Breast MRI after Bilateral Mastectomy: Is It Indicated?
Little is known about the use of breast MRI as a diagnostic or surveillance tool in patients after bilateral mastectomy. The objective of this study was to evaluate breast MRI after bilateral mastectomy. Participants consisted of 48 women with prior bilateral mastectomy who underwent breast MRI betw...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American surgeon 2011-02, Vol.77 (2), p.180-184 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 184 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 180 |
container_title | The American surgeon |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | VANDERWALDE, Lindi H DANG, Catherine M TABRIZI, Robert SAOUAF, Rola PHILLIPS, Edward H |
description | Little is known about the use of breast MRI as a diagnostic or surveillance tool in patients after bilateral mastectomy. The objective of this study was to evaluate breast MRI after bilateral mastectomy. Participants consisted of 48 women with prior bilateral mastectomy who underwent breast MRI between 2003 and 2009. Seventy-nine breast MRIs were obtained. The median time between mastectomy and first MRI was 36 months. MRI was ordered most often by a medical oncologist (71%). Median age at bilateral mastectomy was 49 years (range, 33 to 72 years). Reasons for obtaining MRI included surveillance in 60 (76%), mass in eight (10%), lymph nodes in four (5%), pain in three (4%), and abscess in one (1%). Overall, 68 (86%) MRIs showed benign imaging findings only. Within the surveillance group, six patients had MRIs with findings that changed management; four patients had some residual breast tissue, and two patients had findings outside the breast that were better evaluated by CT or bone scan and were ultimately benign. MRI confirmed locoregional recurrence in two patients with highly suspicious physical findings. Overall, postmastectomy breast MRI had limited use, finding no unsuspected recurrences within our study group. Although MRI can be helpful to establish the presence of residual breast tissue after bilateral mastectomy, subsequent routine screening breast MRI should be questioned if no residual breast tissue is identified. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/000313481107700217 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_853470103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>853470103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-d2e0f8c565441bba9958d9b2eb74c9b2b140676c79c4a45f3129a2fac790c1253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEtLxDAUhYMozjj6B1xIEMRVNTePJnUjzuCjMIMgui5pmkKHPsakXcy_N2VGBV0d7j3fPVwOQudAbgCkvCWEMGBcARApCaEgD9AUhBBRoig7RNMRiEZigk68X4eRxwKO0YQCY1LJeIrk3Fnte7x6S7Eue-vwvKp1UF3jVTCs6btme4dTj9Mep21RmeAW96foqNS1t2d7naGPp8f3xUu0fH1OFw_LyHDC-qiglpTKiFhwDnmuk0SoIsmpzSU3QXPgJJaxkYnhmouSAU00LXVYEANUsBm63uVuXPc5WN9nTeWNrWvd2m7wmRKMSwKEBfLyD7nuBteG5zIVA-WcqjGO7iDjOu-dLbONqxrtthmQbCw1-19qOLrYJw95Y4ufk-8WA3C1B7Q3ui6dbk3lfzmmOBVSsi_nxnq5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>861244285</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Breast MRI after Bilateral Mastectomy: Is It Indicated?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>VANDERWALDE, Lindi H ; DANG, Catherine M ; TABRIZI, Robert ; SAOUAF, Rola ; PHILLIPS, Edward H</creator><creatorcontrib>VANDERWALDE, Lindi H ; DANG, Catherine M ; TABRIZI, Robert ; SAOUAF, Rola ; PHILLIPS, Edward H</creatorcontrib><description>Little is known about the use of breast MRI as a diagnostic or surveillance tool in patients after bilateral mastectomy. The objective of this study was to evaluate breast MRI after bilateral mastectomy. Participants consisted of 48 women with prior bilateral mastectomy who underwent breast MRI between 2003 and 2009. Seventy-nine breast MRIs were obtained. The median time between mastectomy and first MRI was 36 months. MRI was ordered most often by a medical oncologist (71%). Median age at bilateral mastectomy was 49 years (range, 33 to 72 years). Reasons for obtaining MRI included surveillance in 60 (76%), mass in eight (10%), lymph nodes in four (5%), pain in three (4%), and abscess in one (1%). Overall, 68 (86%) MRIs showed benign imaging findings only. Within the surveillance group, six patients had MRIs with findings that changed management; four patients had some residual breast tissue, and two patients had findings outside the breast that were better evaluated by CT or bone scan and were ultimately benign. MRI confirmed locoregional recurrence in two patients with highly suspicious physical findings. Overall, postmastectomy breast MRI had limited use, finding no unsuspected recurrences within our study group. Although MRI can be helpful to establish the presence of residual breast tissue after bilateral mastectomy, subsequent routine screening breast MRI should be questioned if no residual breast tissue is identified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/000313481107700217</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21337876</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMSUAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Atlanta, GA: Southeastern Surgical Congress</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Cancer therapies ; Female ; General aspects ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - utilization ; Mammaplasty ; Mammography ; Mastectomy ; Medical imaging ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Postoperative Care ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland ; Transplants & implants</subject><ispartof>The American surgeon, 2011-02, Vol.77 (2), p.180-184</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Southeastern Surgical Congress Feb 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-d2e0f8c565441bba9958d9b2eb74c9b2b140676c79c4a45f3129a2fac790c1253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-d2e0f8c565441bba9958d9b2eb74c9b2b140676c79c4a45f3129a2fac790c1253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23842577$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21337876$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>VANDERWALDE, Lindi H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DANG, Catherine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TABRIZI, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAOUAF, Rola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PHILLIPS, Edward H</creatorcontrib><title>Breast MRI after Bilateral Mastectomy: Is It Indicated?