The Effects of Differential Interviewer Incentives on a Field Data Collection Effort
Surveys routinely offer incentives to motivate respondents and increase the likelihood of their participation, yet surprisingly little is known about the effectiveness of interviewer incentives. If interviewer incentives increase interviewers’ success in gaining cooperation, they could help address...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Field methods 2011-02, Vol.23 (1), p.24-36 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 36 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 24 |
container_title | Field methods |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Rosen, Jeffrey Murphy, Joe Peytchev, Andy Riley, Sarah Lindblad, Mark |
description | Surveys routinely offer incentives to motivate respondents and increase the likelihood of their participation, yet surprisingly little is known about the effectiveness of interviewer incentives. If interviewer incentives increase interviewers’ success in gaining cooperation, they could help address declining survey response rates. In this article, we present the results of an experiment testing the effectiveness of interviewer incentives in the form of cash bonuses for each successfully completed field interview. We did not find evidence that higher payments to interviewers for each completion led to increased effort on the part of interviewers nor did they lead to higher levels of success in securing respondent cooperation. These findings suggest that per complete interviewer incentives may not be cost effective in reducing survey nonresponse. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1525822X10383390 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_852898792</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1525822X10383390</sage_id><sourcerecordid>852898792</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-8e2d3c0754fd817322d3c8834ed04b7bfdf5da52989e44b0c15196e6842497fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3j7l5Ws3nJjlKvywUvFTwFtLsRLdsd2uyrfjfm6WeBPE0b2Z-78EMQreU3FOq1AOVTGrGXinhmnNDztCISskKbkpzPmgmi2F_ia5S2hJCtCrFCK3X74BnIYDvE-4CntZZR2j72jV42fYQjzV8QszaD9MjZKzFDs9raCo8db3Dk65psr_O85zUxf4aXQTXJLj5qWP0Mp-tJ0_F6nmxnDyuCs-F7AsNrOKeKClCpanibGi15gIqIjZqE6ogKyeZ0QaE2BBPJTUllFowYVTwfIzuTrn72H0cIPV2VycPTeNa6A7Jasm00cqw_0mhiFGE00ySE-ljl1KEYPex3rn4ZSmxw6ft709nS3GyJPcGdtsdYpuv_pv_BiChfL8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>847097031</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Differential Interviewer Incentives on a Field Data Collection Effort</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Rosen, Jeffrey ; Murphy, Joe ; Peytchev, Andy ; Riley, Sarah ; Lindblad, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Jeffrey ; Murphy, Joe ; Peytchev, Andy ; Riley, Sarah ; Lindblad, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>Surveys routinely offer incentives to motivate respondents and increase the likelihood of their participation, yet surprisingly little is known about the effectiveness of interviewer incentives. If interviewer incentives increase interviewers’ success in gaining cooperation, they could help address declining survey response rates. In this article, we present the results of an experiment testing the effectiveness of interviewer incentives in the form of cash bonuses for each successfully completed field interview. We did not find evidence that higher payments to interviewers for each completion led to increased effort on the part of interviewers nor did they lead to higher levels of success in securing respondent cooperation. These findings suggest that per complete interviewer incentives may not be cost effective in reducing survey nonresponse.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-822X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3969</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1525822X10383390</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cooperation ; Data collection ; Interviews ; Methodology ; Methodology (Data Collection) ; Motivation ; Participation ; Payments ; Research methods ; Research Responses ; Surveys</subject><ispartof>Field methods, 2011-02, Vol.23 (1), p.24-36</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-8e2d3c0754fd817322d3c8834ed04b7bfdf5da52989e44b0c15196e6842497fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-8e2d3c0754fd817322d3c8834ed04b7bfdf5da52989e44b0c15196e6842497fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1525822X10383390$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1525822X10383390$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,33752,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peytchev, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riley, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindblad, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Differential Interviewer Incentives on a Field Data Collection Effort</title><title>Field methods</title><description>Surveys