Insight in first episode psychosis: who is measuring what?

Aims: To compare different self‐administered or clinician‐rated insight scales in an FEP population. Methods: A self‐administered measure (Beck Cognitive Insight Scale – BCIS) and clinician‐rated scales (Scale of Unawareness of Mental Disorder – SUMD and Positive And Negative Symptoms Scale – PANSS‐...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Early intervention in psychiatry 2008-02, Vol.2 (1), p.34-41
Hauptverfasser: Tranulis, Constantin, Lepage, Martin, Malla, Ashok
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 41
container_issue 1
container_start_page 34
container_title Early intervention in psychiatry
container_volume 2
creator Tranulis, Constantin
Lepage, Martin
Malla, Ashok
description Aims: To compare different self‐administered or clinician‐rated insight scales in an FEP population. Methods: A self‐administered measure (Beck Cognitive Insight Scale – BCIS) and clinician‐rated scales (Scale of Unawareness of Mental Disorder – SUMD and Positive And Negative Symptoms Scale – PANSS‐G12 insight item) were completed by 38 patients with a diagnosis of FEP. Results: The scales had good internal consistency and only the clinician‐rated scales were intercorrelated (SUMD – awareness of mental disorder and PANSS‐G12 items (r = 0.657, P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2007.00054.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_854375581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>854375581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-b04150662bbc7e157c05f7f691d8cbe98be0305d1219e69aa63f6297ca95c6723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFPwjAUxxujEUS_gtnN02bbre1GTIwhCESiHDR4a7qugyJjuDcCfHuLQ8720pf2_3vv5YeQR3BA3LlfBEQw4os4CQOKsQgwxiwKdmeoffo4P9Uxa6ErgIXLCE7JJWpREjJKaNJG3dEK7Gxee3bl5baC2jNrC2VmvDXs9bwEC11vOy89C15hFGwqu5q5B1U_XqOLXC3B3BzvDvp47r_3hv74bTDqPY19Hbml_BRHhGHOaZpqYQgTGrNc5DwhWaxTk8SpwSFmGaEkMTxRioc5p4nQKmGaCxp20F3Td12V3xsDtSwsaLNcqpUpNyBjFoWCsZi4ZNwkdVUCVCaX68oWqtpLguVBnFzIgxN58CMP4uSvOLlz6O1xyCYtTHYC_0y5wEMT2Nql2f-7seyPJq5wuN_gFmqzO-Gq-pJcuPXl9HUgP19iNpmOh1KEP0UDicQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>854375581</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Insight in first episode psychosis: who is measuring what?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Tranulis, Constantin ; Lepage, Martin ; Malla, Ashok</creator><creatorcontrib>Tranulis, Constantin ; Lepage, Martin ; Malla, Ashok</creatorcontrib><description>Aims: To compare different self‐administered or clinician‐rated insight scales in an FEP population. Methods: A self‐administered measure (Beck Cognitive Insight Scale – BCIS) and clinician‐rated scales (Scale of Unawareness of Mental Disorder – SUMD and Positive And Negative Symptoms Scale – PANSS‐G12 insight item) were completed by 38 patients with a diagnosis of FEP. Results: The scales had good internal consistency and only the clinician‐rated scales were intercorrelated (SUMD – awareness of mental disorder and PANSS‐G12 items (r = 0.657, P &lt; 0.001)). Moreover, we observed a significant association of SUMD and PANSS positive and general subscales and a trend association for BCIS and PANSS negative subscale. Conclusion: Differential associations observed between insight and symptoms may suggest different clinical predictive values for each measure. Our results suggest the necessity to qualify the term ‘insight’ when discussing research results, most notably with respect to who is rating and what aspect of insight is being rated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-7885</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-7893</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2007.00054.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21352129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>Adult ; Awareness ; early intervention ; Female ; Humans ; insight ; Male ; psychiatric status rating scales ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics &amp; numerical data ; psychotic disorders ; Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis ; Psychotic Disorders - psychology ; Self Report</subject><ispartof>Early intervention in psychiatry, 2008-02, Vol.2 (1), p.34-41</ispartof><rights>2008 The Authors</rights><rights>2008 The Authors.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-b04150662bbc7e157c05f7f691d8cbe98be0305d1219e69aa63f6297ca95c6723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-b04150662bbc7e157c05f7f691d8cbe98be0305d1219e69aa63f6297ca95c6723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1751-7893.2007.00054.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1751-7893.2007.00054.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21352129$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tranulis, Constantin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lepage, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malla, Ashok</creatorcontrib><title>Insight in first episode psychosis: who is measuring what?