Abundance of pathogenic bacteria and viral indicators in chlorinated effluents produced by four wastewater treatment plants in the Gauteng Province, South Africa

The failure of South African wastewater treatment plants to produce effluents of a high microbiological quality is a matter of great concern in terms of the pollution of water resources. This study aimed at assessing the effectiveness of 4 wastewater treatment plants in the Gauteng Province, namely...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water S. A. 2010-10, Vol.36 (5), p.607-614
Hauptverfasser: Momba, M.N.B., Dungeni, M., Van der Merwe, R.R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 614
container_issue 5
container_start_page 607
container_title Water S. A.
container_volume 36
creator Momba, M.N.B.
Dungeni, M.
Van der Merwe, R.R.
description The failure of South African wastewater treatment plants to produce effluents of a high microbiological quality is a matter of great concern in terms of the pollution of water resources. This study aimed at assessing the effectiveness of 4 wastewater treatment plants in the Gauteng Province, namely the Zeekoegat, Baviaanspoort, Rayton and Refilwe Water Care Works (WCW), in the removal of pathogenic bacteria and viral indicators. Also taken into consideration were free chlorine concentrations and turbidity levels, which were measured using standard methods. Conventional methods and / or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques were used to detect and identify pathogenic bacteria and coliphages. The turbidity ranged from 2.39 to 62.40 NTU and the concentrations of free chlorine ranged from 0.03 to1.60 mg·ℓ-1 for all plants. Despite high free chlorine residual concentrations in treated effluents, the survival and occurrence of Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium and Vibrio cholerae were significantly higher at Baviaanspoort (100%, 88.2% and 35.3%), Refilwe (87.5%, 59.4% and 21.9%) and Rayton (75%, 38.2% and 9.4%) compared to Zeekoegat, which only showed the survival of E. coli, at a much lower occurrence rate of 8.8%. Somatic and F-RNA coliphages were removed at 15.57 % and 13.96% for Baviaanspoort, 11.62% and 22.42% for Refilwe, 25% and 32.10% for Rayton, and 40.41% and 52.57% for Zeekoegat WCW. Significant correlations were found between pathogenic bacteria and coliphages at all plants (r = 0.765 for Baviaanspoort, r = 0.904 for Zeekoegat, r = 0.680 for Refilwe, r = 0.796 or the Rayton WCW, p < 0.01). A combination of sedimentation, rapid sand filtration and chlorination processes was found to be a major prerequisite for the reduction of turbidity levels and viral indicators and the successful removal of pathogenic bacteria in the Zeekoegat WCW. This study therefore suggests an upgrading of the wastwater treatment plants by including processes such as rapid sand filtration and UV disinfection, which have proved to be effective in the removal and inactivation of pathogenic bacteria and viruses.
doi_str_mv 10.4314/wsa.v36i5.61994
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_853479603</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sabinet_id>10520/EJC116739</sabinet_id><sourcerecordid>1651427094</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-417570325577c3468ad11c176d4d73a71d8949a75ce7948fcbe73b72a7314e3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpoOm2515FoTSH7kayZMs-LkuapgQSSHsWY2mcVfBKriTvkp_Tf1olm0PpoTAww_DM50vIB85WUnB5fkiw2ovG1auGd518RU6ZUO1SKtG-_it-Q96m9MBYJYTsTsnvdT97C94gDQOdIG_DPXpnaA8mY3RAwVu6dxFG6rx1BnKIqYTUbMcQnYeMluIwjDP6nOgUg51NSfWPdAhzpAdIGQ-FijRHhLwrGJ1GeIJLl7xFeglzRn9Pb2PYu7LJF3oX5ryl6yGWee_IyQBjwvcvfkF-fr34sfm2vL65vNqsr5dGsiovJVe1YqKqa6WMkE0LlnPDVWOlVQIUt20nO1C1QdXJdjA9KtGrClR5HgojFuTzsW854deMKeudSwbHsiqGOem2FlJ1DROFPPsvyZuay0qxThb04z_oQ3mKL3folstW1aLYgpwfIRNDShEHPUW3g_ioOdNP2uqirX7WVj9rWyo-HSsS9M5j1glwmvvC1xXTF983nDdKdOIPJWGmGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>814875375</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Abundance of pathogenic bacteria and viral indicators in chlorinated effluents produced by four wastewater treatment plants in the Gauteng Province, South Africa</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>African Journals Online (Open Access)</source><source>Sabinet African Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Momba, M.N.B. ; Dungeni, M. ; Van der Merwe, R.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Momba, M.N.B. ; Dungeni, M. ; Van der Merwe, R.R.