routinely offer incentives to motivate respondents and increase the likelihood of their participation, yet surprisingly little is known about the effectiveness of interviewer incentives. If interviewer incentives increase interviewers’ success in gaining cooperation, they could help address declining survey response rates. In this article, we present the results of an experiment testing the effectiveness of interviewer incentives in the form of cash bonuses for each successfully completed field interview. We did not find evidence that higher payments to interviewers for each completion led to increased effort on the part of interviewers nor did they lead to higher levels of success in securing respondent cooperation. These findings suggest that per complete interviewer incentives may not be cost effective in reducing survey nonresponse.</description><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Methodology (Data Collection)</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Research Responses</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><issn>1525-822X</issn><issn>1552-3969</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3j7l5Ws3nJjlKvywUvFTwFtLsRLdsd2uyrfjfm6WeBPE0b2Z-78EMQreU3FOq1AOVTGrGXinhmnNDztCISskKbkpzPmgmi2F_ia5S2hJCtCrFCK3X74BnIYDvE-4CntZZR2j72jV42fYQjzV8QszaD9MjZKzFDs9raCo8db3Dk65psr_O85zUxf4aXQTXJLj5qWP0Mp-tJ0_F6nmxnDyuCs-F7AsNrOKeKClCpanibGi15gIqIjZqE6ogKyeZ0QaE2BBPJTUllFowYVTwfIzuTrn72H0cIPV2VycPTeNa6A7Jasm00cqw_0mhiFGE00ySE-ljl1KEYPex3rn4ZSmxw6ft709nS3GyJPcGdtsdYpuv_pv_BiChfL8</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Rosen, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Murphy, Joe</creator><creator>Peytchev, Andy</creator><creator>Riley, Sarah</creator><creator>Lindblad, Mark</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>The Effects of Differential Interviewer Incentives on a Field Data Collection Effort</title><author>Rosen, Jeffrey ; Murphy, Joe ; Peytchev, Andy ; Riley, Sarah ; Lindblad, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-8e2d3c0754fd817322d3c8834ed04b7bfdf5da52989e44b0c15196e6842497fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Methodology (Data Collection)</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Research Responses</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peytchev, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riley, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindblad, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Field methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosen, Jeffrey</au><au>Murphy, Joe</au><au>Peytchev, Andy</au><au>Riley, Sarah</au><au>Lindblad, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effects of Differential Interviewer Incentives on a Field Data Collection Effort</atitle><jtitle>Field methods</jtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>24-36</pages><issn>1525-822X</issn><eissn>1552-3969</eissn><abstract>Surveys routinely offer incentives to motivate respondents and increase the likelihood of their participation, yet surprisingly little is known about the effectiveness of interviewer incentives. If interviewer incentives increase interviewers’ success in gaining cooperation, they could help address declining survey response rates. In this article, we present the results of an experiment testing the effectiveness of interviewer incentives in the form of cash bonuses for each successfully completed field interview. We did not find evidence that higher payments to interviewers for each completion led to increased effort on the part of interviewers nor did they lead to higher levels of success in securing respondent cooperation. These findings suggest that per complete interviewer incentives may not be cost effective in reducing survey nonresponse.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1525822X10383390</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1525-822X |
ispartof | Field methods, 2011-02, Vol.23 (1), p.24-36 |
issn | 1525-822X 1552-3969 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_852898792 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Cooperation Data collection Interviews Methodology Methodology (Data Collection) Motivation Participation Payments Research methods Research Responses Surveys |
title | The Effects of Differential Interviewer Incentives on a Field Data Collection Effort |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T19%3A59%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Differential%20Interviewer%20Incentives%20on%20a%20Field%20Data%20Collection%20Effort&rft.jtitle=Field%20methods&rft.au=Rosen,%20Jeffrey&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=24-36&rft.issn=1525-822X&rft.eissn=1552-3969&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1525822X10383390&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E852898792%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=847097031&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1525822X10383390&rfr_iscdi=true |