Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs
This study examines verb processing during sentence comprehension. We describe two experiments that assess whether or not a verb's representational complexity affects real-time sentence processing in normal listeners. Complexity is defined in terms of the kinds of structural information arrayed...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cognition 1987-12, Vol.27 (3), p.219-246 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 246 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 219 |
container_title | Cognition |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Shapiro, Lewis P. Zurif, Edgar Grimshaw, Jane |
description | This study examines verb processing during sentence comprehension. We describe two experiments that assess whether or not a verb's representational complexity affects real-time sentence processing in normal listeners. Complexity is defined in terms of the kinds of structural information arrayed against verbs in their lexical entries—syntactic subcategorization and argument structure. Subjects had to perform a complex secondary task presented in the immediate vicinity of the verb while listening to a sentence for meaning. Reaction times to this secondary task show that the relevant verb complexity metric for sentence processing involves the argument structure of verbs and not syntactic subcategorization, and that it is the number of different argument structure possibilities for a verb that counts in this respect. These data reflect the operation of a processing device that momentarily activates all argument structures for a verb in the verb's immediate temporal vincinity during sentence comprehension.
Cette étude porte sur le traitement du verbe au cours de la compréhension des phrases. Deux expériences ont été faites avec des auditeurs normaux pour étudier si la complexité de représentation d'un verbe affecte le traitement en temps réel de phrases. La complexité est définie par les d'information structurelle en regard des verbes et de leurs entrées lexicales — sous catégorisation syntaxique et structure des arguments que le verbe peut admettre. Les sujets doivent exécuter une tâche secondaire complémentaire présentée dans l'immédiate proximité du verbe pendant l'écoute de la phrase. Les temps de réaction pour cette tâche secondaire indiquent comme métrique de complexité pertinente pour le traitement de la phrase la structure d'arguments des verbes et non leur souscatégorisation syntaxique: c'est le nombre de possibilités différentes de types d'arguments pour un verbe qui rend compte de la complexité. Ces données montrent que le mécanisme de traitement opère en activant momentanément toutes les structures d'arguments qu'un verbe peut admettre dans son voisinage temporel immédiat verbe durant la compréhension de phrase. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0010-0277(87)80010-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85485878</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010027787800100</els_id><sourcerecordid>77856112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-c5b4208f1945264382f8e7b0a0e21fceeeab858905f078651afd26ab3689abae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1LHTEQhkNR9Kj9CcJCrejF1kl289UbEalVEHqhXodsdtJG9uyeJnsE_73Z7uFceFEhMBnmmeGdeQk5pvCNAhUXDwAUSmBSnil5rubsE1lQJatSqkrtkMUW2ScHKT0DQM2k2iN7ldAUmFiQ7w_Yj9g7LFZxcJhS6H8Xtm-L8Q8Wy1yzXRFxFTFN_zEMfTH44gVjk47Irrddws-beEiebn48Xt-W979-3l1f3ZdOMD6Wjjc1A-WprjkTdaWYVygbsICMeoeItlFcaeAepBKcWt8yYZtKKG0bi9UhOZ3nZoV_15hGswzJYdfZHod1MorXuT9v_BEopeKCUpbBL-_A52Ed-7yEoUxTDSD1NI7PlItDShG9WcWwtPHVUDCTBeafBWa6r1H5zVnuO95MXzdLbLddm5vn-smmbpOznY-2dyFtMVnzOivI2Nf_YZRqobPWzF3OHGYPXgJGk1yYHG1DRDeadggfCH4DCpKtdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1291900798</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Shapiro, Lewis P. ; Zurif, Edgar ; Grimshaw, Jane</creator><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Lewis P. ; Zurif, Edgar ; Grimshaw, Jane</creatorcontrib><description>This study examines verb processing during sentence comprehension. We describe two experiments that assess whether or not a verb's representational complexity affects real-time sentence processing in normal listeners. Complexity is defined in terms of the kinds of structural information arrayed against verbs in their lexical entries—syntactic subcategorization and argument structure. Subjects had to perform a complex secondary task presented in the immediate vicinity of the verb while listening to a sentence for meaning. Reaction times to this secondary task show that the relevant verb complexity metric for sentence processing involves the argument structure of verbs and not syntactic subcategorization, and that it is the number of different argument structure possibilities for a verb that counts in this respect. These data reflect the operation of a processing device that momentarily activates all argument structures for a verb in the verb's immediate temporal vincinity during sentence comprehension.
