Scope and the structure of bare nominals: evidence from child language

The special semantic characteristics of bare nominals (nonspecificity and lack of scopal interactions) are best explained in terms of an approach that views these not as full DPs, but as minimal nominal projections containing an internal pro argument. The evidence from child language suggests that s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Linguistics 1999-01, Vol.37 (5), p.927-960
Hauptverfasser: Pérez-Leroux, Ana T, Roeper, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 960
container_issue 5
container_start_page 927
container_title Linguistics
container_volume 37
creator Pérez-Leroux, Ana T
Roeper, Thomas
description The special semantic characteristics of bare nominals (nonspecificity and lack of scopal interactions) are best explained in terms of an approach that views these not as full DPs, but as minimal nominal projections containing an internal pro argument. The evidence from child language suggests that such aspects of the interpretation of bare nominals are readily accessible in children's grammar. Thirty-six English-speaking children participated in a controlled comprehension study comparing their interpretation of sentences with quantifiers involving both the bare noun construction and full DPs. Children seemed to readily understand the interpretive differences between the two structures, suggesting that the presence or absence of a determiner is a sufficient trigger for the acquisition of such construction.
doi_str_mv 10.1515/ling.37.5.927
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85521854</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>85521854</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-12530c89f93b155ffd9af58736f17ab3717d99b00a5f0cf56837383560a385943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LxDAQxYMouK4evQcUb12TTqdJvIm4fiCIqCBeQjZNdqvddk1a0f_elhUFL57ewPzmzcwjZJ-zCUeOx1VZzycgJjhRqdggI55zSEDlT5tkxFia9XWmtslOjC-MsQxEOiLTe9usHDV1QduFo7ENnW274Gjj6cz0WjfLsjZVPKHuvSxcbR31oVlSuyirglamnndm7nbJlu8ht_etY_I4PX84u0xubi-uzk5vEtvvbhOeIjArlVcw44jeF8p4lAJyz4WZgeCiUGrGmEHPrMdcggAJmDMDElUGY3K09l2F5q1zsdXLMlpX9Xe4potaIqZc4v8gSMmVFAN48Ad8abowfKy5UFymKGCgkjVlQxNjcF6vQrk04VNzpofw9RC-BqFR9-H3_OG3q4nWVD6Y2pbxdwgxSxn7tS1j6z5-2ia86lyAQH33kOnrC3iCS3zWKXwBXbuReg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791825734</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scope and the structure of bare nominals: evidence from child language</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Pérez-Leroux, Ana T ; Roeper, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Leroux, Ana T ; Roeper, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>The special semantic characteristics of bare nominals (nonspecificity and lack of scopal interactions) are best explained in terms of an approach that views these not as full DPs, but as minimal nominal projections containing an internal pro argument. The evidence from child language suggests that such aspects of the interpretation of bare nominals are readily accessible in children's grammar. Thirty-six English-speaking children participated in a controlled comprehension study comparing their interpretation of sentences with quantifiers involving both the bare noun construction and full DPs. Children seemed to readily understand the interpretive differences between the two structures, suggesting that the presence or absence of a determiner is a sufficient trigger for the acquisition of such construction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-3949</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-396X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/ling.37.5.927</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LINGBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Walter de Gruyter</publisher><subject>Child language. Acquisition and development ; Children ; English language ; Linguistics ; Production and comprehension processes ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychology of language ; Semantics ; Sentences</subject><ispartof>Linguistics, 1999-01, Vol.37 (5), p.927-960</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-12530c89f93b155ffd9af58736f17ab3717d99b00a5f0cf56837383560a385943</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1554200$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Leroux, Ana T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roeper, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Scope and the structure of bare nominals: evidence from child language</title><title>Linguistics</title><addtitle>Linguistics</addtitle><description>The special semantic characteristics of bare nominals (nonspecificity and lack of scopal interactions) are best explained in terms of an approach that views these not as full DPs, but as minimal nominal projections containing an internal pro argument. The evidence from child language suggests that such aspects of the interpretation of bare nominals are readily accessible in children's grammar. Thirty-six English-speaking children participated in a controlled comprehension study comparing their interpretation of sentences with quantifiers involving both the bare noun construction and full DPs. Children seemed to readily understand the interpretive differences between the two structures, suggesting that the presence or absence of a determiner is a sufficient trigger for the acquisition of such construction.