Temporal and Associative Memory in Chinese and English
This article presents a theoretical model that suggests that linguistic differences between Chinese and English have a qualitative effect on the processing of verbal information. A higher degree of phonological processing of English words was hypothesized to result in a superior encoding of temporal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of consumer research 1999-09, Vol.26 (2), p.170-181 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 181 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 170 |
container_title | The Journal of consumer research |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Tavassoli, Nader T. |
description | This article presents a theoretical model that suggests that linguistic differences between Chinese and English have a qualitative effect on the processing of verbal information. A higher degree of phonological processing of English words was hypothesized to result in a superior encoding of temporal information. In contrast, a higher degree of contextual and visual‐semantic processing of Chinese words was hypothesized to result in a superior encoding of interitem associative information. These effects were hypothesized to be absent for pictorial information. Two experiments found support for the hypotheses. In a sorting task, native English speakers demonstrated superior temporal memory for English words compared with native Chinese speakers for Chinese words. In a free recall task, native English speakers demonstrated a greater reliance on temporal order in the retrieval of English words, whereas native Chinese speakers demonstrated a greater reliance on semantic associations in the retrieval of Chinese words. In both experiments, cross‐cultural differences were absent for semantically equivalent pictorial information. The implications of these memory findings are discussed with respect to the formation of memory‐based judgments and the encoding of thematic information in marketing communications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/209558 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85498415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/209558</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/209558</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-5990e6202b2f9ffad5866d85b61bc2299bfd8e5703a493617c4926cff0bb06b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0M1KAzEUBeAgCtaqT-BicOFu9CaZZJJlKfUHKm7qOiSZxKbMTGoyI_TtrVYUXN3Nx-Hcg9AlhlsMgt8RkIyJIzTBjNYlI3V9jCYAkpaMAj5FZzlvAAADxhPEV67bxqTbQvdNMcs52qCH8OGKZ9fFtCtCX8zXoXfZfYtF_9aGvD5HJ1632V383Cl6vV-s5o_l8uXhaT5blpYCDCWTEhwnQAzx0nvdMMF5I5jh2FhCpDS-EY7VQHUlKce1rSTh1nswBrgBOkU3h9xtiu-jy4PqQraubXXv4piVYJUU1f7RKbr-BzdxTP2-myKYARWEi780m2LOyXm1TaHTaacwqK_t1GG7Pbw6wE0eYvpVpBJSQEU_AeUFZ1c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215038268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Temporal and Associative Memory in Chinese and English</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Tavassoli, Nader T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tavassoli, Nader T.</creatorcontrib><description>This article presents a theoretical model that suggests that linguistic differences between Chinese and English have a qualitative effect on the processing of verbal information. A higher degree of phonological processing of English words was hypothesized to result in a superior encoding of temporal information. In contrast, a higher degree of contextual and visual‐semantic processing of Chinese words was hypothesized to result in a superior encoding of interitem associative information. These effects were hypothesized to be absent for pictorial information. Two experiments found support for the hypotheses. In a sorting task, native English speakers demonstrated superior temporal memory for English words compared with native Chinese speakers for Chinese words. In a free recall task, native English speakers demonstrated a greater reliance on temporal order in the retrieval of English words, whereas native Chinese speakers demonstrated a greater reliance on semantic associations in the retrieval of Chinese words. In both experiments, cross‐cultural differences were absent for semantically equivalent pictorial information. The implications of these memory findings are discussed with respect to the formation of memory‐based judgments and the encoding of thematic information in marketing communications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-5301</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/209558</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCSRBJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Brand names ; Consumer behavior ; Consumer research ; Consumers ; Cultural differences ; Experiments ; Hypotheses ; Information processing ; Language ; Linguistics ; Marketing ; Memory ; Memory recall ; Orthographies ; Phonology ; Product recalls ; Pronunciation ; Semantics ; Short term ; Words</subject><ispartof>The Journal of consumer research, 1999-09, Vol.26 (2), p.170-181</ispartof><rights>1999 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Sep 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-5990e6202b2f9ffad5866d85b61bc2299bfd8e5703a493617c4926cff0bb06b03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tavassoli, Nader T.