A comparison of the learnability of manual sign and Blissymbolics with nonhandicapped adults
Although advocates exist for teaching either Blissymbolics or manual sign to language-impaired students, relatively few empirical data exist on the learnability of the two systems. The present study compared the learning of a list of 20 Blissymbols and comparable ASL signs in a controlled paired-ass...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of communication disorders 1988-02, Vol.21 (1), p.51-58 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 58 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 51 |
| container_title | Journal of communication disorders |
| container_volume | 21 |
| creator | Luftig, Richard L. Bersani, Henry A. |
| description | Although advocates exist for teaching either Blissymbolics or manual sign to language-impaired students, relatively few empirical data exist on the learnability of the two systems. The present study compared the learning of a list of 20 Blissymbols and comparable ASL signs in a controlled paired-associate (P-A) paradigm. Blissymbols were learned significantly faster than manual sign particularly in early learning trials. Results are discussed in terms of the memory requirements of the two systems and their relationship with sign/symbols learning. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0021-9924(88)90010-X |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85488439</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>002199248890010X</els_id><sourcerecordid>78104510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-3d86896e457a1acfd86246db07d6604d0eac329f079a4245eef4e73b94a48e2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLHTEQx0Ox6NP2GyjkJHrYmmzyssmloNJWQfBiwUMhZJNZXySbrMmu5X179_U9PNbTMPP_zQz8EDqm5BslVFwQUtNKqZqfSXmuCKGkevyEFlQ2rGqU4nto8Y4coMNSnmdGCEr30T5jnDEpFujPJbapH0z2JUWcOjyuAAcwOZrWBz-uN7PexMkEXPxTxCY6fBV8Keu-TcHbgv_6cYVjiqs58tYMAzhs3BTG8gV97kwo8HVXj9Dvnz8erm-qu_tft9eXd5VlUo4Vc1JIJYAvG0ON7ea25sK1pHFCEO4IGMtq1ZFGGV7zJUDHoWGt4oZLqDt2hE63d4ecXiYoo-59sRCCiZCmouWSS8mZ-hBsJCV8SckM8i1ocyolQ6eH7HuT15oSvbGvN2r1Rq2WUv-zrx_ntZPd_antwb0v7XTP-fdtDrONVw9ZF-shWnA-gx21S_7_D94AizGUng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78104510</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of the learnability of manual sign and Blissymbolics with nonhandicapped adults</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Luftig, Richard L. ; Bersani, Henry A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Luftig, Richard L. ; Bersani, Henry A.</creatorcontrib><description>Although advocates exist for teaching either Blissymbolics or manual sign to language-impaired students, relatively few empirical data exist on the learnability of the two systems. The present study compared the learning of a list of 20 Blissymbols and comparable ASL signs in a controlled paired-associate (P-A) paradigm. Blissymbols were learned significantly faster than manual sign particularly in early learning trials. Results are discussed in terms of the memory requirements of the two systems and their relationship with sign/symbols learning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9924</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7994</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0021-9924(88)90010-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3343386</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCDIAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Humans ; Manual Communication ; Paired-Associate Learning ; Semantics ; Sign Language</subject><ispartof>Journal of communication disorders, 1988-02, Vol.21 (1), p.51-58</ispartof><rights>1988</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-3d86896e457a1acfd86246db07d6604d0eac329f079a4245eef4e73b94a48e2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-3d86896e457a1acfd86246db07d6604d0eac329f079a4245eef4e73b94a48e2f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/002199248890010X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3343386$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luftig, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bersani, Henry A.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of the learnability of manual sign and Blissymbolics with nonhandicapped adults</title><title>Journal of communication disorders</title><addtitle>J Commun Disord</addtitle><description>Although advocates exist for teaching either Blissymbolics or manual sign to language-impaired students, relatively few empirical data exist on the learnability of the two systems. The present study compared the learning of a list of 20 Blissymbols and comparable ASL signs in a controlled paired-associate (P-A) paradigm. Blissymbols were learned significantly faster than manual sign particularly in early learning trials. Results are discussed in terms of the memory requirements of the two systems and their relationship with sign/symbols learning.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Manual Communication</subject><subject>Paired-Associate Learning</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Sign Language</subject><issn>0021-9924</issn><issn>1873-7994</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFLHTEQx0Ox6NP2GyjkJHrYmmzyssmloNJWQfBiwUMhZJNZXySbrMmu5X179_U9PNbTMPP_zQz8EDqm5BslVFwQUtNKqZqfSXmuCKGkevyEFlQ2rGqU4nto8Y4coMNSnmdGCEr30T5jnDEpFujPJbapH0z2JUWcOjyuAAcwOZrWBz-uN7PexMkEXPxTxCY6fBV8Keu-TcHbgv_6cYVjiqs58tYMAzhs3BTG8gV97kwo8HVXj9Dvnz8erm-qu_tft9eXd5VlUo4Vc1JIJYAvG0ON7ea25sK1pHFCEO4IGMtq1ZFGGV7zJUDHoWGt4oZLqDt2hE63d4ecXiYoo-59sRCCiZCmouWSS8mZ-hBsJCV8SckM8i1ocyolQ6eH7HuT15oSvbGvN2r1Rq2WUv-zrx_ntZPd_antwb0v7XTP-fdtDrONVw9ZF-shWnA-gx21S_7_D94AizGUng</recordid><startdate>19880201</startdate><enddate>19880201</enddate><creator>Luftig, Richard L.</creator><creator>Bersani, Henry A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880201</creationdate><title>A comparison of the learnability of manual sign and Blissymbolics with nonhandicapped adults</title><author>Luftig, Richard L. ; Bersani, Henry A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-3d86896e457a1acfd86246db07d6604d0eac329f079a4245eef4e73b94a48e2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Manual Communication</topic><topic>Paired-Associate Learning</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Sign Language</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luftig, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bersani, Henry A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of communication disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luftig, Richard L.</au><au>Bersani, Henry A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of the learnability of manual sign and Blissymbolics with nonhandicapped adults</atitle><jtitle>Journal of communication disorders</jtitle><addtitle>J Commun Disord</addtitle><date>1988-02-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>51-58</pages><issn>0021-9924</issn><eissn>1873-7994</eissn><coden>JCDIAI</coden><abstract>Although advocates exist for teaching either Blissymbolics or manual sign to language-impaired students, relatively few empirical data exist on the learnability of the two systems. The present study compared the learning of a list of 20 Blissymbols and comparable ASL signs in a controlled paired-associate (P-A) paradigm. Blissymbols were learned significantly faster than manual sign particularly in early learning trials. Results are discussed in terms of the memory requirements of the two systems and their relationship with sign/symbols learning.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>3343386</pmid><doi>10.1016/0021-9924(88)90010-X</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-9924 |
| ispartof | Journal of communication disorders, 1988-02, Vol.21 (1), p.51-58 |
| issn | 0021-9924 1873-7994 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85488439 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Humans Manual Communication Paired-Associate Learning Semantics Sign Language |
| title | A comparison of the learnability of manual sign and Blissymbolics with nonhandicapped adults |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T20%3A47%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20the%20learnability%20of%20manual%20sign%20and%20Blissymbolics%20with%20nonhandicapped%20adults&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20communication%20disorders&rft.au=Luftig,%20Richard%20L.&rft.date=1988-02-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=51-58&rft.issn=0021-9924&rft.eissn=1873-7994&rft.coden=JCDIAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0021-9924(88)90010-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78104510%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78104510&rft_id=info:pmid/3343386&rft_els_id=002199248890010X&rfr_iscdi=true |