</description><subject>Child language. Acquisition and development</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Production and comprehension processes</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychology of language</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><issn>0024-3949</issn><issn>1613-396X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1LxDAQxYMouK4evQcUb12TTqdJvIm4fiCIqCBeQjZNdqvddk1a0f_elhUFL57ewPzmzcwjZJ-zCUeOx1VZzycgJjhRqdggI55zSEDlT5tkxFia9XWmtslOjC-MsQxEOiLTe9usHDV1QduFo7ENnW274Gjj6cz0WjfLsjZVPKHuvSxcbR31oVlSuyirglamnndm7nbJlu8ht_etY_I4PX84u0xubi-uzk5vEtvvbhOeIjArlVcw44jeF8p4lAJyz4WZgeCiUGrGmEHPrMdcggAJmDMDElUGY3K09l2F5q1zsdXLMlpX9Xe4potaIqZc4v8gSMmVFAN48Ad8abowfKy5UFymKGCgkjVlQxNjcF6vQrk04VNzpofw9RC-BqFR9-H3_OG3q4nWVD6Y2pbxdwgxSxn7tS1j6z5-2ia86lyAQH33kOnrC3iCS3zWKXwBXbuReg</recordid><startdate>19990101</startdate><enddate>19990101</enddate><creator>Pérez-Leroux, Ana T</creator><creator>Roeper, Thomas</creator><general>Walter de Gruyter</general><general>de Gruyter</general><general>Mouton</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HFXKP</scope><scope>HZAIM</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990101</creationdate><title>Scope and the structure of bare nominals: evidence from child language</title><author>Pérez-Leroux, Ana T ; Roeper, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-12530c89f93b155ffd9af58736f17ab3717d99b00a5f0cf56837383560a385943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Child language. Acquisition and development</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Production and comprehension processes</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychology of language</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Leroux, Ana T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roeper, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 17</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 26</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pérez-Leroux, Ana T</au><au>Roeper, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scope and the structure of bare nominals: evidence from child language</atitle><jtitle>Linguistics</jtitle><addtitle>Linguistics</addtitle><date>1999-01-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>927</spage><epage>960</epage><pages>927-960</pages><issn>0024-3949</issn><eissn>1613-396X</eissn><coden>LINGBP</coden><abstract>The special semantic characteristics of bare nominals (nonspecificity and lack of scopal interactions) are best explained in terms of an approach that views these not as full DPs, but as minimal nominal projections containing an internal pro argument. The evidence from child language suggests that such aspects of the interpretation of bare nominals are readily accessible in children's grammar. Thirty-six English-speaking children participated in a controlled comprehension study comparing their interpretation of sentences with quantifiers involving both the bare noun construction and full DPs. Children seemed to readily understand the interpretive differences between the two structures, suggesting that the presence or absence of a determiner is a sufficient trigger for the acquisition of such construction.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Walter de Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/ling.37.5.927</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0024-3949
ispartof Linguistics, 1999-01, Vol.37 (5), p.927-960
issn 0024-3949
1613-396X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85521854
source Periodicals Index Online; De Gruyter journals
subjects Child language. Acquisition and development
Children
English language
Linguistics
Production and comprehension processes
Psycholinguistics
Psychology of language
Semantics
Sentences
title Scope and the structure of bare nominals: evidence from child language
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T07%3A53%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scope%20and%20the%20structure%20of%20bare%20nominals:%20evidence%20from%20child%20language&rft.jtitle=Linguistics&rft.au=P%C3%A9rez-Leroux,%20Ana%20T&rft.date=1999-01-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=927&rft.epage=960&rft.pages=927-960&rft.issn=0024-3949&rft.eissn=1613-396X&rft.coden=LINGBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/ling.37.5.927&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85521854%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791825734&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true