Paradigm economy: a reply to Nyman
The paradigm economy principle (PEP) is a constraint on the way in which the inflectional resources of a lang can be organized into paradigms. The strict version of this constraint bans all paradigm mixture. It is argued that some types of mixture are compatible with the PEP. However, some seemingly...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of linguistics 1988-09, Vol.24 (2), p.489-499 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 499 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 489 |
container_title | Journal of linguistics |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Carstairs, Andrew |
description | The paradigm economy principle (PEP) is a constraint on the way in which the inflectional resources of a lang can be organized into paradigms. The strict version of this constraint bans all paradigm mixture. It is argued that some types of mixture are compatible with the PEP. However, some seemingly unacceptable mixtures may occur on a diachronic basis. Martti Nyman has argued (see LLBA 22 /2, 8803370) that the PEP is not a factor in accounting for morphological change. Relevant developments in Latin are viewed by Nyman as illustrations of the "one form-one meaning" (OFOM) principle. It is argued that expectations regarding diachronic change in Latin based on the PEP are more precise & more accurate than those based on the OFOM. In Paradigm Economy: A Rejoinder to Carstairs, Nyman (U of Helsinki) suggests that Carstairs's defense of the PEP is not methodologically explicit. It is argued that the semiological underpinnings of OFOM are clearer than those of PEP. 1 Table, 71 References. B. Annesser Murray |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0022226700011889 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85496087</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022226700011889</cupid><jstor_id>4175954</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4175954</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-8e6ff5aea6a2491c573b303dae8125ede5c6280f06744b31cdca674088c3be413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QPCwCHpbnWyySdabFK1i_ajVi5cwzWbL1v2oyRbcf--WlnoQnEsGnmcmw0vIMYULClReTgCiroQEAEqVSnZIj3KRhFLyaJf0Vjhc8X1y4P28kxgkqkdOX9Bhms_KwJq6qsv2KsDA2UXRBk0dPLUlVodkL8PC26PN2yfvtzdvg7tw9Dy8H1yPQsMhaUJlRZbFaFFgxBNqYsmmDFiKVtEotqmNjYgUZCAk51NGTWqwa0Epw6aWU9Yn5-u9C1d_La1vdJl7Y4sCK1svvVYxTwQo2Yl0LRpXe-9sphcuL9G1moJepaH_pNHNnG2WozdYZA4rk_vfQZqAAB513snam_umdlvOqYyTmHc4XOPcN_Z7i9F9aiGZjLUYjvUjn4w_Hl5HevUt25yK5dTl6czqeb10VZfjP8f-ACOihGk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85496087</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Paradigm economy: a reply to Nyman</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Carstairs, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Carstairs, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>The paradigm economy principle (PEP) is a constraint on the way in which the inflectional resources of a lang can be organized into paradigms. The strict version of this constraint bans all paradigm mixture. It is argued that some types of mixture are compatible with the PEP. However, some seemingly unacceptable mixtures may occur on a diachronic basis. Martti Nyman has argued (see LLBA 22 /2, 8803370) that the PEP is not a factor in accounting for morphological change. Relevant developments in Latin are viewed by Nyman as illustrations of the "one form-one meaning" (OFOM) principle. It is argued that expectations regarding diachronic change in Latin based on the PEP are more precise & more accurate than those based on the OFOM. In Paradigm Economy: A Rejoinder to Carstairs, Nyman (U of Helsinki) suggests that Carstairs's defense of the PEP is not methodologically explicit. It is argued that the semiological underpinnings of OFOM are clearer than those of PEP. 1 Table, 71 References. B. Annesser Murray</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2267</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7742</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022226700011889</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLINAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Descriptive studies and applied theories ; Economic development ; Economic history ; Economic principles ; Historical linguistics ; Homography ; Linguistic morphology ; Linguistics ; Morphology ; Notes and Discussion ; Nouns ; Post exposure prophylaxis ; Syncope ; Verbs</subject><ispartof>Journal of linguistics, 1988-09, Vol.24 (2), p.489-499</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988</rights><rights>Copyright 1988 Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-8e6ff5aea6a2491c573b303dae8125ede5c6280f06744b31cdca674088c3be413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-8e6ff5aea6a2491c573b303dae8125ede5c6280f06744b31cdca674088c3be413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4175954$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022226700011889/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,778,782,801,27907,27908,55611,58000,58233</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=11906042$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carstairs, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Paradigm economy: a reply to Nyman</title><title>Journal of linguistics</title><addtitle>J. Ling</addtitle><description>The paradigm economy principle (PEP) is a constraint on the way in which the inflectional resources of a lang can be organized