A construct definition study of a standardized ESL vocabulary test

This paper reports a construct definition study of a standardized English as a second language (ESL) vocabulary test. The test, which contained 20 stimulus word items and 17 context word items, was administered to two different samples of ESL students at different proficiency levels and to a sample...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Language testing 1987-12, Vol.4 (2), p.125-141
Hauptverfasser: Perkins, Kyle, Linnville, Steven E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 141
container_issue 2
container_start_page 125
container_title Language testing
container_volume 4
creator Perkins, Kyle
Linnville, Steven E.
description This paper reports a construct definition study of a standardized English as a second language (ESL) vocabulary test. The test, which contained 20 stimulus word items and 17 context word items, was administered to two different samples of ESL students at different proficiency levels and to a sample of native speakers of English. The item responses for the 40 items were used as the dependent variable in a stepwise multiple regression, construct specification equation and 12 variables (measures of the stimulus words' and keyed responses' fluency, distribution, abstractness, length, affective impact, and prototypicality) were used as predictors. Only six of the predictors accounted for a significant amount of variance in the dependent variable, and the number and arrangement of significant predictors varied across proficiency strata, indicating the utility of incorporating the examinees' stages of learning into construct validation studies. Construct definition studies such as the current one permit the statement of explicit predictions and a means to falsify construct theory, which is a perceived need in educational and psychological measurement. The paper concludes with an agenda for future research based on the results of the present study.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/026553228700400201
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85494015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_026553228700400201</sage_id><sourcerecordid>85494015</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-295d7ca86c2806d605052c68ff836de3538c53fbe0a7c836eae98468fb82b64f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EEmV5AU4-cQsdr3GOpSqLVIkDcLYcLyhVGhc7QSpPj6tyQ-I0o5nvn-VH6IbAHSF1PQcqhWCUqhqAA1AgJ2hGeF1X0HB5imYHoDoQ5-gi5w0ANITJGbpfYBuHPKbJjtj50A3d2MUB53FyexwDNiU1gzPJdd_e4dXrGn9Fa9qpN2mPR5_HK3QWTJ_99W-8RO8Pq7flU7V-eXxeLtaVpYyNFW2Eq61R0lIF0kkQIKiVKgTFpPNMMGUFC60HU9tS8sY3ipd-q2greWCX6PY4d5fi51QW622Xre97M_g4Za0EbzgQUUB6BG2KOScf9C5123KuJqAPdum_dhXR_CjK5sPrTZzSUJ75T_ED7flpnQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85494015</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A construct definition study of a standardized ESL vocabulary test</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Perkins, Kyle ; Linnville, Steven E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Perkins, Kyle ; Linnville, Steven E.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reports a construct definition study of a standardized English as a second language (ESL) vocabulary test. The test, which contained 20 stimulus word items and 17 context word items, was administered to two different samples of ESL students at different proficiency levels and to a sample of native speakers of English. The item responses for the 40 items were used as the dependent variable in a stepwise multiple regression, construct specification equation and 12 variables (measures of the stimulus words' and keyed responses' fluency, distribution, abstractness, length, affective impact, and prototypicality) were used as predictors. Only six of the predictors accounted for a significant amount of variance in the dependent variable, and the number and arrangement of significant predictors varied across proficiency strata, indicating the utility of incorporating the examinees' stages of learning into construct validation studies. Construct definition studies such as the current one permit the statement of explicit predictions and a means to falsify construct theory, which is a perceived need in educational and psychological measurement. The paper concludes with an agenda for future research based on the results of the present study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0265-5322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/026553228700400201</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LATEEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><ispartof>Language testing, 1987-12, Vol.4 (2), p.125-141</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-295d7ca86c2806d605052c68ff836de3538c53fbe0a7c836eae98468fb82b64f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-295d7ca86c2806d605052c68ff836de3538c53fbe0a7c836eae98468fb82b64f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/026553228700400201$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/026553228700400201$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perkins, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linnville, Steven E.