Collateral Values by Asset Class: Evidence from Primary Securities Dealers
Using data on repurchase agreements by primary securities dealers, we show that three classes of securities (Treasury securities, securities issued by government-sponsored agencies, and mortgage-backed securities) can be formally ranked in terms of their collateral values in the general collateral (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Review of financial studies 2011-01, Vol.24 (1), p.248-278 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 278 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 248 |
container_title | The Review of financial studies |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Bartolini, Leonardo Hilton, Spence Sundaresan, Suresh Tonetti, Christopher |
description | Using data on repurchase agreements by primary securities dealers, we show that three classes of securities (Treasury securities, securities issued by government-sponsored agencies, and mortgage-backed securities) can be formally ranked in terms of their collateral values in the general collateral (GC) market. We then show that GC repurchase agreement (repo) spreads across asset classes display jumps and significant temporal variation, especially at times of predictable liquidity needs, consistent with the "safe haven" properties of Treasury securities: These jumps are driven almost entirely by the behavior of the GC repo rates of Treasury securities. Estimating the "collateral rents" earned by owners of these securities, we find such rents to be sizable for Treasury securities and nearly zero for agency and mortgage-backed securities. Finally, we link collateral values to asset prices in a simple no-arbitrage framework and show that variations in collateral values explain a significant fraction of changes in short-term yield spreads but not those of longer-term spreads.Our results point to securities' role as collateral as a promising direction of research to improve understanding of the pricing of money market securities and their spreads. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/rfs/hhq108 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_854372812</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40985821</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40985821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f444b664693e4529af599dcd95223b946bf6d49704430f5ce965fb3e4e48ff3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0M9LwzAUB_AgCtbpxbsQvAhCXdK8pIm3UecvBgr-uIa0TVhHt25JK-y_N1Lx4OldPu_xfV-Ezim5oUSxqXdhulzuKJEHKKEgeJozIQ9RQqRiqQIOx-gkhBUhhDIgCXouurY1vfWmxZ-mHWzA5R7PQrA9LloTwi2efzW13VQWO9-t8atv1sbv8ZutBt_0TVy4s6a1PpyiI2faYM9-5wR93M_fi8d08fLwVMwWacVy3qcOAEohQChmgWfKOK5UXdWKZxkrFYjSiRpUTgAYcbyySnBXRmtBOsdKNkFX492t73YxcK_XTahsfGNjuyFoyYHlmaRZlJf_5Kob_CaG05IxERsjMqLrEVW-C8Fbp7fji5oS_VOqjqXqsdSIL0a8Cn3n_yQQJbnMKPsG1apzog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>833610908</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Collateral Values by Asset Class: Evidence from Primary Securities Dealers</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Bartolini, Leonardo ; Hilton, Spence ; Sundaresan, Suresh ; Tonetti, Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>Bartolini, Leonardo ; Hilton, Spence ; Sundaresan, Suresh ; Tonetti, Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>Using data on repurchase agreements by primary securities dealers, we show that three classes of securities (Treasury securities, securities issued by government-sponsored agencies, and mortgage-backed securities) can be formally ranked in terms of their collateral values in the general collateral (GC) market. We then show that GC repurchase agreement (repo) spreads across asset classes display jumps and significant temporal variation, especially at times of predictable liquidity needs, consistent with the "safe haven" properties of Treasury securities: These jumps are driven almost entirely by the behavior of the GC repo rates of Treasury securities. Estimating the "collateral rents" earned by owners of these securities, we find such rents to be sizable for Treasury securities and nearly zero for agency and mortgage-backed securities. Finally, we link collateral values to asset prices in a simple no-arbitrage framework and show that variations in collateral values explain a significant fraction of changes in short-term yield spreads but not those of longer-term spreads.Our results point to securities' role as collateral as a promising direction of research to improve understanding of the pricing of money market securities and their spreads.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-9454</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-7368</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhq108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Arbitrage ; Asset pricing ; Cash ; Collateral ; Data security ; Estimation ; Financial securities ; Liquidity ; Market analysis ; Measurement ; Mortgage backed securities ; Mortgages ; National treasuries ; Quarterly estimates ; Repurchase agreement ; Repurchase agreements ; Securities issues ; Security prices ; Spread ; Studies ; Treasuries ; Valuation</subject><ispartof>The Review of financial studies, 2011-01, Vol.24 (1), p.248-278</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 The Society for Financial Studies</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Jan 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f444b664693e4529af599dcd95223b946bf6d49704430f5ce965fb3e4e48ff3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f444b664693e4529af599dcd95223b946bf6d49704430f5ce965fb3e4e48ff3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40985821$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40985821$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bartolini, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilton, Spence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundaresan, Suresh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonetti, Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>Collateral Values by Asset Class: Evidence from Primary Securities Dealers</title><title>The Review of financial studies</title><description>Using data on repurchase agreements by primary securities dealers, we show that three classes of securities (Treasury securities, securities issued by government-sponsored agencies, and mortgage-backed securities) can be formally ranked in terms of their collateral values in the general collateral (GC) market. We then show that GC repurchase agreement (repo) spreads across asset classes display jumps and significant temporal variation, especially at times of predictable liquidity needs, consistent with the "safe haven" properties of Treasury securities: These jumps are driven almost entirely by the behavior of the GC repo rates of Treasury securities. Estimating the "collateral rents" earned by owners of these securities, we find such rents to be sizable for Treasury securities and nearly zero for agency and mortgage-backed securities. Finally, we link collateral values to asset prices in a simple no-arbitrage framework and show that variations in collateral values explain a significant fraction of changes in short-term yield spreads but not those of longer-term spreads.Our results point to securities' role as collateral as a promising direction of research to improve understanding of the pricing of money market securities and their spreads.