</creatorcontrib><title>Temporal and Associative Memory in Chinese and English</title><title>The Journal of consumer research</title><description>This article presents a theoretical model that suggests that linguistic differences between Chinese and English have a qualitative effect on the processing of verbal information. A higher degree of phonological processing of English words was hypothesized to result in a superior encoding of temporal information. In contrast, a higher degree of contextual and visual‐semantic processing of Chinese words was hypothesized to result in a superior encoding of interitem associative information. These effects were hypothesized to be absent for pictorial information. Two experiments found support for the hypotheses. In a sorting task, native English speakers demonstrated superior temporal memory for English words compared with native Chinese speakers for Chinese words. In a free recall task, native English speakers demonstrated a greater reliance on temporal order in the retrieval of English words, whereas native Chinese speakers demonstrated a greater reliance on semantic associations in the retrieval of Chinese words. In both experiments, cross‐cultural differences were absent for semantically equivalent pictorial information. The implications of these memory findings are discussed with respect to the formation of memory‐based judgments and the encoding of thematic information in marketing communications.</description><subject>Brand names</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumer research</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory recall</subject><subject>Orthographies</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Product recalls</subject><subject>Pronunciation</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Short term</subject><subject>Words</subject><issn>0093-5301</issn><issn>1537-5277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0M1KAzEUBeAgCtaqT-BicOFu9CaZZJJlKfUHKm7qOiSZxKbMTGoyI_TtrVYUXN3Nx-Hcg9AlhlsMgt8RkIyJIzTBjNYlI3V9jCYAkpaMAj5FZzlvAAADxhPEV67bxqTbQvdNMcs52qCH8OGKZ9fFtCtCX8zXoXfZfYtF_9aGvD5HJ1632V383Cl6vV-s5o_l8uXhaT5blpYCDCWTEhwnQAzx0nvdMMF5I5jh2FhCpDS-EY7VQHUlKce1rSTh1nswBrgBOkU3h9xtiu-jy4PqQraubXXv4piVYJUU1f7RKbr-BzdxTP2-myKYARWEi780m2LOyXm1TaHTaacwqK_t1GG7Pbw6wE0eYvpVpBJSQEU_AeUFZ1c</recordid><startdate>19990901</startdate><enddate>19990901</enddate><creator>Tavassoli, Nader T.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990901</creationdate><title>Temporal and Associative Memory in Chinese and English</title><author>Tavassoli, Nader T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-5990e6202b2f9ffad5866d85b61bc2299bfd8e5703a493617c4926cff0bb06b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Brand names</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumer research</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory recall</topic><topic>Orthographies</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Product recalls</topic><topic>Pronunciation</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Short term</topic><topic>Words</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tavassoli, Nader T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of consumer research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tavassoli, Nader T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Temporal and Associative Memory in Chinese and English</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of consumer research</jtitle><date>1999-09-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>170</spage><epage>181</epage><pages>170-181</pages><issn>0093-5301</issn><eissn>1537-5277</eissn><coden>JCSRBJ</coden><abstract>This article presents a theoretical model that suggests that linguistic differences between Chinese and English have a qualitative effect on the processing of verbal information. A higher degree of phonological processing of English words was hypothesized to result in a superior encoding of temporal information. In contrast, a higher degree of contextual and visual‐semantic processing of Chinese words was hypothesized to result in a superior encoding of interitem associative information. These effects were hypothesized to be absent for pictorial information. Two experiments found support for the hypotheses. In a sorting task, native English speakers demonstrated superior temporal memory for English words compared with native Chinese speakers for Chinese words. In a free recall task, native English speakers demonstrated a greater reliance on temporal order in the retrieval of English words, whereas native Chinese speakers demonstrated a greater reliance on semantic associations in the retrieval of Chinese words. In both experiments, cross‐cultural differences were absent for semantically equivalent pictorial information. The implications of these memory findings are discussed with respect to the formation of memory‐based judgments and the encoding of thematic information in marketing communications.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/209558</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0093-5301 |
ispartof | The Journal of consumer research, 1999-09, Vol.26 (2), p.170-181 |
issn | 0093-5301 1537-5277 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85498415 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Brand names Consumer behavior Consumer research Consumers Cultural differences Experiments Hypotheses Information processing Language Linguistics Marketing Memory Memory recall Orthographies Phonology Product recalls Pronunciation Semantics Short term Words |
title | Temporal and Associative Memory in Chinese and English |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T15%3A53%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Temporal%20and%20Associative%20Memory%20in%20Chinese%20and%20English&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20consumer%20research&rft.au=Tavassoli,%20Nader%C2%A0T.&rft.date=1999-09-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=170&rft.epage=181&rft.pages=170-181&rft.issn=0093-5301&rft.eissn=1537-5277&rft.coden=JCSRBJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/209558&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/209558%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215038268&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/209558&rfr_iscdi=true |