Comparative assessment of widespread irrigation with low quality mine-water in undisturbed and rehabilitated mine-lands in the upper Olifants using the ACRU2000 model

The ACRU agrohydrological model, in the form of ACRU2000 and its salinity module, ACRUSalinity, was employed in catchment-scale assessment of widespread irrigation with low quality mine-water in undisturbed (un-mined) and rehabilitated soils in the Upper Olifants basin of South Africa. The study are...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water S. A. 2010-10, Vol.36 (5), p.543-552
Hauptverfasser: Aken, M., Annandale, J.G., Lorentz, S.A., Westhuizen, A., Idowu, O.A., Thornton-Dibb, S.L.C., McCartney, M.P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 552
container_issue 5
container_start_page 543
container_title Water S. A.
container_volume 36
creator Aken, M.
Annandale, J.G.
Lorentz, S.A.
Westhuizen, A.
Idowu, O.A.
Thornton-Dibb, S.L.C.
McCartney, M.P.
description The ACRU agrohydrological model, in the form of ACRU2000 and its salinity module, ACRUSalinity, was employed in catchment-scale assessment of widespread irrigation with low quality mine-water in undisturbed (un-mined) and rehabilitated soils in the Upper Olifants basin of South Africa. The study area comprised a small catchment of 4.7 km2 located in a coal-mine environment, known as the Tweefontein Pan catchment. The catchment drained to a surface reservoir (Tweefontein Reservoir) of maximum capacity and surface area 4 000 Mℓ and 1.5 km2, respectively. The catchment was instrumented to measure hydrodynamic responses and simulated as a hydrological system. Consideration was given to runoff, groundwater storage, evapotranspiration, baseflow, interception, irrigation water supply and rainfall, thereby accounting for all the dominant hydrological components of the system. Three scenarios were simulated using the available records for 5 years (1999 to 2004). The first was a baseline scenario representing the prevailing condition in the study area and the other 2 scenarios represented widespread irrigation with the mine-water on undisturbed and rehabilitated soils. In simulating the widespread irrigation on rehabilitated soils, a distinction was made between a rehabilitated irrigated area before and after the re-establishment of the equilibrium water table. Comparison of the results from the simulated scenarios indicated that a greater undisturbed area (max of 160 ha) than rehabilitated area (max of 120 ha) could be irrigated with mine-water from the Tweefontein Reservoir. Irrigation on rehabilitated soils depleted the water in the reservoir more rapidly than irrigation on undisturbed soils, due to lower runoff and higher ingress to groundwater in rehabilitated areas.
doi_str_mv 10.4314/wsa.v36i5.61988
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_853479203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sabinet_id>10520/EJC116745</sabinet_id><sourcerecordid>1651429864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3a27dee09956237d35347ee4c667f889be13d22c7e3fab8add10d60ed88687d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90ctu1DAUBuAIgUQprNlaSAg2mfoW21lWo5aLKlVCdG058UnHVeKkPk5HfSGeE88MC8SClS37O8eXv6reM7qRgsmLPbrNk1Ch2SjWGvOiOqNCm1pqYV7-NX9dvUF8oJQLIduz6td2nhaXXA5PQBwiIE4QM5kHsg8ecEngPAkphfti5lhW846M8548rm4M-ZlMIUK9dxkSCZGs0QfMa-rAExc9SbBzXSiwAH-yY1nHg807IOuylMLbMQwuZiQrhnh_3Ljc_rjjlFIyzR7Gt9WrwY0I7_6M59Xd9dXP7df65vbLt-3lTd2LRuVaOK49AG3bRnGhvWiE1ACyV0oPxrQdMOE57zWIwXXGec-oVxS8Mcpoz8R59enUd0nz4wqY7RSwh7HcGeYVrTk0bDkVRX7-r2SqYZK3RslCP_xDH-Y1xfIOa5g0mitxOPnihPo0IyYY7JLC5NKzZdQeArYlYHsM2B4DLhUfTxVYfjhCtuhgWbviG07t1fctY0rLRvwGbieoSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>814872631</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative assessment of widespread irrigation with low quality mine-water in undisturbed and rehabilitated mine-lands in the upper Olifants using the ACRU2000 model</title><source>African Journals Online (Open Access)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sabinet African Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Aken, M. ; Annandale, J.G. ; Lorentz, S.A. ; Westhuizen, A. ; Idowu, O.A. ; Thornton-Dibb, S.L.C. ; McCartney, M.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aken, M. ; Annandale, J.G. ; Lorentz, S.A. ; Westhuizen, A. ; Idowu, O.A. ; Thornton-Dibb, S.L.C. ; McCartney, M.P.