Health Literacy and the Provision of Information to Women with Breast Cancer

Abstract Aims Health literacy and functional health literacy are important for patients with cancer, as key information regarding treatment complications and clinical trials is often imparted using written educational material. This study measured the health literacy and functional health literacy l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) 2011-04, Vol.23 (3), p.223-227
Hauptverfasser: Cox, N, Bowmer, C, Ring, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 227
container_issue 3
container_start_page 223
container_title Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
container_volume 23
creator Cox, N
Bowmer, C
Ring, A
description Abstract Aims Health literacy and functional health literacy are important for patients with cancer, as key information regarding treatment complications and clinical trials is often imparted using written educational material. This study measured the health literacy and functional health literacy levels in a population of women with breast cancer and compared these with the level of written information provided. Materials and methods A cross-sectional survey of women with stage I–III breast cancer attending an outpatient clinic was conducted. Health literacy levels were assessed using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) score and functional health literacy was assessed using three validated screening questions. Patient education materials were assessed using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) systems. Results One hundred and twenty-seven women were recruited. For patients, the mean REALM score was 64.3 (≥US 9th grade/reading age 14 years). The mean SMOG score of patient education materials was 80.5 (reading age 17 years). The mean FRE score of patient education materials was 55.7 (reading age 15–17 years). All patient information sheets assessed were written at ≥8th grade (reading age 13 years) and as a result up to 9% of patients would be unable to read them. Nineteen per cent of the population had inadequate functional health literacy. Conclusions Health literacy levels were high in the population studied. However, the reading level of written patient information was also high, meaning that up to 9% of patients would be unable to read the information provided. Functional health literacy levels were lower, with 19% of patients having inadequate ability. This means that although most patients are able read the information sheets provided, there is a larger proportion that would be unable to understand and act upon this information. Patient education materials should be written at an appropriate level and different modalities of communication should be used to ensure adequate comprehension.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clon.2010.11.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_854377047</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0936655510004565</els_id><sourcerecordid>854377047</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-7f8e51f966fe6c19bab6053d00ff9b3eff35659376fe9a53b5eaaa2e243ec79e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUGLFDEQhYMo7rj6BzxIbp56rHQ66Q6IoIO6CwMKKh5DOl1hM3Yna5JZmX9vmlk9ePD0SPLeK_IVIc8ZbBkw-eqwtXMM2xbWC7at8oBsWMd506qBPSQbUFw2UghxQZ7kfACAdhjUY3LRMjZIBrAh-ys0c7mhe18wGXuiJky03CD9nOKdzz4GGh29Di6mxZT1WCL9HhcM9JevuXcJTS50Z4LF9JQ8cmbO-OxeL8m3D--_7q6a_aeP17u3-8Z2DErTuwEFc0pKh9IyNZpRguATgHNq5OgcF1Io3td3ZQQfBRpjWmw7jrZXyC_Jy3PvbYo_j5iLXny2OM8mYDxmPYiO9z10fXW2Z6dNMeeETt8mv5h00gz0ClEf9ApRrxA1Y7pKDb24rz-OC05_I3-oVcPrswHrJ-88Jp2tx0pg8glt0VP0_-9_80_czj54a-YfeMJ8iMcUKj7NdG416C_rGtct1tHQVTL8N41ll7E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>854377047</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Health Literacy and the Provision of Information to Women with Breast Cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Cox, N ; Bowmer, C ; Ring, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Cox, N ; Bowmer, C ; Ring, A</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Aims Health literacy and functional health literacy are important for patients with cancer, as key information regarding treatment complications and clinical trials is often imparted using written educational material. This study measured the health literacy and functional health literacy levels in a population of women with breast cancer and compared these with the level of written information provided. Materials and methods A cross-sectional survey of women with stage I–III breast cancer attending an outpatient clinic was conducted. Health literacy levels were assessed using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) score and functional health literacy was assessed using three validated screening questions. Patient education materials were assessed using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) systems. Results One hundred and twenty-seven women were recruited. For patients, the mean REALM score was 64.3 (≥US 9th grade/reading age 14 years). The mean SMOG score of patient education materials was 80.5 (reading age 17 years). The mean FRE score of patient education materials was 55.7 (reading age 15–17 years). All patient information sheets assessed were written at ≥8th grade (reading age 13 years) and as a result up to 9% of patients would be unable to read them. Nineteen per cent of the population had inadequate functional health literacy. Conclusions Health literacy levels were high in the population studied. However, the reading level of written patient information was also high, meaning that up to 9% of patients would be unable to read the information provided. Functional health literacy levels were lower, with 19% of patients having inadequate ability. This means that although most patients are able read the information sheets provided, there is a larger proportion that would be unable to understand and act upon this information. Patient education materials should be written at an appropriate level and different modalities of communication should be used to ensure adequate comprehension.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-6555</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-2981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2010.11.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21186100</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms ; Consumer Health Information ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; functional health literacy ; health literacy ; Health Literacy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Patient Education as Topic - methods ; patient information ; Radiology</subject><ispartof>Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 2011-04, Vol.23 (3), p.223-227</ispartof><rights>The Royal College of Radiologists</rights><rights>2010 The Royal College of Radiologists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-7f8e51f966fe6c19bab6053d00ff9b3eff35659376fe9a53b5eaaa2e243ec79e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-7f8e51f966fe6c19bab6053d00ff9b3eff35659376fe9a53b5eaaa2e243ec79e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2010.11.