The Effects of Expected and Perceived Receiver Response on Source Attitudes

In a 2 × 2 experimental design, communication sources were given an expectation of the response (positive or negative) they might receive from a group of listeners. As they delivered persuasive messages, they were administered positive or negative nonverbal response by a trained audience. The source...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of communication 1972-09, Vol.22 (3), p.289-299
1. Verfasser: Gardiner, James C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 299
container_issue 3
container_start_page 289
container_title Journal of communication
container_volume 22
creator Gardiner, James C.
description In a 2 × 2 experimental design, communication sources were given an expectation of the response (positive or negative) they might receive from a group of listeners. As they delivered persuasive messages, they were administered positive or negative nonverbal response by a trained audience. The sources’ attitudes toward their own performances and toward the receivers were measured. As predicted, sources who expected positive response but received negative response apparently restored balance by devaluing their performances, while sources who expected negative response but received positive response apparently restored balance by evaluating the receivers favorably. Cognitive balance theory was generally successful in predicting attitudes of communication sources in a setting where receiver response was manipulated.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1972.tb00154.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85474360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>85474360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4169-ffdbcddcc1c6dd91d2f5a270264d4d597c34c9f58a03ad0bcf83d6aefff8f9c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVUE1PwkAU3BhNRPQ_NJp4a93vdr0YQwBFFIMYj5tlP2IRWuy2Cv_eRQgHb77Lm5c3M5kMAOcIJijM1SxBlMMYU84TJFKc1FMIEaPJ6gC09q9D0IIQo1gIxI_BifczGG6CYAs8TN5t1HXO6tpHpYu6q2WA1kSqMNGzrbTNv8I1tr-gCsAvy8LbqCyil7IJ_-i2rvO6MdafgiOn5t6e7XYbvPa6k85dPBz17zu3w1hTxEXsnJlqY7RGmhsjkMGOKZxCzKmhholUE6qFY5mCRBk41S4jhivrnMuc0JS0weXWd1mVn431tVzkXtv5XBW2bLzMGE0p4TAQL_4QZyFyEbJJRCDGBBPIAut6y9JV6X1lnVxW-UJVa4mg3LQsZ3JTpdxUKTcty13LchXEN1vxdz63638o5aAzesSZCA7x1iH3tV3tHVT1IXlKUibfnvpyIMasNxizkPsH1NeURQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1302232305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Expected and Perceived Receiver Response on Source Attitudes</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gardiner, James C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gardiner, James C.</creatorcontrib><description>In a 2 × 2 experimental design, communication sources were given an expectation of the response (positive or negative) they might receive from a group of listeners. As they delivered persuasive messages, they were administered positive or negative nonverbal response by a trained audience. The sources’ attitudes toward their own performances and toward the receivers were measured. As predicted, sources who expected positive response but received negative response apparently restored balance by devaluing their performances, while sources who expected negative response but received positive response apparently restored balance by evaluating the receivers favorably. Cognitive balance theory was generally successful in predicting attitudes of communication sources in a setting where receiver response was manipulated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2466</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1972.tb00154.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCMNAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Journal of communication, 1972-09, Vol.22 (3), p.289-299</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4169-ffdbcddcc1c6dd91d2f5a270264d4d597c34c9f58a03ad0bcf83d6aefff8f9c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4169-ffdbcddcc1c6dd91d2f5a270264d4d597c34c9f58a03ad0bcf83d6aefff8f9c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1460-2466.1972.tb00154.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1460-2466.1972.tb00154.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27860,27915,27916,45565,45566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gardiner, James C.</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Expected and Perceived Receiver Response on Source Attitudes</title><title>Journal of communication</title><description>In a 2 × 2 experimental design, communication sources were given an expectation of the response (positive or negative) they might receive from a group of listeners. As they delivered persuasive messages, they were administered positive or negative nonverbal response by a trained audience. The sources’ attitudes toward their own performances and toward the receivers were measured. As predicted, sources who expected positive response but received negative response apparently restored balance by devaluing their performances, while sources who expected negative response but received positive response apparently restored balance by evaluating the receivers favorably. Cognitive balance theory was generally successful in predicting attitudes of communication sources in a setting where receiver response was manipulated.</description><issn>0021-9916</issn><issn>1460-2466</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1972</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqVUE1PwkAU3BhNRPQ_NJp4a93vdr0YQwBFFIMYj5tlP2IRWuy2Cv_eRQgHb77Lm5c3M5kMAOcIJijM1SxBlMMYU84TJFKc1FMIEaPJ6gC09q9D0IIQo1gIxI_BifczGG6CYAs8TN5t1HXO6tpHpYu6q2WA1kSqMNGzrbTNv8I1tr-gCsAvy8LbqCyil7IJ_-i2rvO6MdafgiOn5t6e7XYbvPa6k85dPBz17zu3w1hTxEXsnJlqY7RGmhsjkMGOKZxCzKmhholUE6qFY5mCRBk41S4jhivrnMuc0JS0weXWd1mVn431tVzkXtv5XBW2bLzMGE0p4TAQL_4QZyFyEbJJRCDGBBPIAut6y9JV6X1lnVxW-UJVa4mg3LQsZ3JTpdxUKTcty13LchXEN1vxdz63638o5aAzesSZCA7x1iH3tV3tHVT1IXlKUibfnvpyIMasNxizkPsH1NeURQ</recordid><startdate>197209</startdate><enddate>197209</enddate><creator>Gardiner, James C.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Annenberg School Press, etc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FYSDU</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>ICWRT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197209</creationdate><title>The Effects of Expected and Perceived Receiver Response on Source Attitudes</title><author>Gardiner, James C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4169-ffdbcddcc1c6dd91d2f5a270264d4d597c34c9f58a03ad0bcf83d6aefff8f9c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1972</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gardiner, James C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 07</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 28</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of communication</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gardiner, James C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effects of Expected and Perceived Receiver Response on Source Attitudes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of communication</jtitle><date>1972-09</date><risdate>1972</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>299</epage><pages>289-299</pages><issn>0021-9916</issn><eissn>1460-2466</eissn><coden>JCMNAA</coden><abstract>In a 2 × 2 experimental design, communication sources were given an expectation of the response (positive or negative) they might receive from a group of listeners. As they delivered persuasive messages, they were administered positive or negative nonverbal response by a trained audience. The sources’ attitudes toward their own performances and toward the receivers were measured. As predicted, sources who expected positive response but received negative response apparently restored balance by devaluing their performances, while sources who expected negative response but received positive response apparently restored balance by evaluating the receivers favorably. Cognitive balance theory was generally successful in predicting attitudes of communication sources in a setting where receiver response was manipulated.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1460-2466.1972.tb00154.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9916
ispartof Journal of communication, 1972-09, Vol.22 (3), p.289-299
issn 0021-9916
1460-2466
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85474360
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Periodicals Index Online; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title The Effects of Expected and Perceived Receiver Response on Source Attitudes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T22%3A52%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Expected%20and%20Perceived%20Receiver%20Response%20on%20Source%20Attitudes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20communication&rft.au=Gardiner,%20James%20C.&rft.date=1972-09&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=299&rft.pages=289-299&rft.issn=0021-9916&rft.eissn=1460-2466&rft.coden=JCMNAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1972.tb00154.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85474360%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1302232305&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true