</creatorcontrib><description>The ACRU agrohydrological model, in the form of ACRU2000 and its salinity module, ACRUSalinity, was employed in catchment-scale assessment of widespread irrigation with low quality mine-water in undisturbed (un-mined) and rehabilitated soils in the Upper Olifants basin of South Africa. The study area comprised a small catchment of 4.7 km2 located in a coal-mine environment, known as the Tweefontein Pan catchment. The catchment drained to a surface reservoir (Tweefontein Reservoir) of maximum capacity and surface area 4 000 Mℓ and 1.5 km2, respectively. The catchment was instrumented to measure hydrodynamic responses and simulated as a hydrological system. Consideration was given to runoff, groundwater storage, evapotranspiration, baseflow, interception, irrigation water supply and rainfall, thereby accounting for all the dominant hydrological components of the system. Three scenarios were simulated using the available records for 5 years (1999 to 2004). The first was a baseline scenario representing the prevailing condition in the study area and the other 2 scenarios represented widespread irrigation with the mine-water on undisturbed and rehabilitated soils. In simulating the widespread irrigation on rehabilitated soils, a distinction was made between a rehabilitated irrigated area before and after the re-establishment of the equilibrium water table. Comparison of the results from the simulated scenarios indicated that a greater undisturbed area (max of 160 ha) than rehabilitated area (max of 120 ha) could be irrigated with mine-water from the Tweefontein Reservoir. Irrigation on rehabilitated soils depleted the water in the reservoir more rapidly than irrigation on undisturbed soils, due to lower runoff and higher ingress to groundwater in rehabilitated areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-4738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0378-4738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4314/wsa.v36i5.61988</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Gezina: Water Research Commission (WRC)</publisher><subject>ACRU2000 ; Assessments ; Base flow ; Catchment scale ; Catchments ; Coal mines ; Evapotranspiration ; Groundwater runoff ; Groundwater storage ; Hydrological assessment ; Hydrology ; Interception ; Irrigation ; Irrigation water ; Mine-water ; Mined land irrigation ; Reservoirs ; River basins ; Runoff ; Simulation ; Soil sciences ; Soils ; University of KwaZulu-Natal ; University of Pretoria ; Upper Olifants ; Water resources ; Water supply ; Water table ; Widespread irrigation</subject><ispartof>Water S. A., 2010-10, Vol.36 (5), p.543-552</ispartof><rights>Copyright Water Research Commission Oct 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902,39219</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aken, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Annandale, J.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorentz, S.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westhuizen, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idowu, O.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornton-Dibb, S.L.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCartney, M.P.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative assessment of widespread irrigation with low quality mine-water in undisturbed and rehabilitated mine-lands in the upper Olifants using the ACRU2000 model</title><title>Water S. A.</title><description>The ACRU agrohydrological model, in the form of ACRU2000 and its salinity module, ACRUSalinity, was employed in catchment-scale assessment of widespread irrigation with low quality mine-water in undisturbed (un-mined) and rehabilitated soils in the Upper Olifants basin of South Africa. The study area comprised a small catchment of 4.7 km2 located in a coal-mine environment, known as the Tweefontein Pan catchment. The catchment drained to a surface reservoir (Tweefontein Reservoir) of maximum capacity and surface area 4 000 Mℓ and 1.5 km2, respectively. The catchment was instrumented to measure hydrodynamic responses and simulated as a hydrological system. Consideration was given to runoff, groundwater storage, evapotranspiration, baseflow, interception, irrigation water supply and rainfall, thereby accounting for all the dominant hydrological components of the system. Three scenarios were simulated using the available records for 5 years (1999 to 2004). The first was a baseline scenario representing the prevailing condition in the study area and the other 2 scenarios represented widespread