</creatorcontrib><title>A construct definition study of a standardized ESL vocabulary test</title><title>Language testing</title><description>This paper reports a construct definition study of a standardized English as a second language (ESL) vocabulary test. The test, which contained 20 stimulus word items and 17 context word items, was administered to two different samples of ESL students at different proficiency levels and to a sample of native speakers of English. The item responses for the 40 items were used as the dependent variable in a stepwise multiple regression, construct specification equation and 12 variables (measures of the stimulus words' and keyed responses' fluency, distribution, abstractness, length, affective impact, and prototypicality) were used as predictors. Only six of the predictors accounted for a significant amount of variance in the dependent variable, and the number and arrangement of significant predictors varied across proficiency strata, indicating the utility of incorporating the examinees' stages of learning into construct validation studies. Construct definition studies such as the current one permit the statement of explicit predictions and a means to falsify construct theory, which is a perceived need in educational and psychological measurement. The paper concludes with an agenda for future research based on the results of the present study.</description><issn>0265-5322</issn><issn>1477-0946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EEmV5AU4-cQsdr3GOpSqLVIkDcLYcLyhVGhc7QSpPj6tyQ-I0o5nvn-VH6IbAHSF1PQcqhWCUqhqAA1AgJ2hGeF1X0HB5imYHoDoQ5-gi5w0ANITJGbpfYBuHPKbJjtj50A3d2MUB53FyexwDNiU1gzPJdd_e4dXrGn9Fa9qpN2mPR5_HK3QWTJ_99W-8RO8Pq7flU7V-eXxeLtaVpYyNFW2Eq61R0lIF0kkQIKiVKgTFpPNMMGUFC60HU9tS8sY3ipd-q2greWCX6PY4d5fi51QW622Xre97M_g4Za0EbzgQUUB6BG2KOScf9C5123KuJqAPdum_dhXR_CjK5sPrTZzSUJ75T_ED7flpnQ</recordid><startdate>198712</startdate><enddate>198712</enddate><creator>Perkins, Kyle</creator><creator>Linnville, Steven E.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198712</creationdate><title>A construct definition study of a standardized ESL vocabulary test</title><author>Perkins, Kyle ; Linnville, Steven E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-295d7ca86c2806d605052c68ff836de3538c53fbe0a7c836eae98468fb82b64f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perkins, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linnville, Steven E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Language testing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perkins, Kyle</au><au>Linnville, Steven E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A construct definition study of a standardized ESL vocabulary test</atitle><jtitle>Language testing</jtitle><date>1987-12</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>125-141</pages><issn>0265-5322</issn><eissn>1477-0946</eissn><coden>LATEEU</coden><abstract>This paper reports a construct definition study of a standardized English as a second language (ESL) vocabulary test. The test, which contained 20 stimulus word items and 17 context word items, was administered to two different samples of ESL students at different proficiency levels and to a sample of native speakers of English. The item responses for the 40 items were used as the dependent variable in a stepwise multiple regression, construct specification equation and 12 variables (measures of the stimulus words' and keyed responses' fluency, distribution, abstractness, length, affective impact, and prototypicality) were used as predictors. Only six of the predictors accounted for a significant amount of variance in the dependent variable, and the number and arrangement of significant predictors varied across proficiency strata, indicating the utility of incorporating the examinees' stages of learning into construct validation studies. Construct definition studies such as the current one permit the statement of explicit predictions and a means to falsify construct theory, which is a perceived need in educational and psychological measurement. The paper concludes with an agenda for future research based on the results of the present study.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/026553228700400201</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0265-5322
ispartof Language testing, 1987-12, Vol.4 (2), p.125-141
issn 0265-5322
1477-0946
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85494015
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title A construct definition study of a standardized ESL vocabulary test
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T20%3A59%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20construct%20definition%20study%20of%20a%20standardized%20ESL%20vocabulary%20test&rft.jtitle=Language%20testing&rft.au=Perkins,%20Kyle&rft.date=1987-12&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=125-141&rft.issn=0265-5322&rft.eissn=1477-0946&rft.coden=LATEEU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/026553228700400201&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85494015%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85494015&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_026553228700400201&rfr_iscdi=true