Paradigm economy: a reply to Nyman

The paradigm economy principle (PEP) is a constraint on the way in which the inflectional resources of a lang can be organized into paradigms. The strict version of this constraint bans all paradigm mixture. It is argued that some types of mixture are compatible with the PEP. However, some seemingly...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of linguistics 1988-09, Vol.24 (2), p.489-499
1. Verfasser: Carstairs, Andrew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 499
container_issue 2
container_start_page 489
container_title Journal of linguistics
container_volume 24
creator Carstairs, Andrew
description The paradigm economy principle (PEP) is a constraint on the way in which the inflectional resources of a lang can be organized into paradigms. The strict version of this constraint bans all paradigm mixture. It is argued that some types of mixture are compatible with the PEP. However, some seemingly unacceptable mixtures may occur on a diachronic basis. Martti Nyman has argued (see LLBA 22 /2, 8803370) that the PEP is not a factor in accounting for morphological change. Relevant developments in Latin are viewed by Nyman as illustrations of the "one form-one meaning" (OFOM) principle. It is argued that expectations regarding diachronic change in Latin based on the PEP are more precise & more accurate than those based on the OFOM. In Paradigm Economy: A Rejoinder to Carstairs, Nyman (U of Helsinki) suggests that Carstairs's defense of the PEP is not methodologically explicit. It is argued that the semiological underpinnings of OFOM are clearer than those of PEP. 1 Table, 71 References. B. Annesser Murray
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0022226700011889
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85496087</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022226700011889</cupid><jstor_id>4175954</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4175954</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-8e6ff5aea6a2491c573b303dae8125ede5c6280f06744b31cdca674088c3be413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QPCwCHpbnWyySdabFK1i_ajVi5cwzWbL1v2oyRbcf--WlnoQnEsGnmcmw0vIMYULClReTgCiroQEAEqVSnZIj3KRhFLyaJf0Vjhc8X1y4P28kxgkqkdOX9Bhms_KwJq6qsv2KsDA2UXRBk0dPLUlVodkL8PC26PN2yfvtzdvg7tw9Dy8H1yPQsMhaUJlRZbFaFFgxBNqYsmmDFiKVtEotqmNjYgUZCAk51NGTWqwa0Epw6aWU9Yn5-u9C1d_La1vdJl7Y4sCK1svvVYxTwQo2Yl0LRpXe-9sphcuL9G1moJepaH_pNHNnG2WozdYZA4rk_vfQZqAAB513snam_umdlvOqYyTmHc4XOPcN_Z7i9F9aiGZjLUYjvUjn4w_Hl5HevUt25yK5dTl6czqeb10VZfjP8f-ACOihGk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85496087</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Paradigm economy: a reply to Nyman</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Carstairs, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Carstairs, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>The paradigm economy principle (PEP) is a constraint on the way in which the inflectional resources of a lang can be organized into paradigms. The strict version of this constraint bans all paradigm mixture. It is argued that some types of mixture are compatible with the PEP. However, some seemingly unacceptable mixtures may occur on a diachronic basis. Martti Nyman has argued (see LLBA 22 /2, 8803370) that the PEP is not a factor in accounting for morphological change. Relevant developments in Latin are viewed by Nyman as illustrations of the "one form-one meaning" (OFOM) principle. It is argued that expectations regarding diachronic change in Latin based on the PEP are more precise &amp; more accurate than those based on the OFOM. In Paradigm Economy: A Rejoinder to Carstairs, Nyman (U of Helsinki) suggests that Carstairs's defense of the PEP is not methodologically explicit. It is argued that the semiological underpinnings of OFOM are clearer than those of PEP. 1 Table, 71 References. B. Annesser Murray</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2267</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7742</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022226700011889</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLINAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Descriptive studies and applied theories ; Economic development ; Economic history ; Economic principles ; Historical linguistics ; Homography ; Linguistic morphology ; Linguistics ; Morphology ; Notes and Discussion ; Nouns ; Post exposure prophylaxis ; Syncope ; Verbs</subject><ispartof>Journal of linguistics, 1988-09, Vol.24 (2), p.489-499</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988</rights><rights>Copyright 1988 Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-8e6ff5aea6a2491c573b303dae8125ede5c6280f06744b31cdca674088c3be413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-8e6ff5aea6a2491c573b303dae8125ede5c6280f06744b31cdca674088c3be413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4175954$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022226700011889/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,778,782,801,27907,27908,55611,58000,58233</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=11906042$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carstairs, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Paradigm economy: a reply to Nyman</title><title>Journal of linguistics</title><addtitle>J. Ling</addtitle><description>The paradigm economy principle (PEP) is a constraint on the way in which the inflectional resources of a lang can be organized