</title><title>Early intervention in psychiatry</title><addtitle>Early Interv Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Aims: To compare different self‐administered or clinician‐rated insight scales in an FEP population. Methods: A self‐administered measure (Beck Cognitive Insight Scale – BCIS) and clinician‐rated scales (Scale of Unawareness of Mental Disorder – SUMD and Positive And Negative Symptoms Scale – PANSS‐G12 insight item) were completed by 38 patients with a diagnosis of FEP. Results: The scales had good internal consistency and only the clinician‐rated scales were intercorrelated (SUMD – awareness of mental disorder and PANSS‐G12 items (r = 0.657, P &lt; 0.001)). Moreover, we observed a significant association of SUMD and PANSS positive and general subscales and a trend association for BCIS and PANSS negative subscale. Conclusion: Differential associations observed between insight and symptoms may suggest different clinical predictive values for each measure. Our results suggest the necessity to qualify the term ‘insight’ when discussing research results, most notably with respect to who is rating and what aspect of insight is being rated.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Awareness</subject><subject>early intervention</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>insight</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>psychiatric status rating scales</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>psychotic disorders</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><issn>1751-7885</issn><issn>1751-7893</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFPwjAUxxujEUS_gtnN02bbre1GTIwhCESiHDR4a7qugyJjuDcCfHuLQ8720pf2_3vv5YeQR3BA3LlfBEQw4os4CQOKsQgwxiwKdmeoffo4P9Uxa6ErgIXLCE7JJWpREjJKaNJG3dEK7Gxee3bl5baC2jNrC2VmvDXs9bwEC11vOy89C15hFGwqu5q5B1U_XqOLXC3B3BzvDvp47r_3hv74bTDqPY19Hbml_BRHhGHOaZpqYQgTGrNc5DwhWaxTk8SpwSFmGaEkMTxRioc5p4nQKmGaCxp20F3Td12V3xsDtSwsaLNcqpUpNyBjFoWCsZi4ZNwkdVUCVCaX68oWqtpLguVBnFzIgxN58CMP4uSvOLlz6O1xyCYtTHYC_0y5wEMT2Nql2f-7seyPJq5wuN_gFmqzO-Gq-pJcuPXl9HUgP19iNpmOh1KEP0UDicQ</recordid><startdate>200802</startdate><enddate>200802</enddate><creator>Tranulis, Constantin</creator><creator>Lepage, Martin</creator><creator>Malla, Ashok</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200802</creationdate><title>Insight in first episode psychosis: who is measuring what?</title><author>Tranulis, Constantin ; Lepage, Martin ; Malla, Ashok</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-b04150662bbc7e157c05f7f691d8cbe98be0305d1219e69aa63f6297ca95c6723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Awareness</topic><topic>early intervention</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>insight</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>psychiatric status rating scales</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>psychotic disorders</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tranulis, Constantin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lepage, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malla, Ashok</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Early intervention in psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tranulis, Constantin</au><au>Lepage, Martin</au><au>Malla, Ashok</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Insight in first episode psychosis: who is measuring what?</atitle><jtitle>Early intervention in psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Early Interv Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2008-02</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>34</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>34-41</pages><issn>1751-7885</issn><eissn>1751-7893</eissn><abstract>Aims: To compare different self‐administered or clinician‐rated insight scales in an FEP population. Methods: A self‐administered measure (Beck Cognitive Insight Scale – BCIS) and clinician‐rated scales (Scale of Unawareness of Mental Disorder – SUMD and Positive And Negative Symptoms Scale – PANSS‐G12 insight item) were completed by 38 patients with a diagnosis of FEP. Results: The scales had good internal consistency and only the clinician‐rated scales were intercorrelated (SUMD – awareness of mental disorder and PANSS‐G12 items (r = 0.657, P &lt; 0.001)). Moreover, we observed a significant association of SUMD and PANSS positive and general subscales and a trend association for BCIS and PANSS negative subscale. Conclusion: Differential associations observed between insight and symptoms may suggest different clinical predictive values for each measure. Our results suggest the necessity to qualify the term ‘insight’ when discussing research results, most notably with respect to who is rating and what aspect of insight is being rated.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>21352129</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1751-7893.2007.00054.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1751-7885
ispartof Early intervention in psychiatry, 2008-02, Vol.2 (1), p.34-41
issn 1751-7885
1751-7893
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_854375581
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Awareness
early intervention
Female
Humans
insight
Male
psychiatric status rating scales
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics & numerical data
psychotic disorders
Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis
Psychotic Disorders - psychology
Self Report
title Insight in first episode psychosis: who is measuring what?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A46%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Insight%20in%20first%20episode%20psychosis:%20who%20is%20measuring%20what?&rft.jtitle=Early%20intervention%20in%20psychiatry&rft.au=Tranulis,%20Constantin&rft.date=2008-02&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=34-41&rft.issn=1751-7885&rft.eissn=1751-7893&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1751-7893.2007.00054.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E854375581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=854375581&rft_id=info:pmid/21352129&rfr_iscdi=true