Formal method in discourse analysis

Formal method in discourse analysis

Frow argues that recent attempts to construct computer-generated analyses of discourse, while they may hold promise for rigorous and non-subjective approaches to ideology, also have conceptual weaknesses. He looks particularly at the work of Hak and Torode in this area and at the influence of Pêcheu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pragmatics 1989-06, Vol.13 (3), p.333-341
1. Verfasser: Frow, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Computer Assisted Research
Content Analysis
Discourse Analysis
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 341
container_issue 3
container_start_page 333
container_title Journal of pragmatics
container_volume 13
creator Frow, John
description Frow argues that recent attempts to construct computer-generated analyses of discourse, while they may hold promise for rigorous and non-subjective approaches to ideology, also have conceptual weaknesses. He looks particularly at the work of Hak and Torode in this area and at the influence of Pêcheux. The paper proposes that discourse analysis must be directed towards textual structure rather than particular instances of realised text, and that it must recognise its own interpretive basis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0378-2166(89)90058-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85503405</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0378216689900581</els_id><sourcerecordid>1295883067</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-e95f9a8018475f0f21f272a329838cf13f8e1e28a64f6c34e13b63a9b80b27d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKv_wMVAQXQxeu8kk8dGkGJVKLjRdUgzCabMoyZTof_eGSsuXOjqbr57OOcj5BzhGgH5DVAh8wI5v5TqSgGUMscDMkEpVI5UikMy-UGOyUlKawBARmFCZosuNqbOGte_dVUW2qwKyXbbmFxmWlPvUkin5MibOrmz7zslr4v7l_ljvnx-eJrfLXNLFfa5U6VXRgJKJkoPvkBfiMLQQkkqrUfqpUNXSMOZ55Yyh3TFqVErCatCVEin5GKfu4nd-9alXjdDF1fXpnXdNmlZlkAZlP-CHEFwxsQAzn6B62HaMCtpLFQpJQU-UmxP2dilFJ3XmxgaE3caQY-C9WhPj_a0VPpLsB7r3u7f3ODkI7iokw2uta4K0dleV134O-ATcst-2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1295883067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Formal method in discourse analysis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Frow, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Frow, John</creatorcontrib><description>Frow argues that recent attempts to construct computer-generated analyses of discourse, while they may hold promise for rigorous and non-subjective approaches to ideology, also have conceptual weaknesses. He looks particularly at the work of Hak and Torode in this area and at the influence of Pêcheux. The paper proposes that discourse analysis must be directed towards textual structure rather than particular instances of realised text, and that it must recognise its own interpretive basis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-2166</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1387</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0378-2166(89)90058-1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPRADM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Computer Assisted Research ; Content Analysis ; Discourse Analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of pragmatics, 1989-06, Vol.13 (3), p.333-341</ispartof><rights>1989</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-e95f9a8018475f0f21f272a329838cf13f8e1e28a64f6c34e13b63a9b80b27d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0378216689900581$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27846,27901,27902,33752,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frow, John</creatorcontrib><title>Formal method in discourse analysis</title><title>Journal of pragmatics</title><description>Frow argues that recent attempts to construct computer-generated analyses of discourse, while they may hold promise for rigorous and non-subjective approaches to ideology, also have conceptual weaknesses. He looks particularly at the work of Hak and Torode in this area and at the influence of Pêcheux. The paper proposes that discourse analysis must be directed towards textual structure rather than particular instances of realised text, and that it must recognise its own interpretive basis.</description><subject>Computer Assisted Research</subject><subject>Content Analysis</subject><subject>Discourse Analysis</subject><issn>0378-2166</issn><issn>1879-1387</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKv_wMVAQXQxeu8kk8dGkGJVKLjRdUgzCabMoyZTof_eGSsuXOjqbr57OOcj5BzhGgH5DVAh8wI5v5TqSgGUMscDMkEpVI5UikMy-UGOyUlKawBARmFCZosuNqbOGte_dVUW2qwKyXbbmFxmWlPvUkin5MibOrmz7zslr4v7l_ljvnx-eJrfLXNLFfa5U6VXRgJKJkoPvkBfiMLQQkkqrUfqpUNXSMOZ55Yyh3TFqVErCatCVEin5GKfu4nd-9alXjdDF1fXpnXdNmlZlkAZlP-CHEFwxsQAzn6B62HaMCtpLFQpJQU-UmxP2dilFJ3XmxgaE3caQY-C9WhPj_a0VPpLsB7r3u7f3ODkI7iokw2uta4K0dleV134O-ATcst-2A</recordid><startdate>19890601</startdate><enddate>19890601</enddate><creator>Frow, John</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>North-Holland Pub. Co</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890601</creationdate><title>Formal method in discourse analysis</title><author>Frow, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-e95f9a8018475f0f21f272a329838cf13f8e1e28a64f6c34e13b63a9b80b27d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Computer Assisted Research</topic><topic>Content Analysis</topic><topic>Discourse Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frow, John</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of pragmatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frow, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Formal method in discourse analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pragmatics</jtitle><date>1989-06-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>333</spage><epage>341</epage><pages>333-341</pages><issn>0378-2166</issn><eissn>1879-1387</eissn><coden>JPRADM</coden><abstract>Frow argues that recent attempts to construct computer-generated analyses of discourse, while they may hold promise for rigorous and non-subjective approaches to ideology, also have conceptual weaknesses. He looks particularly at the work of Hak and Torode in this area and at the influence of Pêcheux. The paper proposes that discourse analysis must be directed towards textual structure rather than particular instances of realised text, and that it must recognise its own interpretive basis.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/0378-2166(89)90058-1</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-2166
ispartof Journal of pragmatics, 1989-06, Vol.13 (3), p.333-341
issn 0378-2166
1879-1387
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85503405
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Computer Assisted Research
Content Analysis
Discourse Analysis
title Formal method in discourse analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T21%3A30%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Formal%20method%20in%20discourse%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pragmatics&rft.au=Frow,%20John&rft.date=1989-06-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=333&rft.epage=341&rft.pages=333-341&rft.issn=0378-2166&rft.eissn=1879-1387&rft.coden=JPRADM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0378-2166(89)90058-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1295883067%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1295883067&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0378216689900581&rfr_iscdi=true