Children's comprehension of ‘because’ in reversible and non-reversible sentences
Comprehension of event order was compared for reversible ‘X because Y’ (‘Y because X’ is also logical) and non-reversible ‘X because Y’ sentences. Children aged 5; 8–10; 11 chose one of two picture sequences, differing in event order, and put two pictures in first/last order to match a sentence ‘X b...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of child language 1979-06, Vol.6 (2), p.279-300 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 300 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 279 |
| container_title | Journal of child language |
| container_volume | 6 |
| creator | Emerson, Harriet F. |
| description | Comprehension of event order was compared for reversible ‘X because Y’ (‘Y because X’ is also logical) and non-reversible ‘X because Y’ sentences. Children aged 5; 8–10; 11 chose one of two picture sequences, differing in event order, and put two pictures in first/last order to match a sentence ‘X because Y’ (order of mention violates temporal order) or ‘Because Y, X’ (order of mention preserves temporal order). Reversibility and clause order effects reflected the use of semantic probability cues and order-of-mention strategies for comprehension. Judgements were also made of grammatical acceptability for correct and reversed ‘X because Y’ sentences. Response strategies used in the two experiments suggest that development of comprehension of the role of because reflects acquired independence from contextual support and acquisition of a meaning component: ORDER. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0305000900002300 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85443939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0305000900002300</cupid><sourcerecordid>85443939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-c5eb5e3621db38d0bb89b8d8d871ec448923434243596eef4930c4de6943e3d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkdFqFDEUhoNYdVt9AMGLgUJ7NfZkTiYzubSL7Ra2iFivwyQ5a6fOZNZkR_Suj9G-Xp_ErLuUoohNCIH83_n5w8_Yaw5vOfDq6BMglACg0oECAZ6wCRdS5ZWE4imbrOV8rb9guzFe_SZV_Zw9E7JWWE_YxfSy7VwgfxgzO_TLQJfkYzv4bFhkd9c3hmwzRrq7vs1anwX6TiG2pqOs8S7zg88fPEXyK_KW4ku2s2i6SK-29x77fPL-YjrL5x9Oz6bv5rkVslrltiRTEsqCO4O1A2NqZWqXdsXJClGrAgWKQmCpJNFCKAQrHEklkNAp3GMHG99lGL6NFFe6b6Olrms8DWPUdSkEKnwMWKgyrf-ClZBCgMIE7v8BXg1j8Om3miMgB5ncEsU3lA1DjIEWehnavgk_NQe9LlD_VWCaebN1Hk1P7n5i01iS843cxhX9uFeb8FXLCqtSy9OPelYez1HOTvR54nEboelNaN0XepD0nyF-AXBPs8o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1303106553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Children's comprehension of ‘because’ in reversible and non-reversible sentences</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Emerson, Harriet F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Emerson, Harriet F.</creatorcontrib><description>Comprehension of event order was compared for reversible ‘X because Y’ (‘Y because X’ is also logical) and non-reversible ‘X because Y’ sentences. Children aged 5; 8–10; 11 chose one of two picture sequences, differing in event order, and put two pictures in first/last order to match a sentence ‘X because Y’ (order of mention violates temporal order) or ‘Because Y, X’ (order of mention preserves temporal order). Reversibility and clause order effects reflected the use of semantic probability cues and order-of-mention strategies for comprehension. Judgements were also made of grammatical acceptability for correct and reversed ‘X because Y’ sentences. Response strategies used in the two experiments suggest that development of comprehension of the role of because reflects acquired independence from contextual support and acquisition of a meaning component: ORDER.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-0009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7602</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0305000900002300</identifier><identifier>PMID: 468938</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCLGBJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Communication disorders ; Cues ; Female ; Humans ; Judgment ; Language Development ; Male ; Semantics ; Speech Perception</subject><ispartof>Journal of child language, 1979-06, Vol.6 (2), p.279-300</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-c5eb5e3621db38d0bb89b8d8d871ec448923434243596eef4930c4de6943e3d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-c5eb5e3621db38d0bb89b8d8d871ec448923434243596eef4930c4de6943e3d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0305000900002300/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27848,27903,27904,55606</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/468938$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Emerson, Harriet F.