Conversational Styles in Language Proficiency Interviews

This study compares the conversational styles of intermediate and advanced learners of ESL in language proficiency interviews. Eleven intermediate learners and 12 advanced learners participated in a regular administration of the Cambridge First Certificate in English oral interview. I analyzed inter...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Language learning 1995-03, Vol.45 (1), p.3-42
1. Verfasser: Young, Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 42
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title Language learning
container_volume 45
creator Young, Richard
description This study compares the conversational styles of intermediate and advanced learners of ESL in language proficiency interviews. Eleven intermediate learners and 12 advanced learners participated in a regular administration of the Cambridge First Certificate in English oral interview. I analyzed interview discourse constructed by both interviewer and nonnative speakers (NNSs), using a quantitative model of topical organization. I found differences in the amount of talk and rate of speaking (advanced learners talked more and faster than intermediate learners), in the extent of context dependence (advanced learners elaborated more in answers to questions), and in the ability to construct and sustain narratives (advanced learners did so, intermediate learners did not). There were no differences between the two groups in the frequency of initiation of new topics, nor in the reactivity to topics introduced by the interviewers. Interviewers did not vary in their interviewing style with the two groups. Some of these findings contradict what designers of language proficiency interviews claim to be proficiency‐related differences between NNSs. The discrepancies may be due to the format of the interview and/or to differing expectations of the interview by interviewers and NNSs from different cultures.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00961.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85331056</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>85331056</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4463-891f53cea8810b512dcb1948a4f2251340395ba985a927e2adcc6b387efb42a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkFtLwzAYhoMoOKf_oYh415lDcxK8kKFVKCoe8DJ8zVLJrK0mnW7_3tYNb8XvJpA87_eGB6FDgiekn5P5hGRCpkTK_kJrPulKjLUgk-UWGv08aU3pNhphTFmqGGO7aC_GOe6HCjFCato2ny5E6HzbQJ08dKvaxcQ3SQHNywJeXHIX2spb7xq7Sq6bzoVP777iPtqpoI7uYHOO0dPlxeP0Ki1u8-vpeZHaLBN9pSYVZ9aBUgSXnNCZLYnOFGQVpZywDDPNS9CKg6bSUZhZK0qmpKvKjAJhY3S83vse2o-Fi51589G6uobGtYtoFGeMYC7-BLmiVGLMevB0DdrQxhhcZd6Df4OwMgSbwaqZm0GdGayawarZWDXLPny0aYFooa4CNNbH3w1MUqEE77GzNfbla7f6R4Epzm_y4Y_pOu9j55a_eQivRkgmuXm-yQ3NaT4t8tzcs2-NX5on</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>58227003</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conversational Styles in Language Proficiency Interviews</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Young, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Young, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>This study compares the conversational styles of intermediate and advanced learners of ESL in language proficiency interviews. Eleven intermediate learners and 12 advanced learners participated in a regular administration of the Cambridge First Certificate in English oral interview. I analyzed interview discourse constructed by both interviewer and nonnative speakers (NNSs), using a quantitative model of topical organization. I found differences in the amount of talk and rate of speaking (advanced learners talked more and faster than intermediate learners), in the extent of context dependence (advanced learners elaborated more in answers to questions), and in the ability to construct and sustain narratives (advanced learners did so, intermediate learners did not). There were no differences between the two groups in the frequency of initiation of new topics, nor in the reactivity to topics introduced by the interviewers. Interviewers did not vary in their interviewing style with the two groups. Some of these findings contradict what designers of language proficiency interviews claim to be proficiency‐related differences between NNSs. The discrepancies may be due to the format of the interview and/or to differing expectations of the interview by interviewers and NNSs from different cultures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-8333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9922</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00961.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LNGLA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied linguistics ; Language teaching ; Linguistics</subject><ispartof>Language learning, 1995-03, Vol.45 (1), p.3-42</ispartof><rights>1995 Language Learning Research Club, University of Michigan</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4463-891f53cea8810b512dcb1948a4f2251340395ba985a927e2adcc6b387efb42a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4463-891f53cea8810b512dcb1948a4f2251340395ba985a927e2adcc6b387efb42a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1467-1770.1995.tb00961.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1467-1770.1995.tb00961.