Phonological Awareness Tasks as Predictors of Decoding Ability: Beyond Segmentation
The performance of 38 male third- and fourth-grade reading disabled/poor decoders and above-average readers/good decoders was compared on a series of six measures of phonological awareness, including tasks that required the ability to segment, blend, and manipulate phonemes. Performance on these tas...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of learning disabilities 1990-04, Vol.23 (4), p.240-247 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 247 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 240 |
| container_title | Journal of learning disabilities |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Lenchner, Orna Gerber, Michael M. Routh, Donald K. |
| description | The performance of 38 male third- and fourth-grade reading disabled/poor decoders and above-average readers/good decoders was compared on a series of six measures of phonological awareness, including tasks that required the ability to segment, blend, and manipulate phonemes. Performance on these tasks was also correlated with phonetic decoding of pseudo words. Significant but varying intercorrelations were obtained among tasks in both groups. For the poor decoders, deletion was the most highly correlated with the other tasks. However, all good decoders performed at ceiling level on this task. For the poor decoders, deletion was significantly correlated with phonetic decoding (r=.74 and r =. 78 for timed and untimed decoding measures, respectively). While all good decoders had good phonological awareness, not all those with good phonological awareness were good decoders. The results suggest that tasks that require blending and manipulation of phonemes, in addition to segmentation, may predict decoding ability best. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/002221949002300407 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85511436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_002221949002300407</sage_id><sourcerecordid>79716310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-9af1341fe55ceada759b1b0aea1b54ecb189206e9c1ff207f539d3540316b3623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotX78AUHYi95WM_nYNBeh1E8o2EM9L9lsUrduN5ppkf57U1r0IOhpBuaZd5iHkDOgVwBKXVPKGAMtdGo4pYKqPdIHyQe5UAO6T_obIN8Qh-QIcU4Tw1TRIz3GmSh40Sc3k9fQhTbMGmvabPhpouscYjY1-IaZwWwSXd3YZYiYBZ_dOhvqpptlw6ppm-X6hBx406I73dVj8nJ_Nx095uPnh6fRcJxbLuky18YDF-CdlNaZ2iipK6iocQYqKZytYKAZLZy24D2jykuuay4F5VBUvGD8mFxuc99j-Fg5XJaLBq1rW9O5sMJyICWA4MW_oNIKCg40gWwL2hgQo_Ple2wWJq5LoOXGbvnbblo636WvqoWrv1d2OtP8Yjc3mHz6aDrb4E-y5lykbxJ3veXQzFw5D6vYJXt_Xf4CYV-NOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79716310</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phonological Awareness Tasks as Predictors of Decoding Ability: Beyond Segmentation</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Lenchner, Orna ; Gerber, Michael M. ; Routh, Donald K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lenchner, Orna ; Gerber, Michael M. ; Routh, Donald K.</creatorcontrib><description>The performance of 38 male third- and fourth-grade reading disabled/poor decoders and above-average readers/good decoders was compared on a series of six measures of phonological awareness, including tasks that required the ability to segment, blend, and manipulate phonemes. Performance on these tasks was also correlated with phonetic decoding of pseudo words. Significant but varying intercorrelations were obtained among tasks in both groups. For the poor decoders, deletion was the most highly correlated with the other tasks. However, all good decoders performed at ceiling level on this task. For the poor decoders, deletion was significantly correlated with phonetic decoding (r=.74 and r =. 78 for timed and untimed decoding measures, respectively). While all good decoders had good phonological awareness, not all those with good phonological awareness were good decoders. The results suggest that tasks that require blending and manipulation of phonemes, in addition to segmentation, may predict decoding ability best.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4780</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/002221949002300407</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2324636</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLDIAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Awareness ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child clinical studies ; Cognition ; Communication disorders ; Curriculum ; Dyslexia - rehabilitation ; Education, Special ; Humans ; Language and communication disorders ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Phonetics ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reading</subject><ispartof>Journal of learning disabilities, 1990-04, Vol.23 (4), p.240-247</ispartof><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-9af1341fe55ceada759b1b0aea1b54ecb189206e9c1ff207f539d3540316b3623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/002221949002300407$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002221949002300407$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19334623$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2324636$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lenchner, Orna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerber, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Routh, Donald K.</creatorcontrib><title>Phonological Awareness Tasks as Predictors of Decoding Ability: Beyond Segmentation</title><title>Journal of learning disabilities</title><addtitle>J Learn Disabil</addtitle><description>The performance of 38 male third- and fourth-grade reading disabled/poor decoders and above-average readers/good decoders was compared on a series of six measures of phonological awareness, including tasks that required the ability to segment, blend, and manipulate phonemes. Performance on these tasks was also correlated with phonetic decoding of pseudo words. Significant but varying intercorrelations were obtained among tasks in both groups. For the poor decoders, deletion was the most highly correlated with the other tasks. However, all good decoders performed at ceiling level on this task. For the poor decoders, deletion was significantly correlated with phonetic decoding (r=.74 and r =. 