</description><subject>Arbitrage</subject><subject>Asset pricing</subject><subject>Cash</subject><subject>Collateral</subject><subject>Data security</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Financial securities</subject><subject>Liquidity</subject><subject>Market analysis</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Mortgage backed securities</subject><subject>Mortgages</subject><subject>National treasuries</subject><subject>Quarterly estimates</subject><subject>Repurchase agreement</subject><subject>Repurchase agreements</subject><subject>Securities issues</subject><subject>Security prices</subject><subject>Spread</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Treasuries</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><issn>0893-9454</issn><issn>1465-7368</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0M9LwzAUB_AgCtbpxbsQvAhCXdK8pIm3UecvBgr-uIa0TVhHt25JK-y_N1Lx4OldPu_xfV-Ezim5oUSxqXdhulzuKJEHKKEgeJozIQ9RQqRiqQIOx-gkhBUhhDIgCXouurY1vfWmxZ-mHWzA5R7PQrA9LloTwi2efzW13VQWO9-t8atv1sbv8ZutBt_0TVy4s6a1PpyiI2faYM9-5wR93M_fi8d08fLwVMwWacVy3qcOAEohQChmgWfKOK5UXdWKZxkrFYjSiRpUTgAYcbyySnBXRmtBOsdKNkFX492t73YxcK_XTahsfGNjuyFoyYHlmaRZlJf_5Kob_CaG05IxERsjMqLrEVW-C8Fbp7fji5oS_VOqjqXqsdSIL0a8Cn3n_yQQJbnMKPsG1apzog</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Bartolini, Leonardo</creator><creator>Hilton, Spence</creator><creator>Sundaresan, Suresh</creator><creator>Tonetti, Christopher</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Collateral Values by Asset Class: Evidence from Primary Securities Dealers</title><author>Bartolini, Leonardo ; Hilton, Spence ; Sundaresan, Suresh ; Tonetti, Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f444b664693e4529af599dcd95223b946bf6d49704430f5ce965fb3e4e48ff3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Arbitrage</topic><topic>Asset pricing</topic><topic>Cash</topic><topic>Collateral</topic><topic>Data security</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Financial securities</topic><topic>Liquidity</topic><topic>Market analysis</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Mortgage backed securities</topic><topic>Mortgages</topic><topic>National treasuries</topic><topic>Quarterly estimates</topic><topic>Repurchase agreement</topic><topic>Repurchase agreements</topic><topic>Securities issues</topic><topic>Security prices</topic><topic>Spread</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Treasuries</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bartolini, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilton, Spence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundaresan, Suresh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonetti, Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Review of financial studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bartolini, Leonardo</au><au>Hilton, Spence</au><au>Sundaresan, Suresh</au><au>Tonetti, Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Collateral Values by Asset Class: Evidence from Primary Securities Dealers</atitle><jtitle>The Review of financial studies</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>248</spage><epage>278</epage><pages>248-278</pages><issn>0893-9454</issn><eissn>1465-7368</eissn><abstract>Using data on repurchase agreements by primary securities dealers, we show that three classes of securities (Treasury securities, securities issued by government-sponsored agencies, and mortgage-backed securities) can be formally ranked in terms of their collateral values in the general collateral (GC) market. We then show that GC repurchase agreement (repo) spreads across asset classes display jumps and significant temporal variation, especially at times of predictable liquidity needs, consistent with the "safe haven" properties of Treasury securities: These jumps are driven almost entirely by the behavior of the GC repo rates of Treasury securities. Estimating the "collateral rents" earned by owners of these securities, we find such rents to be sizable for Treasury securities and nearly zero for agency and mortgage-backed securities. Finally, we link collateral values to asset prices in a simple no-arbitrage framework and show that variations in collateral values explain a significant fraction of changes in short-term yield spreads but not those of longer-term spreads.Our results point to securities' role as collateral as a promising direction of research to improve understanding of the pricing of money market securities and their spreads.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/rfs/hhq108</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0893-9454 |
ispartof | The Review of financial studies, 2011-01, Vol.24 (1), p.248-278 |
issn | 0893-9454 1465-7368 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_854372812 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Arbitrage Asset pricing Cash Collateral Data security Estimation Financial securities Liquidity Market analysis Measurement Mortgage backed securities Mortgages National treasuries Quarterly estimates Repurchase agreement Repurchase agreements Securities issues Security prices Spread Studies Treasuries Valuation |
title | Collateral Values by Asset Class: Evidence from Primary Securities Dealers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T20%3A59%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Collateral%20Values%20by%20Asset%20Class:%20Evidence%20from%20Primary%20Securities%20Dealers&rft.jtitle=The%20Review%20of%20financial%20studies&rft.au=Bartolini,%20Leonardo&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=248&rft.epage=278&rft.pages=248-278&rft.issn=0893-9454&rft.eissn=1465-7368&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rfs/hhq108&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40985821%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=833610908&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40985821&rfr_iscdi=true |