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3726865$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Young, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Conversational Styles in Language Proficiency Interviews</title><title>Language learning</title><description>This study compares the conversational styles of intermediate and advanced learners of ESL in language proficiency interviews. Eleven intermediate learners and 12 advanced learners participated in a regular administration of the Cambridge First Certificate in English oral interview. I analyzed interview discourse constructed by both interviewer and nonnative speakers (NNSs), using a quantitative model of topical organization. I found differences in the amount of talk and rate of speaking (advanced learners talked more and faster than intermediate learners), in the extent of context dependence (advanced learners elaborated more in answers to questions), and in the ability to construct and sustain narratives (advanced learners did so, intermediate learners did not). There were no differences between the two groups in the frequency of initiation of new topics, nor in the reactivity to topics introduced by the interviewers. Interviewers did not vary in their interviewing style with the two groups. Some of these findings contradict what designers of language proficiency interviews claim to be proficiency‐related differences between NNSs. The discrepancies may be due to the format of the interview and/or to differing expectations of the interview by interviewers and NNSs from different cultures.</description><subject>Applied linguistics</subject><subject>Language teaching</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><issn>0023-8333</issn><issn>1467-9922</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkFtLwzAYhoMoOKf_oYh415lDcxK8kKFVKCoe8DJ8zVLJrK0mnW7_3tYNb8XvJpA87_eGB6FDgiekn5P5hGRCpkTK_kJrPulKjLUgk-UWGv08aU3pNhphTFmqGGO7aC_GOe6HCjFCato2ny5E6HzbQJ08dKvaxcQ3SQHNywJeXHIX2spb7xq7Sq6bzoVP777iPtqpoI7uYHOO0dPlxeP0Ki1u8-vpeZHaLBN9pSYVZ9aBUgSXnNCZLYnOFGQVpZywDDPNS9CKg6bSUZhZK0qmpKvKjAJhY3S83vse2o-Fi51589G6uobGtYtoFGeMYC7-BLmiVGLMevB0DdrQxhhcZd6Df4OwMgSbwaqZm0GdGayawarZWDXLPny0aYFooa4CNNbH3w1MUqEE77GzNfbla7f6R4Epzm_y4Y_pOu9j55a_eQivRkgmuXm-yQ3NaT4t8tzcs2-NX5on</recordid><startdate>199503</startdate><enddate>199503</enddate><creator>Young, Richard</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199503</creationdate><title>Conversational Styles in Language Proficiency Interviews</title><author>Young, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4463-891f53cea8810b512dcb1948a4f2251340395ba985a927e2adcc6b387efb42a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Applied linguistics</topic><topic>Language teaching</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Young, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Language learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Young, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conversational Styles in Language Proficiency Interviews</atitle><jtitle>Language learning</jtitle><date>1995-03</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>3-42</pages><issn>0023-8333</issn><eissn>1467-9922</eissn><coden>LNGLA5</coden><abstract>This study compares the conversational styles of intermediate and advanced learners of ESL in language proficiency interviews. Eleven intermediate learners and 12 advanced learners participated in a regular administration of the Cambridge First Certificate in English oral interview. I analyzed interview discourse constructed by both interviewer and nonnative speakers (NNSs), using a quantitative model of topical organization. I found differences in the amount of talk and rate of speaking (advanced learners talked more and faster than intermediate learners), in the extent of context dependence (advanced learners elaborated more in answers to questions), and in the ability to construct and sustain narratives (advanced learners did so, intermediate learners did not). There were no differences between the two groups in the frequency of initiation of new topics, nor in the reactivity to topics introduced by the interviewers. Interviewers did not vary in their interviewing style with the two groups. Some of these findings contradict what designers of language proficiency interviews claim to be proficiency‐related differences between NNSs. The discrepancies may be due to the format of the interview and/or to differing expectations of the interview by interviewers and NNSs from different cultures.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00961.x</doi><tpages>40</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-8333
ispartof Language learning, 1995-03, Vol.45 (1), p.3-42
issn 0023-8333
1467-9922
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85331056
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Applied linguistics
Language teaching
Linguistics
title Conversational Styles in Language Proficiency Interviews
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T07%3A05%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conversational%20Styles%20in%20Language%20Proficiency%20Interviews&rft.jtitle=Language%20learning&rft.au=Young,%20Richard&rft.date=1995-03&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=3-42&rft.issn=0023-8333&rft.eissn=1467-9922&rft.coden=LNGLA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00961.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85331056%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=58227003&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true