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21186100$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cox, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowmer, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ring, A</creatorcontrib><title>Health Literacy and the Provision of Information to Women with Breast Cancer</title><title>Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))</title><addtitle>Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)</addtitle><description>Abstract Aims Health literacy and functional health literacy are important for patients with cancer, as key information regarding treatment complications and clinical trials is often imparted using written educational material. This study measured the health literacy and functional health literacy levels in a population of women with breast cancer and compared these with the level of written information provided. Materials and methods A cross-sectional survey of women with stage I–III breast cancer attending an outpatient clinic was conducted. Health literacy levels were assessed using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) score and functional health literacy was assessed using three validated screening questions. Patient education materials were assessed using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) systems. Results One hundred and twenty-seven women were recruited. For patients, the mean REALM score was 64.3 (≥US 9th grade/reading age 14 years). The mean SMOG score of patient education materials was 80.5 (reading age 17 years). The mean FRE score of patient education materials was 55.7 (reading age 15–17 years). All patient information sheets assessed were written at ≥8th grade (reading age 13 years) and as a result up to 9% of patients would be unable to read them. Nineteen per cent of the population had inadequate functional health literacy. Conclusions Health literacy levels were high in the population studied. However, the reading level of written patient information was also high, meaning that up to 9% of patients would be unable to read the information provided. Functional health literacy levels were lower, with 19% of patients having inadequate ability. This means that although most patients are able read the information sheets provided, there is a larger proportion that would be unable to understand and act upon this information. Patient education materials should be written at an appropriate level and different modalities of communication should be used to ensure adequate comprehension.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms</subject><subject>Consumer Health Information</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>functional health literacy</subject><subject>health literacy</subject><subject>Health Literacy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic - methods</subject><subject>patient information</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><issn>0936-6555</issn><issn>1433-2981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUGLFDEQhYMo7rj6BzxIbp56rHQ66Q6IoIO6CwMKKh5DOl1hM3Yna5JZmX9vmlk9ePD0SPLeK_IVIc8ZbBkw-eqwtXMM2xbWC7at8oBsWMd506qBPSQbUFw2UghxQZ7kfACAdhjUY3LRMjZIBrAh-ys0c7mhe18wGXuiJky03CD9nOKdzz4GGh29Di6mxZT1WCL9HhcM9JevuXcJTS50Z4LF9JQ8cmbO-OxeL8m3D--_7q6a_aeP17u3-8Z2DErTuwEFc0pKh9IyNZpRguATgHNq5OgcF1Io3td3ZQQfBRpjWmw7jrZXyC_Jy3PvbYo_j5iLXny2OM8mYDxmPYiO9z10fXW2Z6dNMeeETt8mv5h00gz0ClEf9ApRrxA1Y7pKDb24rz-OC05_I3-oVcPrswHrJ-88Jp2tx0pg8glt0VP0_-9_80_czj54a-YfeMJ8iMcUKj7NdG416C_rGtct1tHQVTL8N41ll7E</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Cox, N</creator><creator>Bowmer, C</creator><creator>Ring, A</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Health Literacy and the Provision of Information to Women with Breast Cancer</title><author>Cox, N ; Bowmer, C ; Ring, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-7f8e51f966fe6c19bab6053d00ff9b3eff35659376fe9a53b5eaaa2e243ec79e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms</topic><topic>Consumer Health Information</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>functional health literacy</topic><topic>health literacy</topic><topic>Health Literacy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic - methods</topic><topic>patient information</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cox, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowmer, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ring, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cox, N</au><au>Bowmer, C</au><au>Ring, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Health Literacy and the Provision of Information to Women with Breast Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)</addtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>227</epage><pages>223-227</pages><issn>0936-6555</issn><eissn>1433-2981</eissn><abstract>Abstract Aims Health literacy and functional health literacy are important for patients with cancer, as key information regarding treatment complications and clinical trials is often imparted using written educational material. This study measured the health literacy and functional health literacy levels in a population of women with breast cancer and compared these with the level of written information provided. Materials and methods A cross-sectional survey of women with stage I–III breast cancer attending an outpatient clinic was conducted. Health literacy levels were assessed using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) score and functional health literacy was assessed using three validated screening questions. Patient education materials were assessed using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) systems. Results One hundred and twenty-seven women were recruited. For patients, the mean REALM score was 64.3 (≥US 9th grade/reading age 14 years). The mean SMOG score of patient education materials was 80.5 (reading age 17 years). The mean FRE score of patient education materials was 55.7 (reading age 15–17 years). All patient information sheets assessed were written at ≥8th grade (reading age 13 years) and as a result up to 9% of patients would be unable to read them. Nineteen per cent of the population had inadequate functional health literacy. Conclusions Health literacy levels were high in the population studied. However, the reading level of written patient information was also high, meaning that up to 9% of patients would be unable to read the information provided. Functional health literacy levels were lower, with 19% of patients having inadequate ability. This means that although most patients are able read the information sheets provided, there is a larger proportion that would be unable to understand and act upon this information. Patient education materials should be written at an appropriate level and different modalities of communication should be used to ensure adequate comprehension.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21186100</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clon.2010.11.010</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0936-6555
ispartof Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 2011-04, Vol.23 (3), p.223-227
issn 0936-6555
1433-2981
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_854377047
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms
Consumer Health Information
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
functional health literacy
health literacy
Health Literacy - statistics & numerical data
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Middle Aged
Patient Education as Topic - methods
patient information
Radiology
title Health Literacy and the Provision of Information to Women with Breast Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A38%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Health%20Literacy%20and%20the%20Provision%20of%20Information%20to%20Women%20with%20Breast%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oncology%20(Royal%20College%20of%20Radiologists%20(Great%20Britain))&rft.au=Cox,%20N&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=227&rft.pages=223-227&rft.issn=0936-6555&rft.eissn=1433-2981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clon.2010.11.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E854377047%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=854377047&rft_id=info:pmid/21186100&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0936655510004565&rfr_iscdi=true