Insight in first episode psychosis: who is measuring what?
Aims: To compare different self‐administered or clinician‐rated insight scales in an FEP population. Methods: A self‐administered measure (Beck Cognitive Insight Scale – BCIS) and clinician‐rated scales (Scale of Unawareness of Mental Disorder – SUMD and Positive And Negative Symptoms Scale – PANSS‐...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Early intervention in psychiatry 2008-02, Vol.2 (1), p.34-41 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 41 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 34 |
container_title | Early intervention in psychiatry |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Tranulis, Constantin Lepage, Martin Malla, Ashok |
description | Aims: To compare different self‐administered or clinician‐rated insight scales in an FEP population.
Methods: A self‐administered measure (Beck Cognitive Insight Scale – BCIS) and clinician‐rated scales (Scale of Unawareness of Mental Disorder – SUMD and Positive And Negative Symptoms Scale – PANSS‐G12 insight item) were completed by 38 patients with a diagnosis of FEP.
Results: The scales had good internal consistency and only the clinician‐rated scales were intercorrelated (SUMD – awareness of mental disorder and PANSS‐G12 items (r = 0.657, P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2007.00054.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_854375581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>854375581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-b04150662bbc7e157c05f7f691d8cbe98be0305d1219e69aa63f6297ca95c6723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFPwjAUxxujEUS_gtnN02bbre1GTIwhCESiHDR4a7qugyJjuDcCfHuLQ8720pf2_3vv5YeQR3BA3LlfBEQw4os4CQOKsQgwxiwKdmeoffo4P9Uxa6ErgIXLCE7JJWpREjJKaNJG3dEK7Gxee3bl5baC2jNrC2VmvDXs9bwEC11vOy89C15hFGwqu5q5B1U_XqOLXC3B3BzvDvp47r_3hv74bTDqPY19Hbml_BRHhGHOaZpqYQgTGrNc5DwhWaxTk8SpwSFmGaEkMTxRioc5p4nQKmGaCxp20F3Td12V3xsDtSwsaLNcqpUpNyBjFoWCsZi4ZNwkdVUCVCaX68oWqtpLguVBnFzIgxN58CMP4uSvOLlz6O1xyCYtTHYC_0y5wEMT2Nql2f-7seyPJq5wuN_gFmqzO-Gq-pJcuPXl9HUgP19iNpmOh1KEP0UDicQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>854375581</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Insight in first episode psychosis: who is measuring what?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Tranulis, Constantin ; Lepage, Martin ; Malla, Ashok</creator><creatorcontrib>Tranulis, Constantin ; Lepage, Martin ; Malla, Ashok</creatorcontrib><description>Aims: To compare different self‐administered or clinician‐rated insight scales in an FEP population.
Methods: A self‐administered measure (Beck Cognitive Insight Scale – BCIS) and clinician‐rated scales (Scale of Unawareness of Mental Disorder – SUMD and Positive And Negative Symptoms Scale – PANSS‐G12 insight item) were completed by 38 patients with a diagnosis of FEP.
Results: The scales had good internal consistency and only the clinician‐rated scales were intercorrelated (SUMD – awareness of mental disorder and PANSS‐G12 items (r = 0.657, P < 0.001)). Moreover, we observed a significant association of SUMD and PANSS positive and general subscales and a trend association for BCIS and PANSS negative subscale.
Conclusion: Differential associations observed between insight and symptoms may suggest different clinical predictive values for each measure. Our results suggest the necessity to qualify the term ‘insight’ when discussing research results, most notably with respect to who is rating and what aspect of insight is being rated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-7885</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-7893</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2007.00054.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21352129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>Adult ; Awareness ; early intervention ; Female ; Humans ; insight ; Male ; psychiatric status rating scales ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics & numerical data ; psychotic disorders ; Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis ; Psychotic Disorders - psychology ; Self Report</subject><ispartof>Early intervention in psychiatry, 2008-02, Vol.2 (1), p.34-41</ispartof><rights>2008 The Authors</rights><rights>2008 The Authors.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-b04150662bbc7e157c05f7f691d8cbe98be0305d1219e69aa63f6297ca95c6723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-b04150662bbc7e157c05f7f691d8cbe98be0305d1219e69aa63f6297ca95c6723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1751-7893.2007.00054.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1751-7893.2007.00054.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21352129$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tranulis, Constantin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lepage, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malla, Ashok</creatorcontrib><title>Insight in first episode psychosis: who is measuring what?</title><title>Early intervention in psychiatry</title><addtitle>Early Interv Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Aims: To compare different self‐administered or clinician‐rated insight scales in an FEP population.
