Abiotic influences on embryo growth: statoliths as experimental tools in the squid early life history
Statolith size and growth was used to determine the influence of abiotic factors on the growth of Loligo vulgaris and Sepioteuthis australis embryos. Recently spawned egg masses collected from the field were incubated in the laboratory under different levels of light intensity, photoperiod, or short...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Reviews in fish biology and fisheries 2007-08, Vol.17 (2-3), p.101-110 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 110 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2-3 |
container_start_page | 101 |
container_title | Reviews in fish biology and fisheries |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Villanueva, Roger Moltschaniwskyj, Natalie A Bozzano, Anna |
description | Statolith size and growth was used to determine the influence of abiotic factors on the growth of Loligo vulgaris and Sepioteuthis australis embryos. Recently spawned egg masses collected from the field were incubated in the laboratory under different levels of light intensity, photoperiod, or short periods of low salinity (30[per thousand]). Double tetracycline staining was used to follow statolith growth. In L. vulgaris constant light conditions produced significantly slower growth in the embryonic statoliths and embryos held at summer photoperiod had slower statolith growth than those held at winter photoperiods. However once they hatched out there was no evidence that photoperiod affected statolith growth. After hatching, in all photoperiods statolith growth rates decreased in comparison with late embryonic rates. In S. australis embryos, differences between the high and medium light intensities for summer and intermediate photoperiods were found, suggesting that under summer incubation temperature, longer daylengths at medium light intensity favoured higher statolith growth for this species. In comparison to controls, slower statolith growth in S. australis embryos due to low salinity only occurred when exposed for 72 h. Comparison with previous studies indicates that temperature seems to be the main abiotic factor influencing statolith growth during early stages, however, interactions among all abiotic factors needs to be determined as well as the unknown influence of other isolated factors, e.g., oxygen concentration within the egg mass. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11160-006-9022-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_853476361</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>853476361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-2edd963ef13a61b030a71f3978c6c7e05bca81e45def8f537b2d87a8ffb3b50f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kbFuFDEQhi0EEkfgAaiwKEi1MLNe27t0UURIpEgUJLXl3R3nHPnWF9sr7t4-jo6KgmqK-b4ZzfyMfUT4igD6W0ZEBQ2AagZo2-bwim1QatFI7LvXbAND7QpU6i17l_MjQLWk2jC6GH0sfuJ-cWGlZaLM48JpN6Zj5A8p_inb7zwXW2LwZZu5zZwOe0p-R0uxgZcYQ642L1vi-Wn1MyebwpEH74hvfS4xHd-zN86GTB_-1jN2f_Xj7vK6uf318-by4raZulaWpqV5HpQgh8IqHEGA1ejEoPtJTZpAjpPtkTo5k-udFHps517b3rlRjBKcOGPnp7n7FJ9WysXsfJ4oBLtQXLPppei0Egor-eW_ZAuiq4uhgp__AR_jmpZ6hdEaOzkgqArhCZpSzDmRM_v6IJuOBsG85GNO-Ziaj3nJxxyq8-nkOBuNfUg-m_vfLaCouB5Ao3gGUpiN8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>771459106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Abiotic influences on embryo growth: statoliths as experimental tools in the squid early life history</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Villanueva, Roger ; Moltschaniwskyj, Natalie A ; Bozzano, Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Villanueva, Roger ; Moltschaniwskyj, Natalie A ; Bozzano, Anna</creatorcontrib><description>Statolith size and growth was used to determine the influence of abiotic factors on the growth of Loligo vulgaris and Sepioteuthis australis embryos. Recently spawned egg masses collected from the field were incubated in the laboratory under different levels of light intensity, photoperiod, or short periods of low salinity (30[per thousand]). Double tetracycline staining was used to follow statolith growth. In L. vulgaris constant light conditions produced significantly slower growth in the embryonic statoliths and embryos held at summer photoperiod had slower statolith growth than those held at winter photoperiods. However once they hatched out there was no evidence that photoperiod affected statolith growth. After hatching, in all photoperiods statolith growth rates decreased in comparison with late embryonic rates. In S. australis