into paradigms. The strict version of this constraint bans all paradigm mixture. It is argued that some types of mixture are compatible with the PEP. However, some seemingly unacceptable mixtures may occur on a diachronic basis. Martti Nyman has argued (see LLBA 22 /2, 8803370) that the PEP is not a factor in accounting for morphological change. Relevant developments in Latin are viewed by Nyman as illustrations of the "one form-one meaning" (OFOM) principle. It is argued that expectations regarding diachronic change in Latin based on the PEP are more precise &amp; more accurate than those based on the OFOM. In Paradigm Economy: A Rejoinder to Carstairs, Nyman (U of Helsinki) suggests that Carstairs's defense of the PEP is not methodologically explicit. It is argued that the semiological underpinnings of OFOM are clearer than those of PEP. 1 Table, 71 References. B. Annesser Murray</description><subject>Descriptive studies and applied theories</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic history</subject><subject>Economic principles</subject><subject>Historical linguistics</subject><subject>Homography</subject><subject>Linguistic morphology</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Notes and Discussion</subject><subject>Nouns</subject><subject>Post exposure prophylaxis</subject><subject>Syncope</subject><subject>Verbs</subject><issn>0022-2267</issn><issn>1469-7742</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QPCwCHpbnWyySdabFK1i_ajVi5cwzWbL1v2oyRbcf--WlnoQnEsGnmcmw0vIMYULClReTgCiroQEAEqVSnZIj3KRhFLyaJf0Vjhc8X1y4P28kxgkqkdOX9Bhms_KwJq6qsv2KsDA2UXRBk0dPLUlVodkL8PC26PN2yfvtzdvg7tw9Dy8H1yPQsMhaUJlRZbFaFFgxBNqYsmmDFiKVtEotqmNjYgUZCAk51NGTWqwa0Epw6aWU9Yn5-u9C1d_La1vdJl7Y4sCK1svvVYxTwQo2Yl0LRpXe-9sphcuL9G1moJepaH_pNHNnG2WozdYZA4rk_vfQZqAAB513snam_umdlvOqYyTmHc4XOPcN_Z7i9F9aiGZjLUYjvUjn4w_Hl5HevUt25yK5dTl6czqeb10VZfjP8f-ACOihGk</recordid><startdate>19880901</startdate><enddate>19880901</enddate><creator>Carstairs, Andrew</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880901</creationdate><title>Paradigm economy: a reply to Nyman</title><author>Carstairs, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-8e6ff5aea6a2491c573b303dae8125ede5c6280f06744b31cdca674088c3be413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Descriptive studies and applied theories</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic history</topic><topic>Economic principles</topic><topic>Historical linguistics</topic><topic>Homography</topic><topic>Linguistic morphology</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Notes and Discussion</topic><topic>Nouns</topic><topic>Post exposure prophylaxis</topic><topic>Syncope</topic><topic>Verbs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carstairs, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carstairs, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Paradigm economy: a reply to Nyman</atitle><jtitle>Journal of linguistics</jtitle><addtitle>J. Ling</addtitle><date>1988-09-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>489</spage><epage>499</epage><pages>489-499</pages><issn>0022-2267</issn><eissn>1469-7742</eissn><coden>JLINAJ</coden><abstract>The paradigm economy principle (PEP) is a constraint on the way in which the inflectional resources of a lang can be organized into paradigms. The strict version of this constraint bans all paradigm mixture. It is argued that some types of mixture are compatible with the PEP. However, some seemingly unacceptable mixtures may occur on a diachronic basis. Martti Nyman has argued (see LLBA 22 /2, 8803370) that the PEP is not a factor in accounting for morphological change. Relevant developments in Latin are viewed by Nyman as illustrations of the "one form-one meaning" (OFOM) principle. It is argued that expectations regarding diachronic change in Latin based on the PEP are more precise &amp; more accurate than those based on the OFOM. In Paradigm Economy: A Rejoinder to Carstairs, Nyman (U of Helsinki) suggests that Carstairs's defense of the PEP is not methodologically explicit. It is argued that the semiological underpinnings of OFOM are clearer than those of PEP. 1 Table, 71 References. B. Annesser Murray</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0022226700011889</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2267
ispartof Journal of linguistics, 1988-09, Vol.24 (2), p.489-499
issn 0022-2267
1469-7742
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85496087
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Descriptive studies and applied theories
Economic development
Economic history
Economic principles
Historical linguistics
Homography
Linguistic morphology
Linguistics
Morphology
Notes and Discussion
Nouns
Post exposure prophylaxis
Syncope
Verbs
title Paradigm economy: a reply to Nyman
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T08%3A22%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Paradigm%20economy:%20a%20reply%20to%20Nyman&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20linguistics&rft.au=Carstairs,%20Andrew&rft.date=1988-09-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=489&rft.epage=499&rft.pages=489-499&rft.issn=0022-2267&rft.eissn=1469-7742&rft.coden=JLINAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022226700011889&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4175954%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85496087&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022226700011889&rft_jstor_id=4175954&rfr_iscdi=true