</creatorcontrib><description>The failure of South African wastewater treatment plants to produce effluents of a high microbiological quality is a matter of great concern in terms of the pollution of water resources. This study aimed at assessing the effectiveness of 4 wastewater treatment plants in the Gauteng Province, namely the Zeekoegat, Baviaanspoort, Rayton and Refilwe Water Care Works (WCW), in the removal of pathogenic bacteria and viral indicators. Also taken into consideration were free chlorine concentrations and turbidity levels, which were measured using standard methods. Conventional methods and / or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques were used to detect and identify pathogenic bacteria and coliphages. The turbidity ranged from 2.39 to 62.40 NTU and the concentrations of free chlorine ranged from 0.03 to1.60 mg·ℓ-1 for all plants. Despite high free chlorine residual concentrations in treated effluents, the survival and occurrence of Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium and Vibrio cholerae were significantly higher at Baviaanspoort (100%, 88.2% and 35.3%), Refilwe (87.5%, 59.4% and 21.9%) and Rayton (75%, 38.2% and 9.4%) compared to Zeekoegat, which only showed the survival of E. coli, at a much lower occurrence rate of 8.8%. Somatic and F-RNA coliphages were removed at 15.57 % and 13.96% for Baviaanspoort, 11.62% and 22.42% for Refilwe, 25% and 32.10% for Rayton, and 40.41% and 52.57% for Zeekoegat WCW. Significant correlations were found between pathogenic bacteria and coliphages at all plants (r = 0.765 for Baviaanspoort, r = 0.904 for Zeekoegat, r = 0.680 for Refilwe, r = 0.796 or the Rayton WCW, p &lt; 0.01). A combination of sedimentation, rapid sand filtration and chlorination processes was found to be a major prerequisite for the reduction of turbidity levels and viral indicators and the successful removal of pathogenic bacteria in the Zeekoegat WCW. This study therefore suggests an upgrading of the wastwater treatment plants by including processes such as rapid sand filtration and UV disinfection, which have proved to be effective in the removal and inactivation of pathogenic bacteria and viruses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-4738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0378-4738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4314/wsa.v36i5.61994</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Gezina: Water Research Commission (WRC)</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Chlorination ; Chlorine ; E coli ; Effluent ; Effluent treatment ; Effluents ; Escherichia coli ; Filtration ; Inactivation ; Indicators ; Microorganisms ; Pathogenic bacteria ; Salmonella typhimurium ; Sand ; Tshwane University of Technology ; Turbidity ; Ultraviolet radiation ; Vibrio cholerae ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewater treatment plants ; Water pollution ; Water quality ; Water resources ; Water treatment plants</subject><ispartof>Water S. A., 2010-10, Vol.36 (5), p.607-614</ispartof><rights>Copyright Water Research Commission Oct 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-417570325577c3468ad11c176d4d73a71d8949a75ce7948fcbe73b72a7314e3c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925,39242</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Momba, M.N.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dungeni, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van der Merwe, R.R.</creatorcontrib><title>Abundance of pathogenic bacteria and viral indicators in chlorinated effluents produced by four wastewater treatment plants in the Gauteng Province, South Africa</title><title>Water S. A.</title><description>The failure of South African wastewater treatment plants to produce effluents of a high microbiological quality is a matter of great concern in terms of the pollution of water resources. This study aimed at assessing the effectiveness of 4 wastewater treatment plants in the Gauteng Province, namely the Zeekoegat, Baviaanspoort, Rayton and Refilwe Water Care Works (WCW), in the removal of pathogenic bacteria and viral indicators. Also taken into consideration were free chlorine concentrations and turbidity levels, which were measured using standard methods. Conventional methods and / or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques were used to detect and identify pathogenic bacteria and coliphages. The turbidity ranged from 2.39 to 62.40 NTU and the concentrations of free chlorine ranged from 0.03 to1.60 