into paradigms. The strict version of this constraint bans all paradigm mixture. It is argued that some types of mixture are compatible with the PEP. However, some seemingly unacceptable mixtures may occur on a diachronic basis. Martti Nyman has argued (see LLBA 22 /2, 8803370) that the PEP is not a factor in accounting for morphological change. Relevant developments in Latin are viewed by Nyman as illustrations of the "one form-one meaning" (OFOM) principle. It is argued that expectations regarding diachronic change in Latin based on the PEP are more precise & more accurate than those based on the OFOM. In Paradigm Economy: A Rejoinder to Carstairs, Nyman (U of Helsinki) suggests that Carstairs's defense of the PEP is not methodologically explicit. It is argued that the semiological underpinnings of OFOM are clearer than those of PEP. 1 Table, 71 References. B. Annesser Murray</description><subject>Descriptive studies and applied theories</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic history</subject><subject>Economic principles</subject><subject>Historical linguistics</subject><subject>Homography</subject><subject>Linguistic morphology</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Notes and Discussion</subject><subject>Nouns</subject><subject>Post exposure prophylaxis</subject><subject>Syncope</subject><subject>Verbs</subject><issn>0022-2267</issn><issn>1469-7742</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QPCwCHpbnWyySdabFK1i_ajVi5cwzWbL1v2oyRbcf--WlnoQnEsGnmcmw0vIMYULClReTgCiroQEAEqVSnZIj3KRhFLyaJf0Vjhc8X1y4P28kxgkqkdOX9Bhms_KwJq6qsv2KsDA2UXRBk0dPLUlVodkL8PC26PN2yfvtzdvg7tw9Dy8H1yPQsMhaUJlRZbFaFFgxBNqYsmmDFiKVtEotqmNjYgUZCAk51NGTWqwa0Epw6aWU9Yn5-u9C1d_La1vdJl7Y4sCK1svvVYxTwQo2Yl0LRpXe-9sphcuL9G1moJepaH_pNHNnG2WozdYZA4rk_vfQZqAAB513snam_umdlvOqYyTmHc4XOPcN_Z7i9F9aiGZjLUYjvUjn4w_Hl5HevUt25yK5dTl6czqeb10VZfjP8f-ACOihGk</recordid><startdate>19880901</startdate><enddate>19880901</enddate><creator>Carstairs, Andrew</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880901</creationdate><title>Paradigm economy: a reply to Nyman</title><author>Carstairs, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-8e6ff5aea6a2491c573b303dae8125ede5c6280f06744b31cdca674088c3be413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Descriptive studies and applied theories</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic history</topic><topic>Economic principles</topic><topic>Historical linguistics</topic><topic>Homography</topic><topic>Linguistic morphology</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Notes and Discussion</topic><topic>Nouns</topic><topic>Post exposure prophylaxis</topic><topic>Syncope</topic><topic>Verbs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carstairs, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carstairs, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Paradigm economy: a reply to Nyman</atitle><jtitle>Journal of linguistics</jtitle><addtitle>J. Ling</addtitle><date>1988-09-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>489</spage><epage>499</epage><pages>489-499</pages><issn>0022-2267</issn><eissn>1469-7742</eissn><coden>JLINAJ</coden><abstract>The paradigm economy principle (PEP) is a constraint on the way in which the inflectional resources of a lang can be organized into paradigms. The strict version of this constraint bans all paradigm mixture. It is argued that some types of mixture are compatible with the PEP. However, some seemingly unacceptable mixtures may occur on a diachronic basis. Martti Nyman has argued (see LLBA 22 /2, 8803370) that the PEP is not a factor in accounting for morphological change. Relevant developments in Latin are viewed by Nyman as illustrations of the "one form-one meaning" (OFOM) principle. It is argued that expectations regarding diachronic change in Latin based on the PEP are more precise & more accurate than those based on the OFOM. In Paradigm Economy: A Rejoinder to Carstairs, Nyman (U of Helsinki) suggests that Carstairs's defense of the PEP is not methodologically explicit. It is argued that the semiological underpinnings of OFOM are clearer than those of PEP. 1 Table, 71 References. B. Annesser Murray</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0022226700011889</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2267 |
ispartof | Journal of linguistics, 1988-09, Vol.24 (2), p.489-499 |
issn | 0022-2267 1469-7742 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85496087 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Descriptive studies and applied theories Economic development Economic history Economic principles Historical linguistics Homography Linguistic morphology Linguistics Morphology Notes and Discussion Nouns Post exposure prophylaxis Syncope Verbs |
title | Paradigm economy: a reply to Nyman |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T08%3A22%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Paradigm%20economy:%20a%20reply%20to%20Nyman&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20linguistics&rft.au=Carstairs,%20Andrew&rft.date=1988-09-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=489&rft.epage=499&rft.pages=489-499&rft.issn=0022-2267&rft.eissn=1469-7742&rft.coden=JLINAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022226700011889&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4175954%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85496087&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022226700011889&rft_jstor_id=4175954&rfr_iscdi=true |