Effects of percentage occurrence of response members and its method of presentation on verbal discrimination learning and transfer

Each of 144 Ss learned two verbal discrimination (VD) lists for six trials. Two levels of percentage occurrence of response members (100% or 50%) were combined factorially with two methods of presentation and three transfer paradigms (C1-I2, C2-I1, C2-I2). In first-list learning, with one method of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Memory & cognition 1974-03, Vol.2 (2), p.215-218
1. Verfasser: Newby, R W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 218
container_issue 2
container_start_page 215
container_title Memory & cognition
container_volume 2
creator Newby, R W
description Each of 144 Ss learned two verbal discrimination (VD) lists for six trials. Two levels of percentage occurrence of response members (100% or 50%) were combined factorially with two methods of presentation and three transfer paradigms (C1-I2, C2-I1, C2-I2). In first-list learning, with one method of presentation in the 50,% ORM entire list was presented with only half the correct (C) items designated on each study trial, while in the second method only half the list was presented with all C items underlined. There were no differences between the two methods in the 100% ORM condition. The results indicated that % ORM was a significant variable in first-list learning, supporting the findings of Newby and Young (1972). No effect was found for method of presentation. Also, no real significant effect of these two variables was found in VD transfer. All results were interpreted in terms of the frequency theory of VD learning.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/BF03208985
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85478169</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1458183931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2285-5422ccab012c452ea8f026c012ca42118b0b4921444f9e3a15db1025a3adff3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV9LwzAUxYMobk5f_ADSJxGhmr9d-qhjU2Hgi4JvJU1vZqVNZtIKvvrJTbepb8KFcLm_c8jhIHRK8BWbCnl9u8CMYplLsYfGRDCaipxn-2iMcY5TgenLCB2F8IYxFiLPDtGIckr4lPMx-pobA7oLiTPJGrwG26kVJE7r3nuwGoaDh7B2NkDSQluCD4myVVJHUQvdq6s22sgM2q52NonzAb5UTVLVQfu6re320IDytrarjUHnlQ0G_DE6MKoJcLJ7J-h5MX-a3afLx7uH2c0y1ZRKkQpOqdaqxIRqLigoaTDN9LCqGIfIEpc8j7k4NzkwRURVEkyFYqoyhlVsgs63vmvv3nsIXdHG30HTKAuuD4UUfCpJlkfw4l-QcCGJZDkjEb3cotq7EDyYYh3jKv9ZEFwM5RR_5UT4bOfbly1Uv-hPG-wb_6aLRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1458183931</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of percentage occurrence of response members and its method of presentation on verbal discrimination learning and transfer</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Newby, R W</creator><creatorcontrib>Newby, R W</creatorcontrib><description>Each of 144 Ss learned two verbal discrimination (VD) lists for six trials. Two levels of percentage occurrence of response members (100% or 50%) were combined factorially with two methods of presentation and three transfer paradigms (C1-I2, C2-I1, C2-I2). In first-list learning, with one method of presentation in the 50,% ORM entire list was presented with only half the correct (C) items designated on each study trial, while in the second method only half the list was presented with all C items underlined. There were no differences between the two methods in the 100% ORM condition. The results indicated that % ORM was a significant variable in first-list learning, supporting the findings of Newby and Young (1972). No effect was found for method of presentation. Also, no real significant effect of these two variables was found in VD transfer. All results were interpreted in terms of the frequency theory of VD learning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-502X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/BF03208985</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24214744</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MYCGAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Memory &amp; cognition, 1974-03, Vol.2 (2), p.215-218</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2285-5422ccab012c452ea8f026c012ca42118b0b4921444f9e3a15db1025a3adff3d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24214744$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Newby, R W</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of percentage occurrence of response members and its method of presentation on verbal discrimination learning and transfer</title><title>Memory &amp; cognition</title><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><description>Each of 144 Ss learned two verbal discrimination (VD) lists for six trials. Two levels of percentage occurrence of response members (100% or 50%) were combined factorially with two methods of presentation and three transfer paradigms (C1-I2, C2-I1, C2-I2). In first-list learning, with one method of presentation in the 50,% ORM entire list was presented with only half the correct (C) items designated on each study trial, while in the second method only half the list was presented with all C items underlined. There were no differences between the two methods in the 100% ORM condition. The results indicated that % ORM was a significant variable in first-list learning, supporting the findings of Newby and Young (1972). No effect was found for method of presentation. Also, no real significant effect of these two variables was found in VD transfer. All results were interpreted in terms of the frequency theory of VD learning.</description><issn>0090-502X</issn><issn>1532-5946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1974</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kV9LwzAUxYMobk5f_ADSJxGhmr9d-qhjU2Hgi4JvJU1vZqVNZtIKvvrJTbepb8KFcLm_c8jhIHRK8BWbCnl9u8CMYplLsYfGRDCaipxn-2iMcY5TgenLCB2F8IYxFiLPDtGIckr4lPMx-pobA7oLiTPJGrwG26kVJE7r3nuwGoaDh7B2NkDSQluCD4myVVJHUQvdq6s22sgM2q52NonzAb5UTVLVQfu6re320IDytrarjUHnlQ0G_DE6MKoJcLJ7J-h5MX-a3afLx7uH2c0y1ZRKkQpOqdaqxIRqLigoaTDN9LCqGIfIEpc8j7k4NzkwRURVEkyFYqoyhlVsgs63vmvv3nsIXdHG30HTKAuuD4UUfCpJlkfw4l-QcCGJZDkjEb3cotq7EDyYYh3jKv9ZEFwM5RR_5UT4bOfbly1Uv-hPG-wb_6aLRA</recordid><startdate>197403</startdate><enddate>197403</enddate><creator>Newby, R W</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197403</creationdate><title>Effects of percentage occurrence of response members and its method of presentation on verbal discrimination learning and transfer</title><author>Newby, R W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2285-5422ccab012c452ea8f026c012ca42118b0b4921444f9e3a15db1025a3adff3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1974</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Newby, R W</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Memory &amp; cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Newby, R W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of percentage occurrence of response members and its method of presentation on verbal discrimination learning and transfer</atitle><jtitle>Memory &amp; cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><date>1974-03</date><risdate>1974</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>215-218</pages><issn>0090-502X</issn><eissn>1532-5946</eissn><coden>MYCGAO</coden><abstract>Each of 144 Ss learned two verbal discrimination (VD) lists for six trials. Two levels of percentage occurrence of response members (100% or 50%) were combined factorially with two methods of presentation and three transfer paradigms (C1-I2, C2-I1, C2-I2). In first-list learning, with one method of presentation in the 50,% ORM entire list was presented with only half the correct (C) items designated on each study trial, while in the second method only half the list was presented with all C items underlined. There were no differences between the two methods in the 100% ORM condition. The results indicated that % ORM was a significant variable in first-list learning, supporting the findings of Newby and Young (1972). No effect was found for method of presentation. Also, no real significant effect of these two variables was found in VD transfer. All results were interpreted in terms of the frequency theory of VD learning.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>24214744</pmid><doi>10.3758/BF03208985</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-502X
ispartof Memory & cognition, 1974-03, Vol.2 (2), p.215-218
issn 0090-502X
1532-5946
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85478169
source SpringerNature Journals
title Effects of percentage occurrence of response members and its method of presentation on verbal discrimination learning and transfer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A23%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20percentage%20occurrence%20of%20response%20members%20and%20its%20method%20of%20presentation%20on%20verbal%20discrimination%20learning%20and%20transfer&rft.jtitle=Memory%20&%20cognition&rft.au=Newby,%20R%20W&rft.date=1974-03&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=215-218&rft.issn=0090-502X&rft.eissn=1532-5946&rft.coden=MYCGAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/BF03208985&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1458183931%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1458183931&rft_id=info:pmid/24214744&rfr_iscdi=true