Selective attention in visual recognition with pictorial and verbal alternatives
A previous experiment by B. Tversky (see LLBA V/1, p. 390) suggested the possibility of perceptual selection (of pictures) with verbal alternatives--i.e., the Ss might pictorially recode verbal information & subsequently process a pictorial target selectively for critical features. The 48 female...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1976-10, Vol.8 (4), p.295-297 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 297 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 295 |
| container_title | Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| container_volume | 8 |
| creator | Redding, Gordon M. Seward, William M. Stolldorf, Dean E. |
| description | A previous experiment by B. Tversky (see LLBA V/1, p. 390) suggested the possibility of perceptual selection (of pictures) with verbal alternatives--i.e., the Ss might pictorially recode verbal information & subsequently process a pictorial target selectively for critical features. The 48 female student volunteers, 16 per group, were divided into eight groups & given a factorial combination of three variables: time of cue (before & after test pictures, or after tests only), similarity of alternatives (similar vs dissimilar), & alternative types (pictorial or verbal). Dissimilar alternatives were more frequently recognized, with the greatest difference being in the after-tests-only condition. The time when dissimilar alternatives were presented had little effect on performance. Verbal recognition was generally poorer than pictorial. Modified HA |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3758/BF03335144 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85500060</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>85500060</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-5717d83b5a5e561f15ea08c697325d332d40ce7decf9841f15e83651f41076603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkDFPwzAUhD2ARCks_IJMDEiB5zy_OB2hooBUCSRgjlznBYxSJ9huEP8e2iIx3em-0w0nxJmES9RUXd0sABFJKnUgJgAzyAlIHYnjGD8AEFDRRDw9c8c2uZEzkxL75HqfOZ-NLm5MlwW2_Zt3u_TLpfdscDb1wf0i45ts5LDa2i5x8Ga7Ek_EYWu6yKd_OhWvi9uX-X2-fLx7mF8vc1uQTjlpqZsKV2SIqZStJDZQ2XKmsaAGsWgUWNYN23ZWqR2vsCTZKgm6LAGn4ny_O4T-c8Mx1WsXLXed8dxvYl0RAcCueLEv2tDHGLith-DWJnzXEurtUfX_UfgD91hc7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85500060</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selective attention in visual recognition with pictorial and verbal alternatives</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Redding, Gordon M. ; Seward, William M. ; Stolldorf, Dean E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Redding, Gordon M. ; Seward, William M. ; Stolldorf, Dean E.</creatorcontrib><description>A previous experiment by B. Tversky (see LLBA V/1, p. 390) suggested the possibility of perceptual selection (of pictures) with verbal alternatives--i.e., the Ss might pictorially recode verbal information & subsequently process a pictorial target selectively for critical features. The 48 female student volunteers, 16 per group, were divided into eight groups & given a factorial combination of three variables: time of cue (before & after test pictures, or after tests only), similarity of alternatives (similar vs dissimilar), & alternative types (pictorial or verbal). Dissimilar alternatives were more frequently recognized, with the greatest difference being in the after-tests-only condition. The time when dissimilar alternatives were presented had little effect on performance. Verbal recognition was generally poorer than pictorial. Modified HA</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-5054</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/BF03335144</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BPNSBY</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1976-10, Vol.8 (4), p.295-297</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-5717d83b5a5e561f15ea08c697325d332d40ce7decf9841f15e83651f41076603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Redding, Gordon M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seward, William M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolldorf, Dean E.</creatorcontrib><title>Selective attention in visual recognition with pictorial and verbal alternatives</title><title>Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society</title><description>A previous experiment by B. Tversky (see LLBA V/1, p. 390) suggested the possibility of perceptual selection (of pictures) with verbal alternatives--i.e., the Ss might pictorially recode verbal information & subsequently process a pictorial target selectively for critical features. The 48 female student volunteers, 16 per group, were divided into eight groups & given a factorial combination of three variables: time of cue (before & after test pictures, or after tests only), similarity of alternatives (similar vs dissimilar), & alternative types (pictorial or verbal). Dissimilar alternatives were more frequently recognized, with the greatest difference being in the after-tests-only condition. The time when dissimilar alternatives were presented had little effect on performance. Verbal recognition was generally poorer than pictorial. Modified HA</description><issn>0090-5054</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1976</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkDFPwzAUhD2ARCks_IJMDEiB5zy_OB2hooBUCSRgjlznBYxSJ9huEP8e2iIx3em-0w0nxJmES9RUXd0sABFJKnUgJgAzyAlIHYnjGD8AEFDRRDw9c8c2uZEzkxL75HqfOZ-NLm5MlwW2_Zt3u_TLpfdscDb1wf0i45ts5LDa2i5x8Ga7Ek_EYWu6yKd_OhWvi9uX-X2-fLx7mF8vc1uQTjlpqZsKV2SIqZStJDZQ2XKmsaAGsWgUWNYN23ZWqR2vsCTZKgm6LAGn4ny_O4T-c8Mx1WsXLXed8dxvYl0RAcCueLEv2tDHGLith-DWJnzXEurtUfX_UfgD91hc7Q</recordid><startdate>19761001</startdate><enddate>19761001</enddate><creator>Redding, Gordon M.</creator><creator>Seward, William M.</creator><creator>Stolldorf, Dean E.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19761001</creationdate><title>Selective attention in visual recognition with pictorial and verbal alternatives</title><author>Redding, Gordon M. ; Seward, William M. ; Stolldorf, Dean E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-5717d83b5a5e561f15ea08c697325d332d40ce7decf9841f15e83651f41076603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1976</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Redding, Gordon M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seward, William M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolldorf, Dean E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Redding, Gordon M.</au><au>Seward, William M.</au><au>Stolldorf, Dean E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selective attention in visual recognition with pictorial and verbal alternatives</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society</jtitle><date>1976-10-01</date><risdate>1976</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>295</spage><epage>297</epage><pages>295-297</pages><issn>0090-5054</issn><coden>BPNSBY</coden><abstract>A previous experiment by B. Tversky (see LLBA V/1, p. 390) suggested the possibility of perceptual selection (of pictures) with verbal alternatives--i.e., the Ss might pictorially recode verbal information & subsequently process a pictorial target selectively for critical features. The 48 female student volunteers, 16 per group, were divided into eight groups & given a factorial combination of three variables: time of cue (before & after test pictures, or after tests only), similarity of alternatives (similar vs dissimilar), & alternative types (pictorial or verbal). Dissimilar alternatives were more frequently recognized, with the greatest difference being in the after-tests-only condition. The time when dissimilar alternatives were presented had little effect on performance. Verbal recognition was generally poorer than pictorial. Modified HA</abstract><doi>10.3758/BF03335144</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0090-5054 |
| ispartof | Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1976-10, Vol.8 (4), p.295-297 |
| issn | 0090-5054 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85500060 |
| source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| title | Selective attention in visual recognition with pictorial and verbal alternatives |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T21%3A57%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selective%20attention%20in%20visual%20recognition%20with%20pictorial%20and%20verbal%20alternatives&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20the%20Psychonomic%20Society&rft.au=Redding,%20Gordon%20M.&rft.date=1976-10-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=295&rft.epage=297&rft.pages=295-297&rft.issn=0090-5054&rft.coden=BPNSBY&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/BF03335144&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85500060%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85500060&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |