Reading, vocabulary and language preference in 7- to 8-year-old bilingual Asian children

Background. Children who have a second language at home and report more usage of this language in various contexts ought reciprocally to be less proficient in English as frequency of exposure to English is reduced. Similarly there should be a two‐way directional influence between oral vocabulary and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of educational psychology 1997-12, Vol.67 (4), p.405-414
Hauptverfasser: Beech, John R., Keys, Alison
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 414
container_issue 4
container_start_page 405
container_title British journal of educational psychology
container_volume 67
creator Beech, John R.
Keys, Alison
description Background. Children who have a second language at home and report more usage of this language in various contexts ought reciprocally to be less proficient in English as frequency of exposure to English is reduced. Similarly there should be a two‐way directional influence between oral vocabulary and reading development. Samples. A group of 40 bilingual Asian children was compared with an age‐matched mixed race (but with only one Asian child) monolingual group of 24 children. Mean age was 8 years for both groups (range 7; 6 to 8; 6 years) and socioeconomic status was low. Group allocation was based on a specially devised Language Preference Questionnaire (LPQ) examining different contexts of language use (e.g., during numerical analysis). Method. Standardised tests of non‐verbal intelligence, vocabulary, basic reading, reading comprehension and the LPQ were given. Results. Controlling for non‐verbal intelligence, there was a marked difference in receptive oral vocabulary and a weaker difference in reading ability between the two groups. The LPQ showed that bilingual children who reported thinking in their parental language had poorer English vocabulary development than bilingual children who preferred to think in English. Conclusions. These findings are discussed in terms of either an effect of frequency of exposure to language or in terms of differences in phonological development between the two groups. The contrasting differences in the effects of bilingualism on vocabulary and reading suggest that in this particular socioeconomic setting parents of both groups do not have substantial impact on reading, but they do have an influence on the development of English oral vocabulary.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01254.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85337121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>58362907</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5064-966969054b39e60612935a0b1359e0a049eced3a95cd577016854708f8d317d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkc1uEzEUhUcIJELhHSxArJjp9b_NilKVUlSVgopgZ3k8TnBwZ4KdgeTt8ShRFt1U9ca-8udzru-pqpcYGlzW8bIhwFitiNQN1lo26xYw4azZPKpmh6vH1QwAZA1aq6fVs5yXpeSSsln185u3XegXb9Hfwdl2jDZtke07FG2_GO3Co1Xyc5987zwKPZI1Wg9I1VtvUz3EDrUhhomM6CQH2yP3K8Su4M-rJ3Mbs3-x34-q7x_Pbk4_1Zdfzi9OTy5rx0GwWguhhQbOWqq9AIGJptxCiynXHiww7Z3vqNXcdVxKwEJxJkHNVUex7Dg9qt7sdFdp-DP6vDa3ITsfS_9-GLNRnFKJCb4X5IoKokHeD5bBSZCigK_ugMthTH35rcFMMkKo1pPvux3l0pBzGaZZpXBbxmwwmClEszRTUmZKykwhmn2IZlMev95b2OxsnCfbu5APCgSUxHpq-f0O-xei3z7AwHz4fHY9HYtEvZMIee03BwmbfhshqeTmx9W5uaJfCRfqxlzT_1EbvMY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1474223991</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reading, vocabulary and language preference in 7- to 8-year-old bilingual Asian children</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Beech, John R. ; Keys, Alison</creator><creatorcontrib>Beech, John R. ; Keys, Alison</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Children who have a second language at home and report more usage of this language in various contexts ought reciprocally to be less proficient in English as frequency of exposure to English is reduced. Similarly there should be a two‐way directional influence between oral vocabulary and reading development. Samples. A group of 40 bilingual Asian children was compared with an age‐matched mixed race (but with only one Asian child) monolingual group of 24 children. Mean age was 8 years for both groups (range 7; 6 to 8; 6 years) and socioeconomic status was low. Group allocation was based on a specially devised Language Preference Questionnaire (LPQ) examining different contexts of language use (e.g., during numerical analysis). Method. Standardised tests of non‐verbal intelligence, vocabulary, basic reading, reading comprehension and the LPQ were given. Results. Controlling for non‐verbal intelligence, there was a marked difference in receptive oral vocabulary and a weaker difference in reading ability between the two groups. The LPQ showed that bilingual children who reported thinking in their parental language had poorer English vocabulary development than bilingual children who preferred to think in English. Conclusions. These findings are discussed in terms of either an effect of frequency of exposure to language or in terms of differences in phonological development between the two groups. The contrasting differences in the effects of bilingualism on vocabulary and reading suggest that in this particular socioeconomic setting parents of both groups do not have substantial impact on reading, but they do have an influence on the development of English oral vocabulary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-8279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01254.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJESAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Asian people ; Bilingualism ; Bilingualism. Multilingualism ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child development ; Developmental psychology ; Factors ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Language ; Languages ; Leicester ; Preferences ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Vocabulary ; Young children</subject><ispartof>British journal of educational psychology, 1997-12, Vol.67 (4), p.405-414</ispartof><rights>1997 The British Psychological Society</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5064-966969054b39e60612935a0b1359e0a049eced3a95cd577016854708f8d317d53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.2044-8279.1997.tb01254.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.2044-8279.1997.tb01254.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27869,27924,27925,31000,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2087197$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beech, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keys, Alison</creatorcontrib><title>Reading, vocabulary and language preference in 7- to 8-year-old bilingual Asian children</title><title>British journal of educational psychology</title><description>Background. Children who have a second language at home and report more usage of this language in various contexts ought reciprocally to be less proficient in English as frequency of exposure to English is reduced. Similarly there should be a two‐way directional influence between oral vocabulary and reading development. Samples. A group of 40 bilingual Asian children was compared with an age‐matched mixed race (but with only one Asian child) monolingual group of 24 children. Mean age was 8 years for both groups (range 7; 6 to 8; 6 years) and socioeconomic status was low. Group allocation was based on a specially devised Language Preference Questionnaire (LPQ) examining different contexts of language use (e.g., during numerical analysis). Method. Standardised tests of non‐verbal intelligence, vocabulary, basic reading, reading comprehension and the LPQ were given. Results. Controlling for non‐verbal intelligence, there was a marked difference in receptive oral vocabulary and a weaker difference in reading ability between the two groups. The LPQ showed that bilingual children who reported thinking in their parental language had poorer English vocabulary development than bilingual children who preferred to think in English. Conclusions. These findings are discussed in terms of either an effect of frequency of exposure to language or in terms of differences in phonological development between the two groups. The contrasting differences in the effects of bilingualism on vocabulary and reading suggest that in this particular socioeconomic setting parents of both groups do not have substantial impact on reading, but they do have an influence on the development of English oral vocabulary.</description><subject>Asian people</subject><subject>Bilingualism</subject><subject>Bilingualism. Multilingualism</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Factors</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Languages</subject><subject>Leicester</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Young children</subject><issn>0007-0998</issn><issn>2044-8279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkc1uEzEUhUcIJELhHSxArJjp9b_NilKVUlSVgopgZ3k8TnBwZ4KdgeTt8ShRFt1U9ca-8udzru-pqpcYGlzW8bIhwFitiNQN1lo26xYw4azZPKpmh6vH1QwAZA1aq6fVs5yXpeSSsln185u3XegXb9Hfwdl2jDZtke07FG2_GO3Co1Xyc5987zwKPZI1Wg9I1VtvUz3EDrUhhomM6CQH2yP3K8Su4M-rJ3Mbs3-x34-q7x_Pbk4_1Zdfzi9OTy5rx0GwWguhhQbOWqq9AIGJptxCiynXHiww7Z3vqNXcdVxKwEJxJkHNVUex7Dg9qt7sdFdp-DP6vDa3ITsfS_9-GLNRnFKJCb4X5IoKokHeD5bBSZCigK_ugMthTH35rcFMMkKo1pPvux3l0pBzGaZZpXBbxmwwmClEszRTUmZKykwhmn2IZlMev95b2OxsnCfbu5APCgSUxHpq-f0O-xei3z7AwHz4fHY9HYtEvZMIee03BwmbfhshqeTmx9W5uaJfCRfqxlzT_1EbvMY</recordid><startdate>199712</startdate><enddate>199712</enddate><creator>Beech, John R.</creator><creator>Keys, Alison</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>British Psychological Society</general><general>Scottish Academic Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FBAQO</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199712</creationdate><title>Reading, vocabulary and language preference in 7- to 8-year-old bilingual Asian children</title><author>Beech, John R. ; Keys, Alison</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5064-966969054b39e60612935a0b1359e0a049eced3a95cd577016854708f8d317d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Asian people</topic><topic>Bilingualism</topic><topic>Bilingualism. Multilingualism</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Factors</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Languages</topic><topic>Leicester</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Young children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beech, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keys, Alison</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 02</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>British journal of educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beech, John R.</au><au>Keys, Alison</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reading, vocabulary and language preference in 7- to 8-year-old bilingual Asian children</atitle><jtitle>British journal of educational psychology</jtitle><date>1997-12</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>414</epage><pages>405-414</pages><issn>0007-0998</issn><eissn>2044-8279</eissn><coden>BJESAE</coden><abstract>Background. Children who have a second language at home and report more usage of this language in various contexts ought reciprocally to be less proficient in English as frequency of exposure to English is reduced. Similarly there should be a two‐way directional influence between oral vocabulary and reading development. Samples. A group of 40 bilingual Asian children was compared with an age‐matched mixed race (but with only one Asian child) monolingual group of 24 children. Mean age was 8 years for both groups (range 7; 6 to 8; 6 years) and socioeconomic status was low. Group allocation was based on a specially devised Language Preference Questionnaire (LPQ) examining different contexts of language use (e.g., during numerical analysis). Method. Standardised tests of non‐verbal intelligence, vocabulary, basic reading, reading comprehension and the LPQ were given. Results. Controlling for non‐verbal intelligence, there was a marked difference in receptive oral vocabulary and a weaker difference in reading ability between the two groups. The LPQ showed that bilingual children who reported thinking in their parental language had poorer English vocabulary development than bilingual children who preferred to think in English. Conclusions. These findings are discussed in terms of either an effect of frequency of exposure to language or in terms of differences in phonological development between the two groups. The contrasting differences in the effects of bilingualism on vocabulary and reading suggest that in this particular socioeconomic setting parents of both groups do not have substantial impact on reading, but they do have an influence on the development of English oral vocabulary.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01254.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0998
ispartof British journal of educational psychology, 1997-12, Vol.67 (4), p.405-414
issn 0007-0998
2044-8279
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85337121
source Wiley Journals; Periodicals Index Online; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source
subjects Asian people
Bilingualism
Bilingualism. Multilingualism
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Child development
Developmental psychology
Factors
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Language
Languages
Leicester
Preferences
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Vocabulary
Young children
title Reading, vocabulary and language preference in 7- to 8-year-old bilingual Asian children
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A52%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reading,%20vocabulary%20and%20language%20preference%20in%207-%20to%208-year-old%20bilingual%20Asian%20children&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=Beech,%20John%20R.&rft.date=1997-12&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=414&rft.pages=405-414&rft.issn=0007-0998&rft.eissn=2044-8279&rft.coden=BJESAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01254.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E58362907%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1474223991&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true