embryos, differences between the high and medium light intensities for summer and intermediate photoperiods were found, suggesting that under summer incubation temperature, longer daylengths at medium light intensity favoured higher statolith growth for this species. In comparison to controls, slower statolith growth in S. australis embryos due to low salinity only occurred when exposed for 72 h. Comparison with previous studies indicates that temperature seems to be the main abiotic factor influencing statolith growth during early stages, however, interactions among all abiotic factors needs to be determined as well as the unknown influence of other isolated factors, e.g., oxygen concentration within the egg mass.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-3166</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11160-006-9022-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Abiotic factors ; Early life ; Embryo ; Embryos ; Growth ; Hatching ; Life history ; Light intensity ; Loliginidae ; Loligo vulgaris ; Marine ; Salinity ; Sepioteuthis australis ; Statolith ; Summer</subject><ispartof>Reviews in fish biology and fisheries, 2007-08, Vol.17 (2-3), p.101-110</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-2edd963ef13a61b030a71f3978c6c7e05bca81e45def8f537b2d87a8ffb3b50f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-2edd963ef13a61b030a71f3978c6c7e05bca81e45def8f537b2d87a8ffb3b50f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Villanueva, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moltschaniwskyj, Natalie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozzano, Anna</creatorcontrib><title>Abiotic influences on embryo growth: statoliths as experimental tools in the squid early life history</title><title>Reviews in fish biology and fisheries</title><description>Statolith size and growth was used to determine the influence of abiotic factors on the growth of Loligo vulgaris and Sepioteuthis australis embryos. Recently spawned egg masses collected from the field were incubated in the laboratory under different levels of light intensity, photoperiod, or short periods of low salinity (30[per thousand]). Double tetracycline staining was used to follow statolith growth. In L. vulgaris constant light conditions produced significantly slower growth in the embryonic statoliths and embryos held at summer photoperiod had slower statolith growth than those held at winter photoperiods. However once they hatched out there was no evidence that photoperiod affected statolith growth. After hatching, in all photoperiods statolith growth rates decreased in comparison with late embryonic rates. In S. australis embryos, differences between the high and medium light intensities for summer and intermediate photoperiods were found, suggesting that under summer incubation temperature, longer daylengths at medium light intensity favoured higher statolith growth for this species. In comparison to controls, slower statolith growth in S. australis embryos due to low salinity only occurred when exposed for 72 h. Comparison with previous studies indicates that temperature seems to be the main abiotic factor influencing statolith growth during early stages, however, interactions among all abiotic factors needs to be determined as well as the unknown influence of other isolated factors, e.g., oxygen concentration within the egg mass.</description><subject>Abiotic factors</subject><subject>Early life</subject><subject>Embryo</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Hatching</subject><subject>Life history</subject><subject>Light intensity</subject><subject>Loliginidae</subject><subject>Loligo vulgaris</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Sepioteuthis australis</subject><subject>Statolith</subject><subject>Summer</subject><issn>0960-3166</issn><issn>1573-5184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kbFuFDEQhi0EEkfgAaiwKEi1MLNe27t0UURIpEgUJLXl3R3nHPnWF9sr7t4-jo6KgmqK-b4ZzfyMfUT4igD6W0ZEBQ2AagZo2-bwim1QatFI7LvXbAND7QpU6i17l_MjQLWk2jC6GH0sfuJ-cWGlZaLM48JpN6Zj5A8p_inb7zwXW2LwZZu5zZwOe0p-R0uxgZcYQ642L1vi-Wn1MyebwpEH74hvfS4xHd-zN86GTB_-1jN2f_Xj7vK6uf318-by4raZulaWpqV5HpQgh8IqHEGA1ejEoPtJTZpAjpPtkTo5k-udFHps517b3rlRjBKcOGPnp7n7FJ9WysXsfJ4oBLtQXLPppei0Egor-eW_ZAuiq4uhgp__AR_jmpZ6hdEaOzkgqArhCZpSzDmRM_v6IJuOBsG85GNO-Ziaj3nJxxyq8-nkOBuNfUg-m_vfLaCouB5Ao3gGUpiN8w</recordid><startdate>20070801</startdate><enddate>20070801</enddate><creator>Villanueva, Roger</creator><creator>Moltschaniwskyj, Natalie A</creator><creator>Bozzano, Anna</creator><general>Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070801</creationdate><title>Abiotic