The Effects of Scrambling on Spanish and Korean Agrammatic Interpretation: Why Linear Models Fail and Structural Models Survive
Several models of comprehension deficits in agrammatic aphasia rely heavily on linear considerations in the assignment of thematic roles to structural positions (e.g., the Trace-Deletion Hypothesis, the Mapping Hypothesis, and the Argument-Linking Hypothesis). These accounts predict that constructio...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Brain and language 2001-12, Vol.79 (3), p.407-425 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 425 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 407 |
| container_title | Brain and language |
| container_volume | 79 |
| creator | Beretta, Alan Schmitt, Cristina Halliwell, John Munn, Alan Cuetos, Fernando Kim, Sujung |
| description | Several models of comprehension deficits in agrammatic aphasia rely heavily on linear considerations in the assignment of thematic roles to structural positions (e.g., the Trace-Deletion Hypothesis, the Mapping Hypothesis, and the Argument-Linking Hypothesis). These accounts predict that constructions in languages with rules that affect syntactic structure but preserve relative linear order should be unimpaired. Other models [e.g., the Double-Dependency Hypothesis, (DDH)] do not resort to linearity but are purely structural in conception and therefore should be immune to word-order effects. We tested linear and nonlinear accounts with scrambling structures in Korean and topicalization structures in Spanish. The results are very clear. The (nonlinear) DDH is entirely compatible with the evidence, but the linear accounts are not. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1006/brln.2001.2495 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85531568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0093934X01924952</els_id><sourcerecordid>85531568</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a424t-cb0b0c1646645c24176c2f602a60a6f4bf63f857292107d96c89341fa9890f053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0b9v1DAUB3ALgehRWBmRF7rleP6ZmK2qWqg4xHBF7WY5jt0zSpzDTk7q1H8dH3eoU8VkPfnznp79Reg9gSUBkJ_a1MclBSBLypV4gRYEFFSUCPESLQAUqxTjdyfoTc6_iiK8Ia_RCSF1Q0CQBXq82Th86b2zU8ajx2ubzND2Id7jMeL11sSQN9jEDn8bkzMRn98XMJgpWHwdJ5e2yU2lGuNnfLt5wKsQnUn4-9i5PuMrE_q_zespzXaak-n_Xa3ntAs79xa98qbP7t3xPEU_ry5vLr5Wqx9fri_OV5XhlE-VbaEFSySXkgtLOamlpV4CNRKM9Lz1kvlG1FRRAnWnpG3Ku4k3qlHgQbBTdHaYu03j79nlSQ8hW9f3JrpxzroRghEhm__CmjJFJYMClwdo05hzcl5vUxhMetAE9D4bvc9G77PR-2xKw4fj5LkdXPfEj2EU8PEITLam98lEG_KTY5zVitfFNQdX_tHtgks62-CidV1IJUfdjeG5Hf4A4X2qLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72392630</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Scrambling on Spanish and Korean Agrammatic Interpretation: Why Linear Models Fail and Structural Models Survive</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Beretta, Alan ; Schmitt, Cristina ; Halliwell, John ; Munn, Alan ; Cuetos, Fernando ; Kim, Sujung</creator><creatorcontrib>Beretta, Alan ; Schmitt, Cristina ; Halliwell, John ; Munn, Alan ; Cuetos, Fernando ; Kim, Sujung</creatorcontrib><description>Several models of comprehension deficits in agrammatic aphasia rely heavily on linear considerations in the assignment of thematic roles to structural positions (e.g., the Trace-Deletion Hypothesis, the Mapping Hypothesis, and the Argument-Linking Hypothesis). These accounts predict that constructions in languages with rules that affect syntactic structure but preserve relative linear order should be unimpaired. Other models [e.g., the Double-Dependency Hypothesis, (DDH)] do not resort to linearity but are purely structural in conception and therefore should be immune to word-order effects. We tested linear and nonlinear accounts with scrambling structures in Korean and topicalization structures in Spanish. The results are very clear. The (nonlinear) DDH is entirely compatible with the evidence, but the linear accounts are not.