Temporal and Associative Memory in Chinese and English

This article presents a theoretical model that suggests that linguistic differences between Chinese and English have a qualitative effect on the processing of verbal information. A higher degree of phonological processing of English words was hypothesized to result in a superior encoding of temporal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of consumer research 1999-09, Vol.26 (2), p.170-181
1. Verfasser: Tavassoli, Nader T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 181
container_issue 2
container_start_page 170
container_title The Journal of consumer research
container_volume 26
creator Tavassoli, Nader T.
description This article presents a theoretical model that suggests that linguistic differences between Chinese and English have a qualitative effect on the processing of verbal information. A higher degree of phonological processing of English words was hypothesized to result in a superior encoding of temporal information. In contrast, a higher degree of contextual and visual‐semantic processing of Chinese words was hypothesized to result in a superior encoding of interitem associative information. These effects were hypothesized to be absent for pictorial information. Two experiments found support for the hypotheses. In a sorting task, native English speakers demonstrated superior temporal memory for English words compared with native Chinese speakers for Chinese words. In a free recall task, native English speakers demonstrated a greater reliance on temporal order in the retrieval of English words, whereas native Chinese speakers demonstrated a greater reliance on semantic associations in the retrieval of Chinese words. In both experiments, cross‐cultural differences were absent for semantically equivalent pictorial information. The implications of these memory findings are discussed with respect to the formation of memory‐based judgments and the encoding of thematic information in marketing communications.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/209558
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85498415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/209558</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/209558</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-5990e6202b2f9ffad5866d85b61bc2299bfd8e5703a493617c4926cff0bb06b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0M1KAzEUBeAgCtaqT-BicOFu9CaZZJJlKfUHKm7qOiSZxKbMTGoyI_TtrVYUXN3Nx-Hcg9AlhlsMgt8RkIyJIzTBjNYlI3V9jCYAkpaMAj5FZzlvAAADxhPEV67bxqTbQvdNMcs52qCH8OGKZ9fFtCtCX8zXoXfZfYtF_9aGvD5HJ1632V383Cl6vV-s5o_l8uXhaT5blpYCDCWTEhwnQAzx0nvdMMF5I5jh2FhCpDS-EY7VQHUlKce1rSTh1nswBrgBOkU3h9xtiu-jy4PqQraubXXv4piVYJUU1f7RKbr-BzdxTP2-myKYARWEi780m2LOyXm1TaHTaacwqK_t1GG7Pbw6wE0eYvpVpBJSQEU_AeUFZ1c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215038268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Temporal and Associative Memory in Chinese and English</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Tavassoli, Nader T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tavassoli, Nader T.</creatorcontrib><description>This article presents a theoretical model that suggests that linguistic differences between Chinese and English have a qualitative effect on the processing of verbal information. A higher degree of phonological processing of English words was hypothesized to result in a superior encoding of temporal information. In contrast, a higher degree of contextual and visual‐semantic processing of Chinese words was hypothesized to result in a superior encoding of interitem associative information. These effects were hypothesized to be absent for pictorial information. Two experiments found support for the hypotheses. In a sorting task, native English speakers demonstrated superior temporal memory for English words compared with native Chinese speakers for Chinese words. In a free recall task, native English speakers demonstrated a greater reliance on temporal order in the retrieval of English words, whereas native Chinese speakers demonstrated a greater reliance on semantic associations in the retrieval of Chinese words. In both experiments, cross‐cultural differences were absent for semantically equivalent pictorial information. The implications of these memory findings are discussed with respect to the formation of memory‐based judgments and the encoding of thematic information in marketing communications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-5301</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/209558</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCSRBJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Brand names ; Consumer behavior ; Consumer research ; Consumers ; Cultural differences ; Experiments ; Hypotheses ; Information processing ; Language ; Linguistics ; Marketing ; Memory ; Memory recall ; Orthographies ; Phonology ; Product recalls ; Pronunciation ; Semantics ; Short term ; Words</subject><ispartof>The Journal of consumer research, 1999-09, Vol.26 (2), p.170-181</ispartof><rights>1999 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Sep 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-5990e6202b2f9ffad5866d85b61bc2299bfd8e5703a493617c4926cff0bb06b03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tavassoli, Nader T.</creatorcontrib><title>Temporal and Associative Memory in Chinese and English</title><title>The Journal of consumer research</title><description>This article presents a theoretical model that suggests that linguistic differences between Chinese and English have a qualitative effect on the processing of verbal information. A higher degree of phonological processing of English words was hypothesized to result in a superior encoding of temporal information. In contrast, a higher degree of contextual and visual‐semantic processing of Chinese words was hypothesized to result in a superior encoding of interitem associative information. These effects were hypothesized to be absent for pictorial information. Two experiments found support for the hypotheses. In a sorting task, native English speakers demonstrated superior temporal memory for English words compared with native Chinese speakers for Chinese words. In a free recall task, native English speakers demonstrated a greater reliance on temporal order in the retrieval of English words, whereas native Chinese speakers demonstrated a greater reliance on semantic associations in the retrieval of Chinese words. In both experiments, cross‐cultural differences were absent for semantically equivalent pictorial information. The implications of these memory findings are discussed with respect to the formation of memory‐based judgments and the encoding of thematic information in marketing communications.</description><subject>Brand names</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumer research</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory recall</subject><subject>Orthographies</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Product recalls</subject><subject>Pronunciation</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Short term</subject><subject>Words</subject><issn>0093-5301</issn><issn>1537-5277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0M1KAzEUBeAgCtaqT-BicOFu9CaZZJJlKfUHKm7qOiSZxKbMTGoyI_TtrVYUXN3Nx-Hcg9AlhlsMgt8RkIyJIzTBjNYlI3V9jCYAkpaMAj5FZzlvAAADxhPEV67bxqTbQvdNMcs52qCH8OGKZ9fFtCtCX8zXoXfZfYtF_9aGvD5HJ1632V383Cl6vV-s5o_l8uXhaT5blpYCDCWTEhwnQAzx0nvdMMF5I5jh2FhCpDS-EY7VQHUlKce1rSTh1nswBrgBOkU3h9xtiu-jy4PqQraubXXv4piVYJUU1f7RKbr-BzdxTP2-myKYARWEi780m2LOyXm1TaHTaacwqK_t1GG7Pbw6wE0eYvpVpBJSQEU_AeUFZ1c</recordid><startdate>19990901</startdate><enddate>19990901</enddate><creator>Tavassoli, Nader T.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990901</creationdate><title>Temporal and Associative Memory in Chinese and English</title><author>Tavassoli, Nader T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-5990e6202b2f9ffad5866d85b61bc2299bfd8e5703a493617c4926cff0bb06b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Brand names</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumer research</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory recall</topic><topic>Orthographies</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Product recalls</topic><topic>Pronunciation</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Short term</topic><topic>Words</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tavassoli, Nader T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of consumer research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tavassoli, Nader T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Temporal and Associative Memory in Chinese and English</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of consumer research</jtitle><date>1999-09-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>170</spage><epage>181</epage><pages>170-181</pages><issn>0093-5301</issn><eissn>1537-5277</eissn><coden>JCSRBJ</coden><abstract>This article presents a theoretical model that suggests that linguistic differences between Chinese and English have a qualitative effect on the processing of verbal information. A higher degree of phonological processing of English words was hypothesized to result in a superior encoding of temporal information. In contrast, a higher degree of contextual and visual‐semantic processing of Chinese words was hypothesized to result in a superior encoding of interitem associative information. These effects were hypothesized to be absent for pictorial information. Two experiments found support for the hypotheses. In a sorting task, native English speakers demonstrated superior temporal memory for English words compared with native Chinese speakers for Chinese words. In a free recall task, native English speakers demonstrated a greater reliance on temporal order in the retrieval of English words, whereas native Chinese speakers demonstrated a greater reliance on semantic associations in the retrieval of Chinese words. In both experiments, cross‐cultural differences were absent for semantically equivalent pictorial information. The implications of these memory findings are discussed with respect to the formation of memory‐based judgments and the encoding of thematic information in marketing communications.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/209558</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0093-5301
ispartof The Journal of consumer research, 1999-09, Vol.26 (2), p.170-181
issn 0093-5301
1537-5277
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85498415
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Brand names
Consumer behavior
Consumer research
Consumers
Cultural differences
Experiments
Hypotheses
Information processing
Language
Linguistics
Marketing
Memory
Memory recall
Orthographies
Phonology
Product recalls
Pronunciation
Semantics
Short term
Words
title Temporal and Associative Memory in Chinese and English
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T15%3A53%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Temporal%20and%20Associative%20Memory%20in%20Chinese%20and%20English&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20consumer%20research&rft.au=Tavassoli,%20Nader%C2%A0T.&rft.date=1999-09-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=170&rft.epage=181&rft.pages=170-181&rft.issn=0093-5301&rft.eissn=1537-5277&rft.coden=JCSRBJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/209558&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/209558%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215038268&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/209558&rfr_iscdi=true