Accuracy of Diagnostic Mammography and Breast Ultrasound During Pregnancy and Lactation
The purpose of this article is to determine the accuracy of mammography and sonography in evaluating pregnant, lactating, and postpartum women. We retrospectively reviewed diagnostic breast imaging examinations of 155 pregnant, lactating, and postpartum women with 164 lesions presenting to our breas...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of roentgenology (1976) 2011-03, Vol.196 (3), p.716-722 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 722 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 716 |
container_title | American journal of roentgenology (1976) |
container_volume | 196 |
creator | ROBBINS, Jessica JEFFRIES, Deborah ROUBIDOUX, Marilyn HELVIE, Mark |
description | The purpose of this article is to determine the accuracy of mammography and sonography in evaluating pregnant, lactating, and postpartum women.
We retrospectively reviewed diagnostic breast imaging examinations of 155 pregnant, lactating, and postpartum women with 164 lesions presenting to our breast imaging department from 2004 to 2005. Records were reviewed for clinical presentation, reported sonographic or mammographic findings with BI-RADS assessment, histologic results, and clinical outcomes. Examinations rated as BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 were considered positive. One hundred thirty-four (82%) of 164 lesions had pathology results available or longer than 12 months follow-up in our study group. Of these lesions, 12 (9%) were evaluated by mammography alone, 49 (37%) were evaluated by ultrasound alone, and 73 (54%) were evaluated by both techniques.
Of 134 lesions, 87 (65%) were in patients who presented during lactation, 34 (25%) who presented during pregnancy, and 13 (10%) who presented postpartum. The presenting symptom for 86 lesions (64%) was a palpable mass. Biopsies were performed for 40 lesions. Of these lesions, four were malignant and 36 were benign. Mammograms were dense or heterogeneously dense in 88% of patients. All four malignancies were BI-RADS category 4 or 5 according to both mammography and ultrasound. For the 85 lesions evaluated with mammography, there was 100% sensitivity, 93% specificity, 40% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. For the 122 lesions evaluated with sonography, there was 100% sensitivity, 86% specificity, 19% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value.
Among lactating and pregnant women, both mammography and sonography had a negative predictive value of 100% and accurately revealed the few cancers that were present in our study group. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2214/AJR.09.3662 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_853677084</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>853677084</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-6d24f5a35d58d5a884839b752729984860d03beababd748d67706766b9ac714e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LwzAYwPEgipvTk3fpRRSkM29N0uPcfGWiiENv5Wma1kpfZtIe9u3N2NSbp5Dwy_PAH6FjgseUEn45eXgZ43jMhKA7aEgiLkJGONlFQ8wECRVm7wN04NwnxliqWO6jASWMs4ioIXqbaN1b0KugzYNZCUXTuq7UwSPUdVtYWH6sAmiy4MoacF2wqDoLru39y6y3ZVMEz9YUDTR6w-agO-jKtjlEezlUzhxtzxFa3Fy_Tu_C-dPt_XQyD7Xf34UiozyPgEVZpLIIlOKKxamMqKRx7C8CZ5ilBlJIM8lVJqTEQgqRxqAl4YaN0Nlm7tK2X71xXVKXTpuqgsa0vUtUxNZ_FPfy_F9JMJF-paDS04sN1bZ1zpo8WdqyBrvyKFk3T3zzBMfJurnXJ9vBfVqb7Nf-RPbgdAvAaahy63OV7s-xmAhKOfsGxC2H5Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1017984627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of Diagnostic Mammography and Breast Ultrasound During Pregnancy and Lactation</title><source>American Roentgen Ray Society</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>ROBBINS, Jessica ; JEFFRIES, Deborah ; ROUBIDOUX, Marilyn ; HELVIE, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>ROBBINS, Jessica ; JEFFRIES, Deborah ; ROUBIDOUX, Marilyn ; HELVIE, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this article is to determine the accuracy of mammography and sonography in evaluating pregnant, lactating, and postpartum women.
We retrospectively reviewed diagnostic breast imaging examinations of 155 pregnant, lactating, and postpartum women with 164 lesions presenting to our breast imaging department from 2004 to 2005. Records were reviewed for clinical presentation, reported sonographic or mammographic findings with BI-RADS assessment, histologic results, and clinical outcomes. Examinations rated as BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 were considered positive. One hundred thirty-four (82%) of 164 lesions had pathology results available or longer than 12 months follow-up in our study group. Of these lesions, 12 (9%) were evaluated by mammography alone, 49 (37%) were evaluated by ultrasound alone, and 73 (54%) were evaluated by both techniques.