78 for timed and untimed decoding measures, respectively). While all good decoders had good phonological awareness, not all those with good phonological awareness were good decoders. The results suggest that tasks that require blending and manipulation of phonemes, in addition to segmentation, may predict decoding ability best.</description><subject>Awareness</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child clinical studies</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Communication disorders</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Dyslexia - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Education, Special</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language and communication disorders</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reading</subject><issn>0022-2194</issn><issn>1538-4780</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotX78AUHYi95WM_nYNBeh1E8o2EM9L9lsUrduN5ppkf57U1r0IOhpBuaZd5iHkDOgVwBKXVPKGAMtdGo4pYKqPdIHyQe5UAO6T_obIN8Qh-QIcU4Tw1TRIz3GmSh40Sc3k9fQhTbMGmvabPhpouscYjY1-IaZwWwSXd3YZYiYBZ_dOhvqpptlw6ppm-X6hBx406I73dVj8nJ_Nx095uPnh6fRcJxbLuky18YDF-CdlNaZ2iipK6iocQYqKZytYKAZLZy24D2jykuuay4F5VBUvGD8mFxuc99j-Fg5XJaLBq1rW9O5sMJyICWA4MW_oNIKCg40gWwL2hgQo_Ple2wWJq5LoOXGbvnbblo636WvqoWrv1d2OtP8Yjc3mHz6aDrb4E-y5lykbxJ3veXQzFw5D6vYJXt_Xf4CYV-NOQ</recordid><startdate>19900401</startdate><enddate>19900401</enddate><creator>Lenchner, Orna</creator><creator>Gerber, Michael M.</creator><creator>Routh, Donald K.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900401</creationdate><title>Phonological Awareness Tasks as Predictors of Decoding Ability</title><author>Lenchner, Orna ; Gerber, Michael M. ; Routh, Donald K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-9af1341fe55ceada759b1b0aea1b54ecb189206e9c1ff207f539d3540316b3623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Awareness</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child clinical studies</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Communication disorders</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Dyslexia - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Education, Special</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language and communication disorders</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reading</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lenchner, Orna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerber, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Routh, Donald K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of learning disabilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lenchner, Orna</au><au>Gerber, Michael M.</au><au>Routh, Donald K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phonological Awareness Tasks as Predictors of Decoding Ability: Beyond Segmentation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of learning disabilities</jtitle><addtitle>J Learn Disabil</addtitle><date>1990-04-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>240</spage><epage>247</epage><pages>240-247</pages><issn>0022-2194</issn><eissn>1538-4780</eissn><coden>JLDIAD</coden><abstract>The performance of 38 male third- and fourth-grade reading disabled/poor decoders and above-average readers/good decoders was compared on a series of six measures of phonological awareness, including tasks that required the ability to segment, blend, and manipulate phonemes. Performance on these tasks was also correlated with phonetic decoding of pseudo words. Significant but varying intercorrelations were obtained among tasks in both groups. For the poor decoders, deletion was the most highly correlated with the other tasks. However, all good decoders performed at ceiling level on this task. For the poor decoders, deletion was significantly correlated with phonetic decoding (r=.74 and r =. 78 for timed and untimed decoding measures, respectively). While all good decoders had good phonological awareness, not all those with good phonological awareness were good decoders. The results suggest that tasks that require blending and manipulation of phonemes, in addition to segmentation, may predict decoding ability best.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>2324636</pmid><doi>10.1177/002221949002300407</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-2194 |
| ispartof | Journal of learning disabilities, 1990-04, Vol.23 (4), p.240-247 |
| issn | 0022-2194 1538-4780 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85511436 |
| source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; MEDLINE |
| subjects | Awareness Biological and medical sciences Child Child clinical studies Cognition Communication disorders Curriculum Dyslexia - rehabilitation Education, Special Humans Language and communication disorders Male Medical sciences Phonetics Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Reading |
| title | Phonological Awareness Tasks as Predictors of Decoding Ability: Beyond Segmentation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T20%3A16%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phonological%20Awareness%20Tasks%20as%20Predictors%20of%20Decoding%20Ability:%20Beyond%20Segmentation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20learning%20disabilities&rft.au=Lenchner,%20Orna&rft.date=1990-04-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=240&rft.epage=247&rft.pages=240-247&rft.issn=0022-2194&rft.eissn=1538-4780&rft.coden=JLDIAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/002221949002300407&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79716310%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79716310&rft_id=info:pmid/2324636&rft_sage_id=10.1177_002221949002300407&rfr_iscdi=true |