irrigation with the mine-water on undisturbed and rehabilitated soils. In simulating the widespread irrigation on rehabilitated soils, a distinction was made between a rehabilitated irrigated area before and after the re-establishment of the equilibrium water table. Comparison of the results from the simulated scenarios indicated that a greater undisturbed area (max of 160 ha) than rehabilitated area (max of 120 ha) could be irrigated with mine-water from the Tweefontein Reservoir. Irrigation on rehabilitated soils depleted the water in the reservoir more rapidly than irrigation on undisturbed soils, due to lower runoff and higher ingress to groundwater in rehabilitated areas.</description><subject>ACRU2000</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Base flow</subject><subject>Catchment scale</subject><subject>Catchments</subject><subject>Coal mines</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Groundwater runoff</subject><subject>Groundwater storage</subject><subject>Hydrological assessment</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Interception</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Irrigation water</subject><subject>Mine-water</subject><subject>Mined land irrigation</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Soil sciences</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>University of KwaZulu-Natal</subject><subject>University of Pretoria</subject><subject>Upper Olifants</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><subject>Water table</subject><subject>Widespread irrigation</subject><issn>0378-4738</issn><issn>0378-4738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JRA</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp90ctu1DAUBuAIgUQprNlaSAg2mfoW21lWo5aLKlVCdG058UnHVeKkPk5HfSGeE88MC8SClS37O8eXv6reM7qRgsmLPbrNk1Ch2SjWGvOiOqNCm1pqYV7-NX9dvUF8oJQLIduz6td2nhaXXA5PQBwiIE4QM5kHsg8ecEngPAkphfti5lhW846M8548rm4M-ZlMIUK9dxkSCZGs0QfMa-rAExc9SbBzXSiwAH-yY1nHg807IOuylMLbMQwuZiQrhnh_3Ljc_rjjlFIyzR7Gt9WrwY0I7_6M59Xd9dXP7df65vbLt-3lTd2LRuVaOK49AG3bRnGhvWiE1ACyV0oPxrQdMOE57zWIwXXGec-oVxS8Mcpoz8R59enUd0nz4wqY7RSwh7HcGeYVrTk0bDkVRX7-r2SqYZK3RslCP_xDH-Y1xfIOa5g0mitxOPnihPo0IyYY7JLC5NKzZdQeArYlYHsM2B4DLhUfTxVYfjhCtuhgWbviG07t1fctY0rLRvwGbieoSg</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Aken, M.</creator><creator>Annandale, J.G.</creator><creator>Lorentz, S.A.</creator><creator>Westhuizen, A.</creator><creator>Idowu, O.A.</creator><creator>Thornton-Dibb, S.L.C.</creator><creator>McCartney, M.P.</creator><general>Water Research Commission (WRC)</general><general>Water Research Commission</general><scope>AEIZH</scope><scope>JRA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>H96</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>Comparative assessment of widespread irrigation with low quality mine-water in undisturbed and rehabilitated mine-lands in the upper Olifants using the ACRU2000 model</title><author>Aken, M. ; Annandale, J.G. ; Lorentz, S.A. ; Westhuizen, A. ; Idowu, O.A. ; Thornton-Dibb, S.L.C. ; McCartney, M.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3a27dee09956237d35347ee4c667f889be13d22c7e3fab8add10d60ed88687d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>ACRU2000</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Base flow</topic><topic>Catchment scale</topic><topic>Catchments</topic><topic>Coal mines</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Groundwater runoff</topic><topic>Groundwater storage</topic><topic>Hydrological assessment</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Interception</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Irrigation water</topic><topic>Mine-water</topic><topic>Mined land irrigation</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Soil sciences</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>University of KwaZulu-Natal</topic><topic>University of Pretoria</topic><topic>Upper Olifants</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><topic>Water table</topic><topic>Widespread irrigation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aken, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Annandale, J.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorentz, S.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westhuizen, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idowu, O.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornton-Dibb, S.L.