Of 134 lesions, 87 (65%) were in patients who presented during lactation, 34 (25%) who presented during pregnancy, and 13 (10%) who presented postpartum. The presenting symptom for 86 lesions (64%) was a palpable mass. Biopsies were performed for 40 lesions. Of these lesions, four were malignant and 36 were benign. Mammograms were dense or heterogeneously dense in 88% of patients. All four malignancies were BI-RADS category 4 or 5 according to both mammography and ultrasound. For the 85 lesions evaluated with mammography, there was 100% sensitivity, 93% specificity, 40% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. For the 122 lesions evaluated with sonography, there was 100% sensitivity, 86% specificity, 19% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value.
Among lactating and pregnant women, both mammography and sonography had a negative predictive value of 100% and accurately revealed the few cancers that were present in our study group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-803X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-3141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3662</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21343518</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAJRDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Roentgen Ray Society</publisher><subject>Adult ; Benign ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Breast Diseases - diagnosis ; Breast Diseases - pathology ; Cancer ; Female ; Genital system. Mammary gland ; Humans ; imaging ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Lactation ; Malignancy ; Mammography ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Postpartum ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Pregnancy ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Ultrasonography, Mammary ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>American journal of roentgenology (1976), 2011-03, Vol.196 (3), p.716-722</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-6d24f5a35d58d5a884839b752729984860d03beababd748d67706766b9ac714e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-6d24f5a35d58d5a884839b752729984860d03beababd748d67706766b9ac714e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4106,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23916224$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21343518$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ROBBINS, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JEFFRIES, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROUBIDOUX, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HELVIE, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of Diagnostic Mammography and Breast Ultrasound During Pregnancy and Lactation</title><title>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</title><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><description>The purpose of this article is to determine the accuracy of mammography and sonography in evaluating pregnant, lactating, and postpartum women.
We retrospectively reviewed diagnostic breast imaging examinations of 155 pregnant, lactating, and postpartum women with 164 lesions presenting to our breast imaging department from 2004 to 2005. Records were reviewed for clinical presentation, reported sonographic or mammographic findings with BI-RADS assessment, histologic results, and clinical outcomes. Examinations rated as BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 were considered positive. One hundred thirty-four (82%) of 164 lesions had pathology results available or longer than 12 months follow-up in our study group. Of these lesions, 12 (9%) were evaluated by mammography alone, 49 (37%) were evaluated by ultrasound alone, and 73 (54%) were evaluated by both techniques.
Of 134 lesions, 87 (65%) were in patients who presented during lactation, 34 (25%) who presented during pregnancy, and 13 (10%) who presented postpartum. The presenting symptom for 86 lesions (64%) was a palpable mass. Biopsies were performed for 40 lesions. Of these lesions, four were malignant and 36 were benign. Mammograms were dense or heterogeneously dense in 88% of patients. All four malignancies were BI-RADS category 4 or 5 according to both mammography and ultrasound. For the 85 lesions evaluated with mammography, there was 100% sensitivity, 93% specificity, 40% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. For the 122 lesions evaluated with sonography, there was 100% sensitivity, 86% specificity, 19% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value.