</title><title>The American surgeon</title><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><description>Little is known about the use of breast MRI as a diagnostic or surveillance tool in patients after bilateral mastectomy. The objective of this study was to evaluate breast MRI after bilateral mastectomy. Participants consisted of 48 women with prior bilateral mastectomy who underwent breast MRI between 2003 and 2009. Seventy-nine breast MRIs were obtained. The median time between mastectomy and first MRI was 36 months. MRI was ordered most often by a medical oncologist (71%). Median age at bilateral mastectomy was 49 years (range, 33 to 72 years). Reasons for obtaining MRI included surveillance in 60 (76%), mass in eight (10%), lymph nodes in four (5%), pain in three (4%), and abscess in one (1%). Overall, 68 (86%) MRIs showed benign imaging findings only. Within the surveillance group, six patients had MRIs with findings that changed management; four patients had some residual breast tissue, and two patients had findings outside the breast that were better evaluated by CT or bone scan and were ultimately benign. MRI confirmed locoregional recurrence in two patients with highly suspicious physical findings. Overall, postmastectomy breast MRI had limited use, finding no unsuspected recurrences within our study group. Although MRI can be helpful to establish the presence of residual breast tissue after bilateral mastectomy, subsequent routine screening breast MRI should be questioned if no residual breast tissue is identified.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - utilization</subject><subject>Mammaplasty</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Postoperative Care</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNplkEtLxDAUhYMozjj6B1xIEMRVNTePJnUjzuCjMIMgui5pmkKHPsakXcy_N2VGBV0d7j3fPVwOQudAbgCkvCWEMGBcARApCaEgD9AUhBBRoig7RNMRiEZigk68X4eRxwKO0YQCY1LJeIrk3Fnte7x6S7Eue-vwvKp1UF3jVTCs6btme4dTj9Mep21RmeAW96foqNS1t2d7naGPp8f3xUu0fH1OFw_LyHDC-qiglpTKiFhwDnmuk0SoIsmpzSU3QXPgJJaxkYnhmouSAU00LXVYEANUsBm63uVuXPc5WN9nTeWNrWvd2m7wmRKMSwKEBfLyD7nuBteG5zIVA-WcqjGO7iDjOu-dLbONqxrtthmQbCw1-19qOLrYJw95Y4ufk-8WA3C1B7Q3ui6dbk3lfzmmOBVSsi_nxnq5</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>VANDERWALDE, Lindi H</creator><creator>DANG, Catherine M</creator><creator>TABRIZI, Robert</creator><creator>SAOUAF, Rola</creator><creator>PHILLIPS, Edward H</creator><general>Southeastern Surgical Congress</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>Breast MRI after Bilateral Mastectomy: Is It Indicated?</title><author>VANDERWALDE, Lindi H ; DANG, Catherine M ; TABRIZI, Robert ; SAOUAF, Rola ; PHILLIPS, Edward H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-d2e0f8c565441bba9958d9b2eb74c9b2b140676c79c4a45f3129a2fac790c1253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - utilization</topic><topic>Mammaplasty</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Postoperative Care</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VANDERWALDE, Lindi H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DANG, Catherine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TABRIZI, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAOUAF, Rola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PHILLIPS, Edward H</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VANDERWALDE, Lindi H</au><au>DANG, Catherine M</au><au>TABRIZI, Robert</au><au>SAOUAF, Rola</au><au>PHILLIPS, Edward H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Breast MRI after Bilateral Mastectomy: Is It Indicated?</atitle><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>180</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>180-184</pages><issn>0003-1348</issn><eissn>1555-9823</eissn><coden>AMSUAW</coden><abstract>Little is known about the use of breast MRI as a diagnostic or surveillance tool in patients after bilateral mastectomy. The objective of this study was to evaluate breast MRI after bilateral mastectomy. Participants consisted of 48 women with prior bilateral mastectomy who underwent breast MRI between 2003 and 2009. Seventy-nine breast MRIs were obtained. The median time between mastectomy and first MRI was 36 months. MRI was ordered most often by a medical oncologist (71%). Median age at bilateral mastectomy was 49 years (range, 33 to 72 years). Reasons for obtaining MRI included surveillance in 60 (76%), mass in eight (10%), lymph nodes in four (5%), pain in three (4%), and abscess in one (1%). Overall, 68 (86%) MRIs showed benign imaging findings only. Within the surveillance group, six patients had MRIs with findings that changed management; four patients had some residual breast tissue, and two patients had findings outside the breast that were better evaluated by CT or bone scan and were ultimately benign. MRI confirmed locoregional recurrence in two patients with highly suspicious physical findings. Overall, postmastectomy breast MRI had limited use, finding no unsuspected recurrences within our study group. Although MRI can be helpful to establish the presence of residual breast tissue after bilateral mastectomy, subsequent routine screening breast MRI should be questioned if no residual breast tissue is identified.</abstract><cop>Atlanta, GA</cop><pub>Southeastern Surgical Congress</pub><pmid>21337876</pmid><doi>10.1177/000313481107700217</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-1348 |
ispartof | The American surgeon, 2011-02, Vol.77 (2), p.180-184 |
issn | 0003-1348 1555-9823 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_853470103 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - surgery Cancer therapies Female General aspects Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging - utilization Mammaplasty Mammography Mastectomy Medical imaging Medical sciences Middle Aged Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Postoperative Care Radiography Retrospective Studies Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland Transplants & implants |
title | Breast MRI after Bilateral Mastectomy: Is It Indicated? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A54%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breast%20MRI%20after%20Bilateral%20Mastectomy:%20Is%20It%20Indicated?&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20surgeon&rft.au=VANDERWALDE,%20Lindi%20H&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=180&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=180-184&rft.issn=0003-1348&rft.eissn=1555-9823&rft.coden=AMSUAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/000313481107700217&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E853470103%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=861244285&rft_id=info:pmid/21337876&rfr_iscdi=true |