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-934X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2155</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/brln.2001.2495</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11781051</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRLGAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Aphasia, Broca - diagnosis ; Aphasia, Broca - etiology ; Argument-Linking Hypothesis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Broca's aphasia ; Double-Dependency Hypothesis ; Humans ; Key Words: agrammatism ; Korean aphasia ; Language ; Language and communication disorders ; Language Tests ; Linguistics ; Mapping Hypothesis ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; scrambling ; Severity of Illness Index ; Spanish aphasia ; Trace-Deletion Hypothesis</subject><ispartof>Brain and language, 2001-12, Vol.79 (3), p.407-425</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science (USA)</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2001 Elsevier Science.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a424t-cb0b0c1646645c24176c2f602a60a6f4bf63f857292107d96c89341fa9890f053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a424t-cb0b0c1646645c24176c2f602a60a6f4bf63f857292107d96c89341fa9890f053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093934X01924952$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13437947$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11781051$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beretta, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halliwell, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munn, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuetos, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sujung</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Scrambling on Spanish and Korean Agrammatic Interpretation: Why Linear Models Fail and Structural Models Survive</title><title>Brain and language</title><addtitle>Brain Lang</addtitle><description>Several models of comprehension deficits in agrammatic aphasia rely heavily on linear considerations in the assignment of thematic roles to structural positions (e.g., the Trace-Deletion Hypothesis, the Mapping Hypothesis, and the Argument-Linking Hypothesis). These accounts predict that constructions in languages with rules that affect syntactic structure but preserve relative linear order should be unimpaired. Other models [e.g., the Double-Dependency Hypothesis, (DDH)] do not resort to linearity but are purely structural in conception and therefore should be immune to word-order effects. We tested linear and nonlinear accounts with scrambling structures in Korean and topicalization structures in Spanish. The results are very clear. The (nonlinear) DDH is entirely compatible with the evidence, but the linear accounts are not.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Aphasia, Broca - diagnosis</subject><subject>Aphasia, Broca - etiology</subject><subject>Argument-Linking Hypothesis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Broca's aphasia</subject><subject>Double-Dependency Hypothesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Key Words: agrammatism</subject><subject>Korean aphasia</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language and communication disorders</subject><subject>Language Tests</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Mapping Hypothesis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>scrambling</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Spanish aphasia</subject><subject>Trace-Deletion Hypothesis</subject><issn>0093-934X</issn><issn>1090-2155</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0b9v1DAUB3ALgehRWBmRF7rleP6ZmK2qWqg4xHBF7WY5jt0zSpzDTk7q1H8dH3eoU8VkPfnznp79Reg9gSUBkJ_a1MclBSBLypV4gRYEFFSUCPESLQAUqxTjdyfoTc6_iiK8Ia_RCSF1Q0CQBXq82Th86b2zU8ajx2ubzND2Id7jMeL11sSQN9jEDn8bkzMRn98XMJgpWHwdJ5e2yU2lGuNnfLt5wKsQnUn4-9i5PuMrE_q_zespzXaak-n_Xa3ntAs79xa98qbP7t3xPEU_ry5vLr5Wqx9fri_OV5XhlE-VbaEFSySXkgtLOamlpV4CNRKM9Lz1kvlG1FRRAnWnpG3Ku4k3qlHgQbBTdHaYu03j79nlSQ8hW9f3JrpxzroRghEhm__CmjJFJYMClwdo05hzcl5vUxhMetAE9D4bvc9G77PR-2xKw4fj5LkdXPfEj2EU8PEITLam98lEG_KTY5zVitfFNQdX_tHtgks62-CidV1IJUfdjeG5Hf4A4X2qLA</recordid><startdate>20011201</startdate><enddate>20011201</enddate><creator>Beretta, Alan</creator><creator>Schmitt, Cristina</creator><creator>Halliwell, John</creator><creator>Munn, Alan</creator><creator>Cuetos, Fernando</creator><creator>Kim, Sujung</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011201</creationdate><title>The Effects of Scrambling on Spanish and Korean Agrammatic Interpretation: Why Linear Models Fail and Structural Models Survive</title><author>Beretta, Alan ; Schmitt, Cristina ; Halliwell, John ; Munn, Alan ; Cuetos, Fernando ; Kim, Sujung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a424t-cb0b0c1646645c24176c2f602a60a6f4bf63f857292107d96c89341fa9890f053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Aphasia, Broca - diagnosis</topic><topic>Aphasia, Broca - etiology</topic><topic>Argument-Linking Hypothesis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Broca's aphasia</topic><topic>Double-Dependency Hypothesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Key Words: agrammatism</topic><topic>Korean aphasia</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language and communication disorders</topic><topic>Language Tests</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Mapping Hypothesis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>scrambling</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Spanish aphasia</topic><topic>Trace-Deletion Hypothesis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beretta, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halliwell, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munn, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuetos, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sujung</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Brain and language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beretta, Alan</au><au>Schmitt, Cristina</au><au>Halliwell, John</au><au>Munn, Alan</au><au>Cuetos, Fernando</au><au>Kim, Sujung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effects of Scrambling on Spanish and Korean Agrammatic Interpretation: Why Linear Models Fail and Structural Models Survive</atitle><jtitle>Brain and language</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Lang</addtitle><date>2001-12-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>407</spage><epage>425</epage><pages>407-425</pages><issn>0093-934X</issn><eissn>1090-2155</eissn><coden>BRLGAZ</coden><abstract>Several models of comprehension deficits in agrammatic aphasia rely heavily on linear considerations in the assignment of thematic roles to structural positions (e.g., the Trace-Deletion Hypothesis, the Mapping Hypothesis, and the Argument-Linking Hypothesis). These accounts predict that constructions in languages with rules that affect syntactic structure but preserve relative linear order should be unimpaired. Other models [e.g., the Double-Dependency Hypothesis, (DDH)] do not resort to linearity but are purely structural in conception and therefore should be immune to word-order effects. We tested linear and nonlinear accounts with scrambling structures in Korean and topicalization structures in Spanish. The results are very clear. The (nonlinear) DDH is entirely compatible with the evidence, but the linear accounts are not.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>11781051</pmid><doi>10.1006/brln.2001.2495</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0093-934X |
| ispartof | Brain and language, 2001-12, Vol.79 (3), p.407-425 |
| issn | 0093-934X 1090-2155 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85531568 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Adult Adult and adolescent clinical studies Aphasia, Broca - diagnosis Aphasia, Broca - etiology Argument-Linking Hypothesis Biological and medical sciences Broca's aphasia Double-Dependency Hypothesis Humans Key Words: agrammatism Korean aphasia Language Language and communication disorders Language Tests Linguistics Mapping Hypothesis Medical sciences Middle Aged Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology Predictive Value of Tests Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry scrambling Severity of Illness Index Spanish aphasia Trace-Deletion Hypothesis |
| title | The Effects of Scrambling on Spanish and Korean Agrammatic Interpretation: Why Linear Models Fail and Structural Models Survive |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T14%3A16%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Scrambling%20on%20Spanish%20and%20Korean%20Agrammatic%20Interpretation:%20Why%20Linear%20Models%20Fail%20and%20Structural%20Models%20Survive&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20language&rft.au=Beretta,%20Alan&rft.date=2001-12-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=407&rft.epage=425&rft.pages=407-425&rft.issn=0093-934X&rft.eissn=1090-2155&rft.coden=BRLGAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/brln.2001.2495&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85531568%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72392630&rft_id=info:pmid/11781051&rft_els_id=S0093934X01924952&rfr_iscdi=true |