Among lactating and pregnant women, both mammography and sonography had a negative predictive value of 100% and accurately revealed the few cancers that were present in our study group.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Benign</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Diseases - pathology</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genital system. Mammary gland</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>imaging</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Lactation</subject><subject>Malignancy</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postpartum</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Mammary</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0361-803X</issn><issn>1546-3141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1LwzAYwPEgipvTk3fpRRSkM29N0uPcfGWiiENv5Wma1kpfZtIe9u3N2NSbp5Dwy_PAH6FjgseUEn45eXgZ43jMhKA7aEgiLkJGONlFQ8wECRVm7wN04NwnxliqWO6jASWMs4ioIXqbaN1b0KugzYNZCUXTuq7UwSPUdVtYWH6sAmiy4MoacF2wqDoLru39y6y3ZVMEz9YUDTR6w-agO-jKtjlEezlUzhxtzxFa3Fy_Tu_C-dPt_XQyD7Xf34UiozyPgEVZpLIIlOKKxamMqKRx7C8CZ5ilBlJIM8lVJqTEQgqRxqAl4YaN0Nlm7tK2X71xXVKXTpuqgsa0vUtUxNZ_FPfy_F9JMJF-paDS04sN1bZ1zpo8WdqyBrvyKFk3T3zzBMfJurnXJ9vBfVqb7Nf-RPbgdAvAaahy63OV7s-xmAhKOfsGxC2H5Q</recordid><startdate>20110301</startdate><enddate>20110301</enddate><creator>ROBBINS, Jessica</creator><creator>JEFFRIES, Deborah</creator><creator>ROUBIDOUX, Marilyn</creator><creator>HELVIE, Mark</creator><general>American Roentgen Ray Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110301</creationdate><title>Accuracy of Diagnostic Mammography and Breast Ultrasound During Pregnancy and Lactation</title><author>ROBBINS, Jessica ; JEFFRIES, Deborah ; ROUBIDOUX, Marilyn ; HELVIE, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-6d24f5a35d58d5a884839b752729984860d03beababd748d67706766b9ac714e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Benign</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Diseases - pathology</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genital system. Mammary gland</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>imaging</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Lactation</topic><topic>Malignancy</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postpartum</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Mammary</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ROBBINS, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JEFFRIES, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROUBIDOUX, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HELVIE, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ROBBINS, Jessica</au><au>JEFFRIES, Deborah</au><au>ROUBIDOUX, Marilyn</au><au>HELVIE, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of Diagnostic Mammography and Breast Ultrasound During Pregnancy and Lactation</atitle><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><date>2011-03-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>196</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>716</spage><epage>722</epage><pages>716-722</pages><issn>0361-803X</issn><eissn>1546-3141</eissn><coden>AAJRDX</coden><abstract>The purpose of this article is to determine the accuracy of mammography and sonography in evaluating pregnant, lactating, and postpartum women.
We retrospectively reviewed diagnostic breast imaging examinations of 155 pregnant, lactating, and postpartum women with 164 lesions presenting to our breast imaging department from 2004 to 2005. Records were reviewed for clinical presentation, reported sonographic or mammographic findings with BI-RADS assessment, histologic results, and clinical outcomes. Examinations rated as BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 were considered positive. One hundred thirty-four (82%) of 164 lesions had pathology results available or longer than 12 months follow-up in our study group. Of these lesions, 12 (9%) were evaluated by mammography alone, 49 (37%) were evaluated by ultrasound alone, and 73 (54%) were evaluated by both techniques.
Of 134 lesions, 87 (65%) were in patients who presented during lactation, 34 (25%) who presented during pregnancy, and 13 (10%) who presented postpartum. The presenting symptom for 86 lesions (64%) was a palpable mass. Biopsies were performed for 40 lesions. Of these lesions, four were malignant and 36 were benign. Mammograms were dense or heterogeneously dense in 88% of patients. All four malignancies were BI-RADS category 4 or 5 according to both mammography and ultrasound. For the 85 lesions evaluated with mammography, there was 100% sensitivity, 93% specificity, 40% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. For the 122 lesions evaluated with sonography, there was 100% sensitivity, 86% specificity, 19% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value.
Among lactating and pregnant women, both mammography and sonography had a negative predictive value of 100% and accurately revealed the few cancers that were present in our study group.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Roentgen Ray Society</pub><pmid>21343518</pmid><doi>10.2214/AJR.09.3662</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0361-803X |
ispartof | American journal of roentgenology (1976), 2011-03, Vol.196 (3), p.716-722 |
issn | 0361-803X 1546-3141 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_853677084 |
source | American Roentgen Ray Society; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Benign Biological and medical sciences Biopsy Breast Diseases - diagnosis Breast Diseases - pathology Cancer Female Genital system. Mammary gland Humans imaging Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Lactation Malignancy Mammography Medical sciences Middle Aged Postpartum Predictive Value of Tests Pregnancy Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry Retrospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity Ultrasonography, Mammary Ultrasound |
title | Accuracy of Diagnostic Mammography and Breast Ultrasound During Pregnancy and Lactation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T15%3A16%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20Diagnostic%20Mammography%20and%20Breast%20Ultrasound%20During%20Pregnancy%20and%20Lactation&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20roentgenology%20(1976)&rft.au=ROBBINS,%20Jessica&rft.date=2011-03-01&rft.volume=196&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=716&rft.epage=722&rft.pages=716-722&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft.coden=AAJRDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214/AJR.09.3662&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E853677084%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1017984627&rft_id=info:pmid/21343518&rfr_iscdi=true |