influences on embryo growth: statoliths as experimental tools in the squid early life history</title><author>Villanueva, Roger ; Moltschaniwskyj, Natalie A ; Bozzano, Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-2edd963ef13a61b030a71f3978c6c7e05bca81e45def8f537b2d87a8ffb3b50f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Abiotic factors</topic><topic>Early life</topic><topic>Embryo</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Hatching</topic><topic>Life history</topic><topic>Light intensity</topic><topic>Loliginidae</topic><topic>Loligo vulgaris</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Sepioteuthis australis</topic><topic>Statolith</topic><topic>Summer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Villanueva, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moltschaniwskyj, Natalie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozzano, Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Reviews in fish biology and fisheries</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Villanueva, Roger</au><au>Moltschaniwskyj, Natalie A</au><au>Bozzano, Anna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Abiotic influences on embryo growth: statoliths as experimental tools in the squid early life history</atitle><jtitle>Reviews in fish biology and fisheries</jtitle><date>2007-08-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2-3</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>101-110</pages><issn>0960-3166</issn><eissn>1573-5184</eissn><abstract>Statolith size and growth was used to determine the influence of abiotic factors on the growth of Loligo vulgaris and Sepioteuthis australis embryos. Recently spawned egg masses collected from the field were incubated in the laboratory under different levels of light intensity, photoperiod, or short periods of low salinity (30[per thousand]). Double tetracycline staining was used to follow statolith growth. In L. vulgaris constant light conditions produced significantly slower growth in the embryonic statoliths and embryos held at summer photoperiod had slower statolith growth than those held at winter photoperiods. However once they hatched out there was no evidence that photoperiod affected statolith growth. After hatching, in all photoperiods statolith growth rates decreased in comparison with late embryonic rates. In S. australis embryos, differences between the high and medium light intensities for summer and intermediate photoperiods were found, suggesting that under summer incubation temperature, longer daylengths at medium light intensity favoured higher statolith growth for this species. In comparison to controls, slower statolith growth in S. australis embryos due to low salinity only occurred when exposed for 72 h. Comparison with previous studies indicates that temperature seems to be the main abiotic factor influencing statolith growth during early stages, however, interactions among all abiotic factors needs to be determined as well as the unknown influence of other isolated factors, e.g., oxygen concentration within the egg mass.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers</pub><doi>10.1007/s11160-006-9022-x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-3166 |
ispartof | Reviews in fish biology and fisheries, 2007-08, Vol.17 (2-3), p.101-110 |
issn | 0960-3166 1573-5184 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_853476361 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Abiotic factors Early life Embryo Embryos Growth Hatching Life history Light intensity Loliginidae Loligo vulgaris Marine Salinity Sepioteuthis australis Statolith Summer |
title | Abiotic influences on embryo growth: statoliths as experimental tools in the squid early life history |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A55%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Abiotic%20influences%20on%20embryo%20growth:%20statoliths%20as%20experimental%20tools%20in%20the%20squid%20early%20life%20history&rft.jtitle=Reviews%20in%20fish%20biology%20and%20fisheries&rft.au=Villanueva,%20Roger&rft.date=2007-08-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2-3&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=101-110&rft.issn=0960-3166&rft.eissn=1573-5184&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11160-006-9022-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E853476361%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=771459106&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |