Reading, vocabulary and language preference in 7- to 8-year-old bilingual Asian children
Background. Children who have a second language at home and report more usage of this language in various contexts ought reciprocally to be less proficient in English as frequency of exposure to English is reduced. Similarly there should be a two‐way directional influence between oral vocabulary and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of educational psychology 1997-12, Vol.67 (4), p.405-414 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 414 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 405 |
container_title | British journal of educational psychology |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Beech, John R. Keys, Alison |
description | Background. Children who have a second language at home and report more usage of this language in various contexts ought reciprocally to be less proficient in English as frequency of exposure to English is reduced. Similarly there should be a two‐way directional influence between oral vocabulary and reading development.
Samples. A group of 40 bilingual Asian children was compared with an age‐matched mixed race (but with only one Asian child) monolingual group of 24 children. Mean age was 8 years for both groups (range 7; 6 to 8; 6 years) and socioeconomic status was low. Group allocation was based on a specially devised Language Preference Questionnaire (LPQ) examining different contexts of language use (e.g., during numerical analysis).
Method. Standardised tests of non‐verbal intelligence, vocabulary, basic reading, reading comprehension and the LPQ were given.
Results. Controlling for non‐verbal intelligence, there was a marked difference in receptive oral vocabulary and a weaker difference in reading ability between the two groups. The LPQ showed that bilingual children who reported thinking in their parental language had poorer English vocabulary development than bilingual children who preferred to think in English.
Conclusions. These findings are discussed in terms of either an effect of frequency of exposure to language or in terms of differences in phonological development between the two groups. The contrasting differences in the effects of bilingualism on vocabulary and reading suggest that in this particular socioeconomic setting parents of both groups do not have substantial impact on reading, but they do have an influence on the development of English oral vocabulary. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01254.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85337121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>58362907</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5064-966969054b39e60612935a0b1359e0a049eced3a95cd577016854708f8d317d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkc1uEzEUhUcIJELhHSxArJjp9b_NilKVUlSVgopgZ3k8TnBwZ4KdgeTt8ShRFt1U9ca-8udzru-pqpcYGlzW8bIhwFitiNQN1lo26xYw4azZPKpmh6vH1QwAZA1aq6fVs5yXpeSSsln185u3XegXb9Hfwdl2jDZtke07FG2_GO3Co1Xyc5987zwKPZI1Wg9I1VtvUz3EDrUhhomM6CQH2yP3K8Su4M-rJ3Mbs3-x34-q7x_Pbk4_1Zdfzi9OTy5rx0GwWguhhQbOWqq9AIGJptxCiynXHiww7Z3vqNXcdVxKwEJxJkHNVUex7Dg9qt7sdFdp-DP6vDa3ITsfS_9-GLNRnFKJCb4X5IoKokHeD5bBSZCigK_ugMthTH35rcFMMkKo1pPvux3l0pBzGaZZpXBbxmwwmClEszRTUmZKykwhmn2IZlMev95b2OxsnCfbu5APCgSUxHpq-f0O-xei3z7AwHz4fHY9HYtEvZMIee03BwmbfhshqeTmx9W5uaJfCRfqxlzT_1EbvMY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1474223991</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reading, vocabulary and language preference in 7- to 8-year-old bilingual Asian children</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Beech, John R. ; Keys, Alison</creator><creatorcontrib>Beech, John R. ; Keys, Alison</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Children who have a second language at home and report more usage of this language in various contexts ought reciprocally to be less proficient in English as frequency of exposure to English is reduced. Similarly there should be a two‐way directional influence between oral vocabulary and reading development.
Samples. A group of 40 bilingual Asian children was compared with an age‐matched mixed race (but with only one Asian child) monolingual group of 24 children. Mean age was 8 years for both groups (range 7; 6 to 8; 6 years) and socioeconomic status was low. Group allocation was based on a specially devised Language Preference Questionnaire (LPQ) examining different contexts of language use (e.g., during numerical analysis).
Method. Standardised tests of non‐verbal intelligence, vocabulary, basic reading, reading comprehension and the LPQ were given.
Results. Controlling for non‐verbal intelligence, there was a marked difference in receptive oral vocabulary and a weaker difference in reading ability between the two groups. The LPQ showed that bilingual children who reported thinking in their parental language had poorer English vocabulary development than bilingual children who preferred to think in English.
Conclusions. These findings are discussed in terms of either an effect of frequency of exposure to language or in terms of differences in phonological development between the two groups. The contrasting differences in the effects of bilingualism on vocabulary and reading suggest that in this particular socioeconomic setting parents of both groups do not have substantial impact on reading, but they do have an influence on the development of English oral vocabulary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-8279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01254.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJESAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Asian people ; Bilingualism ; Bilingualism. Multilingualism ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child development ; Developmental psychology ; Factors ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Language ; Languages ; Leicester ; Preferences ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Vocabulary ; Young children</subject><ispartof>British journal of educational psychology, 1997-12, Vol.67 (4), p.405-414</ispartof><rights>1997 The British Psychological Society</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5064-966969054b39e60612935a0b1359e0a049eced3a95cd577016854708f8d317d53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.2044-8279.1997.tb01254.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.2044-8279.1997.tb01254.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27869,27924,27925,31000,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2087197$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beech, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keys, Alison</creatorcontrib><title>Reading, vocabulary and language preference in 7- to 8-year-old bilingual Asian children</title><title>British journal of educational psychology</title><description>Background. Children who have a second language at home and report more usage of this language in various contexts ought reciprocally to be less proficient in English as frequency of exposure to English is reduced. Similarly there should be a two‐way directional influence between oral vocabulary and reading development.
Samples. A group of 40 bilingual Asian children was compared with an age‐matched mixed race (but with only one Asian child) monolingual group of 24 children. Mean age was 8 years for both groups (range 7; 6 to 8; 6 years) and socioeconomic status was low. Group allocation was based on a specially devised Language Preference Questionnaire (LPQ) examining different contexts of language use (e.g., during numerical analysis).
Method. Standardised tests of non‐verbal intelligence, vocabulary, basic reading, reading comprehension and the LPQ were given.
Results. Controlling for non‐verbal intelligence, there was a marked difference in receptive oral vocabulary and a weaker difference in reading ability between the two groups. The LPQ showed that bilingual children who reported thinking in their parental language had poorer English vocabulary development than bilingual children who preferred to think in English.
Conclusions. These findings are discussed in terms of either an effect of frequency of exposure to language or in terms of differences in phonological development between the two groups. The contrasting differences in the effects of bilingualism on vocabulary and reading suggest that in this particular socioeconomic setting parents of both groups do not have substantial impact on reading, but they do have an influence on the development of English oral vocabulary.</description><subject>Asian people</subject><subject>Bilingualism</subject><subject>Bilingualism. Multilingualism</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Factors</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Languages</subject><subject>Leicester</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Young children</subject><issn>0007-0998</issn><issn>2044-8279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkc1uEzEUhUcIJELhHSxArJjp9b_NilKVUlSVgopgZ3k8TnBwZ4KdgeTt8ShRFt1U9ca-8udzru-pqpcYGlzW8bIhwFitiNQN1lo26xYw4azZPKpmh6vH1QwAZA1aq6fVs5yXpeSSsln185u3XegXb9Hfwdl2jDZtke07FG2_GO3Co1Xyc5987zwKPZI1Wg9I1VtvUz3EDrUhhomM6CQH2yP3K8Su4M-rJ3Mbs3-x34-q7x_Pbk4_1Zdfzi9OTy5rx0GwWguhhQbOWqq9AIGJptxCiynXHiww7Z3vqNXcdVxKwEJxJkHNVUex7Dg9qt7sdFdp-DP6vDa3ITsfS_9-GLNRnFKJCb4X5IoKokHeD5bBSZCigK_ugMthTH35rcFMMkKo1pPvux3l0pBzGaZZpXBbxmwwmClEszRTUmZKykwhmn2IZlMev95b2OxsnCfbu5APCgSUxHpq-f0O-xei3z7AwHz4fHY9HYtEvZMIee03BwmbfhshqeTmx9W5uaJfCRfqxlzT_1EbvMY</recordid><startdate>199712</startdate><enddate>199712</enddate><creator>Beech, John R.</creator><creator>Keys, Alison</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>British Psychological Society</general><general>Scottish Academic Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FBAQO</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199712</creationdate><title>Reading, vocabulary and language preference in 7- to 8-year-old bilingual Asian children</title><author>Beech, John R. ; Keys, Alison</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5064-966969054b39e60612935a0b1359e0a049eced3a95cd577016854708f8d317d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Asian people</topic><topic>Bilingualism</topic><topic>Bilingualism. Multilingualism</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Factors</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Languages</topic><topic>Leicester</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Young children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beech, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keys, Alison</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 02</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>British journal of educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beech, John R.</au><au>Keys, Alison</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reading, vocabulary and language preference in 7- to 8-year-old bilingual Asian children</atitle><jtitle>British journal of educational psychology</jtitle><date>1997-12</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>414</epage><pages>405-414</pages><issn>0007-0998</issn><eissn>2044-8279</eissn><coden>BJESAE</coden><abstract>Background. Children who have a second language at home and report more usage of this language in various contexts ought reciprocally to be less proficient in English as frequency of exposure to English is reduced. Similarly there should be a two‐way directional influence between oral vocabulary and reading development.
Samples. A group of 40 bilingual Asian children was compared with an age‐matched mixed race (but with only one Asian child) monolingual group of 24 children. Mean age was 8 years for both groups (range 7; 6 to 8; 6 years) and socioeconomic status was low. Group allocation was based on a specially devised Language Preference Questionnaire (LPQ) examining different contexts of language use (e.g., during numerical analysis).
Method. Standardised tests of non‐verbal intelligence, vocabulary, basic reading, reading comprehension and the LPQ were given.
Results. Controlling for non‐verbal intelligence, there was a marked difference in receptive oral vocabulary and a weaker difference in reading ability between the two groups. The LPQ showed that bilingual children who reported thinking in their parental language had poorer English vocabulary development than bilingual children who preferred to think in English.
Conclusions. These findings are discussed in terms of either an effect of frequency of exposure to language or in terms of differences in phonological development between the two groups. The contrasting differences in the effects of bilingualism on vocabulary and reading suggest that in this particular socioeconomic setting parents of both groups do not have substantial impact on reading, but they do have an influence on the development of English oral vocabulary.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01254.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-0998 |
ispartof | British journal of educational psychology, 1997-12, Vol.67 (4), p.405-414 |
issn | 0007-0998 2044-8279 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85337121 |
source | Wiley Journals; Periodicals Index Online; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source |
subjects | Asian people Bilingualism Bilingualism. Multilingualism Biological and medical sciences Child Child development Developmental psychology Factors Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Language Languages Leicester Preferences Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Vocabulary Young children |
title | Reading, vocabulary and language preference in 7- to 8-year-old bilingual Asian children |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A52%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reading,%20vocabulary%20and%20language%20preference%20in%207-%20to%208-year-old%20bilingual%20Asian%20children&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=Beech,%20John%20R.&rft.date=1997-12&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=414&rft.pages=405-414&rft.issn=0007-0998&rft.eissn=2044-8279&rft.coden=BJESAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01254.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E58362907%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1474223991&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |