Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words

Three experiments were performed to examine contrsting predictions of a dualrepresentation and context availability hypothesis for concreteness effects in lexical decision. In Experiment 1, equivalent lexical decision times were obtained for concrete and abstract words controlled for rated context a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of memory and language 1988-10, Vol.27 (5), p.499-520
Hauptverfasser: Schwanenflugel, Paula J, Harnishfeger, Katherine Kip, Stowe, Randall W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 520
container_issue 5
container_start_page 499
container_title Journal of memory and language
container_volume 27
creator Schwanenflugel, Paula J
Harnishfeger, Katherine Kip
Stowe, Randall W
description Three experiments were performed to examine contrsting predictions of a dualrepresentation and context availability hypothesis for concreteness effects in lexical decision. In Experiment 1, equivalent lexical decision times were obtained for concrete and abstract words controlled for rated context availability, whereas longer lexical decision times were obtained for abstract words than for concrete words when the abstract words were rated lower in context availability. In a second lexical decision experiment using 365 words, rated context availability was a better predictor of lexical decision time than imagery and concreteness, familiarity, or age-of-acquisition ratings. The third experiment was a sentence context-lexical decision study in which benefits of context were examined for abstract and concrete words controlled on rated context availability and for abstract and concrete words where the abstract words were rated lower in context availability. Larger benefits of context were obtained for abstract words than for concrete words only when the abstract words were also rated low in context availability. These results are discussed as providing support for the context availability hypothesis of concreteness effects during lexical decision.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90022-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85498348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0749596X88900228</els_id><sourcerecordid>1297354140</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-a782eb3b0e059a6d2e8f9774f64453a177b4514091cf4f0c516175c2a22db2c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKBDEQRYMoOD7-wEWDIrpoTdJJJ9kIMvhEcKPgLqTT1ZChpzMmGXX-3syDWbiwNrU5dW9xEDoh-IpgUl9jwVTJVf1xIeWlwpjSUu6gEcGqLrGkZBeNtsg-OohxgjEhXNAReh77IcFPKsyXcb1pXO_SojBDW_Tw46zpixasi84Pseh8KEwTUzA2rRDrBxsgQfHtQxuP0F5n-gjHm32I3u_v3saP5cvrw9P49qW0laKpNEJSaKoGA-bK1C0F2SkhWFczxitDhGgYJwwrYjvWYctJTQS31FDaNtTS6hCdr3NnwX_OISY9ddFC35sB_DxqyZmSFZMZPP0DTvw8DPk3TagSFWe5JlNsTdngYwzQ6VlwUxMWmmC91KuX7vTSnZZSr_TqZfjZJtzErKkLZsietrcC4zpPxm7WGGQjXw6CjtbBYKF1AWzSrXf_9_wCkSqNgg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297354140</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Schwanenflugel, Paula J ; Harnishfeger, Katherine Kip ; Stowe, Randall W</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwanenflugel, Paula J ; Harnishfeger, Katherine Kip ; Stowe, Randall W</creatorcontrib><description>Three experiments were performed to examine contrsting predictions of a dualrepresentation and context availability hypothesis for concreteness effects in lexical decision. In Experiment 1, equivalent lexical decision times were obtained for concrete and abstract words controlled for rated context availability, whereas longer lexical decision times were obtained for abstract words than for concrete words when the abstract words were rated lower in context availability. In a second lexical decision experiment using 365 words, rated context availability was a better predictor of lexical decision time than imagery and concreteness, familiarity, or age-of-acquisition ratings. The third experiment was a sentence context-lexical decision study in which benefits of context were examined for abstract and concrete words controlled on rated context availability and for abstract and concrete words where the abstract words were rated lower in context availability. Larger benefits of context were obtained for abstract words than for concrete words only when the abstract words were also rated low in context availability. These results are discussed as providing support for the context availability hypothesis of concreteness effects during lexical decision.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-596X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0821</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90022-8</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMLAE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Language ; Production and perception of written language ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of memory and language, 1988-10, Vol.27 (5), p.499-520</ispartof><rights>1988</rights><rights>1989 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-a782eb3b0e059a6d2e8f9774f64453a177b4514091cf4f0c516175c2a22db2c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-a782eb3b0e059a6d2e8f9774f64453a177b4514091cf4f0c516175c2a22db2c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90022-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27858,27913,27914,45984</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7006666$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwanenflugel, Paula J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harnishfeger, Katherine Kip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stowe, Randall W</creatorcontrib><title>Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words</title><title>Journal of memory and language</title><description>Three experiments were performed to examine contrsting predictions of a dualrepresentation and context availability hypothesis for concreteness effects in lexical decision. In Experiment 1, equivalent lexical decision times were obtained for concrete and abstract words controlled for rated context availability, whereas longer lexical decision times were obtained for abstract words than for concrete words when the abstract words were rated lower in context availability. In a second lexical decision experiment using 365 words, rated context availability was a better predictor of lexical decision time than imagery and concreteness, familiarity, or age-of-acquisition ratings. The third experiment was a sentence context-lexical decision study in which benefits of context were examined for abstract and concrete words controlled on rated context availability and for abstract and concrete words where the abstract words were rated lower in context availability. Larger benefits of context were obtained for abstract words than for concrete words only when the abstract words were also rated low in context availability. These results are discussed as providing support for the context availability hypothesis of concreteness effects during lexical decision.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Production and perception of written language</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><issn>0749-596X</issn><issn>1096-0821</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0R3</sourceid><sourceid>ACFII</sourceid><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~OC</sourceid><sourceid>~PJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKBDEQRYMoOD7-wEWDIrpoTdJJJ9kIMvhEcKPgLqTT1ZChpzMmGXX-3syDWbiwNrU5dW9xEDoh-IpgUl9jwVTJVf1xIeWlwpjSUu6gEcGqLrGkZBeNtsg-OohxgjEhXNAReh77IcFPKsyXcb1pXO_SojBDW_Tw46zpixasi84Pseh8KEwTUzA2rRDrBxsgQfHtQxuP0F5n-gjHm32I3u_v3saP5cvrw9P49qW0laKpNEJSaKoGA-bK1C0F2SkhWFczxitDhGgYJwwrYjvWYctJTQS31FDaNtTS6hCdr3NnwX_OISY9ddFC35sB_DxqyZmSFZMZPP0DTvw8DPk3TagSFWe5JlNsTdngYwzQ6VlwUxMWmmC91KuX7vTSnZZSr_TqZfjZJtzErKkLZsietrcC4zpPxm7WGGQjXw6CjtbBYKF1AWzSrXf_9_wCkSqNgg</recordid><startdate>19881001</startdate><enddate>19881001</enddate><creator>Schwanenflugel, Paula J</creator><creator>Harnishfeger, Katherine Kip</creator><creator>Stowe, Randall W</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0R3</scope><scope>ACFII</scope><scope>ANHVI</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>JSICY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SFNNT</scope><scope>~OB</scope><scope>~OC</scope><scope>~OG</scope><scope>~PJ</scope><scope>~PM</scope><scope>~PN</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19881001</creationdate><title>Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words</title><author>Schwanenflugel, Paula J ; Harnishfeger, Katherine Kip ; Stowe, Randall W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-a782eb3b0e059a6d2e8f9774f64453a177b4514091cf4f0c516175c2a22db2c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Production and perception of written language</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwanenflugel, Paula J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harnishfeger, Katherine Kip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stowe, Randall W</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1.2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 1 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 1 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 36</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 44</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1 (purchase pre Feb/2008)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JISC Collection</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 1</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of memory and language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwanenflugel, Paula J</au><au>Harnishfeger, Katherine Kip</au><au>Stowe, Randall W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words</atitle><jtitle>Journal of memory and language</jtitle><date>1988-10-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>520</epage><pages>499-520</pages><issn>0749-596X</issn><eissn>1096-0821</eissn><coden>JMLAE6</coden><abstract>Three experiments were performed to examine contrsting predictions of a dualrepresentation and context availability hypothesis for concreteness effects in lexical decision. In Experiment 1, equivalent lexical decision times were obtained for concrete and abstract words controlled for rated context availability, whereas longer lexical decision times were obtained for abstract words than for concrete words when the abstract words were rated lower in context availability. In a second lexical decision experiment using 365 words, rated context availability was a better predictor of lexical decision time than imagery and concreteness, familiarity, or age-of-acquisition ratings. The third experiment was a sentence context-lexical decision study in which benefits of context were examined for abstract and concrete words controlled on rated context availability and for abstract and concrete words where the abstract words were rated lower in context availability. Larger benefits of context were obtained for abstract words than for concrete words only when the abstract words were also rated low in context availability. These results are discussed as providing support for the context availability hypothesis of concreteness effects during lexical decision.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/0749-596X(88)90022-8</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-596X
ispartof Journal of memory and language, 1988-10, Vol.27 (5), p.499-520
issn 0749-596X
1096-0821
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85498348
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; Periodicals Index Online; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Language
Production and perception of written language
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
title Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T08%3A28%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Context%20availability%20and%20lexical%20decisions%20for%20abstract%20and%20concrete%20words&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20memory%20and%20language&rft.au=Schwanenflugel,%20Paula%20J&rft.date=1988-10-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=520&rft.pages=499-520&rft.issn=0749-596X&rft.eissn=1096-0821&rft.coden=JMLAE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90022-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1297354140%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297354140&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0749596X88900228&rfr_iscdi=true