Cette étude porte sur le traitement du verbe au cours de la compréhension des phrases. Deux expériences ont été faites avec des auditeurs normaux pour étudier si la complexité de représentation d'un verbe affecte le traitement en temps réel de phrases. La complexité est définie par les d'information structurelle en regard des verbes et de leurs entrées lexicales — sous catégorisation syntaxique et structure des arguments que le verbe peut admettre. Les sujets doivent exécuter une tâche secondaire complémentaire présentée dans l'immédiate proximité du verbe pendant l'écoute de la phrase. Les temps de réaction pour cette tâche secondaire indiquent comme métrique de complexité pertinente pour le traitement de la phrase la structure d'arguments des verbes et non leur souscatégorisation syntaxique: c'est le nombre de possibilités différentes de types d'arguments pour un verbe qui rend compte de la complexité. Ces données montrent que le mécanisme de traitement opère en activant momentanément toutes les structures d'arguments qu'un verbe peut admettre dans son voisinage temporel immédiat verbe durant la compréhension de phrase.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-0277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(87)80010-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3691026</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CGTNAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Communication disorders ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Language ; Linguistics ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Production and comprehension processes ; Production and perception of spoken language ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychology of language ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reading ; Semantics ; Speech Perception</subject><ispartof>Cognition, 1987-12, Vol.27 (3), p.219-246</ispartof><rights>1987 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. All rights reserved</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-c5b4208f1945264382f8e7b0a0e21fceeeab858905f078651afd26ab3689abae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-c5b4208f1945264382f8e7b0a0e21fceeeab858905f078651afd26ab3689abae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(87)80010-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27869,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=11969919$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7454900$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3691026$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Lewis P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zurif, Edgar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimshaw, Jane</creatorcontrib><title>Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs</title><title>Cognition</title><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><description>This study examines verb processing during sentence comprehension. We describe two experiments that assess whether or not a verb's representational complexity affects real-time sentence processing in normal listeners. Complexity is defined in terms of the kinds of structural information arrayed against verbs in their lexical entries—syntactic subcategorization and argument structure. Subjects had to perform a complex secondary task presented in the immediate vicinity of the verb while listening to a sentence for meaning. Reaction times to this secondary task show that the relevant verb complexity metric for sentence processing involves the argument structure of verbs and not syntactic subcategorization, and that it is the number of different argument structure possibilities for a verb that counts in this respect. These data reflect the operation of a processing device that momentarily activates all argument structures for a verb in the verb's immediate temporal vincinity during sentence comprehension.
Cette étude porte sur le traitement du verbe au cours de la compréhension des phrases. Deux expériences ont été faites avec des auditeurs normaux pour étudier si la complexité de représentation d'un verbe affecte le traitement en temps réel de phrases. La complexité est définie par les d'information structurelle en regard des verbes et de leurs entrées lexicales — sous catégorisation syntaxique et structure des arguments que le verbe peut admettre. Les sujets doivent exécuter une tâche secondaire complémentaire présentée dans l'immédiate proximité du verbe pendant l'écoute de la phrase. Les temps de réaction pour cette tâche secondaire indiquent comme métrique de complexité pertinente pour le traitement de la phrase la structure d'arguments des verbes et non leur souscatégorisation syntaxique: c'est le nombre de possibilités différentes de types d'arguments pour un verbe qui rend compte de la complexité. Ces données montrent que le mécanisme de traitement opère en activant momentanément toutes les structures d'arguments qu'un verbe peut admettre dans son voisinage temporel immédiat verbe durant la compréhension de phrase.