</creatorcontrib><title>Children's comprehension of ‘because’ in reversible and non-reversible sentences</title><title>Journal of child language</title><addtitle>J. Child Lang</addtitle><description>Comprehension of event order was compared for reversible ‘X because Y’ (‘Y because X’ is also logical) and non-reversible ‘X because Y’ sentences. Children aged 5; 8–10; 11 chose one of two picture sequences, differing in event order, and put two pictures in first/last order to match a sentence ‘X because Y’ (order of mention violates temporal order) or ‘Because Y, X’ (order of mention preserves temporal order). Reversibility and clause order effects reflected the use of semantic probability cues and order-of-mention strategies for comprehension. Judgements were also made of grammatical acceptability for correct and reversed ‘X because Y’ sentences. Response strategies used in the two experiments suggest that development of comprehension of the role of because reflects acquired independence from contextual support and acquisition of a meaning component: ORDER.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Communication disorders</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Language Development</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><issn>0305-0009</issn><issn>1469-7602</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1979</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkdFqFDEUhoNYdVt9AMGLgUJ7NfZkTiYzubSL7Ra2iFivwyQ5a6fOZNZkR_Suj9G-Xp_ErLuUoohNCIH83_n5w8_Yaw5vOfDq6BMglACg0oECAZ6wCRdS5ZWE4imbrOV8rb9guzFe_SZV_Zw9E7JWWE_YxfSy7VwgfxgzO_TLQJfkYzv4bFhkd9c3hmwzRrq7vs1anwX6TiG2pqOs8S7zg88fPEXyK_KW4ku2s2i6SK-29x77fPL-YjrL5x9Oz6bv5rkVslrltiRTEsqCO4O1A2NqZWqXdsXJClGrAgWKQmCpJNFCKAQrHEklkNAp3GMHG99lGL6NFFe6b6Olrms8DWPUdSkEKnwMWKgyrf-ClZBCgMIE7v8BXg1j8Om3miMgB5ncEsU3lA1DjIEWehnavgk_NQe9LlD_VWCaebN1Hk1P7n5i01iS843cxhX9uFeb8FXLCqtSy9OPelYez1HOTvR54nEboelNaN0XepD0nyF-AXBPs8o</recordid><startdate>197906</startdate><enddate>197906</enddate><creator>Emerson, Harriet F.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HJHVS</scope><scope>HQAFP</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197906</creationdate><title>Children's comprehension of ‘because’ in reversible and non-reversible sentences</title><author>Emerson, Harriet F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-c5eb5e3621db38d0bb89b8d8d871ec448923434243596eef4930c4de6943e3d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1979</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Communication disorders</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Language Development</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Emerson, Harriet F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 19</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 23</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of child language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Emerson, Harriet F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Children's comprehension of ‘because’ in reversible and non-reversible sentences</atitle><jtitle>Journal of child language</jtitle><addtitle>J. Child Lang</addtitle><date>1979-06</date><risdate>1979</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>279-300</pages><issn>0305-0009</issn><eissn>1469-7602</eissn><coden>JCLGBJ</coden><abstract>Comprehension of event order was compared for reversible ‘X because Y’ (‘Y because X’ is also logical) and non-reversible ‘X because Y’ sentences. Children aged 5; 8–10; 11 chose one of two picture sequences, differing in event order, and put two pictures in first/last order to match a sentence ‘X because Y’ (order of mention violates temporal order) or ‘Because Y, X’ (order of mention preserves temporal order). Reversibility and clause order effects reflected the use of semantic probability cues and order-of-mention strategies for comprehension. Judgements were also made of grammatical acceptability for correct and reversed ‘X because Y’ sentences. Response strategies used in the two experiments suggest that development of comprehension of the role of because reflects acquired independence from contextual support and acquisition of a meaning component: ORDER.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>468938</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0305000900002300</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0305-0009 |
| ispartof | Journal of child language, 1979-06, Vol.6 (2), p.279-300 |
| issn | 0305-0009 1469-7602 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85443939 |
| source | MEDLINE; Periodicals Index Online; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Age Factors Child Child, Preschool Communication disorders Cues Female Humans Judgment Language Development Male Semantics Speech Perception |
| title | Children's comprehension of ‘because’ in reversible and non-reversible sentences |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T10%3A40%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Children's%20comprehension%20of%20%E2%80%98because%E2%80%99%20in%20reversible%20and%20non-reversible%20sentences&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20child%20language&rft.au=Emerson,%20Harriet%20F.&rft.date=1979-06&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=279-300&rft.issn=0305-0009&rft.eissn=1469-7602&rft.coden=JCLGBJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0305000900002300&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85443939%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1303106553&rft_id=info:pmid/468938&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0305000900002300&rfr_iscdi=true |