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCartney, M.P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sabinet:Open Access</collection><collection>Sabinet African Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East &amp; Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><jtitle>Water S. A.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aken, M.</au><au>Annandale, J.G.</au><au>Lorentz, S.A.</au><au>Westhuizen, A.</au><au>Idowu, O.A.</au><au>Thornton-Dibb, S.L.C.</au><au>McCartney, M.P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative assessment of widespread irrigation with low quality mine-water in undisturbed and rehabilitated mine-lands in the upper Olifants using the ACRU2000 model</atitle><jtitle>Water S. A.</jtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>543</spage><epage>552</epage><pages>543-552</pages><issn>0378-4738</issn><eissn>0378-4738</eissn><abstract>The ACRU agrohydrological model, in the form of ACRU2000 and its salinity module, ACRUSalinity, was employed in catchment-scale assessment of widespread irrigation with low quality mine-water in undisturbed (un-mined) and rehabilitated soils in the Upper Olifants basin of South Africa. The study area comprised a small catchment of 4.7 km2 located in a coal-mine environment, known as the Tweefontein Pan catchment. The catchment drained to a surface reservoir (Tweefontein Reservoir) of maximum capacity and surface area 4 000 Mℓ and 1.5 km2, respectively. The catchment was instrumented to measure hydrodynamic responses and simulated as a hydrological system. Consideration was given to runoff, groundwater storage, evapotranspiration, baseflow, interception, irrigation water supply and rainfall, thereby accounting for all the dominant hydrological components of the system. Three scenarios were simulated using the available records for 5 years (1999 to 2004). The first was a baseline scenario representing the prevailing condition in the study area and the other 2 scenarios represented widespread irrigation with the mine-water on undisturbed and rehabilitated soils. In simulating the widespread irrigation on rehabilitated soils, a distinction was made between a rehabilitated irrigated area before and after the re-establishment of the equilibrium water table. Comparison of the results from the simulated scenarios indicated that a greater undisturbed area (max of 160 ha) than rehabilitated area (max of 120 ha) could be irrigated with mine-water from the Tweefontein Reservoir. Irrigation on rehabilitated soils depleted the water in the reservoir more rapidly than irrigation on undisturbed soils, due to lower runoff and higher ingress to groundwater in rehabilitated areas.</abstract><cop>Gezina</cop><pub>Water Research Commission (WRC)</pub><doi>10.4314/wsa.v36i5.61988</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-4738
ispartof Water S. A., 2010-10, Vol.36 (5), p.543-552
issn 0378-4738
0378-4738
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_853479203
source African Journals Online (Open Access); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sabinet African Journals Open Access Collection; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects ACRU2000
Assessments
Base flow
Catchment scale
Catchments
Coal mines
Evapotranspiration
Groundwater runoff
Groundwater storage
Hydrological assessment
Hydrology
Interception
Irrigation
Irrigation water
Mine-water
Mined land irrigation
Reservoirs
River basins
Runoff
Simulation
Soil sciences
Soils
University of KwaZulu-Natal
University of Pretoria
Upper Olifants
Water resources
Water supply
Water table
Widespread irrigation
title Comparative assessment of widespread irrigation with low quality mine-water in undisturbed and rehabilitated mine-lands in the upper Olifants using the ACRU2000 model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T12%3A10%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20assessment%20of%20widespread%20irrigation%20with%20low%20quality%20mine-water%20in%20undisturbed%20and%20rehabilitated%20mine-lands%20in%20the%20upper%20Olifants%20using%20the%20ACRU2000%20model&rft.jtitle=Water%20S.%20A.&rft.au=Aken,%20M.&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=543&rft.epage=552&rft.pages=543-552&rft.issn=0378-4738&rft.eissn=0378-4738&rft_id=info:doi/10.4314/wsa.v36i5.61988&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1651429864%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=814872631&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sabinet_id=10520/EJC116745&rfr_iscdi=true