Methods: A self‐administered measure (Beck Cognitive Insight Scale – BCIS) and clinician‐rated scales (Scale of Unawareness of Mental Disorder – SUMD and Positive And Negative Symptoms Scale – PANSS‐G12 insight item) were completed by 38 patients with a diagnosis of FEP.
Results: The scales had good internal consistency and only the clinician‐rated scales were intercorrelated (SUMD – awareness of mental disorder and PANSS‐G12 items (r = 0.657, P < 0.001)). Moreover, we observed a significant association of SUMD and PANSS positive and general subscales and a trend association for BCIS and PANSS negative subscale.
Conclusion: Differential associations observed between insight and symptoms may suggest different clinical predictive values for each measure. Our results suggest the necessity to qualify the term ‘insight’ when discussing research results, most notably with respect to who is rating and what aspect of insight is being rated.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Awareness</subject><subject>early intervention</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>insight</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>psychiatric status rating scales</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>psychotic disorders</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><issn>1751-7885</issn><issn>1751-7893</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFPwjAUxxujEUS_gtnN02bbre1GTIwhCESiHDR4a7qugyJjuDcCfHuLQ8720pf2_3vv5YeQR3BA3LlfBEQw4os4CQOKsQgwxiwKdmeoffo4P9Uxa6ErgIXLCE7JJWpREjJKaNJG3dEK7Gxee3bl5baC2jNrC2VmvDXs9bwEC11vOy89C15hFGwqu5q5B1U_XqOLXC3B3BzvDvp47r_3hv74bTDqPY19Hbml_BRHhGHOaZpqYQgTGrNc5DwhWaxTk8SpwSFmGaEkMTxRioc5p4nQKmGaCxp20F3Td12V3xsDtSwsaLNcqpUpNyBjFoWCsZi4ZNwkdVUCVCaX68oWqtpLguVBnFzIgxN58CMP4uSvOLlz6O1xyCYtTHYC_0y5wEMT2Nql2f-7seyPJq5wuN_gFmqzO-Gq-pJcuPXl9HUgP19iNpmOh1KEP0UDicQ</recordid><startdate>200802</startdate><enddate>200802</enddate><creator>Tranulis, Constantin</creator><creator>Lepage, Martin</creator><creator>Malla, Ashok</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200802</creationdate><title>Insight in first episode psychosis: who is measuring what?</title><author>Tranulis, Constantin ; Lepage, Martin ; Malla, Ashok</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-b04150662bbc7e157c05f7f691d8cbe98be0305d1219e69aa63f6297ca95c6723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Awareness</topic><topic>early intervention</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>insight</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>psychiatric status rating scales</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>psychotic disorders</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tranulis, Constantin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lepage, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malla, Ashok</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Early intervention in psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tranulis, Constantin</au><au>Lepage, Martin</au><au>Malla, Ashok</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Insight in first episode psychosis: who is measuring what?</atitle><jtitle>Early intervention in psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Early Interv Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2008-02</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>34</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>34-41</pages><issn>1751-7885</issn><eissn>1751-7893</eissn><abstract>Aims: To compare different self‐administered or clinician‐rated insight scales in an FEP population.
Methods: A self‐administered measure (Beck Cognitive Insight Scale – BCIS) and clinician‐rated scales (Scale of Unawareness of Mental Disorder – SUMD and Positive And Negative Symptoms Scale – PANSS‐G12 insight item) were completed by 38 patients with a diagnosis of FEP.
Results: The scales had good internal consistency and only the clinician‐rated scales were intercorrelated (SUMD – awareness of mental disorder and PANSS‐G12 items (r = 0.657, P < 0.001)). Moreover, we observed a significant association of SUMD and PANSS positive and general subscales and a trend association for BCIS and PANSS negative subscale.
Conclusion: Differential associations observed between insight and symptoms may suggest different clinical predictive values for each measure. Our results suggest the necessity to qualify the term ‘insight’ when discussing research results, most notably with respect to who is rating and what aspect of insight is being rated.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>21352129</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1751-7893.2007.00054.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1751-7885 |
ispartof | Early intervention in psychiatry, 2008-02, Vol.2 (1), p.34-41 |
issn | 1751-7885 1751-7893 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_854375581 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Awareness early intervention Female Humans insight Male psychiatric status rating scales Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics & numerical data psychotic disorders Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis Psychotic Disorders - psychology Self Report |
title | Insight in first episode psychosis: who is measuring what? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A46%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Insight%20in%20first%20episode%20psychosis:%20who%20is%20measuring%20what?&rft.jtitle=Early%20intervention%20in%20psychiatry&rft.au=Tranulis,%20Constantin&rft.date=2008-02&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=34-41&rft.issn=1751-7885&rft.eissn=1751-7893&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1751-7893.2007.00054.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E854375581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=854375581&rft_id=info:pmid/21352129&rfr_iscdi=true |