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Communication disorders</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Production and comprehension processes</subject><subject>Production and perception of spoken language</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychology of language</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><issn>0010-0277</issn><issn>1873-7838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1LHTEQhkNR9Kj9CcJCrejF1kl289UbEalVEHqhXodsdtJG9uyeJnsE_73Z7uFceFEhMBnmmeGdeQk5pvCNAhUXDwAUSmBSnil5rubsE1lQJatSqkrtkMUW2ScHKT0DQM2k2iN7ldAUmFiQ7w_Yj9g7LFZxcJhS6H8Xtm-L8Q8Wy1yzXRFxFTFN_zEMfTH44gVjk47Irrddws-beEiebn48Xt-W979-3l1f3ZdOMD6Wjjc1A-WprjkTdaWYVygbsICMeoeItlFcaeAepBKcWt8yYZtKKG0bi9UhOZ3nZoV_15hGswzJYdfZHod1MorXuT9v_BEopeKCUpbBL-_A52Ed-7yEoUxTDSD1NI7PlItDShG9WcWwtPHVUDCTBeafBWa6r1H5zVnuO95MXzdLbLddm5vn-smmbpOznY-2dyFtMVnzOivI2Nf_YZRqobPWzF3OHGYPXgJGk1yYHG1DRDeadggfCH4DCpKtdA</recordid><startdate>19871201</startdate><enddate>19871201</enddate><creator>Shapiro, Lewis P.</creator><creator>Zurif, Edgar</creator><creator>Grimshaw, Jane</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19871201</creationdate><title>Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs</title><author>Shapiro, Lewis P. ; Zurif, Edgar ; Grimshaw, Jane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-c5b4208f1945264382f8e7b0a0e21fceeeab858905f078651afd26ab3689abae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Communication disorders</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Production and comprehension processes</topic><topic>Production and perception of spoken language</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychology of language</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Lewis P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zurif, Edgar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimshaw, Jane</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shapiro, Lewis P.</au><au>Zurif, Edgar</au><au>Grimshaw, Jane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs</atitle><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><date>1987-12-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>219</spage><epage>246</epage><pages>219-246</pages><issn>0010-0277</issn><eissn>1873-7838</eissn><coden>CGTNAU</coden><abstract>This study examines verb processing during sentence comprehension. We describe two experiments that assess whether or not a verb's representational complexity affects real-time sentence processing in normal listeners. Complexity is defined in terms of the kinds of structural information arrayed against verbs in their lexical entries—syntactic subcategorization and argument structure. Subjects had to perform a complex secondary task presented in the immediate vicinity of the verb while listening to a sentence for meaning. Reaction times to this secondary task show that the relevant verb complexity metric for sentence processing involves the argument structure of verbs and not syntactic subcategorization, and that it is the number of different argument structure possibilities for a verb that counts in this respect. These data reflect the operation of a processing device that momentarily activates all argument structures for a verb in the verb's immediate temporal vincinity during sentence comprehension.
Cette étude porte sur le traitement du verbe au cours de la compréhension des phrases. Deux expériences ont été faites avec des auditeurs normaux pour étudier si la complexité de représentation d'un verbe affecte le traitement en temps réel de phrases. La complexité est définie par les d'information structurelle en regard des verbes et de leurs entrées lexicales — sous catégorisation syntaxique et structure des arguments que le verbe peut admettre. Les sujets doivent exécuter une tâche secondaire complémentaire présentée dans l'immédiate proximité du verbe pendant l'écoute de la phrase. Les temps de réaction pour cette tâche secondaire indiquent comme métrique de complexité pertinente pour le traitement de la phrase la structure d'arguments des verbes et non leur souscatégorisation syntaxique: c'est le nombre de possibilités différentes de types d'arguments pour un verbe qui rend compte de la complexité. Ces données montrent que le mécanisme de traitement opère en activant momentanément toutes les structures d'arguments qu'un verbe peut admettre dans son voisinage temporel immédiat verbe durant la compréhension de phrase.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>3691026</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0010-0277(87)80010-0</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-0277 |
ispartof | Cognition, 1987-12, Vol.27 (3), p.219-246 |
issn | 0010-0277 1873-7838 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85485878 |
source | MEDLINE; Periodicals Index Online; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Cognition Communication disorders Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Language Linguistics Pattern Recognition, Visual Production and comprehension processes Production and perception of spoken language Psycholinguistics Psychology of language Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reading Semantics Speech Perception |
title | Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T16%3A09%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sentence%20processing%20and%20the%20mental%20representation%20of%20verbs&rft.jtitle=Cognition&rft.au=Shapiro,%20Lewis%20P.&rft.date=1987-12-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=219&rft.epage=246&rft.pages=219-246&rft.issn=0010-0277&rft.eissn=1873-7838&rft.coden=CGTNAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0010-0277(87)80010-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77856112%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1291900798&rft_id=info:pmid/3691026&rft_els_id=S0010027787800100&rfr_iscdi=true |