mg·ℓ-1 for all plants. Despite high free chlorine residual concentrations in treated effluents, the survival and occurrence of Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium and Vibrio cholerae were significantly higher at Baviaanspoort (100%, 88.2% and 35.3%), Refilwe (87.5%, 59.4% and 21.9%) and Rayton (75%, 38.2% and 9.4%) compared to Zeekoegat, which only showed the survival of E. coli, at a much lower occurrence rate of 8.8%. Somatic and F-RNA coliphages were removed at 15.57 % and 13.96% for Baviaanspoort, 11.62% and 22.42% for Refilwe, 25% and 32.10% for Rayton, and 40.41% and 52.57% for Zeekoegat WCW. Significant correlations were found between pathogenic bacteria and coliphages at all plants (r = 0.765 for Baviaanspoort, r = 0.904 for Zeekoegat, r = 0.680 for Refilwe, r = 0.796 or the Rayton WCW, p &lt; 0.01). A combination of sedimentation, rapid sand filtration and chlorination processes was found to be a major prerequisite for the reduction of turbidity levels and viral indicators and the successful removal of pathogenic bacteria in the Zeekoegat WCW. This study therefore suggests an upgrading of the wastwater treatment plants by including processes such as rapid sand filtration and UV disinfection, which have proved to be effective in the removal and inactivation of pathogenic bacteria and viruses.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Chlorination</subject><subject>Chlorine</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Effluent</subject><subject>Effluent treatment</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Filtration</subject><subject>Inactivation</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Pathogenic bacteria</subject><subject>Salmonella typhimurium</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Tshwane University of Technology</subject><subject>Turbidity</subject><subject>Ultraviolet radiation</subject><subject>Vibrio cholerae</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment plants</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water treatment plants</subject><issn>0378-4738</issn><issn>0378-4738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JRA</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVpoOm2515FoTSH7kayZMs-LkuapgQSSHsWY2mcVfBKriTvkp_Tf1olm0PpoTAww_DM50vIB85WUnB5fkiw2ovG1auGd518RU6ZUO1SKtG-_it-Q96m9MBYJYTsTsnvdT97C94gDQOdIG_DPXpnaA8mY3RAwVu6dxFG6rx1BnKIqYTUbMcQnYeMluIwjDP6nOgUg51NSfWPdAhzpAdIGQ-FijRHhLwrGJ1GeIJLl7xFeglzRn9Pb2PYu7LJF3oX5ryl6yGWee_IyQBjwvcvfkF-fr34sfm2vL65vNqsr5dGsiovJVe1YqKqa6WMkE0LlnPDVWOlVQIUt20nO1C1QdXJdjA9KtGrClR5HgojFuTzsW854deMKeudSwbHsiqGOem2FlJ1DROFPPsvyZuay0qxThb04z_oQ3mKL3folstW1aLYgpwfIRNDShEHPUW3g_ioOdNP2uqirX7WVj9rWyo-HSsS9M5j1glwmvvC1xXTF983nDdKdOIPJWGmGA</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Momba, M.N.B.</creator><creator>Dungeni, M.</creator><creator>Van der Merwe, R.R.</creator><general>Water Research Commission (WRC)</general><general>Water Research Commission</general><scope>AEIZH</scope><scope>JRA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>Abundance of pathogenic bacteria and viral indicators in chlorinated effluents produced by four wastewater treatment plants in the Gauteng Province, South Africa</title><author>Momba, M.N.B. ; Dungeni, M. ; Van der Merwe, R.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-417570325577c3468ad11c176d4d73a71d8949a75ce7948fcbe73b72a7314e3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Chlorination</topic><topic>Chlorine</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Effluent</topic><topic>Effluent treatment</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Filtration</topic><topic>Inactivation</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Pathogenic bacteria</topic><topic>Salmonella typhimurium</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Tshwane University of Technology</topic><topic>Turbidity</topic><topic>Ultraviolet radiation</topic><topic>Vibrio cholerae</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment plants</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water treatment plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Momba, M.N.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dungeni, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van der Merwe, R.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sabinet:Open Access</collection><collection>Sabinet African Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East &amp; Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water S. A.