A Re-Examination of 'Normal Stress'
'Normal stress'-a notion frequently encountered in phonology and, especially, syntax-has never been adequately defined. Linguists have apparently made a tacit assumption that the stress in citations elicited from an informant is the same as the stress used by a speaker making a minimum of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Language (Baltimore) 1974-03, Vol.50 (1), p.66-73 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 73 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 66 |
| container_title | Language (Baltimore) |
| container_volume | 50 |
| creator | Schmerling, Susan F. |
| description | 'Normal stress'-a notion frequently encountered in phonology and, especially, syntax-has never been adequately defined. Linguists have apparently made a tacit assumption that the stress in citations elicited from an informant is the same as the stress used by a speaker making a minimum of special assumptions; but this is shown to be false. It is argued that 'normal stress', a notion inherited from structuralist linguistics, was required by assumptions inconsistent with those of the generative framework; and that this notion, even if it can be defined so as to be consistent with generative assumptions, is not a particularly useful one. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/412010 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85483226</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>412010</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>412010</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-5e590f3dcad0500a494bd1f603cfb1d143c87177248ac3ec7766550d47de77d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtLw0AURgdRsFb9DYGCXUXvvHKTZSn1AUXBx3qYzkwgIcnUmQT03xtJQRAEV3dzOHz3EHJJ4ZpxwBtBGVA4IjMquUwhy-QxmQEUmOYS8JScxVgDAM9ZMSOLVfLs0s2HbqtO95XvEl8my0cfWt0kL31wMS7PyUmpm-guDndO3m43r-v7dPt097BebVPDkPapdLKAklujLUgALQqxs7TMgJtyRy0V3ORIEZnIteHOII7TJFiB1iFawefkavLug38fXOxVW0XjmkZ3zg9R5VLknLHsHyCnWDA5gotfYO2H0I1PKMqKMU02UQedCT7G4Eq1D1Wrw6eioL6Tqinpj66OvQ9_UV9h8G6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1290666925</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Re-Examination of 'Normal Stress'</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Schmerling, Susan F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schmerling, Susan F.</creatorcontrib><description>'Normal stress'-a notion frequently encountered in phonology and, especially, syntax-has never been adequately defined. Linguists have apparently made a tacit assumption that the stress in citations elicited from an informant is the same as the stress used by a speaker making a minimum of special assumptions; but this is shown to be false. It is argued that 'normal stress', a notion inherited from structuralist linguistics, was required by assumptions inconsistent with those of the generative framework; and that this notion, even if it can be defined so as to be consistent with generative assumptions, is not a particularly useful one.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0097-8507</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-0665</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/412010</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANGA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore, etc: Linguistic Society of America</publisher><subject>Interrogative sentences ; Lexical stress ; Phonetics ; Phonological intonation ; Phonological stress ; Phonology ; Pronunciation ; Sentence stress ; Syntactics</subject><ispartof>Language (Baltimore), 1974-03, Vol.50 (1), p.66-73</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1974 The Linguistic Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-5e590f3dcad0500a494bd1f603cfb1d143c87177248ac3ec7766550d47de77d43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/412010$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/412010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27869,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schmerling, Susan F.</creatorcontrib><title>A Re-Examination of 'Normal Stress'</title><title>Language (Baltimore)</title><description>'Normal stress'-a notion frequently encountered in phonology and, especially, syntax-has never been adequately defined. Linguists have apparently made a tacit assumption that the stress in citations elicited from an informant is the same as the stress used by a speaker making a minimum of special assumptions; but this is shown to be false. It is argued that 'normal stress', a notion inherited from structuralist linguistics, was required by assumptions inconsistent with those of the generative framework; and that this notion, even if it can be defined so as to be consistent with generative assumptions, is not a particularly useful one.</description><subject>Interrogative sentences</subject><subject>Lexical stress</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Phonological intonation</subject><subject>Phonological stress</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Pronunciation</subject><subject>Sentence stress</subject><subject>Syntactics</subject><issn>0097-8507</issn><issn>1535-0665</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1974</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtLw0AURgdRsFb9DYGCXUXvvHKTZSn1AUXBx3qYzkwgIcnUmQT03xtJQRAEV3dzOHz3EHJJ4ZpxwBtBGVA4IjMquUwhy-QxmQEUmOYS8JScxVgDAM9ZMSOLVfLs0s2HbqtO95XvEl8my0cfWt0kL31wMS7PyUmpm-guDndO3m43r-v7dPt097BebVPDkPapdLKAklujLUgALQqxs7TMgJtyRy0V3ORIEZnIteHOII7TJFiB1iFawefkavLug38fXOxVW0XjmkZ3zg9R5VLknLHsHyCnWDA5gotfYO2H0I1PKMqKMU02UQedCT7G4Eq1D1Wrw6eioL6Tqinpj66OvQ9_UV9h8G6w</recordid><startdate>19740301</startdate><enddate>19740301</enddate><creator>Schmerling, Susan F.</creator><general>Linguistic Society of America</general><general>Linguistic Society of America, etc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>JHMDA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19740301</creationdate><title>A Re-Examination of 'Normal Stress'</title><author>Schmerling, Susan F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-5e590f3dcad0500a494bd1f603cfb1d143c87177248ac3ec7766550d47de77d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1974</creationdate><topic>Interrogative sentences</topic><topic>Lexical stress</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Phonological intonation</topic><topic>Phonological stress</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Pronunciation</topic><topic>Sentence stress</topic><topic>Syntactics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schmerling, Susan F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 31</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Language (Baltimore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schmerling, Susan F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Re-Examination of 'Normal Stress'</atitle><jtitle>Language (Baltimore)</jtitle><date>1974-03-01</date><risdate>1974</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>66</spage><epage>73</epage><pages>66-73</pages><issn>0097-8507</issn><eissn>1535-0665</eissn><coden>LANGA2</coden><abstract>'Normal stress'-a notion frequently encountered in phonology and, especially, syntax-has never been adequately defined. Linguists have apparently made a tacit assumption that the stress in citations elicited from an informant is the same as the stress used by a speaker making a minimum of special assumptions; but this is shown to be false. It is argued that 'normal stress', a notion inherited from structuralist linguistics, was required by assumptions inconsistent with those of the generative framework; and that this notion, even if it can be defined so as to be consistent with generative assumptions, is not a particularly useful one.</abstract><cop>Baltimore, etc</cop><pub>Linguistic Society of America</pub><doi>10.2307/412010</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0097-8507 |
| ispartof | Language (Baltimore), 1974-03, Vol.50 (1), p.66-73 |
| issn | 0097-8507 1535-0665 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85483226 |
| source | Periodicals Index Online; Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Interrogative sentences Lexical stress Phonetics Phonological intonation Phonological stress Phonology Pronunciation Sentence stress Syntactics |
| title | A Re-Examination of 'Normal Stress' |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A15%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Re-Examination%20of%20'Normal%20Stress'&rft.jtitle=Language%20(Baltimore)&rft.au=Schmerling,%20Susan%20F.&rft.date=1974-03-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=66&rft.epage=73&rft.pages=66-73&rft.issn=0097-8507&rft.eissn=1535-0665&rft.coden=LANGA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/412010&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E412010%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1290666925&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=412010&rfr_iscdi=true |