lending support to the claim that spoken priming is long lasting.</abstract><cop>Austin, TX</cop><pub>Psychonomic Society</pub><pmid>11219957</pmid><doi>10.3758/bf03211830</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0090-502X |
| ispartof | Memory & cognition, 2000-12, Vol.28 (8), p.1297-1302 |
| issn | 0090-502X 1532-5946 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85535695 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Cognition Cognition & reasoning Cues Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Interpersonal communication Language Linguistics Male Models, Psychological Production and perception of spoken language Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Speech Time Factors |
| title | Syntactic priming in spoken production: Linguistic and temporal interference |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T17%3A12%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Syntactic%20priming%20in%20spoken%20production:%20Linguistic%20and%20temporal%20interference&rft.jtitle=Memory%20&%20cognition&rft.au=BRANIGAN,%20Holly%20P&rft.date=2000-12-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1297&rft.epage=1302&rft.pages=1297-1302&rft.issn=0090-502X&rft.eissn=1532-5946&rft.coden=MYCGAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/bf03211830&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69076701%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877058513&rft_id=info:pmid/11219957&rfr_iscdi=true |