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Momba, M.N.B.</au><au>Dungeni, M.</au><au>Van der Merwe, R.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Abundance of pathogenic bacteria and viral indicators in chlorinated effluents produced by four wastewater treatment plants in the Gauteng Province, South Africa</atitle><jtitle>Water S. A.</jtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>607</spage><epage>614</epage><pages>607-614</pages><issn>0378-4738</issn><eissn>0378-4738</eissn><abstract>The failure of South African wastewater treatment plants to produce effluents of a high microbiological quality is a matter of great concern in terms of the pollution of water resources. This study aimed at assessing the effectiveness of 4 wastewater treatment plants in the Gauteng Province, namely the Zeekoegat, Baviaanspoort, Rayton and Refilwe Water Care Works (WCW), in the removal of pathogenic bacteria and viral indicators. Also taken into consideration were free chlorine concentrations and turbidity levels, which were measured using standard methods. Conventional methods and / or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques were used to detect and identify pathogenic bacteria and coliphages. The turbidity ranged from 2.39 to 62.40 NTU and the concentrations of free chlorine ranged from 0.03 to1.60 mg·ℓ-1 for all plants. Despite high free chlorine residual concentrations in treated effluents, the survival and occurrence of Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium and Vibrio cholerae were significantly higher at Baviaanspoort (100%, 88.2% and 35.3%), Refilwe (87.5%, 59.4% and 21.9%) and Rayton (75%, 38.2% and 9.4%) compared to Zeekoegat, which only showed the survival of E. coli, at a much lower occurrence rate of 8.8%. Somatic and F-RNA coliphages were removed at 15.57 % and 13.96% for Baviaanspoort, 11.62% and 22.42% for Refilwe, 25% and 32.10% for Rayton, and 40.41% and 52.57% for Zeekoegat WCW. Significant correlations were found between pathogenic bacteria and coliphages at all plants (r = 0.765 for Baviaanspoort, r = 0.904 for Zeekoegat, r = 0.680 for Refilwe, r = 0.796 or the Rayton WCW, p &lt; 0.01). A combination of sedimentation, rapid sand filtration and chlorination processes was found to be a major prerequisite for the reduction of turbidity levels and viral indicators and the successful removal of pathogenic bacteria in the Zeekoegat WCW. This study therefore suggests an upgrading of the wastwater treatment plants by including processes such as rapid sand filtration and UV disinfection, which have proved to be effective in the removal and inactivation of pathogenic bacteria and viruses.</abstract><cop>Gezina</cop><pub>Water Research Commission (WRC)</pub><doi>10.4314/wsa.v36i5.61994</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-4738
ispartof Water S. A., 2010-10, Vol.36 (5), p.607-614
issn 0378-4738
0378-4738
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_853479603
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; African Journals Online (Open Access); Sabinet African Journals Open Access Collection; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Bacteria
Chlorination
Chlorine
E coli
Effluent
Effluent treatment
Effluents
Escherichia coli
Filtration
Inactivation
Indicators
Microorganisms
Pathogenic bacteria
Salmonella typhimurium
Sand
Tshwane University of Technology
Turbidity
Ultraviolet radiation
Vibrio cholerae
Wastewater
Wastewater treatment
Wastewater treatment plants
Water pollution
Water quality
Water resources
Water treatment plants
title Abundance of pathogenic bacteria and viral indicators in chlorinated effluents produced by four wastewater treatment plants in the Gauteng Province, South Africa
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T09%3A27%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Abundance%20of%20pathogenic%20bacteria%20and%20viral%20indicators%20in%20chlorinated%20effluents%20produced%20by%20four%20wastewater%20treatment%20plants%20in%20the%20Gauteng%20Province,%20South%20Africa&rft.jtitle=Water%20S.%20A.&rft.au=Momba,%20M.N.B.&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=607&rft.epage=614&rft.pages=607-614&rft.issn=0378-4738&rft.eissn=0378-4738&rft_id=info:doi/10.4314/wsa.v36i5.61994&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1651427094%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=814875375&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sabinet_id=10520/EJC116739&rfr_iscdi=true